Search

ObjectiveTo estimate the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV, the prevalence of diagnosed HIV, and proportion of HIV that is undiagnosed in populations with similar demographics as the Universal Screening for HIV in the Emergency Room (USHER) Trial and the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) Emergency Department (ED) in Boston, MA. We also sought to estimate these quantities within demographic and risk behavior subgroups.MethodWe used data from the USHER Trial, which was a randomized clinical trial of HIV screening conducted in the BWH ED. Since eligible participants were HIV-free at time of enrollment, we were able to calculate the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV. We used data from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MA/DPH) to estimate the prevalence of diagnosed HIV since the MA/DPH records the number of persons within MA who are HIV-positive. We calculated the proportion of HIV that is undiagnosed using these estimates of the prevalence of undiagnosed and diagnosed HIV. Estimates were stratified by age, sex, race/ethnicity, history of testing, and risk behaviors.ResultsThe overall expected prevalence of diagnosed HIV in a population similar to those presenting to the BWH ED was 0.71% (95% CI: 0.63%, 0.78%). The prevalence of undiagnosed HIV was estimated at 0.22% (95% CI: 0.10%, 0.42%) and resultant overall prevalence was 0.93%. The proportion of HIV-infection that is undiagnosed in this ED-based setting was estimated to be 23.7% (95% CI: 11.6%, 34.9%) of total HIV-infections.ConclusionsDespite different methodology, our estimate of the proportion of HIV that is undiagnosed in an ED-setting was similar to previous estimates based on national surveillance data. Universal routine testing programs in EDs should use these data to help plan their yield of HIV detection.

Introduction Person-centered care (PCC) is considered a fundamental approach to address clients’ needs. There is a dearth of data on specific actions that HIV treatment providers identify as priorities to strengthen PCC. Objective This study team developed the Person-Centered Care Assessment Tool (PCC-AT), which measures PCC service delivery within HIV treatment settings. The PCC-AT, including subsequent group action planning, was implemented across 29 facilities in Zambia among 173 HIV treatment providers. Mixed-methods study objectives included: (1) identify types of PCC-strengthening activities prioritized based upon low and high PCC-AT scores; (2) identify common themes in PCC implementation challenges and action plan activities by low and high PCC-AT score; and (3) determine differences in priority actions by facility ART clinic volume or geographic type. Methods The study team conducted thematic analysis of action plan data and cross-tabulation queries to observe patterns across themes, PCC-AT scores, and key study variables. Results The qualitative analysis identified 39 themes across 29 action plans. A higher proportion of rural compared to urban facilities identified actions related to stigma and clients’ rights training; accessibility of educational materials and gender-based violence training. A higher proportion of urban and peri-urban compared to rural facilities identified actions related to community-led monitoring. Discussion Findings provide a basis to understand common PCC weaknesses and activities providers perceive as opportunities to strengthen experiences in care. Conclusion To effectively support clients across the care continuum, systematic assessment of PCC services, action planning, continuous quality improvement interventions and re-measurements may be an important approach.

BackgroundPerson-centered care (PCC) within HIV treatment services has demonstrated potential to overcome inequities in HIV service access while improving treatment outcomes. Despite PCC being widely considered a best practice, no consensus exists on its assessment and measurement. This study in Zambia builds upon previous research that informed development of a framework for PCC and a PCC assessment tool (PCC-AT). ObjectiveThis mixed methods study aims to examine the preliminary effectiveness of the PCC-AT through assessing the association between client HIV service delivery indicators and facility PCC-AT scores. We hypothesize that facilities with higher PCC-AT scores will demonstrate more favorable HIV treatment continuity, viral load (VL) coverage, and viral suppression in comparison to those of facilities with lower PCC-AT scores. MethodsWe will implement the PCC-AT at 30 randomly selected health facilities in the Copperbelt and Central provinces of Zambia. For each study facility, data will be gathered from 3 sources: (1) PCC-AT scores, (2) PCC-AT action plans, and (3) facility characteristics, along with service delivery data. Quantitative analysis, using STATA, will include descriptive statistics on the PCC-AT results stratified by facility characteristics. Cross-tabulations and/or regression analysis will be used to determine associations between scores and treatment continuity, VL coverage, and/or viral suppression. Qualitative data will be collected via action planning, with detailed notes collected and recorded into an action plan template. Descriptive coding and emerging themes will be analyzed with NVivo software. ResultsAs of May 2024, we enrolled 29 facilities in the study and data analysis from the key informant interviews is currently underway. Results are expected to be published by September 2024. ConclusionsAssessment and measurement of PCC within HIV treatment settings is a novel approach that offers HIV treatment practitioners the opportunity to examine their services and identify actions to improve PCC performance. Study results and the PCC-AT will be broadly disseminated for use among all project sites in Zambia as well as other HIV treatment programs, in addition to making the PCC-AT publicly available to global HIV practitioners. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/54129

Person-centered care (PCC) aims to improve client’s experiences in HIV care while advancing outcomes. This study team developed the PCC assessment tool (PCC-AT) to assess PCC service performance in HIV treatment settings in Ghana. Study objectives aimed to describe the range of PCC-AT scores within and across study facilities and examine the feasibility of PCC-AT implementation in diverse HIV treatment settings. The PCC-AT was piloted at five health facilities providing HIV services among 37 staff. Immediately following each pilot, focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted to gather feasibility data. Thematic qualitative analysis was conducted on translated FGD transcripts. Across facilities, providers scored highest in the staffing domain, followed by service provision, and direct client support. Time required to implement the PCC-AT averaged 62 minutes. Providers described the tool as well-structured, user-friendly, relevant, reflective of the core PCC delivery elements, and useful in elucidating actions to improve PCC service delivery across domains. The PCC-AT holds potential to strengthen activities that support clients’ broader clinical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing by offering friendly services that attend to each client’s holistic needs while contributing progress towards epidemic control.

Person-centered care (PCC) is foundational to improve client's experiences in care while advancing HIV-related outcomes. However, information is scarce on how to assess PCC in HIV treatment settings. This study team developed the PCC assessment tool (PCC-AT) to assess the performance in HIV clinics in Ghana. The objectives of this study were to: (1) pilot the PCC-AT and assess scoring consistency and reliability among clients and providers; and (2) assess content validity of the PCC-AT through client key informant perspectives and experiences. An analysis of similarities and differences in PCC-AT domain scores between ART providers and clients was conducted to assess score reliability. Axial and open coding of transcripts using NVivo identified key themes. Findings indicate that the PCC framework aligns with client's priorities, additionally two out of the three PCC domain scores demonstrated consistency between ART providers and clients. Emerging differences in ART provider and client perspectives highlighted opportunities for growth and underscored the importance of continually gathering client feedback as an integral component of a PCC assessment to continually strengthen ART services.

Introduction: Person-centered care (PCC) in HIV services aims to improve client experiences, advance service accessibility and treatment outcomes and accelerate progress towards epidemic control. For PCC to be responsive, providers and clients must work together to identify clients’ priorities. However, providers often neglect to identify non-clinical client concerns and clients may feel inhibited due to language or unequal power dynamics. Methods: While evaluating results from a mixed-methods study on implementation of a Person-Centered Care Assessment Tool (PCC-AT) in Ghana, our study team identified contrasting perspectives from people on antiretroviral treatment (ART) and providers that elucidated the need for a PCC minimum practice standard. Our team examined qualitative data to propose a five step PCC minimum practice standard. Discussion: Because PCC is a broad concept, with scarce practical implementable information to support a framework for its operationalization, its consistent and accurate implementation is unlikely without the presence and utilization of a Minimum Practice Standard. Future research should identify aims and further elucidate quality standards within each component of the minimum PCC practice standard.

IntroductionEvidence suggests that person-centered care (PCC) has the potential to overcome inequities in access to HIV services, support quality care that is responsive to diverse needs while increasing efficiencies and resilience of the health system. Despite emerging evidence on the effectiveness of PCC, there is limited information available on how to assess it in diverse clinical settings. This work builds upon a systematic literature review published elsewhere by this study team to develop a PCC framework for HIV treatment service delivery.ObjectivesThe PCC framework informed the development of the PCC assessment tool (PCC-AT) to assess the degree to which PCC activities are operationalized in diverse HIV treatment settings. The study objectives are to assess: (1) content validity of the PCC framework; (2) PCC-AT score consistency and reliability between health facility staff and clients; and (3) PCC-AT feasibility in HIV treatment settings.MethodsThe study team will pilot the PCC-AT among staff in five health facilities and conduct subsequent focus group discussions (FGDs) to determine PCC-AT feasibility. Key informant interviews (KIIs) with clients will explore content validity among PLHIV relative to each subdomain of the PCC-AT and provide a basis to compare score concordance. Quantitative data among health facility staff will examine how many and which cadres participated in the PCC-AT pilot and FGD, years of experience, gender, and the time required to complete the PCC-AT. Information on clients will include total time accessing treatment at the study health facility, years since diagnosis, age and gender. Qualitative data analysis, using descriptive coding with NVivo or a similar software, will be drawn from transcripts from the PCC-AT pilots, FGDs and KIIs.DiscussionPCC assessment is a novel approach that aims to help health facilities assess and strengthen their ability to deliver PCC services to improve client outcomes.

Abstract  Despite increased visibility and availability of prenatal testing procedures, very little is known about the attitudes among the populace toward these procedures. Using a computer assisted telephone interview of pregnant and non-pregnant women of childbearing age we analyze awareness and attitudes regarding prenatal tests among a diverse group of women of childbearing age in Texas. We also examine maternal characteristics associated with awareness and the willingness to undergo these procedures. While 89% were aware that such tests are available, younger, black and less educated women were less likely to know about prenatal tests for birth defects. Seventy-two percent of respondents said they would want their baby tested while Hispanic and black women were significantly more likely to express an interest than non-Hispanic whites. This study demonstrates the variability of knowledge and beliefs and confirms the importance of taking time to understand an individual’s personal beliefs, knowledge and attitudes about prenatal diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]