1. Comparative analysis of LIN28-RNA binding sites identified at single nucleotide resolution
- Author
-
Victor S. Lelyveld, Piotr Sliz, Elizabeth Ransey, Przemyslaw Biecek, Lorena Pantano, Anders Björkbom, and Jack W. Szostak
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Models, Molecular ,Immunoprecipitation ,Guanine ,Protein Conformation ,RNA-binding protein ,Computational biology ,macromolecular substances ,Biology ,Tandem mass spectrometry ,Deep sequencing ,Mass Spectrometry ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,RNA Precursors ,Humans ,Nucleotide ,Binding site ,Molecular Biology ,chemistry.chemical_classification ,Genetics ,Binding Sites ,CIMS ,technology, industry, and agriculture ,RNA ,CLIP ,RNA-Binding Proteins ,Cell Biology ,Recombinant Proteins ,LIN28 ,MicroRNAs ,030104 developmental biology ,chemistry ,Mutation ,Nucleic Acid Conformation ,Research Paper ,Protein Binding - Abstract
It remains a formidable challenge to characterize the diverse complexes of RNA binding proteins and their targets. While crosslink and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) methods are powerful techniques that identify RNA targets on a global scale, the resolution and consistency of these methods is a matter of debate. Here we present a comparative analysis of LIN28-pre-let-7 UV-induced crosslinking using a tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) and deep sequencing interrogation of in vitro crosslinked complexes. Interestingly, analyses by the two methods diverge in their identification of crosslinked nucleotide identity – whereas bioinformatics and sequencing analyses suggest guanine in mammalian cells, MS/MS identifies uridine. This work suggests the need for comprehensive analysis and validation of crosslinking methodologies.
- Published
- 2017