Search

Objective: The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of the premorbid use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB) on short-term mortality in patients with sepsis.Data Sources: Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and MEDLINE were searched for studies based on the below eligibility criteria. The protocol was registered at the PROSPERO (CRD42022309129).Study Selection: Eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, (2) patients with sepsis aged ≥16 years, and (3) received premorbid ACEI/ARB, or not.Data Extraction: The patient and study characteristics and outcomes were extracted. All analyses were presented with the use of random-effects models. The primary outcome was short-term mortality defined as ≤30-day, in-hospital, or intensive care unit (ICU)- mortality. The secondary outcome was acute kidney injury (AKI).Data Synthesis: Fifteen studies (N = 96,159) met the eligibility criteria. Of these, eleven studies (N = 40,360) reported unadjusted short-term mortalities. The pooled odds ratio (OR) of short-term mortality with the premorbid use of ACEI/ARB was as follows: OR, 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.67 to 1.11; P = 0.24, I2 = 88%. Five studies reported an adjusted OR of short-term mortality with the premorbid use of ACEI/ARB as follows: OR, 0.74; 95%CI, 0.59 to 0.93; P < 0.01, I2 = 93%. Seven studies reported the pooled adjusted OR of AKI with the premorbid use of ACEI/ARB as follows: OR: 1.57, 95%CI: 1.26-1.96, p < 0.01, I2 = 69%.Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, the premorbid ACEI/ARB was associated with significantly lower short-term mortality in patients with sepsis despite the significantly higher risk of AKI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) have shown antiarrhythmic effects that are useful as part of the upstream therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF), both for primary and secondary prevention. Nevertheless, the potential prognosis value of these drugs in terms of mortality and major cardiovascular events is unclear, especially in older population with AF. Scientific evidence is scarce in this population and shows contradictory results. The aim of this study was to assess the potential benefit of ACEi and ARB in terms of mortality and major cardiovascular outcomes (hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction and stroke) in older patients with AF, based on a real-world data analysis. Observational: analysis of a retrospective registry. The study included 9365 patients of 75 years or older diagnosed with AF, from CardioCHUVI-AF_75 registry: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04364516. Date of registration: November 26, 2018. We performed propensity score matching techniques to obtain 2 comparable groups of 3601 patients with and without ACEi or ARB treatment. We compared survival and cardiovascular outcomes in both groups of patients using Cox proportional hazards models. We did not find significant differences in terms of survival between using or not using ACEi or ARB for the older population (hazard ratio for mortality: 0.959, 95% confidence interval 0.872–1.054). There were no significant differences regarding cardiovascular major events between the 2 groups. Treatment with ACEi or ARB did not improve outcomes in terms of survival and cardiovascular events in older patients with AF. These results should prompt the conduct of randomized clinical trials specifically in the older AF patient population to robustly address this issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims The COMPARE trial showed a small but significant beneficial effect of 3-year losartan treatment on aortic root dilatation rate in adults with Marfan syndrome (MFS). However, no significant effect was found on clinical endpoints, possibly due to a short follow-up period. The aim of the current study was therefore to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes after losartan treatment. Methods and results In the original COMPARE study (inclusion 2008–2009), adult patients with MFS (n  = 233) were randomly allocated to either the angiotensin-II receptor blocker losartan® on top of regular treatment (β-blockers in 71% of the patients) or no additional medication. After the COMPARE trial period of 3 years, study subjects chose to continue their losartan medication or not. In a median follow-up period of 8 years, 75 patients continued losartan medication, whereas 78 patients, originally allocated to the control group, never used losartan after inclusion. No differences existed between baseline characteristics of the two groups except for age at inclusion [losartan 34 (interquartile range, IQR 26–43) years, control 41 (IQR 30–52) years; P  = 0.031], and β-blocker use (losartan 81%, control 64%; P  = 0.022). A pathological FBN1 mutation was present in 76% of patients and 58% of the patients were male. Clinical endpoints, defined as all-cause mortality, aortic dissection/rupture, elective aortic root replacement, reoperation, and vascular graft implantation beyond the aortic root, were compared between the two groups. A per-patient composite endpoint was also analysed. Five deaths, 14 aortic dissections, 23 aortic root replacements, 3 reoperations, and 3 vascular graft implantations beyond the aortic root occurred during follow-up. Except for aortic root replacement, all endpoints occurred in patients with an operated aortic root. Patients who used losartan during the entire follow-up period showed a reduced number of events compared to the control group (death: 0 vs. 5, P  = 0.014; aortic dissection: 3 vs. 11, P  = 0.013; elective aortic root replacement: 10 vs. 13, P  = 0.264; reoperation: 1 vs. 2, P  = 0.463; vascular graft implantations beyond the aortic root 0 vs. 3, P  = 0.071; and composite endpoint: 14 vs. 26, P  = 0.019). These results remained similar when corrected for age and β-blocker use in a multivariate analysis. Conclusion These results suggest a clinical benefit of combined losartan and β-blocker treatment in patients with MFS. Open in new tab Download slide Open in new tab Download slide [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study was undertaken to evaluate the differences in chronotherapeutic effects of angiotensin-II receptor blockers, valsartan and olmesartan in hypertensive patients with non-dipper blood pressure (BP) pattern during valsartan at morning. Ninety four patients were enrolled, and 40 patients were judged to be non-dippers. In these patients, same dose of valsartan was changed to evening (Val-E, n = 12), or olmesartan (equivalent dose of valsartan) was given at morning (Olm-M, n = 13) or evening (Olm-E, n = 15) for 4 months. BP decreased during sleep and increased during waking hours in Val-E group. In Olm-M and Olm-E groups, BP decreased during sleep and waking hours. Percent reduction in BP at night-time compared to BP at waking hours significantly increased after changing the dose regimen in each group. Serum creatinine decreased and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) elevated in Olm-M and Olm-E, but not Val-E groups. Positive correlation between systolic BP (SBP) during sleep and serum creatinine, and negative correlation between SBP during sleep and eGFR were detected. These data suggest that dipper BP pattern could be obtained by chronotherapeutic approach using valsartan and olmesartan in non-dipper patients with valsartan at morning. Morning and evening olmesartan, but not evening valsartan improved renal function in these patients.

Background: The renoprotective effect of inhibitors of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been identified through placebo-controlled trials. However, the effect of calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) on renal system is still controversial. Our current meta-analysis includes available evidences to compare the effect of dihydropyridine CCBs and ACEIs or ARBs on renal outcomes and mortality. We also further investigate whether CCBs can be used in combination with inhibitors of RAS to improve the prognosis of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).Methods and results: Electronic databases were searched up to July 2012, for clinical randomized controlled trials, assessing the effect of dihydropyridine CCBs on the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and all-cause mortality in contrast to ACEIs or ARBs. Eight clinical trials were included containing 25,647 participants. ESRD showed significantly higher frequency with CCBs therapy compared with ACEIs or ARBs therapy, though blood pressure was decreased similarly in both groups in every trial (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05–1.48;p = 0.01). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the incidence of all-cause mortality between these two groups, though ACEIs or ARBs exhibited better renoprotective effect compared to CCBs (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.89–1.03;p = 0.24).Conclusions: CCBs did not increase all-cause mortality incidence in patients with CKD though they displayed weaker renoprotective, compared to ACEIs or ARBs therapy. Our results suggest the combination of a CCB and an ACEI or ARB should be a preferable antihypertensive therapy in patients with CKD, considering their higher effect in decreasing blood pressure and fewer adverse metabolic problems caused. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Blood pressure (BP) control throughout the entire day is recommended for cardiovascular protection. Angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used in hypertensive patients because of beneficial class effects. It is uncertain, however, whether are there any differences in 24-h BP profiles among ARBs. We examined ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) among 211 Japanese hypertensive patients (age, 69.4 ± 9.6 years; female, 59.2%) under treatment with five different ARBs. Patients were divided into five groups according to ARBs prescribed. Patient backgrounds were almost identical in all the groups and there were no differences in office, 24-h and daytime BP; however, nighttime BP with olmesartan was significantly lower than with other ARBs. Office BPs with candesartan and telmisartan, but not other ARBs, correlated well with 24-h BP (p < 0.01). Also, there were higher correlations between daytime and nighttime BP with candesartan and telmisartan. In all patients, pulse pressure with office BP was significantly correlated with ambulatory arterial stiffness index (p = 0.001) and fluctuation of systolic BP on ABPM (p = 0.002). In conclusion, different ARB treatments produced meaningful differences in 24-h profiles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to evaluate the effects of telmisartan, compared with the calcium-channel blocker amlodipine, on endothelial function after coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in hypertensive patients. Background: DES implantation impairs local endothelial function, which may be associated with future cardiovascular events. Telmisartan, which has unique peroxisome proliferator-activated-receptor-gamma–mediated effects in addition to its renin-angiotensin system–inhibition effects, has favorable effects on endothelial function. Methods: Fifty-one hypertensive patients with coronary artery stenosis but without coronary artery spasm, treated with a sirolimus-eluting stent, were randomly assigned to either the telmisartan (25 cases) or amlodipine (26 cases) treatment groups. At baseline and at 3 months after DES implantation, endothelium-dependent and -independent vasomotion were evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography under the condition of medication withdrawal. The mean luminal diameter of a 20-mm coronary segment, beginning 5 mm distal to the stent, was measured before and after infusion of intracoronary acetylcholine (10−7, 10−6 mol/l) and then again after infusion of nitroglycerin. Results: Blood pressure was comparable between groups at baseline and after 3 months. Vasoconstriction after acetylcholine infusion at 3 months (impaired endothelial function) was less pronounced in the telmisartan group than in the amlodipine group (p < 0.0001), although there was no significant difference between the 2 groups before DES implantation. The response to nitroglycerin did not differ between groups before or at 3 months after DES implantation. Conclusions: Telmisartan, compared with amlodipine, significantly ameliorated endothelial dysfunction after DES implantation in terms of vasoconstriction induced by acetylcholine. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Myocardial fibrosis and dysfunction can be detected in the early phases of organ damage associated with hypertension. Valsartan, an angiotensin-II receptor blocker, is efficacious in lowering blood pressure (BP) and reducing left ventricular mass in patients with hypertension. Levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and procollagen type I carboxy-terminal propeptide (PICP) are correlated with organ damage in patients with overt congestive heart failure; however, few data are available in patients with hypertension. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of 12 months of valsartan treatment on echocardiographic measures and indices of organ damage (NT-proBNP and PICP) in newly diagnosed patients with hypertension. Methods: This was a prospective, open-label, single-center, exploratory study. Patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated hypertension were treated for 12 months with valsartan 160 mg/d and compared with an equal number of healthy, untreated control subjects. Baseline and follow-up visits at 3, 6, and 12 months included physical examination, systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) measurements, ECG, echocardiography, and NT-proBNP and PICP determination. Results: A total of 20 patients (mean [SD] age, 48.05 [7.29] years) were enrolled and compared with 20 healthy controls (age, 49-6 [6.95] years). Compared with baseline, valsartan was associated with reduced BP in the group with hypertension after 12 months of treatment (mean SBP, 150.05 [11.15] vs 120.00 [8.43] mm Hg, P < 0.001; DBP, 97.80 [8.36] vs 79-50 [4.26] mm Hg, P < 0.001). Compared with the control group, at baseline, the group with hypertension had significantly higher mean left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (119.88 [22.86] vs 87.31 [15.77] g/m2; P < 0.001), relative wall thickness (thickness/radius [h/r] ratio: 0.45 [0.08] vs 0.35 [0.07]; P = 0.001), and NT-proBNP (50.00 [32.01] vs 25.47 [9.69] pg/dL; P = 0.002). PICP was higher, but the difference was not statistically significant (46.10 [15.69] vs 37.50 [7.20] μg/L). After 12 months, treatment with valsartan was associated with significant reductions in all measured parameters compared with baseline (LVMI, 106.51 [17.12] g/m2, P = 0.004; h/r, 0.41 [0.07], P = 0.026; NT-proBNP, 22.55 [13.52] pg/dL, P = 0.001; PICP, 35.20 [9–19] μg/L, P < 0.008). At 12 months, patients with hypertension treated with valsartan achieved NT-proBNP and PICP levels not statistically different from those of the healthy controls (NT-proBNP, 22.55 [13–52] vs 25.24 [8.43] pg/dL; PICP, 35.20 [9.19] vs 36.90 [6.41] μg/L). Conclusion: Patients treated with valsartan for 12 months had significant reductions in BP, LVMI, and indices of subclinical organ damage (NT-proBNP and PICP) compared with baseline. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background:: The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction (LIFE) study was a randomized, doubleblind trial that compared the effects of losartan-based treatment with those of atenolol-based treatment on cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related morbidity and mortality in 9193 patients with hypertension and left-ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Compared with atenolol, losartan reduced the combined risk for CVD-related morbidity and mortality by 13% (P = 0.021), and reduced the risk for stroke by 25% (P = 0.001), with comparable blood pressure control in both trial arms. Objective:: The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of losartan compared with atenolol in the treatment of stroke from the Dutch health care perspective. Methods:: Utilization of losartan and atenolol within the trial period (mean, 4.8 years) and an estimation of direct medical costs of stroke for The Netherlands were combined with estimates of reduction in life expectancy through stroke. Medication costs and stroke incidence during 5.5 years of patient follow-up were estimated separately, adjusted for the baseline degree of LVH and Framingham risk score. To estimate lifetime stroke costs, the cumulative incidence of stroke was multiplied by the lifetime direct medical costs attributable to stroke. All costs are in 2006 Dutch prices and discounted following the former (4% costs and effects) and new Dutch guideline (4% costs, 1.5% effects) for conducting pharmacoeconomic analyses. Results:: With 4% discounting, prevention of stroke was associated with a gain of 3.7 life-years. As a consequence, losartan treatment was associated with 0.059 life-year gained (LYG) per patient treated with losartan. Losartan reduced stroke-related costs by 1076 (US $1349) per patient. After inclusion of study medication cost, net cost per patient was 51 ($64) higher for losartan than atenolol. The net cost per LYG was 864 ($1083), which is below the Dutch pharmacoeconomic threshold of 20,000/LYG (−$25,000/LYG) for accepting interventions. The corresponding probability of a cost-effectiveness ratio below this Dutch threshold was 0.95. Discounting money and health following the new Dutch guideline resulted in an even more favorable cost-effectiveness for losartan. Conclusions:: Results from the present analysis suggest that, in The Netherlands, treatment with losartan compared with atenolol may well be a cost-effective intervention based on the reduced risk for stroke observed in the LIFE trial. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We report a patient with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) showing reduction of proteinuria and histological improvement of renal injury with cyclosporin A (CsA) and angiotensin-II receptor blocker (ARB) therapy. The amount of urinary protein was reduced from 4.4 to 1.8 g/24 h after 2 months of CsA (150 mg/day) therapy, and further, to 0.4 g/24 h after 1 month of the combination therapy with ARB (candesartan, 4 mg/day). A renal re-biopsy, after treatment with CsA for 3 months and ARB for 1 month, demonstrated a reduction of IgA deposits, disappearance of crescents, re-separation of foot process fusion and decrease of interstitial cellular infiltration. After CsA therapy for 20 months and ARB for 18 months, the patient currently remains stable without deterioration of serum creatinine (1.7 mg/dl) and urinary protein excretion (0.5 g/day). These findings seem to indicate that combination therapy with CsA and ARB is effective for achieving histological improvement and protecting against deteriorated renal function, in addition to reducing proteinuria, in IgAN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The COMPARE trial showed a small but significant beneficial effect of 3-year losartan treatment on aortic root dilatation rate in adults with Marfan syndrome (MFS). However, no significant effect was found on clinical endpoints, possibly due to a short follow-up period. The aim of the current study was therefore to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes after losartan treatment., Methods and Results: In the original COMPARE study (inclusion 2008-2009), adult patients with MFS (n = 233) were randomly allocated to either the angiotensin-II receptor blocker losartan® on top of regular treatment (β-blockers in 71% of the patients) or no additional medication. After the COMPARE trial period of 3 years, study subjects chose to continue their losartan medication or not. In a median follow-up period of 8 years, 75 patients continued losartan medication, whereas 78 patients, originally allocated to the control group, never used losartan after inclusion. No differences existed between baseline characteristics of the two groups except for age at inclusion [losartan 34 (interquartile range, IQR 26-43) years, control 41 (IQR 30-52) years; P = 0.031], and β-blocker use (losartan 81%, control 64%; P = 0.022). A pathological FBN1 mutation was present in 76% of patients and 58% of the patients were male. Clinical endpoints, defined as all-cause mortality, aortic dissection/rupture, elective aortic root replacement, reoperation, and vascular graft implantation beyond the aortic root, were compared between the two groups. A per-patient composite endpoint was also analysed. Five deaths, 14 aortic dissections, 23 aortic root replacements, 3 reoperations, and 3 vascular graft implantations beyond the aortic root occurred during follow-up. Except for aortic root replacement, all endpoints occurred in patients with an operated aortic root. Patients who used losartan during the entire follow-up period showed a reduced number of events compared to the control group (death: 0 vs. 5, P = 0.014; aortic dissection: 3 vs. 11, P = 0.013; elective aortic root replacement: 10 vs. 13, P = 0.264; reoperation: 1 vs. 2, P = 0.463; vascular graft implantations beyond the aortic root 0 vs. 3, P = 0.071; and composite endpoint: 14 vs. 26, P = 0.019). These results remained similar when corrected for age and β-blocker use in a multivariate analysis., Conclusion: These results suggest a clinical benefit of combined losartan and β-blocker treatment in patients with MFS., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

This study was undertaken to evaluate the differences in chronotherapeutic effects of angiotensin-II receptor blockers, valsartan and olmesartan in hypertensive patients with non-dipper blood pressure (BP) pattern during valsartan at morning. Ninety four patients were enrolled, and 40 patients were judged to be non-dippers. In these patients, same dose of valsartan was changed to evening (Val-E, n = 12), or olmesartan (equivalent dose of valsartan) was given at morning (Olm-M, n = 13) or evening (Olm-E, n = 15) for 4 months. BP decreased during sleep and increased during waking hours in Val-E group. In Olm-M and Olm-E groups, BP decreased during sleep and waking hours. Percent reduction in BP at night-time compared to BP at waking hours significantly increased after changing the dose regimen in each group. Serum creatinine decreased and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) elevated in Olm-M and Olm-E, but not Val-E groups. Positive correlation between systolic BP (SBP) during sleep and serum creatinine, and negative correlation between SBP during sleep and eGFR were detected. These data suggest that dipper BP pattern could be obtained by chronotherapeutic approach using valsartan and olmesartan in non-dipper patients with valsartan at morning. Morning and evening olmesartan, but not evening valsartan improved renal function in these patients., (Copyright © 2014 Japanese Pharmacological Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: The benefit of adjusted antiplatelet therapy in patients with myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention is not well elucidated. We aimed to identify patients with high on treatment platelet reactivity and to gradually adjust antiplatelet therapy., Materials and Methods: We enrolled 133 acute myocardial infarction and 67 stable angina patients undergoing intracoronary stenting into our study. Maximal aggregation was determined with light transmission aggregometry. Aggregation >50% induced by 5 μM ADP was indexed with high on-clopidogrel treatment platelet reactivity. In these cases 75 mg clopidogrel was doubled and control test was performed. Patients effectively inhibited with 150 mg clopidogrel were defined as clopidogrel pseudo non-responders. Patients with high platelet reactivity even on 150 mg clopidogrel were considered as clopidogrel real non-responders and were switched to ticlopidine., Results: Aggregations (5ADP; p=0.046) and the ratio of real non-responders (p=0.013) were significantly higher in the myocardial infarction group. Most real non-responders were effectively treated with switch of therapy. The ratio of pseudo non-responders also tended to be higher in myocardial infarction. Platelet reactivity remained constant during follow-up; however, a new appearance of high platelet reactivity was observed at 6 and at 12 months., Conclusions: Patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention may benefit from prospective platelet function testing, because of higher platelet reactivity and much higher ratio of clopidogrel real non-response. Switch of therapy may effectively overcome clopidogrel non-response. A new appearance of high platelet reactivity with unknown clinical significance is observed in both groups among the patients on clopidogrel., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: It is widely known that angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) have reverse remodeling effects in atrium. Although atrial fibrillation is frequent in ischemic heart failure clinically, experiments to demonstrate ARB's effects on atrial remodeling in a heart failure model are rare., Materials and Methods: A heart failure model and a sham-operated group were formed in 25 Sprague-Dawley male rats of roughly 260 g in weight. Ischemic heart failure models were obtained via ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. In the ARB group, 30 mg/kg of losartan was administrated over a day for 4 weeks. Echocardiography was performed to measure left ventricle ejection fraction and left atrial diameter (LAD) at the baseline and 4 weeks after the operation. 4 weeks later, histologic and immunohistochemical evaluation were performed., Results: Groups were divided into the sham group, heart failure group, and heart failure-ARB group. We maintained 5 rats in each group for 4 weeks after operation. The decrease of left ventricular ejection fraction in the heart failure-ARB group was less than that in the heart failure group (p=0.023). The increase of LAD in the heart failure-ARB group was less than that in the heart failure group (p=0.025). Masson's trichrome stain revealed less fibrosis in the heart failure-ARB group. Immunohistochemical stain and western blot for connexin 43 showed less expression in the heart failure-ARB group., Conclusion: In the ischemic heart failure model of rats, structurally and histologically, the ARB, losartan, has atrial reverse-remodeling effects. However, electrically, its role as an electrical stabilizer should be studied further.

The remodeling of gap junctions may affect their conduction properties and contribute to the maintenance of atrial fibrillation. The significance of the role of angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) in upstream therapy is not clear. This study was performed to investigate the effects of ARBs on atrial remodeling in a heart failure model. A model of heart failure was established or sham surgery performed in 24 Sprague-Dawley male rats. The rats were divided into sham, heart failure and heart failure-ARB groups. In the ARB group, 30 mg/kg of losartan was administered each day for 4 weeks. Echocardiography was performed at the baseline and 4 weeks following the surgery. An atrial fibrillation induction study and histological and immunohistochemical evaluation were performed 4 weeks after surgery. The increase in the left atrial diameter of the heart failure-ARB group was smaller than that of the heart failure group (P=0.028). The atrial fibrillation inducibility and duration of induced atrial fibrillation were not different between the heart failure and heart failure-ARB groups. Masson's trichrome staining revealed less fibrosis in the heart failure-ARB group compared with the heart failure group. Immunohistochemical staining and western blot analysis for connexin 43 showed a lower expression level in the heart failure-ARB group compared with that in the heart failure group. In a rat model of ischemic heart failure the ARB losartan had structural and histological atrial reverse-remodeling effects. However, its role as an electrical stabilizer requires further study.

Background: Reducing the excessive accumulation of amyloid β-protein (Aβ) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a key objective of most AD therapies. Several studies suggest that pharmacological inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) or its by-product angiotensin II may delay onset or progression of dementia and it has been suggested that this occurs via regulation of Aβ. Intraneuronal oligomeric accumulation of Aβ is postulated to be one of the earliest pathological events. Thus this study investigated the effect of an ACE-inhibitor, captopril, and two angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), eprosartan and valsartan, on intraneuronal Aβ pathology and oligomeric Aβ levels in a triple transgenic (3xTGAD) mouse model of AD., Methods: Male, adult (3-4 month old) 3xTgAD mice (n=39) were randomly assigned to 4 treatment groups: valsartan (0.17g/l), eprosartan (0.8g/l), captopril (5g/l) or normal drinking water and the drugs given ad libitum for 2 months. Mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) was measured at baseline, at 2 weeks and at 2 months when the mice were sacrificed and the brains hemisected for analysis. One hemisphere was processed for Aβ and amyloid precursor protein (APP) immunohistochemistry and the other for biochemical measurement of oligomeric Aβ and APP. ACE activity was measured in the brain and kidney., Results: MABP was significantly reduced at 2 weeks and 2 months in the ACE-I group (p=0.0006) but was unaltered in the ARB groups compared to vehicle. Neither ACE-I nor ARB treatment altered Aβ and APP immunolabelling or the level of Aβ or APP in brain tissue homogenates. Similarly neither ACE-I nor ARB treatment altered ACE activity in either brain or kidney compared to control tissue., Conclusions: ACE-I or ARB administration over 2 months did not affect APP levels or either intraneuronal Aβ or oligomeric Aβ levels in 3xTGAD mice. While ARBs did not alter MABP, captopril did mediate reductions in MABP in the 3xTGAD mice which appeared to be independent of ACE activity. Further studies are needed to examine the effects of these drugs over a longer term and in older mice (i.e. when AD-like changes are more pronounced).