Search

Background As to who should manage osteoporotic spine fractures presenting to Emergency departments (ED) is sometimes debated. We sought to review practice regarding their management in our institution that might inform a clinical pathway. Methods We conducted a search of radiology reports for a consecutive series of thoracic or lumbar spine x-rays ordered by ED team only, i.e. a series of patients whose presenting complaint was a suspected acute fracture. We narrowed search to include terms 'compression' or 'wedge' or 'end-plate'. Results Over 7 months, there were 1,505 such reports; narrowed search and excluding duplicates yielded 168 patients of whom 84 had a fracture. We looked at the acute management of those >50yrs, excluding one metastatic fracture leaving n=64. Of these, 65% occurred following a fall, 14% on twisting/bending/coughing, 14% spontaneous, 7% unclear onset. ED first consulted orthopaedics for 10 cases, neurosurgeons for 2, physicians for 18. A total of 21 were discharged from ED (5 having speciality review pre-discharge). A further 11 were sent home from ED with fracture diagnosis made only when x-ray subsequently reported. Of those admitted, 28 went to physicians with consult to surgeons in 39%, 2 went to orthopaedic surgery, 2 to other specialists. Admission was complicated by pressure ulcer in 13% (4/32), pneumonia in 13%. Overall 24/64 (38%) went on to have MRI/CT (mainly admitted cases). At least 12 were managed with a brace (all records not available). N=7 (11%) had later vertebroplasty. More than half had no documented osteoporosis treatment plans nor GP instruction to address. Conclusion Care of spine fractures presenting acutely varies; a high proportion managed by ED solely. Whether outcomes vary as a result is not answered by this audit but there is a need for a pathway to inform best practice. Osteoporosis is inadequately-addressed in this high risk group, highlighting need for fracture liaison services in post-acute management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The health effects of vitamin D are well documented, with increasing evidence of its roles beyond bone. There is, however, little evidence of the effects of vitamin D on hospitalisation among older adults. This study aimed to prospectively determine the relationship of vitamin D status in older adults with hospital admission and emergency department (ED) attendance. Trinity University of Ulster Department of Agriculture (TUDA) is a large cross-sectional study of older adults with a community population from three disease-defined cohorts (cognitive dysfunction, hypertension, and osteoporosis). Participants included in this analysis were recruited between 2008 and 2012. ED and hospital admission data were gathered from the date of TUDA participation until June 2013, with a mean follow up of 3.6 years. Of the 3093 participants, 1577 (50.9%) attended the ED during the period of follow-up. Attendees had lower mean serum 25(OH)D concentrations than non-attendees (59.1 vs. 70.6 nmol/L). Fully adjusted models showed an inverse association between vitamin D and ED attendance (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.996; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.995–0.998; p < 0.001). A total of 1269 participants (41%) were admitted to hospital during the follow-up. Those admitted had lower mean vitamin D concentrations (58.4 vs. 69.3 nmol/L, p < 0.001). In fully adjusted models, higher vitamin D was inversely associated with hospital admission (HR 0.996; 95% CI 0.994–0.998; p < 0.001) and length of stay (LOS) (β = −0.95, p = 0.006). This study showed independent prospective associations between vitamin D deficiency and increased hospitalisation by older adults. The need for further evaluation of current recommendations in relation to vitamin D supplementation, with consideration beyond bone health, is warranted and should focus on randomised controlled trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]