Search

Introduction: Polymorphonuclear cell influx into the interstitial and bronchoalveolar spaces is a cardinal feature of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), principally mediated by interleukin-8 (IL-8). We sought to determine whether reparixin, a novel IL-8 pathway inhibitor, could reduce disease progression in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia., Methods: In this Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia were randomized 2:1 to receive oral reparixin 1200 mg three times daily or placebo for up to 21 days or until hospital discharge. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 28, with key secondary endpoints being the proportion of patients free of respiratory failure at Day 60, incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission by Day 28 and time to recovery by Day 28., Results: Of 279 patients randomized, 182 received at least one dose of reparixin and 88 received placebo. The proportion of patients alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 28 was similar in the two groups {83.5% versus 80.7%; odds ratio 1.63 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75, 3.51]; p = 0.216}. There were no statistically significant differences in the key secondary endpoints, but a numerically higher proportion of patients in the reparixin group were alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 60 (88.7% versus 84.6%; p = 0.195), fewer required ICU admissions by Day 28 (15.8% versus 21.7%; p = 0.168), and a higher proportion recovered by Day 28 compared with placebo (81.6% versus 74.9%; p = 0.167). Fewer patients experienced adverse events with reparixin than placebo (45.6% versus 54.5%), most mild or moderate intensity and not related to study treatment., Conclusions: This trial did not meet the primary efficacy endpoints, yet reparixin showed a trend toward limiting disease progression as an add-on therapy in COVID-19 severe pneumonia and was well tolerated., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04878055, EudraCT: 2020-005919-51., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Prone positioning is routinely used among patients with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation. However, its utility among spontaneously breathing patients is still debated., Methods: In an open-label randomised controlled trial, we enrolled patients hospitalised with mild COVID-19 pneumonia, whose arterial oxygen tension to inspiratory oxygen fraction ratio ( P aO 2 / F IO 2 ) was >200 mmHg and who did not require mechanical ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure at hospital admission. Patients were randomised 1:1 to prone positioning on top of standard of care (intervention group) versus standard of care only (controls). The primary composite outcome included death, mechanical ventilation, continuous positive airway pressure and P aO 2 / F IO 2 <200 mmHg; secondary outcomes were oxygen weaning and hospital discharge., Results: A total of 61 subjects were enrolled, 29 adjudicated to prone positioning and 32 to the control group. By day 28, 24 out of 61 patients (39.3%) met the primary outcome: 16 because of a P aO 2 / F IO 2 ratio <200 mmHg, five because of the need for continuous positive airway pressure and three because of the need for mechanical ventilation. Three patients died. Using an intention-to-treat approach, 15 out of 29 patients in the prone positioning group versus nine out of 32 controls met the primary outcome, corresponding to a significantly higher risk of progression among those randomised to prone positioning (HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.04-5.43; p=0.040). Using an as-treated approach, which included in the intervention group only patients who maintained prone positioning for ≥3 h·day -1 , no significant differences were found between the two groups (HR 1.77, 95% CI 0.79-3.94; p=0.165). Also, we did not find any statistically significant difference in terms of time to oxygen weaning or hospital discharge between study arms in any of the analyses conducted., Conclusions: We observed no clinical benefit from prone positioning among spontaneously breathing patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring conventional oxygen therapy., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest for the present study., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Objective: To study incidence, type, etiology, risk factors, and impact on outcome of nosocomial infections during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation., Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data., Setting: Italian tertiary referral center medical-surgical ICU., Patients: One hundred five consecutive patients who were treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation from January 2010 to November 2015., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: Ninety-two patients were included in the analysis (48.5 [37-56] years old, simplified acute physiology score II 37 [32-47]) who underwent peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (87% veno-venous) for medical indications (78% acute respiratory distress syndrome). Fifty-two patients (55%) were infected (50.4 infections/1,000 person-days of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation). We identified 32 ventilator-associated pneumonia, eight urinary tract infections, five blood stream infections, three catheter-related blood stream infections, two colitis, one extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannula infection, and one pulmonary-catheter infection. G+ infections (35%) occurred earlier compared with G- (48%) (4 [2-10] vs. 13 [7-23] days from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation; p < 0.001). Multidrug-resistant organisms caused 56% of bacterial infections. Younger age (2-35 years old) was independently associated with higher risk for nosocomial infections. Twenty-nine patients (31.5%) died (13.0 deaths/1,000 person-days of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation). Infected patients had higher risk for death (18 vs. 8 deaths/1,000 person-days of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; p = 0.037) and longer ICU stay (32.5 [19.5-78] vs. 19 [10.5-27.5] days; p = 0.003), mechanical ventilation (36.5 [20-80.5] vs. 16.5 [9-25.5] days; p < 0.001), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (25.5 [10.75-54] vs. 10 [5-13] days; p < 0.001). Older age (> 50 years old), reason for connection different from acute respiratory distress syndrome, higher simplified acute physiology score II, diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and infection by multidrug-resistant bacteria were independently associated to increased death rate., Conclusions: Infections (especially ventilator-associated pneumonia) during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy are common and frequently involve multidrug-resistant organisms. In addition, they have a negative impact on patients' outcomes.

Background: During the last decade, the spread of Klebsiella pneumoniae -carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC- Kp ) has increased dramatically worldwide. In this scenario, growing interest has been addressed to genotyping of KPC- Kp strains, which emerged as an important tool for a better understanding of the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the outbreaks., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on patients infected with KPC- Kp during a 28-month outbreak period (January 2010-April 2012) at San Gerardo Hospital (Monza, Italy), investigating KPC- Kp genotypes by means of repetitive element sequence-based polymerase chain reaction (Rep-PCR)., Results: We enrolled 97 patients infected with KPC- Kp . Rep-PCR analysis identified 5 distinct clone types, with different distribution over time. During the first 12 months of the outbreak period, only 1 clone was detected (clone A, in 47 patients), while the 4 other clones were identified over the remaining 16 months (clones C, E, and F/L in 23, 24, and 3 patients respectively). Mechanical ventilation was less frequent in patients infected with clones C/E/F/L (OR = 0.14; 95% CI: 0.05-0.37) compared to clone A, and the Charlson comorbidity index (CI) was more likely to have a score >5 in patients infected with clones C/E/F/L (OR = 7.21; 95% CI: 2.24-23.14) compared to clone A.Overall mortality was higher in patients infected with clones C/E/F/L (13/20 patients, 65%) compared to those infected with clone A (7/20, 35%). Mortality in patients infected with clones C/E/F/L remained significantly higher even after adjusting for the potential confounding effect of comorbidities (ie, CI), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 4.65 (95% CI: 1.83-11.89)., Conclusions: Our results suggested a close relationship between strain genotype and clinical outcome., Competing Interests: All authors: No reported conflicts. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

Catheter-related bacteremias carry high mortality rates in hematological patients. When a multidrug-resistant microorganism is involved, the catheter should ideally be removed; however, this approach is not always possible. Tigecycline lock therapy was used in two pediatric oncohematological patients with intravascular catheter-related infection due to KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. The catheter was salvaged in both cases, and the patients were later discharged. Our experience suggests the usefulness of this approach in treating this type of infection., (Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.)

HIV infection is characterized by a chronic inflammatory state. Recently, it has been shown that mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) released from damaged or dead cells can bind Toll like receptor-9 (TLR9), an intracellular receptor that responds to bacterial or viral DNA molecules. The activation of TLR9 present within monocytes or neutrophils results in a potent inflammatory reaction, with the production of proinflammatory cytokines. We measured plasma levels of mtDNA in different groups of HIV(+) patients, i.e., those experiencing an acute HIV infection (AHI), long term non progressors (LTNP), late presenters (LP) taking antiretroviral therapy for the first time, and healthy controls. We found that in AHI and LP mtDNA plasma levels were significantly higher than in healthy individuals or in LTNP. Plasma mtDNA levels were not correlated to peripheral blood CD4(+) T cell count, nor to markers of immune activation, but had a significant correlation with plasma viral load, revealing a possible role for mtDNA in inflammation, or as a biomarker of virus-induced damage., (Copyright © 2011 © Elsevier B.V. and Mitochondria Research Society. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of the ADONE (ADherence to ONE pill) study was to verify the effect of a reduced number of pills on adherence and quality of life (QoL) in HIV-infected patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)., Design: Prospective, multicenter, study., Methods: Patients chronically treated with emtricitabine (FTC) + tenofovir (TDF) + efavirenz (EFV) or lamivudine (3TC) +TDF +EFV and with a HIV-RNA < 50 copies/mL were switched to the single-pill fixed-dose regimen (FDR) of FTC +TDF +EFV. Data were collected with SF-36 using visual analog scales. Results of the final (6 months) primary as-treated analysis are reported., Results: 212 patients (77.4% males) of mean age 45.8 years were enrolled; 202 completed the study. One month post switch to FDR the adherence rate increased significantly to 96.1% from a baseline value of 93.8% (P < 0.01). The increase was steadily maintained throughout the study (96.2% at 6 months). QoL improved over time from 68.8% to 72.7% (P = 0.042) as well, and was significantly associated with the perception of health status, presence of adverse events (AEs) and number of reported AEs (P < 0.0001). QoL significantly influenced adherence (P < 0.0001). During FDR use the mean CD4 count increased from 556 to 605 cells/muL (P < 0.0001). At the end of follow-up 98% of patients maintained HIV-RNA level < 50 copies/mL and 100% <400 copies/mL. Four patients stopped therapy because they were lost to follow-up and 6 because of AEs (insomnia/nervousness 4, allergy 1, difficulties swallowing pills 1)., Conclusion: By substituting a one-pill once-a-day HAART, we observed an improvement of both adherence and QoL while maintaining high virologic and immunologic efficacy. HAART simplicity is an added value that favors adherence and may improve long-term success.

The amount of HIV-1 DNA within peripheral blood mononuclear cells is an important marker of viral activity. We studied intracellular HIV-1 DNA content in purified CD4(+) T cells from 28 chronically HIV-1-infected adults with sustained CD4(+) T cell counts (>500 cells/microl) and undetectable plasma viral load (<50 copies/ml), who underwent CD4-guided treatment interruption (TI). Patients were followed up for 18 months during TI, and for 6 months after treatment resumption (TR). Six naïve HIV(+) patients starting therapy were also enrolled and followed up for 6 months. All patients were studied every 2 months; HIV-1 DNA copy number was quantified with real-time PCR. Considering all patients remaining off-treatment, in the first 18 months of TI, intracellular HIV-1 DNA levels (expressed as Log(10) copies/million cells) remained stable (mean, 3.82 and 3.77 at time 0 and after 18 months, respectively). Similarly, HIV-1 DNA values, either in patients who restarted treatment after TI (time 0, 4.90) or in naïve patients who started treatment for the first time (time 0, 4.37), did not change significantly in the first 6 months of therapy (4.42 and 3.67, respectively). Evaluating HIV-1 DNA variations during the first 2 months of TI, we found that patients with a stable level had a lower risk to reach a CD4(+) T cell count <350 cells/microl, and thus to restart therapy, whereas this risk was significantly higher in those with a marked increase of HIV-1 DNA. In conclusion, intracellular HIV-1 DNA is a predictive marker for the length of CD4-guided TI.