Search

Although several promising approaches for the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (rrDLBCL) have been approved recently, it remains unclear which patients will ultimately achieve long‐term responses. Circulating tumor (ct)DNA sequencing has emerged as a valuable tool to assess minimal residual disease (MRD). Correlations between MRD and outcomes have been shown in previously untreated DLBCL, but data on the repeated assessment of MRD in the dynamic course of rrDLBCL is limited. Here, we present an approach leveraging cost‐ and time‐sensitivity of digital droplet (dd)PCR to repeatedly assess MRD in rrDLBCL and present proof‐of‐principle for its ability to predict outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) relapsing after second‐line therapy have a dismal prognosis and novel approaches are required for this patient group. Based on promising (pre‐)clinical data and the favourable toxicity profile, we performed a phase II clinical trial with the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib in patients with relapsed or refractory cHL (r/r cHL). Methods: Patients ≥18 years with histologically confirmed r/r cHL who failed second‐line treatment were included. Ruxolitinib was given orally at a dose of 25 mg twice daily in continuous 28‐day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was the PET/CT‐based overall response rate (ORR; complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)) after 2 cycles; secondary endpoints included progression‐free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as well as feasibility. The Jericho Trial adopted a 2‐stage phase 2 design (Simon 1989). Results: Among the 12 included patients in stage 1, 2 had a PR, 3 had a stable disease (SD) and 6 had progressive disease (PD) after two treatment cycles (ORR: 2/12 evaluable patients, 16.7%). Median PFS was 3.6 months, the 1‐year OS estimate was 50.6% (median not reached). The toxicity profile was favourable with only one grade IV adverse event (7.1%) reported. Conclusion: Ruxolitinib exhibited a favourable side effect profile but modest activity in r/r cHL. Although the formal stopping criterion after stage 1 was not met, the trial did not continue to stage 2 due to the low response and PFS rates observed in stage 1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Lung cancer that is driven by mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is currently treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Although patients initially respond well to TKI treatment, drug resistance against EGFR-targeted therapy emerges. Attempts to combine immunotherapy with EGFR-targeted treatment to prolong response rates or prevent the development of resistances have been limited due to insufficient knowledge about the effects of targeted therapy on the tumour microenvironment (TME) in EGFR-driven tumours and tumour-infiltrating immune cells. The aims of this study were to improve our understanding on the impact of EGFR inhibition on the immune response in EGFR-driven lung cancer and, furthermore, to gain insights into the impact of combining targeted therapy with immunotherapy on the TME. EGFR-driven non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are currently treated with TKIs targeting EGFR, such as erlotinib or osimertinib. Despite a promising initial response to TKI treatment, most patients gain resistance to oncogene-targeted therapy, and tumours progress. With the development of inhibitors against immune checkpoints, such as PD-1, that mediate an immunosuppressive microenvironment, immunotherapy approaches attempt to restore a proinflammatory immune response in tumours. However, this strategy has shown only limited benefits in EGFR-driven NSCLC. Approaches combining EGFR inhibition with immunotherapy to stimulate the immune response and overcome resistance to therapy have been limited due to insufficient understanding about the effect of EGFR-targeting treatment on the immune cells in the TME. Here, we investigate the impact of EGFR inhibition by erlotinib on the TME and its effect on the antitumour response of the immune cell infiltrate. For this purpose, we used a transgenic conditional mouse model to study the immunological profile in EGFR-driven NSCLC tumours. We found that EGFR inhibition mediated a higher infiltration of immune cells and increased local proliferation of T-cells in the tumours. Moreover, inhibiting EGFR signalling led to increased activation of immune cells in the TME. Most strikingly, combined simultaneous blockade of EGFR and anti-PD-1 (aPD-1) enhanced tumour treatment response in a transgenic mouse model of EGFR-driven NSCLC. Thus, our findings show that EGFR inhibition promotes an active and proinflammatory immune cell infiltrate in the TME while improving response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in EGFR-driven NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Reinduction chemotherapy followed by high‐dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDCT + ASCT) is second‐line standard of care for transplant‐eligible patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (r/r cHL) but has a high failure rate. Because response to reinduction is predictive of the outcome after HDCT + ASCT, we aimed to improve the standard dexamethasone, high‐dose cytarabine and cisplatinum (DHAP) reinduction regimen by addition of the oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus (everDHAP). Transplant‐eligible patients aged 18–60 years with histologically confirmed r/r cHL were included in this experimental phase I/II trial. Everolimus (10 mg/day, determined in phase‐I‐part) was administered on day 0–13 of each DHAP cycle. From July 2014 to March 2018, 50 patients were recruited to the phase II everDHAP group; two were not evaluable, three discontinued due to toxicity. Randomization to a placebo group stopped in October 2015 due to poor recruitment after nine patients. The primary end‐point of computed tomography (CT)‐based complete remission (CR) after two cycles of everDHAP was expected to be ≥40%. With a CT‐based CR rate of 27% (n = 12/45) after two cycles of everDHAP the trial did not meet the primary end‐point. Adding everolimus to DHAP is thus feasible; however, the everDHAP regimen failed to show an improved efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: High programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD‐L1) protein expression and copy number alterations (CNAs) of the corresponding genomic locus 9p24.1 in Hodgkin‐ and Reed–Sternberg cells (HRSC) have been shown to be associated with favourable response to anti‐PD‐1 checkpoint inhibition in relapsed/refractory (r/r) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). In the present study, we investigated baseline 9p24.1 status as well as PD‐L1 and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II protein expression in 82 biopsies from patients with early stage unfavourable cHL treated with anti‐PD‐1‐based first‐line treatment in the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) NIVAHL trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03004833). All evaluated specimens showed 9p24.1 CNA in HRSC to some extent, but with high intratumoral heterogeneity and an overall smaller range of alterations than reported in advanced‐stage or r/r cHL. All but two cases (97%) showed PD‐L1 expression by the tumour cells in variable amounts. While MHC‐I was rarely expressed in >50% of HRSC, MHC‐II expression in >50% of HRSC was found more frequently. No obvious impact of 9p24.1 CNA or PD‐L1 and MHC‐I/II expression on early response to the highly effective anti‐PD‐1‐based NIVAHL first‐line treatment was observed. Further studies evaluating an expanded panel of potential biomarkers are needed to optimally stratify anti‐PD‐1 first‐line cHL treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) is an unusual B‐cell lymphoma because the malignant cells exist as a minority population in a densely cellular microenvironment. The microenvironment is comprised predominately of inflammatory and immune cells with fibrosis in some cases. There are multiple dysregulated signalling pathways that sustain HL within this microenvironment, such as the Nuclear factor‐κB and Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription pathways. Advances in genomic medicine have enabled a better characterisation of the rare tumour cells and improved our understanding of the signalling mechanisms that exist between the malignant cell and its microenvironment. Current therapy for HL produces excellent clinical outcomes in most younger patients. However, problems with current treatment approaches include poorer outcomes in the elderly, toxicity of highly‐effective combination chemotherapy regimens and relapse in high‐risk patients. Better understanding of disease biology aids in upfront prognostication of patients, defines new methods for treatment monitoring and assists in the recognition of novel targets for therapy. Biology‐driven therapies, including anti‐CD30 antibody conjugates, cellular immunotherapies and immune modulation, particularly with checkpoint inhibitors, have changed treatment algorithms for relapsed/refractory patients. Future challenges exist in incorporating immune‐based therapies earlier in treatment algorithms to reduce toxicity and prevent relapse for patients with HL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article provides information on a study which observed the link between different blood count parameters at baseline with response and progression-free survival (PFS) in relapsed or refractory (r/r) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients treated with the anti-PD1 antibody, nivolumab. Topics discussed include role of eosinophils as co-effectors of the immune response, and results of the study.

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is the most common hematological malignancy in young adults and can be cured in most cases. However, relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma, certain patient groups, such as elderly patients, and toxicity of first-line treatment still pose significant challenges. Consequently, new treatment options are needed. Recently, many new treatment concepts have been evaluated in clinical trials. Targeted drug-antibody conjugates and immune checkpoint inhibitors have decisively changed treatment approaches. This review aims to give a comprehensive overview of novel agents in Hodgkin lymphoma that have been recently or are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. In addition to dedicated sections on brentuximab vedotin (BV) and immune checkpoint inhibitors, other emerging substances and concepts are discussed. In doing so, this review compares trial results regarding safety and efficacy. A special focus lies on the effect novel agents will have on the different treatment settings faced by clinicians involved in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a rare malignancy accounting for roughly 15% of all lymphomas and mostly affecting young patients. A second peak is seen in patients above 60 years of age. The history of HL treatment represents a remarkable success story in which HL has turned from an incurable disease to a neoplasm with an excellent prognosis. First-line treatment with stage-adapted treatment consisting of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy results in cure rates of approximately 80%. Second-line treatment mostly consists of intensive salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Novel approaches such as antibody drug conjugates and immunomodulatory drugs have shown impressive results in clinical trials in refractory and relapsed HL and are now increasingly implemented in earlier treatment lines. This review gives a comprehensive overview on HL addressing epidemiology, pathophysiology and current treatment options as well as recent developments and perspectives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article, we broadly review the application of cfDNA analysis to the diagnosis and management of lymphoma. We introduce the advantages of cfDNA measurement over conventional tissue biopsy and describe how cfDNA may be utilized for both genotyping and detection of minimal residual disease. First, we discuss genotyping, beginning with differences in identifying mutations from the blood plasma vs. from circulating cells. We review the technical distinctions between PCR- and NGS-based assays and describe two important applications of NGS-based cfDNA tests, namely the identification of resistance mutations and classification of disease subtype. We discuss difficulties in genotyping diseases with low burden of tumor cells and the application of cfDNA assays in these contexts. Second, we describe the utility of ctDNA measurement in assessing MRD. We cover recent advances in the assessment of pre-treatment disease burden as a prognostic biomarker, detection of molecular response to therapy, and early detection of relapsing disease. Third, we explore select emerging areas of research in ctDNA technologies that show promise in boosting the performance of existing ctDNA-based assays. These include cell-free DNA fragment structure analysis or 'fragmentomics', epigenetic modifications, and novel circulating analytes such as tumor-educated platelets and extracellular vesicular DNA. We also discuss alternative analytes to blood plasma for tumor detection, such as urine, saliva, and stool. Finally, we present a case that highlights potential applications of ctDNA approaches to the management of patients with lymphoma, while also defining important prerequisite advances before this can be fully realized. We close with a look to the future of cfDNA applications, outlining one potential timeline and path forward towards routine clinical application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anti-angiogenic treatment targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-VEGFR2 signaling has shown limited efficacy in lung cancer patients. Here, we demonstrate that inhibition of VEGFR2 in tumor cells, expressed in ∼20% of non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, leads to a pro-invasive phenotype. Drug-induced inhibition of tumor VEGFR2 interferes with the formation of the EphA2/VEGFR2 heterocomplex, thereby allowing RSK to interact with Serine 897 of EphA2. Inhibition of RSK decreases phosphorylation of Serine 897 EphA2. Selective genetic modeling of Serine 897 of EphA2 or inhibition of EphA2 abrogates the formation of metastases in vivo upon VEGFR2 inhibition. In summary, these findings demonstrate that VEGFR2-targeted therapy conditions VEGFR2-positive NSCLC to Serine 897 EphA2-dependent aggressive tumor growth and metastasis. These data shed light on the molecular mechanisms explaining the limited efficacy of VEGFR2-targeted anti-angiogenic treatment in lung cancer patients. • VEGFR2 inhibition in VEGFR2-positive NSCLC tumor cells induces tumor cell invasion • EphA2-S897 mediates invasive phenotype induced by VEGFR2 inhibition • These data provide a mechanism for the limited efficacy of VEGFR2-targeted therapy Anti-angiogenic treatment targeting VEGFR2 signaling has shown limited efficacy in lung cancer patients. Volz et al. show that VEGFR2 inhibition leads to a pro-invasive phenotype in VEGFR2-positive non-small cell lung cancer cells, which is mediated by phosphorylation of EphA2-S897. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most aggressive lung cancer entity with an extremely limited therapeutic outcome. Most patients are diagnosed at an extensive stage. However, the molecular mechanisms driving SCLC invasion and metastasis remain largely elusive. We used an autochthonous SCLC mouse model and matched samples from patients with primary and metastatic SCLC to investigate the molecular characteristics of tumor metastasis. We demonstrate that tumor cell invasion and liver metastasis in SCLC are triggered by an Angiopoietin-2 (ANG-2)/Integrin β-1-dependent pathway in tumor cells, mediated by focal adhesion kinase/Src kinase signaling. Strikingly, CRISPR-Cas9 KO of Integrin β-1 or blocking Integrin β-1 signaling by an anti-ANG-2 treatment abrogates liver metastasis formation in vivo. Interestingly, analysis of a unique collection of matched samples from patients with primary and metastatic SCLC confirmed a strong increase of Integrin β-1 in liver metastasis in comparison with the primary tumor. We further show that ANG-2 blockade combined with PD-1-targeted by anti-PD-1 treatment displays synergistic treatment effects in SCLC. Together, our data demonstrate a fundamental role of ANG-2/Integrin β-1 signaling in SCLC cells for tumor cell invasion and liver metastasis and provide a potentially new effective treatment strategy for patients with SCLC.

Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is a rare lymphoma that has traditionally been considered a subgroup of Hodgkin lymphoma. However, morphology, surface marker expression, genetics, and clinical course are different from classic Hodgkin lymphoma. While most patients experience indolent disease with slow progression, some patients can also have more aggressive disease. Nevertheless, outcomes are excellent, and excess mortality due to NLPHL is at most very low. The treatment of newly diagnosed NLPHL has historically mirrored that of classic Hodgkin lymphoma. However, evidence for deviations from that approach has emerged over time and is discussed herein. Less evidence is available for the optimal management of relapsed patients. So-called variant histology has recently emerged as a biological risk factor, providing at least a partial explanation for the observed heterogeneity of NLPHL. Considering variant histology together with other risk factors and careful observation of the clinical course of the disease in each patient can help to assess individual disease aggressiveness. Also important in this mostly indolent disease are the preferences of the patient and host factors, such as individual susceptibility to specific treatment side effects. Considering all this together can guide individualized treatment recommendations, which are paramount in this rare disease., (Copyright © 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Background: Single-agent immunotherapy has shown remarkable efficacy in selected cancer entities and individual patients. However, most patients fail to respond. This is likely due to diverse immunosuppressive mechanisms acting in a concerted way to suppress the host anti-tumor immune response. Combination immunotherapy approaches that are effective in such poorly immunogenic tumors mostly rely on precise knowledge of antigenic determinants on tumor cells. Creating an antigen-agnostic combination immunotherapy that is effective in poorly immunogenic tumors for which an antigenic determinant is not known is a major challenge., Methods: We use multiple cell line and poorly immunogenic syngeneic, autochthonous, and autologous mouse models to evaluate the efficacy of a novel combination immunotherapy named tripartite immunotherapy (TRI-IT). To elucidate TRI-ITs mechanism of action we use immune cell depletions and comprehensive tumor and immune infiltrate characterization by flow cytometry, RNA sequencing and diverse functional assays., Results: We show that combined adoptive cellular therapy (ACT) with lymphokine-activated killer cells, cytokine-induced killer cells, Vγ9Vδ2-T-cells (γδ-T-cells) and T-cells enriched for tumor recognition (CTLs) display synergistic antitumor effects, which are further enhanced by cotreatment with anti-PD1 antibodies. Most strikingly, the full TRI-IT protocol, a combination of this ACT with anti-PD1 antibodies, local immunotherapy of agonists against toll-like receptor 3, 7 and 9 and pre-ACT lymphodepletion, eradicates and induces durable anti-tumor immunity in a variety of poorly immunogenic syngeneic, autochthonous, as well as autologous humanized patient-derived models. Mechanistically, we show that TRI-IT coactivates adaptive cellular and humoral, as well as innate antitumor immune responses to mediate its antitumor effect without inducing off-target toxicity., Conclusions: Overall, TRI-IT is a novel, highly effective, antigen-agnostic, non-toxic combination immunotherapy. In this study, comprehensive insights into its preclinical efficacy, even in poorly immunogenic tumors, and mode of action are given, so that translation into clinical trials is the next step., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SB has received travel support from BMS and travel support and consulting fees from Takeda. SB received research funding form Takeda, but this funding did not support the research described in this paper. DK is a cofounder of XRAD Therapeutics, which is developing radiosensitizers. DK is the recipient of a Stand Up To Cancer (SU2C) Merck Catalyst Grant studying pembrolizumab and radiation therapy in sarcoma patients. DK has received research funding from XRAD Therapeutics, Eli Lilly & Co., Bristol Myers Squibb, Varian Medical Systems, and Merck, but this funding did not support the research described in this paper. CR received consulting and lecture fees from Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, Vertex and Merck. CR received research funding from Gilead Pharmaceuticals. CR is a cofounder of CDL Therapeutics., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)