Search

Background and Aims It is not possible to accurately count adenomas in many patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Nevertheless, polyp counts are critical in evaluating each patient's response to interventions. However, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration no longer recognizes the decrease in polyp burden as a sufficient chemoprevention trial treatment endpoint requiring a measure of "clinical benefit." To develop endpoints for future industry-sponsored chemopreventive trials, the International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumors (InSIGHT) developed an FAP staging and intervention classification scheme for lower-GI tract polyposis. Methods Twenty-four colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy videos were reviewed by 26 clinicians familiar with diagnosis and treatment of FAP. The reviewers independently assigned a stage to a case by using the proposed system and chose a stage-specific intervention for each case. Our endpoint was the degree of concordance among reviewers staging and intervention assessments. Results The staging and intervention ratings of the 26 reviewers were highly concordant (ρ = 0.710; 95% credible interval, 0.651-0.759). Sixty-two percent of reviewers agreed on the FAP stage, and 90% of scores were within ±1 stage of the mode. Sixty percent of reviewers agreed on the intervention, and 86% chose an intervention within ±1 level of the mode. Conclusions The proposed FAP colon polyposis staging system and stage-specific intervention are based on a high degree of agreement on the part of experts in the review of individual cases of polyposis. Therefore, reliable and clinically relevant means for measuring trial outcomes can be developed. Outlier cases showing wide scatter in stage assignment call for individualized attention and may be inappropriate for enrollment in clinical trials for this reason.

Angiotensin II (AII) receptor binding assays were performed in rat adipocytes from three separate anatomic depots. Fat cells were isolated by collagenase digestion, and plasma membranes were prepared from the epididymal, mesenteric, and retroperitoneal fat depots of male Sprague-Dawley rats at 100 days of age. Binding of 125I-labeled [Sar1,Ile8]AII was rapid, saturable, and specific in membranes from all depots, identifying a receptor with a similar affinity of approximately 1 nM. Site-associated differences in receptor number were observed, with epididymal and mesenteric fat cell membranes exhibiting significantly more receptors than retroperitoneal fat cells when binding was expressed per unit of membrane protein. When corrected for cell volume, the number of receptors per cell ranked epididymal > retroperitoneal > mesenteric. Inhibitory constants for the peptide agonists AII and AIII and the peptide antagonist [Sar1,Ala8]AII indicated similar affinities in all three depots. Because the receptor has been classified pharmacologically into two subtypes, the AT1 selective antagonist losartan, and the AT2 selective antagonist PD 123,319 were used to classify the adipocyte receptor, indicating an AT1 subtype with an affinity for losartan in the mesenteric and retroperitoneal adipocytes that was significantly greater than the epididymal. Similar studies were performed in adipocyte membranes obtained from human omental and subcutaneous adipose tissue, revealing the presence of an AII receptor in both depots with an affinity of approximately 10 nM for losartan. These data indicate site-specific differences in AII receptor number in fat cell membranes from rats and the existence of human adipocyte AII receptors, suggesting that the adipocyte is significant for the peripheral metabolism of components of the renin-angiotensin system.