Search

Parvovirus B19 (PB19) associated pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) is an uncommon but well described complication of immunosuppression post solid organ transplantation. We report a unique case of a renal transplant patient with PB19 associated PRCA who developed a spontaneous splenic rupture after receiving IVIg for persistent anemia. He subsequently required splenectomy. Within the spleen we subsequently identified PB19 affected cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The development of precise RNA-editing tools is essential for the advancement of RNA therapeutics. CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) PspCas13b is a programmable RNA nuclease predicted to offer superior specificity because of its 30-nucleotide spacer sequence. However, its design principles and its on-target, off-target and collateral activities remain poorly characterized. Here, we present single-base tiled screening and computational analyses that identify key design principles for potent and highly selective RNA recognition and cleavage in human cells. We show that the de novo design of spacers containing guanosine bases at precise positions can greatly enhance the catalytic activity of inefficient CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs). These validated design principles (integrated into an online tool, https://cas13target.azurewebsites.net/ ) can predict highly effective crRNAs with ~90% accuracy. Furthermore, the comprehensive spacer-target mutagenesis revealed that PspCas13b can tolerate only up to four mismatches and requires ~26-nucleotide base pairing with the target to activate its nuclease domains, highlighting its superior specificity compared to other RNA or DNA interference tools. On the basis of this targeting resolution, we predict an extremely low probability of PspCas13b having off-target effects on other cellular transcripts. Proteomic analysis validated this prediction and showed that, unlike other Cas13 orthologs, PspCas13b exhibits potent on-target activity and lacks collateral effects., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Central aortic blood pressure (cBP) is often promoted to be a superior predictor of cardiovascular risk compared to brachial blood pressure, and brachial-central pulse pressure amplification is also suggested as prognostic. Several devices and techniques, each purporting to estimate cBP, have entered commercial use. The interchangeability of cBP measurements between devices and the influence of disease states on central to brachial pulse pressure amplification remain unclear. The useful measurement of cBP in clinical trials is dependent on clarification of these issues., Method: We performed a systematic meta-analysis of studies reporting cBP between 2000 and 2012. Studies were included if both central and brachial SBPs (cSBP and bSBP) were reported. Studies were categorized by technique and according to the prevalent disease state with the bSBP - cSBP difference calculated. Random-effects modeling (inverse variance weighted approach) was used to estimate the pooled mean difference associated with each technique., Results: Of the 164 eligible studies, the SphygmoCor device was most commonly reported (110 studies), with direct carotid applanation second-most utilized (31 studies). In 30 included invasive cohorts, the measured cSBP did not differ significantly from the oscillometric bSBP recorded [mean difference 4.19  mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.13 to 12.51], whereas mean differences of 12.77  mmHg (95% CI 11.93, 13.60) and 8.83  mmHg (95% CI 7.86, 9.79) were obtained with the SphygmoCor and carotid applanation estimates of cSBP, respectively (both P < 0.05). Conversely, the reported mean cSBP-to-bSBP differences measured across various disease states with SphygmoCor did not differ significantly., Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that noninvasive cBP estimation is device/technique-dependent. Consequently, caution is advisable in applying these devices and techniques across clinical studies.