Search

Background: Lung transplant recipients are at high risk for severe cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. Off‐label use of letermovir (LET) may avert myelotoxicity associated with valganciclovir (VGCV), but data in lung transplantation are limited. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of LET prophylaxis among lung transplant recipients. Methods: This retrospective, matched cohort study included lung transplant recipients who received LET for primary CMV prophylaxis following VGCV intolerance. Patients were matched 1:1 to historical VGCV controls based on age, serostatus group, and time from transplant. The primary outcome was CMV breakthrough within 1 year post‐LET initiation; secondary outcomes included hematologic changes. Results: A total of 124 lung transplant recipients were included per group (32% CMV mismatch, D+R‐), with LET initiated a median of 9.6 months post‐transplantation. One CMV breakthrough event (0.8%) was observed in the LET group versus four (3.2%) in the VGCV group (p =.370). The median (interquartile range) white blood cell (WBC) count was 3.1 (2.1–5.6) at LET initiation which increased to 5.1 (3.9–7.2) at the end of follow‐up (p <.001). For VGCV controls, WBC was 4.8 (3.4–7.2) at baseline and 5.4 (3.6–7.2) at the end of follow‐up; this difference was not statistically significant (p =.395). Additionally, 98.4% of LET patients experienced ≥1 leukopenia episode in the year prior to LET compared to 71.8% the year after initiation (p <.001). Similar results were observed for neutropenia (48.4% and 17.7%, p <.001). Conclusion: LET prophylaxis was associated with a low rate of CMV reactivation and leukopenia recovery. LET may represent a reasonable prophylaxis option for lung transplant recipients unable to tolerate VGCV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the general population, prior infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 reduces the risk of severe COVID‐19; however, studies in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are lacking. We sought to describe the clinical course of COVID‐19 recurrence and compare outcomes between the first and second episodes of COVID‐19 in LTRs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single‐center cohort study of LTRs with COVID‐19 between January 1, 2022, and September 30, 2022, during the Omicron wave. We compared the clinical course of a second episode of COVID‐19 to that of the patients' own first episode and to that of LTRs who developed a first episode during the study period. Results: During the study period, we identified 24 LTRs with COVID‐19 recurrence and another 75 LTRs with a first episode of COVID‐19. LTRs who survived the initial episode of COVID‐19 had a similar disease course with recurrence, with a trend toward reduced hospitalization (10 (41.6%) vs. 4 (16.7%), p =.114). Furthermore, compared to LTRs with a primary infection during the Omicron wave, those with a reinfection had a non‐statistically significant trend toward reduced hospitalizations (aOR.391, 95% CI [.115–1.321], p =.131), shorter lengths‐of‐stay (median, 4 vs. 9 days, p =.181), and reduced intensive care unit admissions, intubations, and COVID‐19–related mortality. Conclusions: LTRs who survive the first episode of COVID‐19 are likely to have a similar clinical course with recurrent episodes. Although recurrent COVID‐19 may be milder, larger, well‐powered studies are needed to confirm this observation. Ongoing precautions are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Guidelines recommend the use of direct oral anticoagulation therapy over warfarin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation. However, there is uncertainty and a lack of data supporting the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation therapy in lung transplant recipients. Additionally, there are unique considerations for this population, such as labile renal function and drug interactions. Project Aims: The objective of this program evaluation was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apixaban therapy for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism in lung transplant recipients. Design: Medical records of all adult lung transplant recipients who received apixaban for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism treatment between January 1, 2018, and August 31, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Safety was evaluated by the incidence of bleeding. Efficacy was evaluated by the recurrence of blood clots or the incidence of stroke. Results: A total of 134 recipients were included in the review. Thromboembolisms occurred in 14 recipients (10%), and none experienced a stroke. Bleeding occurred in 12 recipients (9%). Conclusions: The results of this evaluation were similar to those seen in smaller studies of the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulation therapy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism in lung transplant recipients, especially in recipients taking interacting azole antifungals. Prospective, comparative studies are needed to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Lung transplant recipients residing in the endemic region are vulnerable to severe morbidity and mortality from Coccidioides. As infection risk persists beyond the first posttransplant year, investigations evaluating extended prophylaxis durations are needed. The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of coccidioidomycosis among lung transplant recipients receiving universal lifelong azole antifungal prophylaxis. Methods Patients receiving transplants from 2013–2018 and initiated on azole antifungal prophylaxis at a lung transplant center in Arizona were included and followed through 2019 or until death, second transplant, or loss to follow-up. Recipients who died or received treatment for coccidioidomycosis during the transplant admission, or who had received a previous transplant, were excluded. The primary outcome was proven or probable coccidioidomycosis with new asymptomatic seropositivity assessed secondarily. Results A total of 493 lung transplant recipients were included, with 82% initiated on itraconazole prophylaxis, 9.3% on voriconazole, and 8.5% on posaconazole. Mean age at transplant was 62 years, 77% were diabetic, and 8% were seropositive for Coccidioides pretransplant. After a median follow-up of 31 months, 1 proven infection and 1 case of new asymptomatic seropositivity (1/493 each, 0.2% incidence) occurred during the study period. The single coccidioidomycosis case occurred 5 years posttransplant in a patient who had azole prophylaxis stopped several months prior. Although within-class switches were common throughout the study period, permanent discontinuation of azole prophylaxis was rare (1.4% at end of follow-up). Conclusions Universal lifelong azole prophylaxis was associated with a low rate of coccidioidomycosis among lung transplant recipients residing in endemic regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Lung transplant recipients are at increased risk for acquiring nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), but the clinical significance of NTM isolation, particularly among patients not meeting guideline-endorsed diagnostic criteria for NTM pulmonary disease, is unclear. Methods A case-control study of lung transplant recipients culture-positive for NTM at a large transplant center during a 7-year period (2013-2019) was performed. Results Twenty-nine cases were matched 1:2 to non-NTM controls. The median time to NTM isolation was 10.7 months post transplant. Only 34.5% of all cases, and half of treated cases, met diagnostic criteria for NTM pulmonary infection. All-cause mortality at 12 months was numerically higher among NTM cases versus controls (20.7% vs 8.6%, P = 0.169); however, no deaths were attributed to NTM. No increase in the 12-month rate of acute rejection was observed (27.6% vs 36.2%, P = 0.477). Recent augmented immunosuppression was associated with increased odds of NTM isolation, while azithromycin prophylaxis was associated with reduced odds of NTM isolation and was not associated with macrolide resistance. Both adverse events and actual or potential drug-drug interactions occurred in more than 90% of treated cases; these events included ocular toxicity, hearing loss, and supratherapeutic calcineurin inhibitor concentrations. Eight of the 14 treated cases (57.1%) required early antibiotic discontinuation due to adverse events or drug-drug interactions. Conclusion Among lung transplant recipients, most patients with NTM isolation did not meet guideline criteria for infection and had outcomes similar to non‒NTM-infected patients, which may reflect transient lung colonization by NTM rather than true disease. As adverse events are common with NTM therapy, limiting unnecessary antibiotic treatment represents an area for future antimicrobial stewardship efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is extremely common after lung transplant and can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Current practice suggests the use of 900 mg daily of valganciclovir for CMV prophylaxis, but there is no literature assessing whether 450 mg daily of valganciclovir is sufficient in intermediate CMV risk lung transplant recipients. Therefore, we sought to assess the role of low-dose valganciclovir (LDV) versus high-dose valganciclovir (HDV) prophylaxis in intermediate-risk (R+) recipients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis on lung transplant recipients at the Norton Thoracic Institute in Phoenix, Arizona looking at intermediate-risk patients that received either valganciclovir 450 mg per day (LDV) or 900 mg/day (HDV). All patients were followed for 1 year posttransplant for incidence of CMV viremia. The primary outcome was the rate of CMV viremia as determined by a positive CMV polymerase chain reaction ([PCR] >2.7 log copies/mL). Secondary outcomes included rate of adverse events, acute cellular rejection, and mortality. Results: The primary analysis included 103 patients (55 in the LDV group, 48 in the HDV group). In the LDV group, 9 patients (16.4%) developed CMV viremia compared to 4 (8.3%) in the HDV group (p=0.221) with no difference observed in adverse event rates between groups. Conclusion: There was no statistical difference between groups for the primary outcome. However, the effect size demonstrated in this analysis may be of clinical relevance and valganciclovir 450 mg daily would not be recommended in intermediate risk lung transplant recipients at this time. To confirm our results, further prospective studies enrolling larger patient populations are necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Lung transplant recipients are at heightened risk for nocardiosis compared to other solid organ transplant recipients, with incidence rates as high as 9% and up to 30% associated mortality. No controlled studies assessing risk factors for nocardiosis in this high‐risk population have been reported. Methods: Patients undergoing lung transplantation at a single center between 2012 and 2018 and diagnosed with nocardiosis post‐transplant were matched 1:2 to uninfected control subjects on the basis of age, transplant date, and sex. Results: The incidence of nocardiosis in this lung transplant population was 3.4% (20/586), occurring a median of 9.4 months (range 4.4‐55.2) post‐transplant. In multivariable analysis, consistent use of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) in the 12 weeks prior to diagnosis was independently associated with protection against nocardiosis (OR 0.038; 95% CI 0.01‐0.29; P =.002). Augmented immunosuppression in the 6 months prior to diagnosis was independently associated with the development of nocardiosis (OR 9.94; 95% CI 1.62‐ 61.00; P =.013). Six case patients (30%) had disseminated disease; all‐cause 6‐month mortality was 25%. The most common species was Nocardia farcinica (7/17 isolates), which was associated with dissemination and mortality. The most active antibiotics were TMP/SMX (100%), linezolid (100%), and amikacin (76%). Imipenem was only active against 4/17 isolates (24% susceptibility), with two isolates becoming non‐susceptible later in therapy. Conclusions: Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis was shown to be protective against nocardiosis in lung transplant recipients, while augmented immunosuppression conferred increased risk. Institutional epidemiologic data are needed to best guide empiric therapy for Nocardia, as historical in vitro data may not predict local susceptibilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]