Search

The detachment of rock fragments from fractured bedrock on hillslopes creates sediment with an initial size distribution that sets the upper limits on particle size for all subsequent stages in the evolution of sediment in landscapes. We hypothesize that the initial size distribution should depend on the size distribution of latent sediment (i.e., fracture-bound blocks in unweathered bedrock) and weathering of blocks both before and during detachment (e.g., disintegration along crystal grain boundaries). However, the initial size distribution is difficult to measure because the interface across which sediment is produced is often shielded from view by overlying soil. Here we overcome this limitation by comparing fracture spacings measured from exposed bedrock on cliff faces with particle size distributions in adjacent talus deposits at 15 talus–cliff pairs spanning a wide range of climates and lithologies in California. Median fracture spacing and particle size vary by more than 10-fold and correlate strongly with lithology. Fracture spacing and talus size distributions are also closely correlated in central tendency, spread, and shape, with b-axis diameters showing the closest correspondence with fracture spacing at most sites. This suggests that weathering has not modified latent sediment either before or during detachment from the cliff face. In addition, talus at our sites has not undergone much weathering after deposition and is slightly coarser than the latent sizes because it contains unexploited fractures inherited from bedrock. We introduce a new conceptual framework for understanding the relative importance of latent size and weathering in setting initial sediment size distributions in mountain landscapes. In this framework, hillslopes exist on a spectrum defined by the ratio of two characteristic timescales: the residence time in saprolite and weathered bedrock and the time required to detach a particle of a characteristic size. At one end of the spectrum, where weathering residence times are negligible, the latent size distribution can be used to predict the initial size distribution. At the other end of the spectrum, where weathering residence times are long, the latent size distribution can be erased by weathering in the critical zone.

The generation and transport of mineral dust is strongly related to climate on seasonal, year-to-year, and glacial-interglacial timescales. The modern dust cycle is influenced by soil moisture, which is partly a function of drought duration and severity. The production and transport of dust can therefore be amplified by global and regional droughts, thereby moderating ecosystem vulnerability to disturbance through the influence of dust on nutrient delivery to ecosystems. In this work, we use strontium and neodymium isotopes in combination with trace element concentrations in modern dust samples collected in 2015 to quantify the role of regionally versus globally supplied dust in nutrient delivery to a montane ecosystem. The study sites lie along an elevational transect in the southern Sierra Nevada, USA, with samples spanning the dry seasons of 2014 (Aciego et al., 2017) and 2015 (this study), when the region was experiencing a historic drought. The goal of our research was to quantify the spatial and temporal variability and sensitivity of the dust cycle to short term changes at nutrient-limited sites. We find that, during the dry season of 2015, Asian sources contributed between 10 and 40% of dust to sites located along this elevational transect, and importantly increased in importance during the summer growing season compared to regional dust sources. These changes are likely related to the prolonged drought in Asia in 2015, highlighting both the sensitivity of dust production and transport to drought and the teleconnections of dust transport in terrestrial ecosystems.

Long-term environmental research networks are one approach to advancing local, regional, and global environmental science and education. A remarkable number and wide variety of environmental research networks operate around the world today. These are diverse in funding, infrastructure, motivating questions, scientific strengths, and the sciences that birthed and maintain the networks. Some networks have individual sites that were selected because they had produced invaluable long-term data, while other networks have new sites selected to span ecological gradients. However, all long-term environmental networks share two challenges. Networks must keep pace with scientific advances and interact with both the scientific community and society at large. If networks fall short of successfully addressing these challenges, they risk becoming irrelevant. The objective of this paper is to assert that the biogeosciences offer environmental research networks a number of opportunities to expand scientific impact and public engagement. We explore some of these opportunities with four networks: the International Long-Term Ecological Research Network programs (ILTERs), critical zone observatories (CZOs), Earth and ecological observatory networks (EONs), and the FLUXNET program of eddy flux sites. While these networks were founded and expanded by interdisciplinary scientists, the preponderance of expertise and funding has gravitated activities of ILTERs and EONs toward ecology and biology, CZOs toward the Earth sciences and geology, and FLUXNET toward ecophysiology and micrometeorology. Our point is not to homogenize networks, nor to diminish disciplinary science. Rather, we argue that by more fully incorporating the integration of biology and geology in long-term environmental research networks, scientists can better leverage network assets, keep pace with the ever-changing science of the environment, and engage with larger scientific and public audiences. Fil: Richter, Daniel D.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos Fil: Billings, Sharon A.. University of Kansas; Estados Unidos Fil: Groffman, Peter M.. Brooklyn College; Estados Unidos Fil: Kelly, Eugene F.. State University of Colorado - Fort Collins; Estados Unidos Fil: Lohse, Kathleen A.. Idaho State University; Estados Unidos Fil: McDowell, William H.. University Of New Hampshire; Estados Unidos Fil: White, Timothy S.. State University of Pennsylvania; Estados Unidos Fil: Anderson, Suzanne. State University of Colorado at Boulder; Estados Unidos Fil: Baldocchi, Dennis D.. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos Fil: Banwart, Steve. University Of Leeds; Reino Unido Fil: Brantley, Susan. State University of Pennsylvania; Estados Unidos Fil: Braun, Jean J.. University of Yaounide; Camerún. Universite de Toulouse; Francia Fil: Brecheisen, Zachary S.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos Fil: Cook, Charles S.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos Fil: Hartnett, Hilairy E.. Arizona State University; Estados Unidos Fil: Hobbie, Sarah E.. University of Minnesota; Estados Unidos Fil: Gaillardet, Jerome. Institut Universitaire de France. Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris; Francia Fil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi". Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Ciencias Físico, Matemáticas y Naturales. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis "Prof. Ezio Marchi"; Argentina Fil: Jungkunst, Hermann F.. Universitat Koblenz; Alemania Fil: Kazanski, Clare E.. University of Minnesota; Estados Unidos Fil: Krishnaswamy, Jagdish. Ashoka Trust For Research In Ecology And The Environment; India Fil: Markewitz, Daniel. University of Georgia; Estados Unidos Fil: O'Neill, Katherine. Roanoke College; Estados Unidos Fil: Riebe, Clifford S.. University Of Wyoming; Fil: Schroeder, Paul. University of Georgia; Estados Unidos Fil: Siebe, Christina. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México Fil: Silver, Whendee L.. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos Fil: Thompson, Aaron. University of Georgia; Estados Unidos Fil: Verhoef, Anne. University of Reading; Reino Unido Fil: Zhang, Ganlin. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China

Dust provides ecosystem-sustaining nutrients to landscapes underlain by intensively weathered soils. Here we show that dust may also be crucial in montane forest ecosystems, dominating nutrient budgets despite continuous replacement of depleted soils with fresh bedrock via erosion. Strontium and neodymium isotopes in modern dust show that Asian sources contribute 18–45% of dust deposition across our Sierra Nevada, California study sites. The remaining dust originates regionally from the nearby Central Valley. Measured dust fluxes are greater than or equal to modern erosional outputs from hillslopes to channels, and account for 10–20% of estimated millennial-average inputs of bedrock P. Our results demonstrate that exogenic dust can drive the evolution of nutrient budgets in montane ecosystems, with implications for predicting forest response to changes in climate and land use., Dust is an important nutrient source to landscapes, but often the source of dust is poorly constrained. Here, the authors quantify the origin of different dust sources in the Sierra Nevada by analysing dust composition and suggest exogenic dust may drive nutrient budgets in montane ecosystems.