Search

Few centers routinely report aortic arch calcification (AAC) due to the lack of an easy and effective evaluation method. The association between AAC and the clinical prognosis of patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is unclear. We aimed to develop a rapid method to evaluate AAC in patients who underwent TAVR and to further assess their prognosis. We enrolled 464 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR. Patients with severe (11.2%), moderate (18.5%), mild (58.2%), and no (12.1%) AAC had an estimated 3-year all-cause mortality incidence of 39.6%, 20.8%, 13.4%, and 6.7% (log rank p < 0.001), respectively. Patients with severe AAC had a significantly higher incidence of both cardiovascular (log rank p = 0.002) and non-cardiovascular mortality (log rank p = 0.009), whereas patients with moderate AAC had a higher incidence of only non-cardiovascular mortality (p = 0.003) compared with patients with no/mild AAC. Moderate/severe AAC was an independent predictor of 3-year all-cause mortality in univariate (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41–4.03; p = 0.001) and multivariate COX regression analyses (HR: 1.78, 95%CI: 1.04–3.06; p = 0.037). Our rapid semi-quantitative method to evaluate AAC is highly reproducible and can be used to assess AAC in patients who undergo TAVR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There are limited data available on the development of arrhythmias in patients at risk of high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) or complete heart block (CHB) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Objective: This study aimed to explore the incidence and evolution of arrhythmias by monitoring patients at risk of HAVB or CHB after TAVR using smartwatches. Methods: We analyzed 188 consecutive patients in the prospective SMART TAVR (smartwatch-facilitated early discharge in patients undergoing TAVR) trial. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the risk of HAVB or CHB. Patients were required to trigger a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recording and send it to the Heart Health App via their smartphone. Physicians in the central ECG core lab would then analyze the ECG. The incidence and timing of arrhythmias and pacemaker implantation within a 30-day follow-up were compared. All arrhythmic events were adjudicated in a central ECG core lab. Results: The mean age of the patients was 73.1 (SD 7.3) years, of whom 105 (55.9%) were men. The mean discharge day after TAVR was 2.0 (SD 1.8) days. There were no statistically significant changes in the evolution of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, Mobitz I, Mobitz II, and third-degree atrial ventricular block over time in the first month after TAVR. The incidence of the left bundle branch block (LBBB) increased in the first week and decreased in the subsequent 3 weeks significantly (P <.001). Patients at higher risk of HAVB or CHB received more pacemaker implantation after discharge (n=8, 9.6% vs n=2, 1.9%; P =.04). The incidence of LBBB was higher in the group with higher HAVB or CHB risk (n=47, 56.6% vs n=34, 32.4%; P =.001). The independent predictors for pacemaker implantation were age, baseline atrial fibrillation, baseline right bundle branch block, Mobitz II, and third-degree atrioventricular block detected by the smartwatch. Conclusions: Except for LBBB, no change in arrhythmias was observed over time in the first month after TAVR. A higher incidence of pacemaker implantation after discharge was observed in patients at risk of HAVB or CHB. However, Mobitz II and third-degree atrioventricular block detected by the smartwatch during follow-ups were more valuable indicators to predict pacemaker implantation after discharge from the index TAVR. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04454177; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04454177 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), a pathological microbial metabolite, is demonstrated to be related to cardiovascular diseases. This study was (1) to investigate the association between TMAO and aortic stenosis and (2) to determine the prognostic value of TMAO for predicting mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods: 299 consecutive patients (77 (72–81) years, 58.2% male, Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score 5.8 (4.9–9.3)) with severe aortic stenosis and 711 patients (59 (52–66) years, 51.9% male) without aortic stenosis were included in this retrospective study. A total of 126 pairs of patients were assembled by Propensity Score Matching. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality using survival analyses stratified by TMAO quartiles. Results: Patients with severe aortic stenosis had higher TMAO levels (3.18 (1.77–6.91) μmol/L vs. 1.78 (1.14–2.68) μmol/L, p < 0.001), and TMAO remained significantly higher after adjusting for baseline characteristics. Higher TMAO level was associated with higher 2-year all-cause mortality (19.2% vs. 9.5%, log-rank p = 0.028) and higher late cumulative mortality (34.2% vs. 19.1%, log-rank p = 0.004). In Cox regression multivariate analysis, higher TMAO level remained an independent predictor (hazard ratio 1.788; 95% CI 1.064–3.005, p = 0.028) of all-cause mortality after adjusting for STS score, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide, and maximum velocity. Conclusions: The TMAO level was higher in aortic stenosis patients. Elevated TMAO was associated with poor adverse outcome after TAVR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Comparative data of the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-3)-defined technical success between bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic stenosis (AS) remain lacking. Aims: We sought to compare the technical success and other clinical outcomes between patients with bicuspid and tricuspid AS receiving transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Methods: A registration-based analysis was performed for 402 patients (211 and 191 cases of bicuspid and tricuspid AS, respectively). The primary outcome was VARC-3-defined technical success. Additional analysis was performed to assess outcomes for up to one year between the two groups. Results: Bicuspid AS patients tended to be younger (74 years vs. 77 years; p < 0.001) with a lower Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (4.4% vs. 5.4%; p = 0.003). Bicuspid AS patients showed a lower prevalence of hypertension and peripheral vascular diseases. Technical failure was encountered in 17.7% of these patients, driven primarily by the high incidence of second valve implantation. The technical success rates were comparable between the bicuspid and tricuspid AS groups (82.5% vs. 82.2%, p = 0.944). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and larger sinotubular junctional diameter (STJ) were identified as predictors of technical failure, whereas CKD, impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), along with larger STJ, were predictors of cardiac technical failure. Technical failure was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality at 30 days and 1 year, as evidenced by the Cox multivariable analysis. Conclusions: No significant differences were observed in the technical success rates and most clinical outcomes between the bicuspid and tricuspid AS groups. Technical failure conferred an increased risk for both 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evidence for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is scarce among patients with non-calcific aortic stenosis, and it is not known whether aortic valve calcification is associated with new cerebral ischemic lesions (CILs) that are detected by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. So, our study enrolled 328 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI using a self-expanding valve between December 2016 and June 2021 from the TORCH registry (NCT02803294). A total of 34 patients were finally confirmed as non-calcific AS and the remaining 294 patients were included in the calcific AS group. Incidence of new CILs (70.6% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.022), number of lesions (2.0 vs. 3.0, p = 0.010), and lesions volume (105.0 mm3 vs. 200.0 mm3, p = 0.047) was significantly lower in the non-calcific AS group. However, the maximum and average lesion volumes were comparable between two groups. Non-calcific AS was associated with lower risk for developing new CILs by univariate logistic regression analysis [Odds ratio (OR): 0.040, 95% confident interval (CI): 0.18–0.90, p = 0.026] and multivariate analysis (OR: 0.031, 95% CI: 0.13–0.76, p = 0.010). In summary, non-calcific AS patients had a lower risk of developing new cerebral ischemic infarction after TAVI compared to calcific AS patients. However, new ischemic lesions were still found in over 70% of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Quadricuspid aortic valve (QAV) is a rare congenital cardiac anomaly associated with symptomatic aortic regurgitation (AR) or aortic stenosis (AS). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for QAV remains uncertain. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from patients with QAV undergoing TAVR in our center and conducted a systematic literature review for further investigation. Results: Five patients with QAV were treated with TAVR between April 2016 and December 2023. The median age was 67 years (range: 59-86), and the median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (STS-score) was 3.750% (range: 0.916%-11.823%). Procedural success was achieved in all cases. The median follow-up period was 3 years (from 30 days to 7 years). Four of the patients exhibited no serious complications, while one experienced delayed coronary obstruction. Our systematic review included 31 cases from 21 publications and our center. The median age of patients was 79 years (range: 57-90), including 18 males. The median STS score was 7.835%. Severe AS was present in 64.5% of the patients and severe AR in 41.9%. The most common QAV subtype was type B (48.4%). Technical success was achieved in 100% of the cases, with two cases reporting coronary obstruction and one required a permanent pacemaker implantation. During a median follow-up period of 1 year (from 30 days to 7 years), one case experienced serious complications of delayed coronary obstruction. Conclusion: The TAVR may be an alternative treatment for patients with QAV, preliminarily demonstrating feasible early and long-term results from current experience. However, extra precautions regarding coronary artery obstruction complications are necessary due to the rarity and anatomical complexity of QAV., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2025 Wenjing Sheng et al. Cardiology Research and Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: The high incidence of coronary artery heart disease (CHD) poses a significant burden and challenge to public health systems globally. Effective prevention and early diagnosis of CHD have become key strategies to alleviate this burden. This study aims to explore the application of advanced machine learning techniques to enhance the accuracy of early screening and risk assessment for CHD., Methods: A total of 49 490 study subjects from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database spanning from 1999 to 2018 were included. The dataset was randomly divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. The dependent variable (outcome variable) was whether the subjects were informed of a CHD diagnosis, categorizing them into a CHD group and a non-CHD group. We reviewed the literature on risk factors associated with CHD, ultimately including 68 independent variables. The variable characteristics of the study subjects were analyzed, comparing differences between the CHD and non-CHD groups. Machine learning algorithms, specifically random forest (randomForest&#95;4.7-1.1) and XGBoost (xgboost&#95;1.7.7.1) were utilized for variable selection. A comprehensive analysis of the top 10 variables identified by these 2 algorithms were conducted, selecting those mutually recognized by both. A generalized linear model was used to analyze the relationships between variables and CHD, and classical logistic regression was used to construct the CHD risk prediction model. The model's ability to distinguish between CHD and non-CHD individuals was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC); calibration measurements were conducted with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test to evaluate the consistency between predicted values and actual CHD proportions; and decision curve analysis was applied to evaluate the clinical benefits of the model's risk prediction. Finally, a nomogram was constructed to visually present the risk scoring of the final model., Results: The mean age of the overall population was (49.53±18.31) years, with males comprising 51.8%. Compared to the non-CHD group, the CHD group was older [(69.05± 11.32) years vs (48.67±18.07) years, P <0.001], had a higher proportion of females (67.1% vs 47.4%, P <0.001), and exhibited statistically significant differences in classical cardiovascular risk factors such as body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and smoking (all P <0.001). Additionally, there were statistically significant differences in non-classical cardiovascular factors, such as energy intake, vitamins E, vitamin K, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, zinc, copper, sodium, potassium, and selenium (all P <0.05). Six key variables most associated with CHD occurrence were ultimately identified. The CHD risk prediction model constructed was as follows: logit(p)= -7.783+0.074×age+0.003×creatinine-0.003×platelets+0.257×glycated hemoglobin+0.003× uric acid+0.101×coefficient of variation of red cell distribution width. The model demonstrated excellent discriminative ability in predicting CHD, with an accuracy of 0.712 and an AUC of 0.841. Calibration curves indicated good consistency between predicted probabilities and actual values in both the training and testing sets, demonstrating model stability and reliability. Decision curve analysis suggested that the model provided net benefits across a range of threshold probabilities, supporting its potential application in clinical decision-making., Conclusions: This study successfully identified potential risk factors for CHD using machine learning techniques and developed a concise and practical clinical prediction model. Further prospective clinical cohort studies are needed to validate its potential for clinical application, enabling effective cardiovascular disease prevention and intervention strategies in real-world healthcare settings.

Background: Coronary occlusion is an uncommon but fatal complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a poor prognosis., Case Presentation: A patient with symptomatic severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis was admitted to a high-volume center specializing in transfemoral TAVR with self-expanding valves. No anatomical risk factors of coronary occlusion were identified on pre-procedural computed tomography analysis. The patient was scheduled for a transfemoral TAVR with a self-expanding valve. Balloon pre-dilatation prior to prosthesis implantation was routinely used for assessing the supra-annular structure and assessing the risk of coronary occlusion. Immediately after the tubular balloon inflation, fluoroscopy revealed that the right coronary artery was not visible, and the flow in the left coronary artery was reduced. The patient would be at high-risk of coronary occlusion if a long stent self-expanding valve was implanted. Therefore, our heart team decided to suspend the ongoing procedure. A transapical TAVR with a 23 mm J-valve was performed 3 days later. The prosthesis was deployed at a proper position without blocking the coronary ostia and the final fluoroscopy showed normal flow in bilateral coronary arteries with the same filling as preoperatively., Discussion: Our successful case highlights the importance of a comprehensive assessment of coronary risk and a thorough understanding of the TAVR procedure for the heart team. A short-stent prosthesis is feasible for patients at high risk of coronary occlusion. Most importantly TAVR should be called off even if the catheter has been introduced when an extremely high risk of coronary obstruction is identified during the procedure and no solution can be found., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Dai, Zhou, Fan, Wang, Yidilisi, Zhu, Jiang, Li, Liu and Wang.)

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) might be a feasible treatment option for more patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis. However, long-term follow-up data in this population are scarce., Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate three-year outcomes after TAVI in patients with BAV., Methods: A total of 246 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI at a single centre in China between March 2013 and February 2018 were enrolled in this study. Clinical outcomes, health status and echocardiography were followed and recorded for three years., Results: Among 109 (44.3%) BAV patients, 61.5% were Type 0 and 36.7% were Type 1 BAV patients. BAV patients were younger (75 vs 77 years, p=0.041) and had a lower Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (5.09 vs 6.00, p=0.026) compared to tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients. There were no differences in three-year survival rates between bicuspid and tricuspid patients (87.1% vs 79.5%, log-rank p=0.126). Multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusting for confounding factors revealed a similar risk of all-cause mortality in the BAV population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-1.70, p=0.666). Except for the rate of permanent pacemaker implantation that was lower in BAV patients (11.9% vs 21.9%, p=0.041), the incidence of other clinical adverse events was comparable between the two groups. Both BAV and TAV patients showed an obvious improvement in valve haemodynamics, which was sustained for three years. In addition, similar left ventricular reverse remodelling was found during follow-up., Conclusions: BAV patients showed similar satisfactory three-year clinical outcomes, persistent valve haemodynamics improvement, and obvious cardiac reverse remodelling after TAVI compared to TAV patients.

Background In the recent decades, the development of novel digital health technologies enables doctors to monitor ECG and vital signs remotely. But the data on applying the noninvasive wearable smartwatch on patients with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are unknown. Methods and Results We performed a prospective, observational cohort study to evaluate the feasibility of a novel, virtual, and remote health care strategy for patients with TAVR discharged to home with smart wearable devices. A total of 100 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent elective transfemoral TAVR were enrolled and received the Huawei smartwatch at least 1 day before TAVR. Vital signs, including heart rate, rhythm, oxygen saturation, and activity, were continuously recorded. Single-lead ECG was recorded twice per day in the week following TAVR discharge and at least 2 days a week for the subsequent month after TAVR discharge. A designated heart team member provided remote health care with the data from the smartwatch when the patient had a need. Thirty-eight cardiac events were reported in 34 patients after discharge, with most of the events (76.0%) detected and confirmed by the smartwatch. Six patients were advised and readmitted to the hospital for arrhythmia events detected by the smartwatch, of whom 4 patients received pacemaker implantation. The remaining 28 (82.4%) patients received telemedicine monitoring instead of face-to-face clinical visits, and 3 of them received new medication treatment under the online guidance of doctors. New-onset left branch bundle block was found in 48 patients, with transient characteristics, and recovered spontaneously in 30 patients, and new-onset atrial fibrillation was detected in 4 patients. There were no significant differences in the average weekly heart rates or the ratio of abnormal or low oxygen saturation when compared with the baseline. The average daily steps increased over time significantly (baseline, 870±1353 steps; first week, 1986±2406 steps; second week, 2707±2716 steps; third week, 3059±3036 steps; fourth week, 3678±3485 steps, P <0.001). Conclusions Smartwatches can facilitate remote health care for patients discharged to home after undergoing TAVR and enable a novel remote follow-up strategy. The majority of cardiac clinical events that occurred within 30-day follow-up were detected by the smartwatch, mainly because of the record of conduction abnormality. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04454177.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is not the preferred therapy for pure aortic regurgitation (AR). Extremely horizontal aorta (aorta root angle ≥70°) is regarded as an "off-label" use in self-expanding TAVR. This case series enrolled 7 consecutive pure AR patients who had extremely horizontal aorta and underwent self-expanding TAVR from the TORCH registry. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report successful self-expanding TAVR for pure AR with extremely horizontal aorta, revealing the feasibility of both transapical and transfemoral TAVR in this challenging population.

Background: Subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) is an important sequela that compromises the durability of the bioprosthetic valve. Objectives: To better determine the effect of SLT in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), we performed a retrospective assessment of CT-defined SLT in BAV and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) stenotic patients. Methods: We consecutively collected patients undergoing the TAVR between August 2015 and March 2020 in our center. A total of 170 BAV and 201 TAV cases were enrolled. Multidetector computed tomography was performed within 30 days and at 1-year. Results: Twenty cases in the BAV group and 19 cases in the TAV group had hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) in 30 days (12.5 vs. 9.9%, p = 0.449), and 52 cases in BAV and 61 cases in TAV had the HALT (34.9 vs. 36.7%, p = 0.733) at 1-year follow-up. The mean aortic gradient (MAG) and effective orifice areas (EOA) values were comparable between the two groups at 30 days (HALT vs. no HALT; 10.8 ± 4.8 vs. 11.3 ± 6.0, p = 0.638; 1.6 ± 0.4 vs. 1.6 ± 0.3, p = 0.724), and still, no difference was observed in the MAG at 1-year (11.5 ± 5.6 vs. 10.6 ± 5.1, p = 0.164). However, the EOA at 1-year was statistically different between the two groups (1.5 ± 0.3 vs. 1.6 ± 0.4, p = 0.004). The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated the anticoagulation and age as independent predictors both in the BAV and TAV groups at 1-year. There was no difference in clinical events between the HALT and no HALT group in relevant to BAV or TAV at 1-year follow-up. Conclusions: The presence of subclinical leaflet thrombosis defined by the CT was comparable between the BAV and TAV in the first year after the TAVR procedure. Age and anticoagulation were the independent predictors of the subclinical leaflet thrombosis at 1 year after the TAVR. There was no difference in relevant clinical events between the BAV and TAV groups at 1-year follow-up., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Zhu, Fan, Zhou, Dai, Zhu, He, Guo, Wang, Liu and Wang.)