1. New Decision Criteria for Selecting Delta Check Methods Based on the Ratio of the Delta Difference to the Width of the Reference Range Can Be Generally Applicable for Each Clinical Chemistry Test Item
- Author
-
Sang Hyuk Park, Sail Chun, So-Young Kim, Woochang Lee, and Won Ki Min
- Subjects
Delta ,Clinical Biochemistry ,Delta check ,Decision tree ,Reference range ,Clinical Chemistry Tests ,Delta (difference) ,Blood Urea Nitrogen ,Laboratory Informatics ,Test item ,Rate difference ,Reference Values ,Renal Dialysis ,Biological variation ,Statistics ,Detection methods ,Medicine ,Humans ,Aspartate Aminotransferases ,Chemoembolization, Therapeutic ,Decision criteria ,business.industry ,Biochemistry (medical) ,Decision Trees ,Alanine Transaminase ,Bilirubin ,General Medicine ,Multiple-criteria decision analysis ,Alkaline Phosphatase ,Creatine ,Uric Acid ,Original Article ,business - Abstract
Background: Many laboratories use 4 delta check methods: delta difference, delta percent change, rate difference, and rate percent change. However, guidelines regarding decision criteria for selecting delta check methods have not yet been provided. We present new decision criteria for selecting delta check methods for each clinical chemistry test item. Methods: We collected 811,920 and 669,750 paired (present and previous) test results for 27 clinical chemistry test items from inpatients and outpatients, respectively. We devised new decision criteria for the selection of delta check methods based on the ratio of the delta difference to the width of the reference range (DD/RR). Delta check methods based on these criteria were compared with those based on the CV% of the absolute delta difference (ADD) as well as those reported in 2 previous studies. Results: The delta check methods suggested by new decision criteria based on the DD/ RR ratio corresponded well with those based on the CV% of the ADD except for only 2 items each in inpatients and outpatients. Delta check methods based on the DD/RR ratio also corresponded with those suggested in the 2 previous studies, except for 1 and 7 items in inpatients and outpatients, respectively. Conclusions: The DD/RR method appears to yield more feasible and intuitive selection criteria and can easily explain changes in the results by refl ecting both the biological variation of the test item and the clinical characteristics of patients in each laboratory. We suggest this as a measure to determine delta check methods.
- Published
- 2012