Search

Several clinical trials have demonstrated that antiretroviral (ARV) drugs taken as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can prevent HIV infection, with the magnitude of protection ranging from -49 to 86% (refs. ). Although these divergent outcomes are thought to be due primarily to differences in product adherence, biological factors likely contribute. Despite selective recruitment of higher-risk participants for prevention trials, HIV risk is heterogeneous even within higher-risk groups. To determine whether this heterogeneity could influence patient outcomes following PrEP, we undertook a post hoc prospective analysis of results from the CAPRISA 004 trial for 1% tenofovir gel (n = 774 patients), one of the first trials to demonstrate protection against HIV infection. Concentrations of nine proinflammatory cytokines were measured in cervicovaginal lavages at [greater than] 2,000 visits, and a graduated cytokine score was used to define genital inflammation. In women without genital inflammation, tenofovir was 57% protective against HIV (95% confidence interval (CI): 7-80%) but was 3% protective (95% CI: -104-54%) if genital inflammation was present. Among women who highly adhered to the gel, tenofovir protection was 75% (95% CI: 25-92%) in women without inflammation compared to -10% (95% CI: -184-57%) in women with inflammation. Immunological predictors of HIV risk may modify the effectiveness of tools for HIV prevention; reducing genital inflammation in women may augment HIV prevention efforts., Author(s): Lyle R McKinnon (corresponding author) [1, 2, 3]; Lenine J Liebenberg [1, 3]; Nonhlanhla Yende-Zuma [1]; Derseree Archary [1, 3]; Sinaye Ngcapu [1, 3]; Aida Sivro [1, 2, 3]; [...]

Background: Topically delivered tenofovir (TFV) from intravaginal rings, tablets, or gels is being evaluated for HIV prevention. We previously demonstrated that TFV delivered vaginally by gel protected macaques from vaginal infection with SHIV. Here we investigated efficacy of the TFV gel against vaginal transmission of a TFV-resistant SHIV containing the K65R mutation (SHIV162P3K65R) and its relationship to drug levels in vaginal tissues. Results: SHIV162P3K65R shows approximately a 5-fold reduction in susceptibility to TFV compared to wild-type SHIV. Efficacy was evaluated in pig-tailed macaques exposed vaginally twice-weekly (up to 10 weeks) to SHIV162P3K65R 30 min after receiving placebo (n = 6) or 1% TFV (n = 6) gel. Four of the six controls were infected after a median of 5 exposures. In contrast, five of six macaques that received TFV gel remained uninfected after 20 vaginal SHIV162P3K65R exposures, resulting in an estimated efficacy of 75%. The mean intracellular TFV-diphosphate (TFV-DP) concentrations in vaginal lymphocytes 4 h after a single gel dose were found to be high (1,631 fmol/106 cells, range 492-3,847) and within the in vitro IC75 range (1,206 fmol/106 cells) for SHIV162P3K65R. Conclusion: Both the modest resistance conferred by K65R and the high TFV-DP exposure in vaginal lymphocytes, likely explain the observed protection. The findings in this model do not predict complete loss of protection by topical TFV against vaginal exposure to HIV-1K65R viruses and provide a tissue drug target for high efficacy. These data will facilitate the development of TFV delivery platforms that have high activity on both wild-type and TFV-resistant viruses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention is a novel biomedical prevention method. We have previously modeled PrEP during rectal SHIV exposures in macaques and identified that Simian/Human Immunodeficiency Virus chimera (SHIV)-specific T-cell responses were induced in the presence of antiretroviral drugs, an observation previously termed T-cell chemo-vaccination. This report expands those initial findings by examining a larger group of macaques that were given oral or topical PrEP during repeated vaginal virus exposure., Methods: Thirty-six female pigtail macaques received up to 20 repeat low-dose vaginal inoculations with wild-type (WT) SHIVSF162P3 (n = 24) or a clonal derivative with the tenofovir (TFV) K65R drug-resistant mutation (n = 12). PrEP consisted of oral Truvada (n = 6, WT), TFV vaginal gel (n = 6, K65R), or TFV intravaginal ring (n = 6, WT). The remaining animals were PrEP-inexperienced controls (n = 12, WT; n = 6, K65R). SHIV-specific T cells were identified and characterized using interferon γ Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot (ELISPOT) and multiparameter flow cytometry., Results: Of 9 animals that were on PrEP and remained uninfected during WT SHIV vaginal challenges, 8 (88.9%) developed virus-specific T-cell responses. T cells were in CD4 and CD8 compartments, reached up to 4900 interferon γ-producing cells per million peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and primarily pol directed. In contrast, the replication-impaired K65R virus did not induce detectable T-cell responses, likely reflecting the need for adequate replication., Conclusions: Virus-specific T-cell responses occur frequently in oral or topical PrEP-protected pigtail macaques after vaginal exposure to WT SHIV virus. The contribution of such immune responses to protection from infection during and after PrEP warrants further investigation.