Search

Objectives: Changes in the contractual responsibilities of primary care practitioners and health boards have resulted in a plethora of arrangements relating to out-of-hours healthcare services. Rather than being guaranteed access to a GP (usually either their own or another through a local GP co-operative), patients have a number of alternative routes to services. Our objective was to identify and assess the availability and adequacy of relevant standards, responsibilities and information systems in Scotland to monitor the impact of contractual changes to out-of-hours healthcare services on equity of access.Design: Cross-sectional study.Setting: All providers of primary care out-of-hours services in Scotland.Participants: Not applicable.Main Outcome Measures: First, identification and policy review of current standards and performance monitoring systems, data and information, primarily through directly contacting national and local organizations responsible for monitoring out-of-hours care, supplemented by literature searches to highlight specific issues arising from the review; and second, mapping of data items by out-of-hours provider type to identify overlap and significant gaps.Results: In Scotland, data monitoring systems have not kept pace with changes in the organization of out-of-hours care, so the impact on access to services for different population groups is unknown. There are significant gaps in information collected with respect to workforce, distribution of services, service utilisation and clinical outcomes.Conclusions: Since 2004 there have been major changes to the way patients access out-of-hours healthcare in the UK. In Scotland, none of the current systems provide information on whether the new services satisfy the key NHS principle of equity of access. There is an urgent need for a comprehensive review of data standards and systems relating to out-of-hours care in order to monitor and evaluate inputs, processes and outcomes of care not least in respect of access and fairness of distribution of resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Situation Reports (SitReps) is an internal Department of Health performance data collecting system. Although intended primarily for internal use, the data are also used to answer parliamentary questions, brief ministers and to inform national performance indicators. This paper reviews the data collection system and data-set, and shows how it can be used to evaluate delays in hospital discharge under the Community Care (Delayed Discharges etc.) Act 2003. However, limitations in the data include the fact that the data have only recently been extended to National Health Service (NHS) non-acute settings and do not include NHS patients in the private acute sector. Further, as the data-set derives from a weekly aggregate return rather than from individualized person-based records, it cannot be used to evaluate length of delay, or to link to other relevant data such as emergency readmissions. The provision of individualized data to facilitate linkage and extending coverage would increase its potential future use. Categories of delay should be further refined to facilitate monitoring of delays due to disputes about eligibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors describe the complexity of the financing arrangements of primary care premises. They explain how the early vision of integrating health and social services within local health centres failed to be realized, with GP-owned practice premises remaining as the dominant model. There was a switch to private finance when the government loan body (General Practice Finance Corporation) was privatized in 1989. Although capital can now be freely raised by the private sector for investment in the National Health Service (NHS), these debts have to be repaid through NHS funds or user charges. The complexity, combined with demographic factors, makes it likely that as GPs opt for the Personal Medical Services (PMS) scheme and a salaried service, the trend towards for-profit corporations owning and buying out GP premises will accelerate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter is presented in response to the article "Dismantling the signposts to public health? NHS data under the Health and Social Care Act 2012" by Allyson M. Pollock, Alison Macfarlane and Sylvia Godden in the April 2012 issue; a response by Pollock and colleagues to this letter is also included.