Search

Antecedentes: La elevada prevalencia de hipovitaminosis D en España es considerada una verdadera epidemia con importantes implicaciones para la salud por las múltiples funciones que ejerce la vitamina D tanto a nivel esquelético como extraesquelético. Para que las personas con insuficiencia o deficiencia en vitamina D alcancen los niveles séricos más adecuados, deben recibir suplementos de vitamina D. Este estudio se realizó con la finalidad de evaluar si en la práctica clínica habitual, el manejo de la hipovitaminosis D era llevada a cabo según las recomendaciones internacionales establecidas por las sociedades científicas. Métodos: Se realizaron dos rondas de circulación de un cuestionario Delphi entre un panel formado por médicos prescriptores habituales de vitamina D. Resultados: En general, los médicos del panel reconocieron la alta prevalencia de la hipovitaminosis D en España, la necesidad del cribado en los distintos grupos de riesgo y los beneficios de la suplementación en los pacientes con insuficiencia o déficit de vitamina D. Sin embargo, no se alcanzó el consenso en algunas de las aseveraciones relacionadas con los métodos de cuantificación de la vitamina D o con las recomendaciones para el manejo de la hipovitaminosis D. Conclusiones: La ausencia de acuerdo para algunos de los ítems reveló la necesidad de realizar acciones formativas destinadas a proporcionar un conocimiento adecuado y actualizado sobre las evidencias científicas y las recomendaciones para la práctica clínica de la suplementación de vitamina D.

This article reports on the sixth scientific workshop of the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] on the pathogenesis of extraintestinal manifestations [EIMs] in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. This paper has been drafted by 15 ECCO members and 6 external experts [in rheumatology, dermatology, ophthalmology, and immunology] from 10 European countries and the USA. Within the workshop, contributors formed subgroups to address specific areas. Following a comprehensive literature search, the supporting text was finalized under the leadership of the heads of the working groups before being integrated by the group consensus leaders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and tolerance of infliximab in ulcerative colitis. Methods Selection of studies: evaluating efficacy of infliximab in ulcerative colitis. For the meta-analysis, randomized clinical trials comparing infliximab vs. placebo/steroids. Search strategy: electronic and manual. Study quality: independently assessed by two reviewers. Data synthesis: meta-analysis combining the odds ratios (OR). Results Thirty-four studies (896 patients) evaluated infliximab therapy in UC, with heterogeneous results. Mean short-term (2.3 weeks) response and remission with infliximab was 68% (95% CI 65–71%) and 40% (36–44%). Mean long-term (8.9 months) response and remission was 53% (49–56%) and 39% (35–42%). Five randomized double-blind studies compared infliximab with placebo, the meta-analysis showing an advantage ( P < 0.001) of infliximab in all endpoints (short-/long-term response/remission): ORs from 2.7 to 4.6, and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) from 3 to 5. Similar infliximab response was calculated independently of the indication (steroid-refractory/non-steroid-refractory) or the dose (5/10 mg/kg). Adverse effects were reported in 83% and 75% of the infliximab and placebo-treated patients (OR = 1.52; 95% CI 1.03–2.24; number-needed-to-harm (NNH) was 14). Conclusion Infliximab is more effective than placebo, with an NNT from 3 to 5, for the treatment of moderate-to-severe UC, achieving clinical remission in 40% of the patients at approximately 9 months of follow-up. Further studies are necessary to confirm the long-term efficacy of infliximab in ulcerative colitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ustekinumab is approved for ulcerative colitis (UC)., Aims: To assess the durability of ustekinumab in patients with UC and its short-term effectiveness, durability and tolerability in clinical practice., Methods: Retrospective, multicentre study of patients who had received their first ustekinumab dose at least 16 weeks before inclusion. Patients were followed until treatment discontinuation or last visit. Only patients with active disease at the start of ustekinumab treatment were considered in the effectiveness analysis. Patients who stopped ustekinumab before their last visit were considered not to be in subsequent remission., Results: We included 620 patients; 155 (25%) discontinued ustekinumab during follow-up (median 12 months). Rate of discontinuation was 20% per patient-year of follow-up. Anaemia at baseline (hazard ratio, HR 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.1), steroids at baseline (HR 1.5; 95% CI 1.06-2.08) and more severe clinical activity at baseline (HR 1.5; 95% CI 1.09-2.06) were associated with higher risk of discontinuation. At the end of induction, 226 (40%) patients were in steroid-free clinical remission. Moderate-severe vs mild disease activity at baseline (odds ratio [OR] 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.5), male sex (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.4-0.8), and increased number of previous biologics (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.6-0.8) were associated with lower likelihood of steroid-free clinical remission at week 16. One hundred and seventy-six patients (28%) had at least one adverse event. We observed no negative impact of ustekinumab on extraintestinal manifestations and/or immune-mediated diseases., Conclusions: Ustekinumab durability in UC was relatively high, and treatment was effective in highly refractory patients. The safety profile was consistent with previous studies., (© 2024 The Author(s). Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: We aimed to (1) analyze the applicability of the updated Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE-II) recommendations in real-world clinical practice, (2) identify barriers to their implementation, and (3) propose practical measures to overcome these obstacles., Methods: This qualitative study was based on a survey, a literature review, and expert opinions. Nine inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experts identified 7 areas likely to be controversial or potential implementation barriers in daily clinical practice: endoscopy, histology, ultrasound, quality of life, biomarkers, symptom control, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Based on this, a survey was carried out among educational course participants. The experts discussed the literature review and survey results and proposed several statements and practical actions., Results: A total of 55 gastroenterologists answered the survey. The reported difficulty level in reaching STRIDE-II treatment goals in clinical practice was high. Only 22% of participants performed clinical remission assessments using clinical indexes and PROs. Seventy percent of responders did not use fecal calprotectin cutoffs and considered changes from the previous levels instead. Mucosal healing as a long-term therapeutic goal was considered necessary to be individualized in specific patient subgroups (eg, elderly/fragile patients, multiple treatment failures, and last-line therapies). Other barriers, like the lack of access to imaging techniques or insufficient knowledge and skills among healthcare professionals, were detected. The experts suggested adding less stringent treatment goals and measurements, patient stratification, local adaptations, educational activities, and research., Conclusions: STRIDE-II recommendations face various implementation barriers needing careful evaluation in order to enhance their adoption in clinical practice, and ultimately improve outcomes in IBD patients., Competing Interests: ER has received support for congress and conference attendance, speaker fees, research support, or consulting fees from MSD, Abbvie, Ferring, Janssen, Otsuka, Pfizer, Takeda, Faes Farma, Galapagos, Kern Pharma, Lilly, and Fresenius-Kabi. DG has received support for congress and conference attendance, speaker fees, or consulting fees from MSD, Abbvie, Ferring, Janssen, Adacyte, Pfizer, Takeda, Faes Farma, Galapagos, Kern Pharma, Lilly, and Fresenius-Kabi. I M-J has been a speaker, consultant, and advisory member for or has received research funding from Abbvie, Amgen, Chiesi, Dr. Falk Pharma, Faes Farma, Ferring, Fresenius, Galapagos, Gebro Pharma, Janssen, Kern Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sandoz, Shire Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Tillotts Pharma, and Vifor Pharma. LM has been a speaker, consultant, or advisory member for or has received unrestricted grants from MSD, Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, Biogen, Galapagos, Kern Pharma, Lilly Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, Tillotts, Dr. Falk Pharma, Ferring, Medtronic, and General Electric. DC has been a speaker, consultant, or advisory member for or has received unrestricted grants from Abbvie, Dr Falk Pharma, Faes, Ferring, Galapagos, Johnson & Johnson, Kern Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda, and Tillots. The rest of the authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn's & Colitis Foundation.)

It is widely acknowledged that inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with a high prevalence of sexual dysfunction (SD). However, there is a notable paucity of specific literature in this field. This lack of information impacts various aspects, including the understanding and comprehensive care of SD in the context of IBD. Furthermore, patients themselves express a lack of necessary attention in this area within the treatment of their disease, thus creating an unmet need in terms of their well-being. The aim of this position statement by the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) is to provide a review on the most relevant aspects and potential areas of improvement in the detection, assessment, and management of SD in patients with IBD and to integrate the approach to sexual health into our clinical practice. Recommendations are established based on available scientific evidence and expert opinion. The development of these recommendations by GETECCU has been carried out through a collaborative multidisciplinary approach involving gastroenterologists, gynecologists, urologists, surgeons, nurses, psychologists, sexologists, and, of course, patients with IBD., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite research, there are still controversial areas in the management of Crohn's disease (CD)., Objective: To establish practical recommendations on using anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs in patients with moderate-to-severe CD., Methods: Clinical controversies in the management of CD using anti-TNF therapies were identified. A comprehensive literature review was performed, and a national survey was launched to examine current clinical practices when using anti-TNF therapies. Their results were discussed by expert gastroenterologists within a nominal group meeting, and a set of statements was proposed and tested in a Delphi process., Results: Qualitative study. The survey and Delphi process were sent to 244 CD-treating physicians (response rate: 58%). A total of 14 statements were generated. All but two achieved agreement. These statements cover: (1) use of first-line non-anti-TNF biological therapy; (2) role of HLA-DQA1*05 in daily practice; (3) attitudes in primary non-response and loss of response to anti-TNF therapy due to immunogenicity; (4) use of ustekinumab or vedolizumab if a change in action mechanism is warranted; (5) anti-TNF drug level monitoring; (6) combined therapy with an immunomodulator., Conclusion: This document sought to pull together the best evidence, experts' opinions, and treating physicians' attitudes when using anti-TNF therapies in patients with CD., Competing Interests: Competing interests: IM-J has served as a speaker, consultant, or advisory member for or has received unrestricted grants from Dr Falk Pharma, Galapagos, Tillotts, Otsuka, Sandoz, MSD, AbbVie, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, Amgen, Kern Pharma, and Ferring. GB has served as a speaker, consultant, or advisory member for or has received unrestricted grants from AbbVie, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, Galapagos, Kern Pharma, Tillotts, and Ferring. ER has served as a speaker, consultant, or advisory member for or has received research funding from MSD, AbbVie, Takeda, Janssen, Galapagos, Fresenius Kabi, Pfizer, Amgen, Kern Pharma, and Ferring. YG-L has served as a speaker, consultant, or advisory member for or has received unrestricted grants from MSD, AbbVie, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, Amgen, Kern Pharma, and Ferring. LM has served as a speaker, consultant or advisory member for or has received unrestricted grants from MSD, AbbVie, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, Biogen, Galapagos, Kern Pharma, Tillotts, Dr Falk Pharma, Ferring, Medtronic, and General Electric. DG has served as a speaker, consultant, or advisory member for or has received unrestricted grants from AbbVie, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, Biogen, Adacyte, Sandoz, and Ferring. DC has served as a speaker, consultant, or advisory member for or has received unrestricted grants from AbbVie, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, Adacyte, Galapagos, Fresenius-Kabi, and Ferring. FM has served as a speaker, consultant, or advisory member for or has received unrestricted grants from AbbVie, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, and Ferring. DC has served as a speaker, consultant or advisory member for or has received unrestricted grants from AbbVie, Fresenius-Kabi, Ferring, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Kern, MSD, Pfizer, and Takeda., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Identifying novel treatment strategies for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and at risk of relapse is critical. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in lowering fecal calprotectin (FC) levels in UC patients in clinical remission and at risk of relapse., Methods: This multicenter study comprised a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase (part I) and an open-label, non-randomized phase (part II). Eligible participants with UC in clinical remission treated with 5-aminosalicylic acid and with FC levels ≥250 μg/g were randomized to receive 5 mg/day of BDP or placebo for 4 weeks (part I). At week 5, patients with FC ≥100 μg/g were treated with 5 mg/day of BDP for 4 weeks (part II), and FC levels were tested at week 9., Results: Forty-three patients were randomized: 22 received BDP (group A) and 21 placebo (group B). At week 4, 13 patients (59.1%) in group A and 3 (17.6%) in group B had FC levels <100 μg/g (p value = 0.010). In the double-blind phase of the study, no patient relapsed in group A and 4 in group B (p value = 0.049). Both treatment groups showed a favorable safety profile, with the most common adverse events being gastrointestinal disorders., Conclusion: In this multicenter, randomized clinical trial including patients with UC in clinical remission but with elevated FC, BDP was efficacious in reducing FC and well-tolerated., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: To assess and improve the level of implementation of the recommendations for the psychological management of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and associated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)., Methods: Qualitative study. We performed a narrative literature review to identify the recommendations for the psychological management of SpA and associated IBD and to explore their level of implementation. Based on the findings, we developed a national survey to assess: (1) current level of knowledge and implementation of the recommendations; (2) attitudes towards the recommendations; and (3) barriers and facilitators to their implementation. The results of the review and survey were discussed by a multidisciplinary group of 9 expert rheumatologists and gastroenterologists, who defined implementation strategies to increase the uptake of the recommendations., Results: The review included 4 articles, 2 of them included direct recommendations on the identification and management of psychological problems in patients with SpA and IBD. None assessed the level of implementation of the recommendations in routine clinical practice. Our survey showed a great lack of awareness and implementation of the recommendations, even though psychological issues are very relevant for health professionals. Lack of time, resources, and knowledge are considered the main barriers to adherence to the recommendations. We propose several implementation strategies related to educational activities, clinical practice, and others to increase the uptake of reported recommendations., Conclusions: Further research and efforts are required to achieve behaviour changes in clinical practice to improve the identification and management of psychological problems and needs in patients with SpA and IBD., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

Background and study aims  Rates of new dysplastic lesions or cancer progression after first dye chromoendoscopy in the era of high-definition endoscopy have yet to be determined. Patients and methods  A multicenter, population-based, retrospective cohort study was performed in seven hospitals in Spain. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease and fully resected (R0) dysplastic colon lesions under surveillance with high-definition dye-based chromoendoscopy were sequentially enrolled between February 2011 and June 2017, with a minimum endoscopic follow-up of 36 months. The aim was to assess the incidence of developing more advanced metachronous neoplasia by analyzing possible associated risk factors. Results  The study sample included 99 patients and 148 index lesions (145 low-grade dysplasia lesions and three high-grade dysplasia [HGD] lesions with a mean follow-up of 48.76 months [IQR: 36.34-67.15]). The overall incidence of new dysplastic lesions was 0.23 per 100 patient-years, 1.15 per 100 patients at 5 years and 2.29 per 100 patients at 10 years. A history of dysplasia was associated with a higher risk of developing any grade of dysplasia during follow-up ( P  = 0.025), whereas left colon lesions were associated with a lower risk ( P  = 0.043). The incidence of more advanced lesions at 1 year and 10 years was 1 % and 14 % respectively, with lesion size > 1 cm being a risk factor ( P  = 0.041). One of the eight patients (13 %) with HGD lesions developed colorectal cancer during follow-up. Conclusions  The risk of dysplasia progressing to advanced neoplasia and, specifically, the risk of new neoplastic lesions after endoscopic resection of colitis-associated dysplasia, are both very low., Competing Interests: Competing interests Dra. B. Sicilia has received support for conference attendance, speaker fees, research support and consulting fees of Abbvie, FAES, Chiesi, Dr. Falk, MSD, Tillots Pharma, Khern Pharma, Janssen, Pfizer y Takeda., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a high impact. In order to improve patient outcomes, the clinician-patient relationship in daily practice is critical. Clinical guidelines provide a framework for UC diagnosis and treatment. However, standard procedures and the medical content focused upon medical consultations in UC patients has not yet been defined. Moreover, UC is a complex disease, given that patient characteristics and patient needs have been proven to vary during clinical consultation since establishing the diagnosis and upon the course of the disease. In this article, we have discussed the key elements and specific objectives to consider in medical consultation, such as diagnosis, first visits, follow-up visits, active disease patients, patients on topical therapies, new treatment initiation, refractory patients, extra-intestinal manifestations, as well as challenging situations. The key elements have been mentioned to comprise effective communication techniques, motivational interviewing (MI), as well as information and educational aspects, or organizational issues. The key elements to be implemented in daily practice were reported to comprise several general principles like duly prepared consultations, in addition to honesty and empathy with patients, as well as effective communication techniques, MI, information and educational points, or organizational issues. The role of other healthcare professionals such as specialized nurses, psychologists, or the use of checklists was also discussed and commented on., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: Fortes P and Cábez A are employees of Pfizer (Spain). González-Lama Y, Casellas F, and Ricart E have received consultancy fees from Pfizer S.L.U. for their work in this project but have no other relevant financial relationships to disclose. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript apart from those disclosed. González-Lama Y received research funding from AbbVie, Ferring, MSD, Takeda, Janssen, and Pfizer; speaker fees from AbbVie, Ferring, Gebro, Takeda, and Janssen. Casellas F received research funding from AbbVie, Ferring, MSD, Shire, Takeda, Zambon and Pfizer; speaker fees from AbbVie, Chiesi, Ferring, Gebro, MSD, Shire, Takeda, and Zambon., (©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is frequent and, in case of low drug levels, treatment intensification is recommended. In addition, in cases in which clinical response without attainment of remission (clinical, endoscopic, or radiological), intensification could be justified since higher drug levels are associated with better outcomes. For adalimumab (ADA), the standard intensification regimen is 40 mg every week (ew). Availability of ADA 80 mg prefilled pens has enabled every other week (eow) intensification. We assessed the clinical efficacy of intensification with ADA 80 mg eow., Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Spain. Patients with IBD receiving maintenance ADA 80 mg eow with clinical, biomarker, and drug-level assessments were included. Demographics and clinical, biological, and endoscopic evaluation of the disease before and after ADA intensification, and pharmacokinetic assessments, were collected., Results: Eighty-seven patients (72 Crohn's disease, 15 ulcerative colitis; average age 50 years) were included. Reasons for ADA intensification were: low ADA levels-<5 µg mL -1 -(17%), low ADA levels-<5 µg mL -1 -without clinical response (63%), clinical response without clinical remission (15%) and active disease on objective evaluation (including colonoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, capsule endoscopy, and/or intestinal ultrasound; 5%). Following treatment intensification to ADA 80 mg eow, 75 patients (86%) were in clinical remission and 69 (79.3%) were in biologic remission (clinical remission and normalization of biomarkers). After a median follow-up of 19 months (interquartile range 13-25), 63 patients (72%) remained on treatment and in clinical remission. There were no serious infections, hospitalizations, or deaths. Drug costs did not increase with the 80 mg eow regimen versus a standard intensification regimen., Conclusions: ADA intensification to 80 mg eow was safe, effective, and did not increase drug costs versus standard intensification to 40 mg ew in our experience., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn's & Colitis Foundation.)

(1) Scant information is available concerning the characteristics that may favour the acquisition of COVID-19 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess these differences between infected and noninfected patients with IBD. (2) This nationwide case−control study evaluated patients with inflammatory bowel disease with COVID-19 (cases) and without COVID-19 (controls) during the period March−July 2020 included in the ENEIDA of GETECCU. (3) A total of 496 cases and 964 controls from 73 Spanish centres were included. No differences were found in the basal characteristics between cases and controls. Cases had higher comorbidity Charlson scores (24% vs. 19%; p = 0.02) and occupational risk (28% vs. 10.5%; p < 0.0001) more frequently than did controls. Lockdown was the only protective measure against COVID-19 (50% vs. 70%; p < 0.0001). No differences were found in the use of systemic steroids, immunosuppressants or biologics between cases and controls. Cases were more often treated with 5-aminosalicylates (42% vs. 34%; p = 0.003). Having a moderate Charlson score (OR: 2.7; 95%CI: 1.3−5.9), occupational risk (OR: 2.9; 95%CI: 1.8−4.4) and the use of 5-aminosalicylates (OR: 1.7; 95%CI: 1.2−2.5) were factors for COVID-19. The strict lockdown was the only protective factor (OR: 0.1; 95%CI: 0.09−0.2). (4) Comorbidities and occupational exposure are the most relevant factors for COVID-19 in patients with IBD. The risk of COVID-19 seems not to be increased by immunosuppressants or biologics, with a potential effect of 5-aminosalicylates, which should be investigated further and interpreted with caution.

Background: Large real-world-evidence studies are required to confirm the durability of response, effectiveness, and safety of ustekinumab in Crohn's disease (CD) patients in real-world clinical practice., Methods: A retrospective, multicentre study was conducted in Spain in patients with active CD who had received ≥1 intravenous dose of ustekinumab for ≥6 months. Primary outcome was ustekinumab retention rate; secondary outcomes were to identify predictive factors for drug retention, short-term remission (week 16), loss of response and predictive factors for short-term efficacy and loss of response, and ustekinumab safety., Results: A total of 463 patients were included. Mean baseline Harvey-Bradshaw Index was 8.4. A total of 447 (96.5%) patients had received prior biologic therapy, 141 (30.5%) of whom had received ≥3 agents. In addition, 35.2% received concomitant immunosuppressants, and 47.1% had ≥1 abdominal surgery. At week 16, 56% had remission, 70% had response, and 26.1% required dose escalation or intensification; of these, 24.8% did not subsequently reduce dose. After a median follow-up of 15 months, 356 (77%) patients continued treatment. The incidence rate of ustekinumab discontinuation was 18% per patient-year of follow-up. Previous intestinal surgery and concomitant steroid treatment were associated with higher risk of ustekinumab discontinuation, while a maintenance schedule every 12 weeks had a lower risk; neither concomitant immunosuppressants nor the number of previous biologics were associated with ustekinumab discontinuation risk. Fifty adverse events were reported in 39 (8.4%) patients; 4 of them were severe (2 infections, 1 malignancy, and 1 fever)., Conclusions: Ustekinumab is effective and safe as short- and long-term treatment in a refractory cohort of CD patients in real-world clinical practice., (© 2022 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation.)

Ustekinumab has shown efficacy in Crohn's Disease (CD) patients. To identify patient profiles of those who benefit the most from this treatment would help to position this drug in the therapeutic paradigm of CD and generate hypotheses for future trials. The objective of this analysis was to determine whether baseline patient characteristics are predictive of remission and the drug durability of ustekinumab, and whether its positioning with respect to prior use of biologics has a significant effect after correcting for disease severity and phenotype at baseline using interpretable machine learning. Patients' data from SUSTAIN, a retrospective multicenter single-arm cohort study, were used. Disease phenotype, baseline laboratory data, and prior treatment characteristics were documented. Clinical remission was defined as the Harvey Bradshaw Index ≤ 4 and was tracked longitudinally. Drug durability was defined as the time until a patient discontinued treatment. A total of 439 participants from 60 centers were included and a total of 20 baseline covariates considered. Less exposure to previous biologics had a positive effect on remission, even after controlling for baseline disease severity using a non-linear, additive, multivariable model. Additionally, age, body mass index, and fecal calprotectin at baseline were found to be statistically significant as independent negative risk factors for both remission and drug survival, with further risk factors identified for remission.

Objectives: a) to analyze the evidence available about poor adherence/non-adherence, including prevalences, associated factors, and interventions in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients; b) to provide a framework to improve poor adherence/non-adherence., Methods: a qualitative approach was used. A literature review was performed using Medline. Primary searches were performed with Mesh and free texts to identify articles that analyzed prevalence, causes, associated factors, and interventions designed to improve poor adherence/non-adherence in UC patients. Study quality was evaluated using the Oxford scale. The results were presented and discussed in a nominal group meeting comprising a multidisciplinary committee of six gastroenterologists, one psychologist, one nurse, and one patient. Several overarching principles and recommendations were generated. A consensus procedure was implemented via a Delphi process, during which each committee member produced a score ranging from 0 = totally disagree to 10 = totally agree. Agreement was considered when at least 70 % of participants had voted ≥ 7., Results: the literature review included 75 articles. Non-adherence rates ranged from 7 % to 72 %. We found a great variability in the methods employed to assess adherence, associated factors, and interventions designed to improve adherence. Overall, eight overarching principles and six recommendations were generated, all of them achieving the pre-established agreement level, including, among others, the identification, classification, and management of non-adherence., Conclusions: Poor adherence/non-adherence are common in UC patients, this being a relevant clinical concern. Health professionals should address this issue and actively involve their patients in implementing effective, individualized interventions to improve adherence.

We aim to describe the incidence and source of contagion of COVID-19 in patients with IBD, as well as the risk factors for a severe course and long-term sequelae. This is a prospective observational study of IBD and COVID-19 included in the ENEIDA registry (53,682 from 73 centres) between March-July 2020 followed-up for 12 months. Results were compared with data of the general population (National Centre of Epidemiology and Catalonia). A total of 482 patients with COVID-19 were identified. Twenty-eight percent were infected in the work environment, and 48% were infected by intrafamilial transmission, despite having good adherence to lockdown. Thirty-five percent required hospitalization, 7.9% had severe COVID-19 and 3.7% died. Similar data were reported in the general population (hospitalisation 19.5%, ICU 2.1% and mortality 4.6%). Factors related to death and severe COVID-19 were being aged ≥ 60 years (OR 7.1, 95% CI: 1.8-27 and 4.5, 95% CI: 1.3-15.9), while having ≥2 comorbidities increased mortality (OR 3.9, 95% CI: 1.3-11.6). None of the drugs for IBD were related to severe COVID-19. Immunosuppression was definitively stopped in 1% of patients at 12 months. The prognosis of COVID-19 in IBD, even in immunosuppressed patients, is similar to that in the general population. Thus, there is no need for more strict protection measures in IBD.

Background Aims: Current therapeutic goals in ulcerative colitis (UC) include clinical and endoscopic remission, named mucosal healing (MH). Despite MH, a proportion of patients suffer a clinical relapse, which has been related to histological inflammation. We aimed to identify which histopathological features or histopathological index cut-off was associated with endoscopic relapse (ER) in UC patients with MH., Methods: Retrospective analysis of UC patients who underwent surveillance colonoscopy showing complete MH (endoscopic Mayo subscore=0) with random biopsies, and at least one more endoscopy along the follow-up. After a consensus meeting, expert pathologist performed histological assessment according to Simplified Geboes Score (SGS), Nancy Index (NI) and Robarts Histopathological Index (RHI). Other histopathological features were also evaluated. Patients were followed until ER or last endoscopy performed showing persistence of MH., Results: A total of 95 patients (150 colonoscopies) were included. After mean follow-up of 31.2 months (SD 21.7), 33 patients (34.7%) suffered ER. Neutrophils in lamina propria (OR 2.6; P = 0.037), within the epithelium (OR 2.6; P = 0.03), SGS ≥3.1 (OR 2.6; P = 0.037), NI ≥2 (OR 2.6; P = 0.03) and RHI ≥5 (OR 2.6; P = 0.037) were associated with ER in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, eosinophils in the lamina propria (HR 2.5; P = 0.01) and clinical remission<12 months (HR 3.2; P = 0.002) were associated with ER., Conclusions: Histopathological findings in UC patients who have achieved endoscopic MH may predict ER. Standardized histopathology reports according to the presence of neutrophils, eosinophils or to defined cut-off of validated histopathologic indexes may represent a useful tool to predict ER and should be considered at therapeutic and surveillance decision process., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: biosimilar infliximab (CTP-13) has been recently approved for the treatment of several immune-mediated inflammatory disorders, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Comparative studies between this biosimilar and original infliximab in the real clinical practice are scarce. The objective of this study was to compare short and long-term safety and efficacy of original (O) and biosimilar infliximab (B-IFX) in biologic-naïve, IBD patients in the real life clinical practice., Methods: a retrospective, multicentric study was performed in five Spanish hospitals. Consecutive IBD, biologic-naïve patients from an historic cohort who initiated O-IFX from January 2013 were compared with biologic-naïve patients, who started treatment with B-IFX since its approval in January 2015. The evaluation of efficacy was assessed after the induction phase, at week 14 and week 54 of treatment. Time to dose escalation or treatment persistence of both O-IFX and B-IFX was also considered. The appearance of serious adverse events was recorded., Results: two hundred and thirty-nine IBD biologic-naïve patients who started with O-IFX or B-IFX were included: 153 patients were diagnosed with Crohn's disease (95 treated with O- and 58 treated with B-IFX) and 86 with ulcerative colitis (40 received O- and 46 received B-IFX). At weeks 14 and 54, both O-IFX and B-IFX groups reached a similar clinical response and remission rates. Time to dose escalation, treatment persistence and safety profile were comparable between both groups., Conclusions: this long-term real-life experience provides additional evidence of the similarity of O- and B-IFX CTP-13 in terms of efficacy and safety in IBD patients.

Introduction: COVID-19 has altered the usual practice of medicine and the state of emergency declared in Spain on March 14th has considerably changed the activity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) units. The aim of this study was to evaluate the consequences of COVID-19 on the IBD Unit's activity and provide information on restructuring with available resources., Methods: an observational study was performed in a referral hospital in Madrid (Spain). Type of appointment, loss of follow-up, hospital admission, treatment changes, endoscopic activity, surgeries and blood tests were evaluated between March 15th and May 15th, 2020. This data was compared with the usual activity a year before., Results: among the 510 patients included, 476 (93.33 %) received had a remote consultation, representing an increase of 92.38 % compared with the previous year (0.95 %). There was a loss of follow-up in 26 patients (5.1 %) vs 15 (3.58 %) the previous year. A total of 60 (35.09 %) blood tests, 64 (76.19 %) endoscopies and all scheduled surgeries were suspended. Besides, 484 (94.9 %) patients remained adherent vs 417/419 (99.5 %) in the pre-pandemic period and 48 (9.41 %) reported symptoms of an IBD flare. Thirty-nine (7.6 %) patients developed symptoms suggestive of COVID-19., Conclusion: a large number of tests and on-site outpatient visit consultations were suspended. However, a rapid adaptation to telemedicine allowed these patients to be closely followed up. Although it was possible to maintain therapeutic compliance, with a loss to follow-up slightly higher than the previous year, suspensions and delays of tests could have significant negative consequences in the long term.

Background and Aims: Our objective was to define, describe and organize (on the basis of consensus) the patient's preferences in the management of ulcerative colitis (UC), in order to further incorporate them in daily practice and improve patients satisfaction, adherence to the treatment and quality of care., Methods: Qualitative study. A narrative literature review in Medline using Mesh and free-text terms was conducted to identify articles on UC patient preferences as well as clinical scenarios that may influence the preferences. The results were presented and discussed in a multidisciplinary nominal group meeting composed of six gastroenterologists, one primary care physician, one nurse practitioner and one expert patient. Key clinical scenarios and patient preferences were then defined, generating a series of points to consider and recommendations. The level of agreement with the final selection of preferences was established following a Delphi process., Results: The narrative review retrieved 69 articles of qualitative design and moderate quality. The following key clinical scenarios were identified: diagnosis, follow-up, surgery, and special situations/patients profiles such as adolescents or women. Patient preferences were classified into information, treatment (pharmacological and non-pharmacological), follow-up, relations with health professionals, relations with the health system and administration. Finally, 11 recommendations on patient preferences for UC in relation to its management reached the level of agreement established., Conclusion: The consensual description of patient's preferences contribute to identify different areas for improvement in healthcare practice.

Introduction: Since the first edition of the Guidelines was published in 2013, much information has been generated around the treatment of ulcerative colitis, and new drugs and action protocols have been introduced. Clinical practice has changed substantially, warranting new approaches and a comprehensive review and update of the evidence., Material and Methods: Once again, we used the GRADE approach, supported by an electronic tool (https://gradepro.org). The clinical scenarios are the same as in the previous version (induction and maintenance in severe and mild-moderate flare-ups), as are the variables and their evaluation. However, in the updated guidelines, three questions have been deleted, 14 added and 30 maintained, making a total of 44 clinical questions. After an exhaustive review of the evidence, the recommendations are now updated., Results: Of the 44 questions analysed, no recommendation could be established in two due to the very low quality of the evidence, while in the other 42, based on different degrees of quality of evidence, recommendations were made according to the GRADE system. In 25 of these questions the final recommendation is strongly in favour, in six strongly against, in seven weakly in favour and in four weakly against. According to the scenarios and recommendations, six algorithms are proposed as a simple guide for practical decision-making., Conclusions: The aim of this update of the 2013 guidelines is to provide answers, based on the GRADE approach, to the different questions we ask ourselves daily when deciding the most appropriate treatment for our patients with ulcerative colitis in the different clinical scenarios., (Copyright © 2020. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

Background: Ustekinumab is effective in Crohn's disease. However, a substantial proportion of patients will not respond or lose response to ustekinumab. The current evidence to support the effectiveness of dose-optimisation for ustekinumab nonresponse is limited., Aim: To assess the effectiveness of dose escalation of ustekinumab., Methods: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study. We included active Crohn's disease patients who received a standard-dose intravenous induction and at least one subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg dose. All enrolled patients received dose escalation by either shortening the interval between the doses to every 4 or 6 weeks, intravenous reinduction or a combination of strategies. The primary outcome of the study was clinical response at week 16 after dose escalation., Results: A total of 142 patients (22 centres/14 countries) were included. The patients were dose-escalated after a median treatment duration of 30 weeks. At week 16 from escalation, 73/142 (51.4%) responded to treatment, including 55/142 (38.7%) in clinical remission. Corticosteroid-free remission was achieved in 6/34 (17.6%) patients on corticosteroids at the time of escalation; 118/142 (83%) continued treatment beyond week 16. Follow-up data beyond week 16 were available for 74/118 (62.7%) patients. On the last follow-up, 51/98 (52%) patients with available data responded to treatment, including 41/98 (42%) in clinical remission., Conclusions: Intensification of ustekinumab maintenance dosage was effective in over 50% of the patients. This strategy should be considered in patients who are nonresponsive to every 8 weeks ustekinumab maintenance dosing., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)