Search

Artificial intelligence (AI) models were developed to determine the center of tropical cyclones (TCs) in the western North Pacific. These models integrated information from six channels of geostationary satellite imagery: the brightness temperature of four infrared (IR) and one shortwave IR channels, as well as the reflectivity of one visible channel. The first model is a convolutional neural network designed for spatial data processing, and the second is a convolutional long short-term memory model that effectively captures spatiotemporal information. For training, verification, and testing purposes, spatial images from six channels were obtained from the Japanese Himawari-8 satellite from 2016 to 2021. The position of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts 6- or 12-h prediction was assigned as an initial value to the AI models. Errors in the initial value were 20–50 km compared to the Joint Typhoon Warning Center best track, depending on TC intensity. Weak (strong) TCs exhibited large (small) errors. This error dependency was found in Automated Rotational Center Hurricane Eye Retrieval (ARCHER) product, which is currently used by several operational organizations. ARCHER errors were typically small when observations from both geostationary and polar-orbiting satellites were included. Significant errors remained in the absence of microwave channel information from polar-orbiting satellites. This study successfully developed two AI models that consistently determined the location of the TC center using only six-channel images from geostationary satellites. These models exhibited comparable or better performance than the ARCHER products. The newly developed AI models can potentially be implemented for operational use. SIGNICANCE STATEMENT: This study has developed AI models that can determine the center of TCs in the western North Pacific, which can be applied to meteorological organizations that have limited access to real-time polar-orbiting satellite data. The newly developed AI models derived positions comparable to or better than ARCHER, which is currently one of the most precise systems for determining the position of the TC center. The successful development of these AI models is very opportune as it was only possible thanks to the recent availability of high-frequency data observed from geostationary satellite, coupled with the rapid technological advances in AI algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most tropical cyclone (TC) forecasting centers have implemented a probabilistic circle to represent track uncertainty at a specified lead time. Recent studies suggest that probability ellipses constructed from ensemble prediction systems can convey the anisotropy of track predictability. In this study, a new probability ellipse model is developed to interpret the extent of forward speed and heading uncertainties in ensemble forecasts by selecting an equal proportion of members in the along‐ and cross‐track directions. This method is validated using the 2019–2021 western North Pacific (WNP) TC track forecasts from the ensemble predictions of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts, the United States National Centers for Environmental Prediction, and the Korea Meteorological Administration. When the proportion of ensemble members in the ellipse is set to 70%, more than one‐half (50.0%–73.6%) of the forecasts, depending on the lead time, indicate reduced area compared with that of the circle. The mean areas of the probability ellipses are 4.9%, 7.0%, 10.0%, and 11.5% smaller than those of the circle in 48‐, 72‐, 96‐, and 120‐hr forecasts, respectively. The forward speed shows greater uncertainty than the heading, as evidenced by the along‐track radii being larger than the cross‐track counterpart in ∼60% of the samples, regardless of the lead time. In addition, the regional distribution of the along‐track/cross‐track ratio in the probability ellipses can explain the dominant direction of the track error in a particular location. The proposed probability ellipse shows potential for application in operational TC track predictions. Plain Language Summary: Operational tropical cyclone (TC) forecasting centers usually represent the uncertainty of a TC track forecast with a circle, namely the probabilistic circle. In this paper, the circle is generalized to a probability ellipse directly using the output of ensemble prediction systems. The key to the new ellipse is that an equal proportion of ensemble members are selected in the along‐ and cross‐track directions to determine the two elliptical radii. This probability ellipse is smaller in size than the circle when representing the same level of uncertainty. The eccentric property of the probability ellipse allows for easy interpretation of the direction with larger ensemble‐forecast uncertainty. Such results can aid in operational TC track predictions and subsequent implementation of preventive measures. Key Points: The proposed probability ellipse explicitly shows the uncertainty of ensemble forecast tracks in the along‐ and cross‐track directionsThe probability ellipse is capable of explaining the dominant direction of error in track forecastsRegional distributions of uncertainty and error resemble each other in terms of magnitude and direction [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inclusion of the effects of vegetation feedback in a global climate change simulation suggests that the vegetation–climate feedback works to alleviate partially the summer surface warming and the associated heat waves over Europe induced by the increase in atmospheric CO2 concentrations. The projected warming of 4°C over most of Europe with static vegetation has been reduced by 1°C as the dynamic vegetation feedback effects are included.. Examination of the simulated surface energy fluxes suggests that additional greening in the presence of vegetation feedback effects enhances evapotranspiration and precipitation, thereby limiting the warming, particularly in the daily maximum temperature. The greening also tends to reduce the frequency and duration of heat waves. Results in this study strongly suggest that the inclusion of vegetation feedback within climate models is a crucial factor for improving the projection of warm season temperatures and heat waves over Europe.

The National Institute of Environmental Research, under the Ministry of Environment of Korea, provides two-day forecasts, through AirKorea, of the concentration of particulate matter with diameters of ≤ 2.5 μm (PM2.5) in terms of four grades (low, moderate, high, and very high) over 19 districts nationwide. Particulate grades are subjectively designated by human forecasters based on forecast results from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) and artificial intelligence (AI) models in conjunction with weather patterns. This study evaluates forecasts from the long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithm relative to those from CMAQ-solely and AirKorea using observations from 2019. The skills of the one-day PM2.5 forecasts over the 19 districts were 39–70% for CMAQ, 72–79% for LSTM, and 73–80% for AirKorea; the AI forecasts showed comparable skills to the human forecasters at AirKorea. The one-day forecast skill levels of high and very high PM2.5 pollution grades are 31–98%, 31–74%, and 39–81% for the CMAQ-solely, the LSTM, and the AirKorea forecasts, respectively. Despite good skills for forecasting the high and very high events, CMAQ-solely forecasts also generate substantially higher false alarm rates (up to 86%) than the LSTM and AirKorea forecasts (up to 58%). Hence, applying only the LSTM model to the CMAQ forecasts can yield reasonable forecast skill levels comparable to the operational AirKorea forecasts that elaborately combine the CMAQ model, AI models, and human forecasters. The present results suggest that applications of appropriate AI models can greatly enhance PM2.5 forecast skills for Korea in a more objective way. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]