Search

Background: Prophylactic removal of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth is the surgical removal of wisdom teeth in the absence of symptoms and with no evidence of local disease. Impacted wisdom teeth may be associated with pathological changes, such as pericoronitis, root resorption, gum and alveolar bone disease (periodontitis), caries and the development of cysts and tumours. When surgical removal is performed in older people, the risk of postoperative complications, pain and discomfort is increased. Other reasons to justify prophylactic removal of asymptomatic disease-free impacted third molars have included preventing late lower incisor crowding, preventing damage to adjacent structures such as the second molar or the inferior alveolar nerve, in preparation for orthognathic surgery, in preparation for radiotherapy or during procedures to treat people with trauma to the affected area. Removal of asymptomatic disease-free wisdom teeth is a common procedure, and researchers must determine whether evidence supports this practice. This review is an update of an review originally published in 2005 and previously updated in 2012 and 2016., Objectives: To evaluate the effects of removal compared with retention (conservative management) of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth in adolescents and adults., Search Methods: Cochrane Oral Health's Information Specialist searched the following databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register (to 10 May 2019), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library, 2019, Issue 4), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 10 May 2019), and Embase Ovid (1980 to 10 May 2019). The US National Institutes of Health Trials Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov)and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched for ongoing trials. No restrictions were placed on the language or date of publication when searching the electronic databases. ., Selection Criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), with no restriction on length of follow-up, comparing removal (or absence) with retention (or presence) of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth in adolescents or adults. We also considered quasi-RCTs and prospective cohort studies for inclusion if investigators measured outcomes with follow-up of five years or longer., Data Collection and Analysis: Eight review authors screened search results and assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion according to the review inclusion criteria. Eight review authors independently and in duplicate conducted the risk of bias assessments. When information was unclear, we contacted the study authors for additional information., Main Results: This review update includes the same two studies that were identified in our previous version of the review: one RCT with a parallel-group design, which was conducted in a dental hospital setting in the United Kingdom, and one prospective cohort study, which was conducted in the private sector in the USA. Primary outcome No eligible studies in this review reported the effects of removal compared with retention of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth on health-related quality of life Secondary outcomes We found only low- to very low-certainty evidence of the effects of removal compared with retention of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth for a limited number of secondary outcome measures. One prospective cohort study, reporting data from a subgroup of 416 healthy male participants, aged 24 to 84 years, compared the effects of the absence (previous removal or agenesis) against the presence of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth on periodontitis and caries associated with the distal aspect of the adjacent second molar during a follow-up period of three to over 25 years. Very low-certainty evidence suggests that the presence of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth may be associated with increased risk of periodontitis affecting the adjacent second molar in the long term. In the same study, which is at serious risk of bias, there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate a difference in caries risk associated with the presence or absence of impacted wisdom teeth. One RCT with 164 randomised and 77 analysed adolescent participants compared the effect of extraction with retention of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth on dimensional changes in the dental arch after five years. Participants (55% female) had previously undergone orthodontic treatment and had 'crowded' wisdom teeth. No evidence from this study, which was at high risk of bias, was found to suggest that removal of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth has a clinically significant effect on dimensional changes in the dental arch. The included studies did not measure any of our other secondary outcomes: costs, other adverse events associated with retention of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth (pericoronitis, root resorption, cyst formation, tumour formation, inflammation/infection) and adverse effects associated with their removal (alveolar osteitis/postoperative infection, nerve injury, damage to adjacent teeth during surgery, bleeding, osteonecrosis related to medication/radiotherapy, inflammation/infection)., Authors' Conclusions: Insufficient evidence is available to determine whether asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth should be removed or retained. Although retention of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth may be associated with increased risk of periodontitis affecting adjacent second molars in the long term, the evidence is very low certainty. Well-designed RCTs investigating long-term and rare effects of retention and removal of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth, in a representative group of individuals, are unlikely to be feasible. In their continuing absence, high quality, long-term prospective cohort studies may provide valuable evidence in the future. Given the current lack of available evidence, patient values should be considered and clinical expertise used to guide shared decision-making with people who have asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth. If the decision is made to retain these teeth, clinical assessment at regular intervals to prevent undesirable outcomes is advisable., (Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Objectives: The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative irrigation of the socket with drinking tap water on inflammatory complications following lower third molar removal., Material and Methods: A multicenter randomized controlled trial was carried out from June 2013 to June 2014. In one arm of the study, patients were instructed to irrigate the tooth socket and surgical site with a Monoject® Curved 412 Tip Syringe (Tyco/healthcare-Kendall, Mansfield, MA, USA) with tap water. In a second arm of the study, the standard postoperative instructions did not include irrigation instructions. The incidences of alveolar osteitis and wound infection were recorded for each group and analyzed by the Fisher's exact test., Results: A total of 280 patients with 333 mandibular third molars were analyzed. According to the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, inflammatory complications occurred in 18 cases in the Monoject® group (11.4 %) compared to 34 cases (19.1 %) in the control group (p = 0.04). These complications were associated with significant worse outcomes regarding quality of life, pain, and trismus and caused significantly more missed days of work or study. Female gender, age >26, bone removal, deep impacted third molars, less experienced surgeons, and a high amount of debris at the surgical site were also identified as risk factors for developing inflammatory complications following lower third molar removal., Conclusion: Irrigation of the surgical site with drinking tap water using a curved syringe following removal of third molars is effective in reducing the risk of inflammatory complications., Clinical Relevance: Water is a very accessible, cost-effective irrigant without side effects and the results from this study have proven that it can be used to reduce the risk of inflammatory complications and associated morbidity following lower third molar removal., Competing Interests: Compliance with ethical standards This study was part of a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy of CBCT prior to mandibular third molar removal from which the trial and the clinical protocol were approved by the Institutional Review Board (CCMO Arnhem-Nijmegen, NL nr.: 40492.091.12). Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Funding The work was supported by the Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery of Radboud University Medical Centre. The BOOA Research Foundation of the Dutch Society of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery furthermore supported this study. Informed consent All patients were informed about the study and a written informed consent was obtained.

Background: Prophylactic removal of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth is surgical removal of wisdom teeth in the absence of symptoms and with no evidence of local disease. Impacted wisdom teeth may be associated with pathological changes, such as pericoronitis, root resorption, gum and alveolar bone disease (periodontitis), caries and the development of cysts and tumours. When surgical removal is carried out in older people, the risk of postoperative complications, pain and discomfort is increased. Other reasons to justify prophylactic removal of asymptomatic disease-free impacted third molars have included preventing late lower incisor crowding, preventing damage to adjacent structures such as the second molar or the inferior alveolar nerve, in preparation for orthognathic surgery, in preparation for radiotherapy or during procedures to treat people with trauma to the affected area. Removal of asymptomatic disease-free wisdom teeth is a common procedure, and researchers must determine whether evidence supports this practice. This review is an update of an existing review published in 2012., Objectives: To evaluate the effects of removal compared with retention (conservative management) of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth in adolescents and adults., Search Methods: We searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register (to 24 May 2016), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2016, Issue 4), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 24 May 2016) and Embase Ovid (1980 to 24 May 2016). We searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing and unpublished studies to 24 May 2016. We imposed no restrictions on language or date of publication in our search of electronic databases., Selection Criteria: Studies comparing removal (or absence) with retention (or presence) of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth in adolescents or adults. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with no restriction on length of follow-up, if available. We considered quasi-RCTs and prospective cohort studies for inclusion if investigators measured outcomes with follow-up of five years or longer., Data Collection and Analysis: Eight review authors screened search results and assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion according to the review inclusion criteria. Eight review authors independently conducted risk of bias assessments in duplicate. When information was unclear, we contacted study authors for additional information., Main Results: This review includes two studies. The previous review included one RCT with a parallel-group design, which was conducted in a dental hospital setting in the United Kingdom; our new search for this update identified one prospective cohort study conducted in the private sector in the USA. Primary outcome No eligible studies in this review reported the effects of removal compared with retention of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth on health-related quality of life Secondary outcomes We found only low to very low quality evidence of the effects of removal compared with retention of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth for a limited number of secondary outcome measures.One prospective cohort study, reporting data from a subgroup of 416 healthy male participants, aged 24 to 84 years, compared the effect of the absence (previous removal or agenesis) against the presence of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth on periodontitis and caries associated with the distal of the adjacent second molar during a follow-up period of three to over 25 years. Very low quality evidence suggests that the presence of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth may be associated with increased risk of periodontitis affecting the adjacent second molar in the long term. In the same study, which is at serious risk of bias, there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate a difference in caries risk associated with the presence or absence of impacted wisdom teeth.One RCT with 164 randomised and 77 analysed adolescent participants compared the effect of extraction with retention of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth on dimensional changes in the dental arch after five years. Participants (55% female) had previously undergone orthodontic treatment and had 'crowded' wisdom teeth. No evidence from this study, which was at high risk of bias, was found to suggest that removal of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth has a clinically significant effect on dimensional changes in the dental arch.The included studies did not measure our other secondary outcomes: costs, other adverse events associated with retention of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth (pericoronitis, root resorption, cyst formation, tumour formation, inflammation/infection) and adverse effects associated with their removal (alveolar osteitis/postoperative infection, nerve injury, damage to adjacent teeth during surgery, bleeding, osteonecrosis related to medication/radiotherapy, inflammation/infection)., Authors' Conclusions: Insufficient evidence is available to determine whether or not asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth should be removed. Although asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth may be associated with increased risk of periodontitis affecting adjacent second molars in the long term, the evidence is of very low quality. Well-designed RCTs investigating long-term and rare effects of retention and removal of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth, in a representative group of individuals, are unlikely to be feasible. In their continuing absence, high quality, long-term prospective cohort studies may provide valuable evidence in the future. Given the lack of available evidence, patient values should be considered and clinical expertise used to guide shared decision making with patients who have asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth. If the decision is made to retain asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth, clinical assessment at regular intervals to prevent undesirable outcomes is advisable.

Purpose: The aims of this study were to investigate the effectiveness of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) compared to panoramic radiography (PR), prior to mandibular third molar removal, in reducing patient morbidity, and to identify risk factors associated with inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury., Material and Methods: This multicentre, randomised, controlled trial was performed at three centres in the Netherlands. Adults with an increased risk for IAN injury, as diagnosed from PR, were included in the study. In one arm of the study, patients underwent an additional CBCT prior to third molar surgery. In a second arm of the study, no additional radiographs were acquired. The primary outcome measure was the number of patient-reported altered sensations 1 week after surgery. As secondary outcome measures, the number of patients with objective IAN injury, with long-term (>6 months) IAN injury, the occurrence of other postoperative complications, the Oral Health Related Quality of Life-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire responses, postoperative pain (visual analogue scale score), duration of surgery, number of emergency visits, and number of missed days of work or study were scored., Results: A total of 268 patients with 320 mandibular third molars were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The overall incidence of IAN injury 1 week after surgery was 6.3%. No significant differences between CBCT and PR for temporary IAN injury (p = 0.64) and all other secondary outcomes were registered. A lingual position of the mandibular canal (MC) and narrowing, in which the diameter of the MC lumen was decreased at the contact area between the MC and the roots, were significant risk factors for temporary IAN injury., Conclusion: Although CBCT is a valuable diagnostic adjunct for identification of an increased risk for IAN injury, the use of CBCT does not translate into a reduction of IAN injury and other postoperative complications, after removal of the complete mandibular third molar. In these selected cases of a high risk for IAN injury, an alternative strategy, such as monitoring or a coronectomy, might be more appropriate. (http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02071030)., (Copyright © 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Biodegradable fixation systems could reduce/delete the problems associated with titanium plate removal. This means less surgical discomfort, and a reduction in costs., Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare the cost-effectiveness between a biodegradable and a titanium system in Maxillofacial surgery., Materials and Methods: This multicenter RCT was performed in the Netherlands from December 2006 to July 2009. Included were 230 patients who underwent a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO), a Le Fort-I osteotomy, or a bi-maxillary osteotomy and those treated for fractures of the mandible, maxilla, or zygoma. The patients were randomly assigned to a titanium group (KLS Martin) or to a biodegradable group (Inion CPS). Costs were assessed from a societal perspective. Health outcomes in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were bone healing (8 weeks) and plate removal (2 years)., Results: In 25 out of the 117 patients who were randomized to the biodegradable group, the maxillofacial surgeon made the decision to switch to the titanium system intra-operatively. This resulted in an Intention-To-Treat (ITT-)analysis and a Treatment-Received (TR-) analysis. Both analyses indicated that operations performed with titanium plates and screws had better health outcomes. In the TR-analysis the costs were lower in the biodegradable group, in the ITT-analysis costs were lower in the titanium group., Conclusion and Discussion: The difference in costs between the ITT and the TR analyses can be explained by the intra-operative switches: In the TR-analysis the switches were analysed in the titanium group. In the ITT-analysis they were analysed in the biodegradable group. Considering the cost-effectiveness the titanium system is preferable to the biodegradable system in the regular treatment spectrum of mandibular, Le Fort-I, and zygomatic fractures, and BSSO's, Le Fort-I osteotomies and bimaxillary osteotomies., Trial Registration: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN 44212338.

The results of a retrospective study on 24 patients who underwent a Le Fort I osteotomy to improve the condition for implant insertion are presented. They all had an edentulous maxilla, Cawood and Howell class VI. Bone grafts were taken from the anterior or posterior iliac crest and implants were placed between 3 and 6 months after the osteotomy. The follow-up period ranged from 5 to 18 years. Initial complications occurred in seven patients in whom small bony defects were present at the time of the implant insertion procedure. The position of the advanced and downward grafted maxilla remained stable over the years. A total of 135 implants were initially inserted, of which 34 failed over the years. Ten implants were inserted to compensate for lost ones, of which only one failed. The screw implants tended to do better than the cylindrical implants. Two patients lost all implants; they had undergone previous surgery affecting the sinus and were also heavy smokers. The remaining 22 patients were satisfied with their treatment as shown by visual analogue scale scores. The results presented are in keeping with those of other reports and underscore the viability of the procedure., (Copyright © 2014 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Biodegradable fixation systems could reduce or eliminate the problems associated with removal of titanium plates. A multicenter randomised controlled trial (RCT) was performed in the Netherlands from December 2006-July 2009, and originally 230 injured and orthognathic patients were included. The patients were randomly assigned to either a titanium control group (KLS Martin) or to a biodegradable test group (Inion CPS). The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term skeletal stability of advancement bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO) of a biodegradable system and a titanium system. Only patients from the original RCT who were at least 18 years old and who had a BSSO advancement osteotomy were included. Those who had simultaneous Le Fort I osteotomy or genioplasty were excluded. Analysis of skeletal stability was made by digital tracing of lateral cephalograms. Long-term skeletal stability in BSSO advancement did not differ significantly between patients treated with biodegradable plates and screws and those treated with titanium plates and screws. Given the comparable amount of relapse, the general use of Inion CPS in the treatment of BSSO advancement should not be discouraged. On the basis of other properties a total picture of the clinical use can be obtained; the short-term stability, the intraoperative switches, the number of plates removed and cost-effectiveness. Trial registration of original RCT: http://www.controlled-trials.com; ISRCTN 44212338., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

In a recent RCT comparing biodegradable (Inion CPS) with titanium (KLS Martin) plates and screws for fixation of osteotomies or fractures, we found that in 21% of the cases the surgeon decided intra-operatively to switch from biodegradable to titanium. The aim of the current retrospective cohort study was to analyse the reasons for these switches in order to find predictor variables that may be helpful in the decision to use biodegradable devices or not. The surgeons' opinion about the biodegradable system, and if there was a learning curve in the application of the biodegradable system were also investigated. All variables were assessed during the original RCT by using a questionnaire that was completed by the OMF surgeon directly post-operatively. For the outcome variable "surgeons' opinion" a separate questionnaire was used. Regarding the predictor variables a mandibular fracture had a higher risk of switching compared to a BSSO. However, looking at the reasons for these switches no firm conclusions can be drawn. There was a subjective learning curve to acquire the application-skills for the biodegradable system. There were no changes in isolated Le-Fort-I osteotomies despite the fact that the biodegradable system seems more difficult to apply in the midface. Inadequate stability was the main reason for switching. This can be material-related, or related to inexperience with or lack of confidence in the system, or impatience of the surgeon. A learning curve and personal preferences probably play an important role in the decision to switch. We think that with more patience and more experience it should be possible to increase both user comfort and confidence in the biodegradable system of Inion CPS, which likely will decrease the number of intra-operative switches., (Copyright © 2013 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Biodegradable osteosynthesis could reduce/delete the problems associated with titanium plate removal. The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical performance in the first 2 post-operative years between a biodegradable and a titanium system in oral and maxillofacial surgery. The multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed in the Netherlands from December 2006 to July 2009. Included were 230 patients who underwent a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and/or a Le Fort-I osteotomy and those treated for fractures of the mandible, maxilla, or zygoma. The patients were randomly assigned to a titanium group (KLS Martin) or to a biodegradable group (Inion CPS). Plate removal was necessary in 16 of the 134 patients (11.9%) treated with titanium and in 21 of the 87 patients (24.1%) treated with the biodegradable system within the first 2 post-operative years [p = .016, HR biodegradable (95% CI) = 2.2 (1.1-4.2), HR titanium = 1]. Occlusion, VAS, and MFIQ scores showed that both groups had good mandibular function and were (almost) free of pain 1 and 2 years post-operatively (http://controlled-trials.com ISRCTN 44212338).

Biodegradable fixation systems could reduce or delete the problems associated with metallic systems, since removal is not necessary. The aim of this study was to establish the effectiveness and safety of biodegradable plates and screws as potential alternatives to metallic ones. This multi-center randomized controlled trial was conducted from December 2006 to July 2009. Included were patients who underwent mandibular and/or Le Fort I osteotomies and those with fractures of the mandible, maxilla, and zygoma. The patients were assigned to a titanium control group (KLS Martin) or to a biodegradable test group (Inion CPS). The primary outcome measure was 'bone healing 8 weeks post-operatively'. The Intention-To-Treat (ITT) analysis of 113 patients in the titanium group and 117 patients in the biodegradable group yielded a significant difference (p < 0.001), primarily because in 25 patients (21%) who were randomized to the biodegradable group, the surgeon made the decision to switch to titanium intra-operatively. Despite this 'inferior' primary outcome result, biodegradable plates and screws could be safely used when it was possible to apply them. The benefits of using biodegradable systems (fewer plate removal operations) should be confirmed during a follow-up of minimally 5 years (Controlled-trials.com ISRCTN number 44212338).

Transplants from the anterior iliac crest are used for most reconstructive procedures in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. The advantages are easy accessibility, the ability to work in two teams and the amount of corticocancellous bone available; disadvantages are postoperative pain and gait disturbances. To reduce donor-site pain, the effect of a single dose of bupivacaine (10 cc of 2.5mg/cc with 1:80.000 epinephrine) was studied. 200 consecutive patients, who underwent anterior iliac crest bone harvesting for reconstructive procedures, were randomly divided into those receiving bupivacaine and those not. They completed a standardized questionnaire. Patients scored the intensity of the pain and difficulties walking at different times with a visual analogue scale. They recorded analgesics used. 98 questionnaires were eligible for analysis. No differences between the bupivacaine and the control group were detected for postoperative pain and gait disturbance. There is no support for administration of a single dose of bupivacaine to reduce pain in the first postoperative days. The surface area of the removed bone had a significant influence on pain and walking; pain is related to the local osseous damage or periosteal stripping rather than to the length of incision or the operation time.

The aim of this study was to assess post-operative stability of bilateral sagittal split set-back osteotomies using two miniplates and clinical parameters including nerve function, TMJ function, occlusal relapse and patient satisfaction. The stability was measured on cephalometric radiographs and possible condylar alterations on orthopantomograms. This prospective study implied a 2-year follow-up on a group of 24 patients. The same protocol was used at six participating institutions at which the patients were treated. A stable occlusion without appreciable relapse was seen in 91% after 2-year follow-up. Only two patients in this study had mild occlusal relapse. The mean skeletal horizontal relapse at pogonion of the whole group, after 2 years was 1.1mm and appeared to be directed backwards. At occlusal level, however, the mean relapse was 1.2mm forwards. The function of the inferior alveolar nerve 2 years post-operatively was reported to be normal in approximately 70% of the patients, yet 80% had no complaints about nerve dysaesthesia. In approximately 21% of the patients, signs and symptoms of TMJ dysfunction had disappeared. Another group (10%), however, without pre-operative signs and symptoms of TMJ dysfunction developed these signs or symptoms post-operatively. No condylar remodelling or resorption was seen in this group of patients. The sagittal split set-back osteotomy fixed with miniplates appeared to be a relatively save and reliable procedure giving rise to adequate results and a high degree of patients satisfaction.

This prospective study implied a two-year follow-up in a group of patients that underwent a Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy (BSSO) for advancement of the mandible that were treated in seven institutions following the same treatment protocol (using two miniplates). The aim of Part III of this study was to define a Condylar Morphology Scale (CMS) and to analyse radiological changes in the TMJ after BSSO in relation to postoperative relapse and to determine the incidence of morphologic changes and its risk factors. It was concluded that the used 3-point CMS served its purpose well. In eight patients (4%) resorption of the condyle developed postoperatively. The value of preoperative cephalograms to predict condylar alterations appeared to be limited (12% explained variance). Patients treated at a relative low age (< or = 14 years) appeared to be at risk for the occurrence of condylar alterations including resorption. A steep mandibular plane angle and the low facial height ratio (post:ant) were also significantly related to the occurrence of condylar alteration, but the multi variance regression showed that these parameters had only limited value. The occurrence of pain and TMJ sounds in the first few months postoperatively are highly suspicious for condylar changes to occur in the next months.

This prospective study implied a two-year follow-up on a group of patients that underwent a Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy (BSSO) for advancement (n=222) of the mandible that were treated in seven institutions following the same treatment protocol. The aim of Part II of this study was to correlate the clinical findings on stability and relapse as reported in Part I (clinical parameters) of this series of articles with the cephalometric findings. The mean skeletal relapse at pogonion of the whole group after two years was 0.9 mm. The clinically stable group, however, had only 0.4 mm relapse, whereas the clinical relapse group showed a mean relapse of 3.3 mm. The findings underline a relationship between the amount of advancement and relapse. The tendency for both, horizontal and vertical movement is the same, i.e., the larger the surgery effect, the larger the relapse. The angle post plane/mandibular plane showed the highest explained variance 9%. Patients with a high mandibular plane angle may be more prone to relapse. The explained variance of all considered prognostic factors together, however, is small (13%). The findings of this study express that patients with a clinical stable occlusion after a BSSO advancement, stabilised with miniplates, have a minimal to no skeletal relapse as measured on the cephalometric radiograms. The clinically non-stable group, however, appeared to have considerable skeletal relapse.

The principal aim of this study was to assess the postoperative stability of bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO) using two miniplates. Part I reports on the clinical results including treatment characteristics, nerve functions, TMJ function, occlusional relapse and patient satisfaction. This prospective study evaluated a group of 222 patients who underwent a BSSO for mandibular advancement. The same treatment protocol was used at seven participating institutions at which the patients were treated. A stable occlusion without appreciable relapse was seen in 84% after 2 years of follow-up. A considerable minority (16%) had occlusal relapse. There were no clinical parameters that pointed towards a high risk for relapse except age. The mean operation age of the relapse group was 20.7 years (SD 6.7) and in the stable group 26.1 years (SD 8.2). The function of the inferior alveolar nerve 2 years postoperatively was reported to be normal in approximately 88% of the patients, while 94% had no complaints about nerve dysaesthesia. In approximately 56% of the patients with pre-existing TMJ-dysfunction these signs and symptoms had disappeared. Another group of patients, however, without TMJ-dysfunction preoperatively (22%) developed signs or symptoms of TMJ-dysfunction postoperatively. The sagittal split osteotomy fixed with miniplates appeared to be a relatively safe and reliable procedure giving rise to a high degree of patient satisfaction, despite the fact that some occlusal relapse was seen.

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term treatment results of 26 patients who developed progressive condylar resorption (PCR) following a bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomy (n= 19) or a bimaxillary osteotomy (n=7). PCR was diagnosed clinically and from a comparison of pre- and postoperative cephalometric and orthopantomographic radiographs. The preoperative condylar configuration and resorption pattern were assessed distinguishing between 'deep bite' and 'open bite'. Patients with 'deep bites' tended to have more resorption on the superior site of the condyle, while 'anterior open bites' often had resorption on the superior and anterior sites of the condyle. The patients were divided into 2 groups, one receiving non-surgical treatment that included splints, orthodontics with or without extractions and restorative dentistry. The second group underwent repeated surgery to treat skeletal relapse. Thirteen patients who underwent non-surgical treatment after orthognathic surgery had satisfactory results from orthodontic dental compensation, although only 3/13 had Class I occlusion. Another 13 patients had unacceptable occlusal and/or esthetic results and, therefore, underwent a second surgery. Following surgery, 7 patients had satisfactory occlusal and esthetic results and were skeletally stable. Four patients had 40-80% relapse, but with a stable occlusion. Two patients had 120% and 100% relapse, respectively, and needed a third surgical intervention. The first patient had a stable occlusal and esthetic result with approximately 30% relapse at pogonion, but the second patient still had an unstable malocclusion with again 100% relapse. It appeared that, without surgical intervention after PCR, further resorption ceased after approximately two years. Second surgery appeared to produce variable results, but, in this series, the majority had significant improvement.

Two hundred eighty-two patients who received surgical-orthodontic treatment to correct anterior open bite were retrospectively evaluated by interview and questionnaires to determine the motivation and expectations before treatment, experience during treatment, psychosocial impact, functional and esthetic results, and satisfaction. All patients underwent a Le Fort I osteotomy, and 126 patients also received a bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomy. The mean follow-up was 6 years. The most important reasons for treatment, as cited by the patients, were biting and chewing problems (28%), dissatisfaction with facial appearance (26%), and symptoms of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dysfunction (21%). Patients with anterior open bite had a critical attitude toward facial appearance; therefore, esthetic aspects should be taken seriously. The expectations on chewing ability, phonetics, nasal passage, and facial appearance were met by the treatment; however, expectations on TMJ function, interincisal relationship, and biting ability were not completely fulfilled. There was a subjective improvement of TMJ sounds in 27% and a worsening in 14% of the patients. Dysesthesia of the infraorbital nerve was noticed in 4% of patients and of the mental or inferior alveolar nerve in 23% of the patients. Chewing and biting abilities improved in 53% and 73%, respectively. Facial appearance, self-confidence, and social interaction had improved. Patients had expected more information before and psychologic support after treatment. Despite the relapse of open bite in 20% of the patients, 75% were satisfied with the dental and 85% with the facial appearance.

Functional conditions, skeletal and dento-alveolar stability and condylar changes in 15 patients with mandibular hypoplasia, anterior open bite (AOB) and amelogenesis imperfecta (AI), who had undergone a Le Fort I osteotomy, were analysed after a mean follow-up of 5 years. Two patients underwent a one-piece Le Fort I intrusion osteotomy and 13 patients a multi-segment Le Fort I osteotomy. In three of these patients, an additional bilateral sagittal split osteotomy was performed. Thirteen patients underwent a genioplasty. Surgery was followed by prosthetic rehabilitation in 10 patients. Skeletal and dento-alveolar stability were analysed on lateral cephalometric radiographs and condylar changes on orthopantomographic radiographs. Transverse stability of the dental arches was analysed on dental casts. The treatment results in this group were compared with patients with similar skeletal features but without amelogenesis imperfecta. The harmony of the long faces was restored and a reasonable vertical stability of the maxilla was achieved, however, a slight open bite and tongue interposition was still present. The transverse stability of dental arches (60%) was disappointing. Rigid internal fixation produced better transverse stability. Progressive condylar resorption was seen in two patients (13%). Less occlusal stability could be achieved in patients with AI, but resulted neither in less skeletal stability nor in more susceptibility to morphological condylar changes.

Anterior open bite (AOB) is often seen in patients with amelogenesis imperfecta (AI). The skeletal and dental components were analysed in 15 patients with AI and AOB. Measurements on cephalometric radiographs and dental models were compared with those of 130 patients with AOB but without enamel anomalies. Skeletal components in the AI and non-AI group were comparable. The AI group showed omega-shaped dental arches and a reversed mandibular curve of Spee. Orthodontic treatment options are limited because of the conical form of the teeth, tight contacts in the posterior regions and the condition of enamel resulting in difficulties in bonding brackets. Fixation problems encountered during surgery are discussed. A multidisciplinary treatment is outlined consisting of a multi-segment Le Fort I osteotomy followed by prosthetic rehabilitation to stabilize occlusion for at least one year postoperatively.

A sample of 259 patients with vertical maxillary hyperplasia, mandibular hypoplasia and anterior vertical open bite, collected from three different institutions, was analysed regarding temporomandibular joint (TMJ) sounds, condylar remodelling, and condylar resorption. All patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomies, and bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomies were performed in 117 patients. Intraosseous wire fixation was used in 149 and rigid internal fixation in 110 patients. Cephalometric and orthopantomographic radiographs were available before surgery, immediately after surgery, one year postoperatively and at the latest follow up. The mean follow up was 69 months (range 20-210 months). The number of patients with TMJ sounds decreased from 38% to 31%. At the latest follow up 23.6% of the patients showed condylar remodelling, 7.7% unilateral condylar resorption and 7.7% bilateral condylar resorption. Condylar contours, as assessed on orthopantomographic radiographs, were classified as five different types. Condyles with preexisting radiological signs of osteoarthrosis or having a posterior inclination were at high risk for progressive resorption. Female patients with severe anterior open bite, high mandibular plane angle and a low posterior-to-anterior facial height ratio, who underwent a bimaxillary osteotomy, were prone to condylar resorption. Bone loss was predominantly found at the anterior site of the condyle. The incidence of condylar resorption was significantly higher after bimaxillary osteotomies (23%) than after only Le Fort I intrusion osteotomies (9%). Avoidance of intermaxillary fixation by using rigid internal fixation tended to reduce condylar changes, in particular in patients who underwent only a Le Fort I osteotomy. Rigid internal fixation in bimaxillary osteotomies resulted in condylar remodelling in 30% and progressive condylar resorption in 19% of the patients. Condylar changes were not significantly different after using either miniplate osteosynthesis or positional screws in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy procedures.

A sample of 130 patients with vertical maxillary hyperplasia; mandibular hypoplasia with a high mandibular plane angle; narrow, tapered maxillary dental arch form; and anterior vertical open bite were collected from three different institutions to evaluate the stability of transverse maxillary arch dimensions after correction of the open bite. Surgical treatment consisted of Le Fort I or bimaxillary osteotomies. Intermolar, interpremolar, and anterior arch widths were measured three-dimensionally on dental casts using a Reflex microscope, and transverse stability after orthodontic or surgical maxillary expansion was analyzed. Orthodontic expansion followed by a one-piece Le Fort I intrusion osteotomy was performed in 77 patients, and surgical maxillary expansion by a multisegment Le Fort I intrusion osteotomy was performed in 53 patients. The increase of transverse arch width and the relapse after orthodontic or surgical expansion were not significantly different. The transverse arch width in these two groups did not relapse in 20% of the patients after a mean follow-up of 69 months. An additional bilateral sagittal split osteotomy had no detectable effect on stability. Patients who underwent a multisegment Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with rigid internal fixation showed better transverse stability than those with intraosseous wire fixation and maxillomandibular fixation. Maxillary intermolar and interpremolar arch width relapses were not correlated with tongue interposition or loss of interdigitation. The relapse of these arch widths showed significant correlations with clockwise rotation of the mandible but not with changes of overbite or overjet.

A sample of 267 patients with maxillary hyperplasia, a Class I or Class II/I occlusion and anterior vertical open bites, collected from three different institutions, was analysed regarding stability after surgical corrections. Skeletal and dento-alveolar stability of the maxilla, and positional changes of the mandible and of the incisors were evaluated. All patients underwent Le Fort I intrusion osteotomies and in 92 patients segmentation of the maxillae was performed. An additional bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomy was performed in 123 patients. Intraosseous wire fixation was used in 153 patients and rigid internal fixation in 114 patients. Cephalometric radiographs were collected before orthodontic treatment, before surgery, immediately after surgery, one year postoperatively and at the latest follow up. The mean follow up was 69 months (range 20-210 months). It can be concluded that patients with anterior open bites, treated with a Le Fort I osteotomy in one-piece or in multi-segments, with or without bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, exhibited good skeletal stability of the maxilla. Rigid internal fixation produced the best maxillary and mandibular stability. The mean overbite at the longest follow up was 1.24 mm and a lack of overlap between opposing incisors was present in 19%. The overbite did not differ significantly between the different treatment procedures, probably due to compensatory movements of the mandibular and maxillary incisors.

The data of 2049 patients, who underwent maxillofacial orthopaedic surgery, were retrospectively analysed for major intra- and immediate postoperative complications. Immediate life-threatening complications were very rare. They can in most cases be avoided by good anaesthetic and surgical techniques and adequate postoperative care. The most frequently encountered problem in maxillary surgery is excessive blood loss, whilst a compromised airway due to swelling is the most frequent complication in mandibular surgery. Good co-operation between anaesthetist and surgeon is essential to prevent major intraoperative and immediate postoperative problems.

A method of placing two endosteal implants with simultaneous bone grafting to the anterior mandible is described. This technique is simple to use, has minimal morbidity, and has produced good preliminary results. Retrospectively, 18 patients with a total of 36 implants were reviewed. An implant success rate of 91.6% was seen at a mean follow-up time of 17 months after loading with an implant-supported, soft-tissue-borne overdenture.

The dental occlusion and alterations in orofacial muscles were studied in 267 patients whose severe anterior open bite had been treated with a Le Fort 1 intrusion osteotomy with or without an advancement sagittal split osteotomy about 6 years ago. Only 17% of those patients showed anterior contact, and 20% had no vertical overlap of mandibular and maxillary central incisors at all. Tongue position, activity of masticatory muscles, lip competence, lip-incisor relationship, and breathing mode were assessed. Statistically significant correlations were found between tongue positions and occlusion in both the anterior and the posterior regions. In addition, the activity of the masticatory muscles, habitual mouth posture, and interlabial distance were each significantly correlated to overbite, open bite, and overjet. The interlabial distance was also significantly correlated with both breathing mode and mentalis muscle activity. The activity of the masticatory muscles was negatively correlated with tongue position.

26 unilateral cleft palate patients received an autogenous bicortical chin bone graft for early reconstruction of the alveolar process. In the evaluation of the donor site, 4% of the anterior teeth showed a negative pulpal sensibility, less than 1% a peri-apical granuloma and 12% pulp canal obliteration. The tooth buds of the canines showed developmental disturbances in 6%. Exposure of unerupted canines should be avoided, and a 5 mm safety margin is advised. Based on its architecture, topographic accessibility, minimal post-operative morbidity and absence of visible scars, the chin can be considered to be a very useful donor site in bone grafting procedures.

The cutaneous sensibility of 13 pectoralis major cutaneous island flaps has been investigated retrospectively. Although in raising the pectoralis major myocutaneous island flap sensory denervation of the skin is produced, after a mean follow-up period of 29 months (range 5 to 71 months), 68% of the cutaneous portion of the flap revealed sensibility to touch, suggesting a reinnervation from the surrounding intact oral mucosa or skin. The rate of reinnervation was found to be related to the sensibility present in the surrounding tissue.

The treatment of 8 adults with untreated cleft palates is retrospectively discussed. A palatorraphy, consisting of a palatoplasty with pedicled palatal mucoperiosteal flaps and an intravelar veloplasty, is performed. A rib graft between the nasal and oral layer and a partial vestibuloplasty are used in a few patients to create a more favourable anatomical situation for the prosthetic appliance. The palatorraphy contributes to improved speech intelligibility however, combined with a pharyngeal flap as performed in 5 patients, an even better result can be achieved. According to the results, a surgical procedure in the adult still seems to be worthwhile.