Search

Background: Radial head subluxation, known as pulled elbow or Nursemaid’s elbow, is a common pediatric condition that occurs when a longitudinal traction force is applied to an elbow that is pronated and extended. Although the stability of the proximal radioulnar joint has been previously examined in cadaveric models, there are no current studies quantifying the biomechanics of nursemaid’s elbow. The purpose of our study was to demonstrate and quantify the axial traction force required to produce a nursemaid’s elbow in a pediatric cadaver specimen. Methods: Two fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows from a single 3 year-old male donor were dissected by a fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon. An Instron 5944 testing machine with a 2 kN load cell was used to perform uniaxial testing. The radius and humerus were mounted to the Instron machine, and loaded in the axial direction with the elbow in full extension. Loading occurred at a rate of 10 mm/sec for 4 seconds, during which the force and actuator displacement were continuously recorded. The local instantaneous load and extension displacement at the time of subluxation were recorded, and data was synced with high-frame-rate video footage used to confirm the annular ligament subluxation. Results: The load to failure required to produce the nursemaid’s elbow injury in the first elbow was 31N, with a failure displacement of 4.6mm. The second elbow demonstrated a load to failure of 26N, with a failure displacement of 4.6mm. After subluxation, we reduced the annular ligament from the first specimen. The elbow was then re-tested and demonstrated a load to failure of 20N, with a failure displacement of 2.6mm. Conclusion: Axial traction applied to a pediatric cadaver specimen results in subluxation of the annular ligament into the radiocapitellar joint. The mean load to failure is 28.5N, and a lower load to failure was required to produce a recurrent subluxation in a previously injured specimen. Lower load for a recurrent subluxation may be attributed to damage on the annular ligament due to the first subluxation. [Figure: see text]

Category: Sports; Basic Sciences/Biologics Introduction/Purpose: Syndesmosis injuries are common and frequently occur with deltoid injuries but optimal repair remains controversial. Prior biomechanical studies have demonstrated that 1 and 2 suture buttons are equivalent to screw fixation and that parallel or divergent suture buttons are equivalent to single suture button. Prior studies, however, created constructs with suture buttons within 1cm from each other (2-3cm from joint surface). Additionally, the role of deltoid injury and repair have not been evaluated in conjunction with syndesmosis injury and repair. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare a narrow vs spread 2-suture button construct with and without a deltoid repair. Methods: Four matched lower leg specimens (8 total specimens) aged mean 60.2 years (range 57-66 years; 6 females and 2 males; mean BMI 21.1) were tested. Ankle motion under cyclic loading was measured in multiple planes: first in the intact state, following simulated syndesmosis and deltoid injury, then following fixation with 1 of 2 randomly assigned constructs: 2 parallel suture buttons at 2 and 3cm from joint line (narrow); and 2 parallel suture buttons at 1 and 4cm from joint line (spread), and then finally following a deltoid repair with each construct. Each state was tested at a constant 750 N axial compressive force and 5N internal/external torque. Rotation position (degrees) and anterior-posterior displacement (mm) were collected throughout the testing to characterize relative spatial relationships of the tibiofibular articulation using 3D video capture technology. Results: Narrow and spread 2-suture button constructs improved rotation and translation compared to cut state (p0.05). There were no significant differences in rotation or translation between Narrow and Spread constructs (p>0.05). The addition of a deltoid repair did not improve rotation or translation compared to syndesmosis repair with either construct alone (p>0.05). Conclusion: The preliminary results of this study suggest that constructs with suture button placed close together or spread apart during fixation of combined syndesmosis and deltoid injury could improve rotation and translation equally. Additionally, in a combined syndesmosis and deltoid injury, the addition of a deltoid repair to a syndesmosis repair did not strengthen the construct. These findings suggest that repair of syndesmosis alone may be sufficient in combined syndesmosis and deltoid injuries. Additional matched samples will be tested to validate preliminary findings.

Background: Transtibial pull-out repair of the medial meniscal posterior root (MMPR) has been largely assessed through biomechanical studies. Biomechanically comparing different suture types would further optimize MMPR fixation and affect clinical care. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal suture material for MMPR fixation. It was hypothesized that ultra high–molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) suture tape would be biomechanically superior to UHMWPE suture and standard suture. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: The MMPR attachment was divided in 24 human cadaveric knees and randomly assigned to 3 repair groups: UHMWPE suture tape, UHMWPE suture, and standard suture. Specimens were dissected down to the medial meniscus, and the posterior root attachments were sectioned off the tibia. Two-tunnel transtibial pull-out repair with 2 sutures, as determined by the testing group, was performed. The repair constructs were cyclically loaded between 10 and 30 N at 0.5 Hz for 1000 cycles to mimic the forces experienced on the medial meniscus during postoperative rehabilitation. Displacement was recorded at 1, 50, 100, 500, and 1000 cycles. Ultimate failure load, displacement at failure, and load at 3 mm of displacement (clinical failure) were also recorded. Results: UHMWPE suture tape had significantly less displacement of the medial meniscus when compared with standard suture at 1 (–0.22 mm [95% CI, –0.41 to –0.02]; P = .025) and 50 (–0.35 mm [95% CI, –0.67 to –0.03]; P = .029) cycles. There were no other significant differences observed in displacement between groups at any number of cycles. UHMWPE suture tape had significantly less displacement at the time of failure than standard suture (–3.71 mm [95% CI, –7.17 to –0.24]; P = .034). UHMWPE suture tape had a significantly higher load to reach the clinical failure displacement of 3 mm than UHMWPE suture (15.64 N [95% CI, 0.02 to 31.26]; P = .05). There were no significant differences in ultimate failure load between groups. Conclusion: The meniscal root repair construct with UHMWPE suture tape may be stronger and less prone to displacement than that with standard suture or UHMWPE suture. Clinical Relevance: UHMWPE suture tape may provide better clinical results compared with UHMWPE suture and standard suture.