Search

Objectives: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) remain first-choice to treat symptomatic anemia and delay transfusion dependence in most patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) without del(5q). Deferasirox increased erythroid responses in some lower-risk MDS patients in clinical trials, and adding low-dose deferasirox to ESA treatment may further improve erythroid response. Methods: KALLISTO (NCT01868477) was a randomized, open-l abel, multicenter, phase II study. Lower-risk MDS patients received deferasirox at 10 mg/kg/d (dispersible tablets) or 7 mg/kg/d (film-coated tablets) plus erythropoietin (n = 11), or erythropoietin alone (n = 12) for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the between-group difference in erythroid response within 12 weeks. Results: Erythroid response occurred in 27.3% of patients receiving deferasirox plus erythropoietin vs 41.7% of patients receiving erythropoietin alone within 12 weeks (difference 14.4%; 95% CI -24.0, 48.16). Within 24 weeks, the hematologic response rate was 27.3% with deferasirox plus erythropoietin vs 50% with erythropoietin alone, and hematologic improvement rates were 45.5% vs 100%. Deferasirox plus erythropoietin was generally well tolerated. Conclusions: In this small pilot study, combining low-dose deferasirox with erythropoietin did not improve erythroid response. It remains of interest to investigate early chelation approaches with even lower deferasirox doses plus erythropoietin in lower-risk MDS patients before the onset of transfusion dependence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Improved therapeutic options are needed for patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Subcutaneous bortezomib has replaced intravenous bortezomib as it is associated with a more favourable toxicity profile. We investigated the activity and safety of three different dosing regimens of oral panobinostat in combination with subcutaneous bortezomib and oral dexamethasone for this indication.Methods: PANORAMA 3 is an open-label, randomised, phase 2 study being done at 71 sites (hospitals and medical centres) across 21 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (as per International Myeloma Working Group 2014 criteria), who had received one to four previous lines of therapy (including an immunomodulatory agent), and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive oral panobinostat 20 mg three times weekly, 20 mg twice weekly, or 10 mg three times weekly, plus subcutaneous bortezomib and oral dexamethasone. All study drugs were administered in 21-day cycles. Randomisation was done by an interactive response technology provider, and stratified by number of previous treatment lines and age. The primary endpoint was overall response rate after up to eight treatment cycles (analysed in all randomly assigned patients by intention to treat). Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug. No statistical comparisons between groups were planned. This trial is ongoing and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02654990.Findings: Between April 27, 2016, and Jan 17, 2019, 248 patients were randomly assigned (82 to panobinostat 20 mg three times weekly, 83 to panobinostat 20 mg twice weekly, and 83 to 10 mg panobinostat three times weekly). Median duration of follow-up across all treatment groups was 14·7 months (IQR 7·8-24·1). The overall response rate after up to eight treatment cycles was 62·2% (95% CI 50·8-72·7; 51 of 82 patients) for the 20 mg three times weekly group, 65·1% (53·8-75·2; 54 of 83 patients) for the 20 mg twice weekly group, and 50·6% (39·4-61·8; 42 of 83 patients) for the 10 mg three times weekly group. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 71 (91%) of 78 patients in the 20 mg three times weekly group, 69 (83%) of 83 patients in the 20 mg twice weekly group, and 60 (75%) of 80 patients in the 10 mg three times weekly group; the most common (≥20% patients in any group) grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (33 [42%] of 78, 26 [31%] of 83, and 19 [24%] of 83 patients) and neutropenia (18 [23%], 13 [16%], and six [8%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 42 (54%) of 78 patients in the 20 mg three times weekly group, 40 (48%) of 83 patients in the 20 mg twice weekly group, and 35 (44%) of 83 patients in the 10 mg three times weekly group; the most common serious adverse event (≥10% patients in any group) was pneumonia (nine [12%] of 78, ten [12%] of 83, and nine [11%] of 80 patients). There were 14 deaths during the study (five [6%] of 78 patients in the 20 mg three times weekly group, three [4%] of 83 in the 20 mg twice weekly group, and six [8%] of 80 in the 10 mg three times weekly group); none of these deaths was deemed treatment related.Interpretation: The safety profile of panobinostat 20 mg three times weekly was more favourable than in previous trials of this regimen with intravenous bortezomib, suggesting that subcutaneous bortezomib improves the tolerability of the panobinostat plus bortezomib plus dexamethasone regimen. The overall response rate was highest in the 20 mg three times weekly and 20 mg twice weekly groups, with 10 mg three times weekly best tolerated.Funding: Novartis Pharmaceuticals and Secura Bio. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anti-PD-1, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy are used in the treatment of patients with advanced HER2-positive esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, but long-term survival remains limited. In this study, we report extended follow-up data from the INTEGA trial (NCT03409848), which investigated the efficacy of the anti-PD-1 nivolumab, trastuzumab, and FOLFOX chemotherapy (FOLFOX arm) in comparison with a chemotherapy-free regimen involving nivolumab, trastuzumab, and the anti-CTLA-4 ipilimumab (Ipi arm) in the first-line setting for advanced disease. The 12-month overall survival (OS) showed no statistical difference between the arms, with 57% OS (95% confidence interval, 41%-71%) in the Ipi arm and 70% OS (95% confidence interval, 54%-82%) in the FOLFOX arm. Crossing of the survival curves indicated a potential long-term benefit for some patients within the Ipi arm, but early progressors in the Ipi arm underlined the need for biomarker-guided strategies to optimize treatment selection. To this end, metabolomic and cytokine analyses demonstrated elevated levels of normetanephrine, cortisol, and IL6 in immunotherapy-unresponsive patients in the Ipi arm, suggesting a role for systemic inflammatory stress in modulating antitumor immune responses. Patients with this signature also showed an increased neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio that persisted in the Ipi arm, but not in the FOLFOX arm, and strongly correlated with survival. Furthermore, a low neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio characterized patients benefiting from immunotherapy and targeted therapy without the need for additional chemotherapy. These data suggest that patient selection based on inflammatory stress-driven immune changes could help customize first-line treatment in patients with advanced HER2-positive esophagogastric adenocarcinoma to potentially improve long-term survival., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Few data exist on health-related quality of life (QoL) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) receiving first-line chemotherapy (Awad L ZE, Mesbah M Boston, MA. Applying survival data methodology to analyze quality of life data, in Mesbah M, Cole BF, Ting Lee M-L (eds): Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies: Design, Measurements and Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002). The QOLIXANE study is a prospective, noninterventional, multicenter substudy of the Platform for Outcome, Quality of Life and Translational Research on Pancreatic Cancer (PARAGON) registry, which evaluated QoL in patients with mPC receiving first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy in real-life setting. QoL was prospectively measured via EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires at baseline and every month thereafter. Therapy and efficacy parameters were prospectively collected. Main objectives were the rate of patients without deterioration of Global Health Status/QoL (GHS/QoL) at 3 and 6 months. Six hundred patients were enrolled in 95 German study sites. Median progression-free survival was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2-6.3). Median overall survival (OS) was 8.9 months (95% CI, 7.9-10.2), while median time to deterioration of GHS/QoL was 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.0-5.6). With a baseline GHS/QoL score of 46 (SD, 22.8), baseline QoL of the patients was severely impaired, in most cases due to loss in role functioning and fatigue. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, 61% and 41% of patients had maintained GHS/QoL after 3 and 6 months, respectively. However, in the QoL response analysis, 35% and 19% of patients had maintained (improved or stable) GHS/QoL after 3 and 6 months, respectively, while 14% and 9% had deteriorated GHS/QoL with the remaining patients being nonevaluable. In the Cox regression analysis, GHS/QoL scores strongly predicted survival with a hazard ratio of 0.86 (P < .0001). Patients with mPC have poor QoL at baseline that deteriorates within a median of 4.7 months. Treatment with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel is associated with maintained QoL in relevant proportions of patients. However, overall, results remain poor, reflecting the aggressive nature of the disease., (© 2020 Union for International Cancer Control.)