Search

Background: Robotics is currently being adopted across the spectrum of neurosurgery from deep brain stimulation to spine surgery instrumentation. Mastoidectomy is a cognitively demanding procedure that involves careful removal of bone around the critical structures of the temporal bone. Herein, we report a pilot study that serves as a proof of concept for real-time, multiparameter recording during mastoidectomy. Methods: This pilot study involved the iterative development of a platform for the real time recording of video, 3D position, velocity, acceleration, and force data during the performance of mastoidectomy using cadaveric specimens. Results: Across all 8 replicates, the average distance traveled by the drill tip in the x, y, and z axes was 39.88 mm (±11.98 mm), 38.52 mm (±8.24 mm), 31.40 mm (±7.89 mm), respectively. The overall average ranges for velocity and acceleration of the drill tip in the x axis were 412.81 mm/s (±91.12 mm/s) and 6383.05 mm/s2 (±941.05 mm/s2). The range of forces recorded was 8.52 N (±2.90 N), 40.94 N (±9.81 N), and 35.42 N (±11.06 N) in the x-, y-, and z-axis, respectively. Conclusions: This study represents a proof-of-concept that the mechanical parameters associated with surgeon-performed mastoidectomy can be recorded in real-time. This represents a crucial step in understanding the human drilling process which incorporates visual and haptic sensory input with experiential and explicit knowledge using fuzzy logic feedback. Ultimately, data collected using this methodology may provide the groundwork for the development of an algorithm for robotic mastoidectomy.

Abstract Within Neurotology, special draping systems have been devised for mastoid surgery recognizing that drilling of middle ear mucosa is an aerosol generating medical procedure (AGMP) which can place surgical teams at risk of COVID-19 infection. We provide a thorough description of a barrier system utilized in our practice, along with work completed by our group to better quantify its effectiveness. Utilization of a barrier system can provide near complete bone dust and droplet containment within the surgical field and prevent contamination of other healthcare workers. As this is an early system, further adaptations and national collaborations are required to ultimately arrive at a system that seamlessly integrates into the surgical suite. While these barrier systems are new, they are timely as we face a pandemic, and can play a crucial role in safely resuming surgery.

Introduction:. Orthopaedic surgery resident case exposure is an important component of surgical training and is monitored by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to ensure resident readiness for graduation. The purpose of this study was to investigate trends in exposure to adult orthopaedic surgical procedures and analyze the impact of the 2013 update in ACGME case logging expectations. Methods:. A retrospective review of ACGME case log data was conducted for adult orthopaedic procedures performed by graduating orthopaedic surgery residents from 2012 to 2020. Trends in the number of cases logged and the case share by anatomical location were investigated. Linear regression analysis was performed to analyze changes in case number over the 9-year period. Results:. For all surgical categories, there was stability in the average case number per resident from 2012 to 2013, followed by a precipitous decrease from 2013 to 2014. From 2014 to 2020, there has been a gradual increase in case number for all categories except “other musculoskeletal (MSK),” resulting in a total 46% recovery since the 2014 decline. Concomitant with the decline, there was a relative increase in pelvis/hip and femur/knee procedures and decrease in shoulder, other MSK, and spine procedures. From 2014 to 2020, shoulder, humerus/elbow, pelvis/hip, leg/ankle, foot/toes, and spine cases have gradually accounted for a larger proportion of total cases while femur/knee and “other MSK” cases have accounted for less. Conclusions:. The 2013 update in ACGME case logging expectations was associated with a significant decrease in case number. This is likely a reflection of residents correctly entering 1 primary Current Procedural Terminology code for each surgical case. Programs should be aware of a general increase in case number since 2014 and acknowledge the fact that some procedure types may be given priority from a logging standpoint when multiple Current Procedural Terminology codes apply.