Search

Wearable devices for the quantification of walking have recently been adopted for gait rehabilitation. To apply this method in subacute rehabilitation settings, this approach must be effective in these populations and implemented as a feasible method in terms of adherence and safety, especially the risk of falling. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of an activity monitoring approach in subacute rehabilitation using a commercially available pedometer validated with slow walking. This randomized controlled study with blinded assessors recruited 29 patients admitted to a rehabilitation ward. The participants were randomly assigned to either the feedback (intervention) or the no-feedback (control) group. Participants in both groups received at least 120 min of therapy sessions every day for 6 or 7 days per week while wearing pedometers on their unaffected ankles from the day they were permitted to walk independently till discharge. Only participants in the feedback group received weekly encouragement and the next goals. The primary outcome was the change in the 6-minute walking distance (Δ6MD). Feasibility (percentage of pedometer data acquisition days in the total observational period and the number of falls) and other efficacy outcomes (step counts, gait speed, 30-seconds chair stand test, Berg Balance Scale, and Timed Up and Go Test) were also evaluated. Regarding feasibility outcomes, the data acquisition rate was 94.1% and the number of falls during the observation period was one in the feedback group. Regarding efficacy outcomes, Δ6MD was not significantly greater in the feedback group [mean (standard deviation): 79.1 (51.7) m] than in the no-feedback group [86.1 (65.4) m] (p = 0.774) and the other five secondary outcomes showed no between-group difference. Considering the large number of steps per day in both groups [6,912 (4,751) and 5,600 (5,108) steps in the feedback and no-feedback group, respectively], the effect of the intended intervention might have been masked by the effect of simply wearing pedometers in the control group. This study revealed that the activity monitoring approach using an ankle-worn pedometer was practical in terms of adherence and safety. Further clinical trials are required to elucidate ways to effectively use wearable devices in subacute rehabilitation.

Background: A self-monitoring approach utilizing fitness trackers that provide feedback regarding physical activities has been recently applied to rehabilitation patients to promote voluntary walking activities. Although this approach has been proven to increase physical activity, it is uncertain whether the intervention improves walking ability.Aim: This review investigated whether the additional self-monitoring approach using activity trackers would improve walking ability in any type of rehabilitation setting.Methods: A systematic search was performed in four databases [PubMed (MEDLINE), The Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature] to identify studies that examined the self-monitoring approach combined with rehabilitative intervention vs. the same rehabilitative intervention only in participants with any unhealthy conditions. Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of all the retrieved English literature published from 2009 to 2019, then discussed the final inclusion. The risk of bias was assessed referring to the criteria of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The key findings were synthesized using narrative synthesis. In addition, a quantitative synthesis was conducted when more than two studies investigating the same disease were identified.Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials satisfied the eligibility criteria, nine of which had a lower risk of bias. The types of diseases included stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cancer, Parkinson's disease, hemophilia, peripheral artery disease, post-total knee arthroplasty, and geriatric rehabilitation. Eight studies reported measures of walking endurance and four reported measures of gait speed. In the quantitative synthesis of two studies investigating COPD, there was a significant between-group difference in terms of changes in the 6-min walking distance from the baseline, which was favorable to the additional self-monitoring intervention group (mean difference: 13.1 m; 95% confidence interval, 1.8–24.5; 2 studies, 124 participants; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%). Other available data revealed no consistent evidence regarding effectiveness of the intervention.Conclusions: The findings indicate that there is little evidence suggesting the effectiveness of the self-monitoring approach in improving walking ability in rehabilitation settings. However, a weak recommendation for patients with stable COPD was implicated in the quantitative synthesis. Further research would be required to explore the best indications for this self-monitoring approach.Systematic Review Registration: CRD 42020157695.