Search

Aim: Non‐surgical options for inducing type 2 diabetes remission are limited. We examined whether remission can be achieved by combining lifestyle approaches and short‐term intensive glucose‐lowering therapy. Methods: In this trial, 160 patients with type 2 diabetes on none to two diabetes medications other than insulin were randomised to (a) an intervention comprising lifestyle approaches, insulin glargine/lixisenatide and metformin, or (b) standard care. Participants with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.3% (56 mmol/mol) at 12 weeks were asked to stop diabetes medications and were followed for an additional 52 weeks. The primary outcome was diabetes relapse defined as HbA1c ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol) at 24 weeks or thereafter, capillary glucose ≥10 mmol/L on ≥50% of readings, or use of diabetes medications, analysed as time‐to‐event. Main secondary outcomes included complete or partial diabetes remission at 24, 36, 48 and 64 weeks defined as HbA1c <6.5% (48 mmol/mol) off diabetes medications since 12 weeks after randomisation. A hierarchical testing strategy was applied. Results: The intervention significantly reduced the hazard of diabetes relapse by 43% (adjusted hazard ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.40‐0.81; p =.002). Complete or partial diabetes remission was achieved in 30 (38.0%) intervention group participants versus 16 (19.8%) controls at 24 weeks and 25 (31.6%) versus 14 (17.3%) at 36 weeks [relative risk 1.92 (95% confidence interval 1.14‐3.24) and 1.83 (1.03‐3.26), respectively]. The relative risk of diabetes remission in the intervention versus control group was 1.88 (1.00‐3.53) at 48 weeks and 2.05 (0.98‐4.29) at 64 weeks. Conclusions: A 12‐week intensive intervention comprising insulin glargine/lixisenatide, metformin and lifestyle approaches can induce remission of diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To investigate once‐weekly (OW) semaglutide, a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist (GLP‐1RA), in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in routine clinical practice. Methods: The SURE Canada study was a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Adults with T2D and one or more documented HbA1c values 12 weeks or less before semaglutide initiation were enrolled. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to end of study (EOS; ~30 weeks). Secondary endpoints included change in body weight (BW), waist circumference and patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) and the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c of less than 7.0%, weight loss (WL) of 5% or higher, and a composite of HbA1c reduction of 1% or higher and WL of 3% or higher at EOS. Data were analysed and presented for patients on semaglutide at EOS overall and for the following baseline medication subgroups: oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs) only; GLP‐1RA experienced; insulin ± OADs without GLP‐1RA. Results: In total, 452 patients initiated semaglutide and 356 completed the study on treatment. For the 452 patients, mean baseline HbA1c was 8.1%; 86 (19.0%) patients had HbA1c of less than 7.0%. Mean dose of semaglutide at EOS was 0.76 ± 0.31 mg. Mean HbA1c was reduced by 0.9%‐point (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97; 0.78). Mean BW was reduced by 4.3 kg (95% CI: 4.79; 3.76). At EOS, 46.9% of patients achieved HbA1c of less than 7.0%, 40.9% achieved WL of 5% or higher and 24.1% achieved the composite endpoint. PROs improved from baseline to EOS. No new safety concerns were reported. Conclusions: In SURE Canada, patients treated with OW semaglutide in routine clinical practice experienced clinically significant improvements in HbA1c, BW and other outcomes, supporting semaglutide use in routine clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aim of the study was to examine glycaemic control and safety of insulin degludec (degludec) in patients with either type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) under routine care settings in Canada. Methods: Data were extracted from medical records of adults with T1D or T2D who switched to degludec (± prandial insulin) from another basal insulin (± prandial insulin) ≥ 6 months prior to data collection. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at 6 ± 3 months after degludec initiation. Secondary endpoints included change in hypoglycaemia rate in the 6 months before versus the 6 months after switching, and change in mean total daily insulin dose. Results: Of 667 patients assessed for eligibility, 626 were included. After 6 ± 3 months, HbA1c decreased from baseline in patients with T1D (− 0.3% [− 0.42, − 0.14]95% CI; p < 0.001) and in patients with T2D (− 0.4% [− 0.55, − 0.30]95% CI; p < 0.001). In patients with T1D, there were significant reductions in the rates of overall (rate ratio [RR] 0.70), non-severe (RR 0.69), non-severe nocturnal (RR 0.36), and severe nocturnal hypoglycaemia (RR 0.12; all p ≤ 0.004). In patients with T2D there was a significant reduction in non-severe nocturnal hypoglycaemia (RR 0.22; p < 0.001). Mean daily basal insulin dose decreased in patients with T1D (− 1.6 units [− 2.8, − 0.4]95% CI; p = 0.008); there was no significant change in patients with T2D (− 0.6 units [− 2.7, 1.4]95% CI; p = 0.543). Conclusion: In routine clinical practice, improved glycaemic control was observed in patients with T1D or T2D switching to insulin degludec from other basal insulins, with either improvement or no change in hypoglycaemia rates. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03674866 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are routinely treated with combinations of glucose-lowering agents. The adverse event (AE) profile and effects on glycemic control have not been assessed for the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide once weekly in combination with a thiazolidinedione (TZD) with or without metformin. Objective: This study was conducted to examine the long-term safety profile and changes in glycemic control and weight for exenatide once weekly with TZD with or without metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus over 2 years. Methods: In this single-arm, open-label trial with treatment up to 104 or 117 weeks, patients received 2 mg exenatide once weekly while continuing treatment with a TZD with or without metformin. Patients were either exenatide-naïve before this study or had previously received exenatide twice daily, which was discontinued on initiating exenatide once weekly. Patients were on a stable dosage of TZD (rosiglitazone or pioglitazone) and, if applicable, metformin. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as those first occurring or worsening post baseline. Descriptive statistics were used for absolute and change-from-baseline data, and a one-sample t test for within-group change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Results: Of 134 patients in the intent-to-treat population (baseline mean [SD] HbA1c,7.2% [1.0%]), 44 were exenatide-naïve (baseline HbA1c, 7.8% [1.0%]) and 90 switched from exenatide twice daily (baseline HbA1c, 7.0% [0.8%]). Of intent-to-treat patients, 106 (79%) completed the final treatment visit (week 104 or week 117). The most common AEs were nausea (17% of patients) and injection-site nodule (12% of patients). Serious AEs were reported in 14% of patients and 5% withdrew because of a treatment-emergent AE. No identifiable pattern of serious AEs was observed. There were 4 reports of edema and no reports of heart failure. No major hypoglycemia was reported; minor hypoglycemia was reported in 4% of patients. Exenatide-naïve patients experienced mean (SE) HbA1c reductions of −0.7% (0.2%) and weight reductions of −2.7 (0.8) kg, whereas patients with prior exposure to exenatide twice daily experienced a reduction of −0.4% (0.1%) in HbA1c and no change in weight. Conclusions: Adverse events over 2 years were consistent with the reported safety profiles of exenatide once weekly and TZDs. Exenatide-naïve patients experienced improvements in HbA1c and weight, while patients with the benefit of prior exenatide therapy experienced an additional reduction from baseline in HbA1c and no additional change in weight after 2 years. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00753896. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Diabetes remission due to non-surgical approaches has not been well studied. We investigated induction of diabetes remission following a short-term treatment with insulin glargine, lixisenatide and metformin and changes in exercise and dietary behaviours. Methods: We randomized 160 individuals with type 2 diabetes to (i) 12-week intensive treatment with insulin glargine, lixisenatide, metformin and lifestyle approaches or (ii) standard glycemic management. At 12 weeks, diabetes medications were stopped in patients with HbA1C<7.3%, and participants were followed for diabetes relapse over the subsequent 52 weeks. Diabetes relapse was defined as either the use of diabetes medications, ≥50% of capillary glucose levels ≥10 mmol/L over 1 week, or HbA1C≥6.5% at 24, 36, 48 or 64 weeks and analyzed as time to event. Treatment groups were compared using a Cox Proportional Hazards model with adjustment for duration of diabetes and baseline HbA1C (primary analysis). Key secondary outcomes included the proportion of participants in remission at 24, 36, 48 and 64 weeks. Results: The intervention significantly reduced the hazard of diabetes relapse (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40-0.81; p=0.002). The proportion of participants with diabetes remission was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group at 24 weeks (38% vs. 20%; relative risk RR 1.92 (1.14-3.24)) and at 36 weeks (32% vs. 17%; RR 1.83 (1.03-3.26)), but not at 48 and 64 weeks (RR 1.88 (1.00-3.53) and 2.05 (0.98-4.29), respectively). Conclusion: Short-term intensive treatment targeting normoglycemia and weight loss with insulin glargine, lixisenatide, metformin and lifestyle changes can induce sustained remission of type 2 diabetes. Disclosure: N. Mcinnes: Other Relationship; Self; Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk, Sanofi. J. Yale: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., Sanofi, Research Support; Self; Bayer Inc., Speaker's Bureau; Self; Dexcom, Inc., Medtronic, Merck & Co., Inc., Omnipod. F. Sultan: Employee; Self; Abbott Diabetes. A. C. Smith: None. R. E. Otto: None. D. Sherifali: None. Y. Liu: None. H. C. Gerstein: Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc., Pfizer Inc., Sanofi, Consultant; Self; Abbott, Covance Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Kowa Company, Ltd., Sanofi, Other Relationship; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., DKSH, Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi, Zuellig, Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi. Remit-iglarlixi collaborative group: n/a. S. Hall: None. H. A. Lochnan: Research Support; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi. S. B. Harris: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Abvance Therapeutics, HLS Therapeutics Inc., Lilly Diabetes, Novo Nordisk A/S, Consultant; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., mdBriefCase, Other Relationship; Self; American Diabetes Association, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., Sanofi. Z. Punthakee: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk. R. J. Sigal: Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk, Research Support; Self; Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk. I. Hramiak: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer Inc., BI-Lilly Joint Venture (Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly), Dexcom, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Medtronic, Research Support; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi. M. Azharuddin: Consultant; Self; Novo Nordisk Canada Inc. J. F. Liutkus: Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., Research Support; Self; Bayer Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., IQVIA, Kowa Research Institute, Inc., Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., Sanofi, Speaker's Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Self; Bayer Inc., Novo Nordisk, Pfizer Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Spouse/Partner; Bayer Inc., Eisai Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., Pfizer Inc. Funding: Sanofi [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This post hoc pooled analysis of four real-world studies (SURE Canada, Denmark/Sweden, Switzerland and UK) aimed to characterize the use of once-weekly (OW) semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D)., Research Design and Methods: The Semaglutide Real-world Evidence (SURE) studies had a duration of ~30 weeks. Changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ) and body weight (BW) were analyzed for the overall population and the following baseline subgroups: GLP-1RA-naïve/GLP-1RA switchers; body mass index <25/≥25-<30/≥30-<35/≥35 kg/m 2 ; age <65/≥65 years; HbA 1c <7%/≥7-≤8%/>8-≤9%/>9%; T2D duration <5/≥5-<10/≥10 years. Data for patients achieving treatment targets were analyzed in the overall population and the baseline HbA 1c ≥7% subgroup., Results: Of 1212 patients, 960 were GLP-1RA-naïve and 252 had switched to semaglutide from another GLP-1RA. In the overall population, HbA 1c was reduced from baseline to end of study (EOS) by -1.1% point and BW by -4.7 kg; changes were significant for all subgroups. There were significantly larger reductions of HbA 1c and BW in GLP-1RA-naïve versus GLP-1RA switchers and larger reductions in HbA 1c for patients with higher versus lower baseline HbA 1c . At EOS, 52.6% of patients in the overall population achieved HbA 1c <7%. No new safety concerns were identified in any of the completed SURE studies., Conclusions: In this pooled analysis, patients with T2D initiating OW semaglutide showed significant improvements from baseline to EOS in HbA 1c and BW across various baseline subgroups, including patients previously treated with a GLP-1RA other than semaglutide, supporting OW semaglutide use in clinical practice., Trail Registration Numbers: NCT03457012; NCT03631186; NCT03648281; NCT03876015., Competing Interests: Competing interests: J-FY reports receiving grants from Novo Nordisk during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Janssen, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi, all outside the submitted work. UB reports personal fees for participation in a scientific advisory board from Novo Nordisk, outside the submitted work. A-MC, AC and UE are employees of Novo Nordisk, and A-MC and UE own stock in the company. SC reports consultancy payment for Novo Nordisk (paid to his employer). NRE reports payment for lecturing and reimbursement for participation in scientific advisory boards from Novo Nordisk (paid to her employer), outside the submitted work. PH reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, and Novo Nordisk, outside the submitted work. STK reports grants and personal fees for lectures and/or consultancy from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novo Nordisk, and personal fees for lectures and/or consultancy from MSD, Mundipharma and Sanofi, outside of the submitted work. JL reports compensation for clinical trial research, personal fees from continuing medical education events, outside the submitted work. TS reports grants from Abbott and Novo Nordisk outside the submitted work. BS reports fees for advisory board meetings and lectures from Novo Nordisk. GR reports research funding from Novo Nordisk., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)