Search

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is effective for replication-repair-deficient, high-grade gliomas (RRD-HGG). The clinical/biological impact of immune-directed approaches after failing ICI monotherapy is unknown. We performed an international study on 75 patients treated with anti-PD-1; 20 are progression free (median follow-up, 3.7 years). After second progression/recurrence (n = 55), continuing ICI-based salvage prolonged survival to 11.6 months (n = 38; P < 0.001), particularly for those with extreme mutation burden (P = 0.03). Delayed, sustained responses were observed, associated with changes in mutational spectra and the immune microenvironment. Response to reirradiation was explained by an absence of deleterious postradiation indel signatures (ID8). CTLA4 expression increased over time, and subsequent CTLA4 inhibition resulted in response/stable disease in 75%. RAS-MAPK-pathway inhibition led to the reinvigoration of peripheral immune and radiologic responses. Local (flare) and systemic immune adverse events were frequent (biallelic mismatch-repair deficiency > Lynch syndrome). We provide a mechanistic rationale for the sustained benefit in RRD-HGG from immune-directed/synergistic salvage therapies. Future approaches need to be tailored to patient and tumor biology., Significance: Hypermutant RRD-HGG are susceptible to checkpoint inhibitors beyond initial progression, leading to improved survival when reirradiation and synergistic immune/targeted agents are added. This is driven by their unique biological and immune properties, which evolve over time. Future research should focus on combinatorial regimens that increase patient survival while limiting immune toxicity. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 201., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome (CMMRD) is a lethal cancer predisposition syndrome characterized by early-onset synchronous and metachronous multiorgan tumors. We designed a surveillance protocol for early tumor detection in these individuals., Patients and Methods: Data were collected from patients with confirmed CMMRD who were registered in the International Replication Repair Deficiency Consortium. Tumor spectrum, efficacy of the surveillance protocol, and malignant transformation of low-grade lesions were examined for the entire cohort. Survival outcomes were analyzed for patients followed prospectively from the time of surveillance implementation., Results: A total of 193 malignant tumors in 110 patients were identified. Median age of first cancer diagnosis was 9.2 years (range: 1.7-39.5 years). For patients undergoing surveillance, all GI and other solid tumors, and 75% of brain cancers were detected asymptomatically. By contrast, only 16% of hematologic malignancies were detected asymptomatically ( P < .001). Eighty-nine patients were followed prospectively and used for survival analysis. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 90% (95% CI, 78.6 to 100) and 50% (95% CI, 39.2 to 63.7) when cancer was detected asymptomatically and symptomatically, respectively ( P = .001). Patient outcome measured by adherence to the surveillance protocol revealed 4-year OS of 79% (95% CI, 54.8 to 90.9) for patients undergoing full surveillance, 55% (95% CI, 28.5 to 74.5) for partial surveillance, and 15% (95% CI, 5.2 to 28.8) for those not under surveillance ( P < .0001). Of the 64 low-grade tumors detected, the cumulative likelihood of transformation from low-to high-grade was 81% for GI cancers within 8 years and 100% for gliomas in 6 years., Conclusion: Surveillance and early cancer detection are associated with improved OS for individuals with CMMRD., Competing Interests: Hagit N. BarisConsulting or Advisory Role: Sanofi, Igentify LtdSpeakers' Bureau: Sanofi, Takeda, Pfizer Donald BaselHonoraria: BioMarinConsulting or Advisory Role: iQvia Deborah T. BlumenthalConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Novocure, Takeda Miriam BornhorstConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca/MedImmune Sara RhodeHonoraria: Myriad GeneticsSpeakers' Bureau: Myriad GeneticsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Myriad Genetics Roula FarahHonoraria: Novo NordiskConsulting or Advisory Role: Novo Nordisk William D. FoulkesResearch Funding: AstraZeneca David GassEmployment: X4 PharmaceuticalsHonoraria: X4 PharmaceuticalsSpeakers' Bureau: Precisionscientia Heather HampelStock and Other Ownership Interests: Genome MedicalConsulting or Advisory Role: InVitae, Genome Medical, Promega, 23andMe Jordan R. HansfordConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer Craig HarlosTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: GlaxoSmithKline Nobuko HijiyaHonoraria: NovartisConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, IncyteResearch Funding: Pfizer Junne KamiharaStock and Other Ownership Interests: PanTher Therapeutics, ROME Therapeutics, TellBioHonoraria: Pfizer, NanoString Technologies, Third Rock Ventures, Foundation MedicineConsulting or Advisory Role: ROME Therapeutics, Third Rock VenturesResearch Funding: PureTech, Ribon Therapeutics, ACD BiotechnePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent on drug delivery device licensed to PanTher Therapeutics, Patents on Repeat RNA biomarkers and therapeutics licensed to Rome Therapeutics, Patents on Circulating Tumor Cell Biomarkers Licensed to TellBio Inc Jeffrey KnipsteinEmployment: PRA Health SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: Atheneum Alvaro LassalettaStock and Other Ownership Interests: Gilead SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: Shire, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Roche, ServierTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Shire, Gilead Sciences Simon C. LingHonoraria: AbbvieResearch Funding: Abbvie, Gilead Sciences Michael P. LinkConsulting or Advisory Role: Incyte, ADC Therapeutics, Lilly, Steba Biotech, Mesoblast, GlaxoSmithKline, SyndaxResearch Funding: Seattle Genetics, Janssen Oncology Rebecca Loret de MolaEmployment: Huron Consulting Maura MassiminoConsulting or Advisory Role: Oncoscience, Novartis Gary MasonEmployment: Janssen Research & Development, MerckStock and Other Ownership Interests: Johnson & Johnson, MerckTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen Research & Development Kim E. NicholsStock and Other Ownership Interests: IncyteResearch Funding: Incyte/Novartis, Alpine Immune Sciences Enrico OpocherConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZenecaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca Michael OsbornTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, Pfizer Benjamin OshrineHonoraria: Mesoblast Alyssa ReddyConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, AstraZeneca Lara ReichmanResearch Funding: Illumina Marc RemkeStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bayer, BB Biotech Ventures, BioNTech AG, InVitae, IDEXX Laboratories Kami Wolfe SchneiderOther Relationship: Journal of Genetic Counseling Duncan StearnsConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZenecaOpen Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/792397 Patrick TombocHonoraria: Unicare Health PlanConsulting or Advisory Role: UniCare Health Plan An Van DammeConsulting or Advisory Role: Octapharm, Pfizer, BayerResearch Funding: Johnson & JohnsonTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer, Sobi, Shire, Roche Ira WinerResearch Funding: Oncoceutics David S. ZieglerConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, AmgenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bayer Cynthia HawkinsConsulting or Advisory Role: BayerPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: IP for low-grade glioma and sarcoma fusion panels as well as medulloblastoma subgrouping panel David MalkinConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer Eric BouffetConsulting or Advisory Role: NovartisResearch Funding: Roche, Bristol Myers SquibbNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Purpose: To review and critique the current state of liquid biopsy in pHGG., Materials and Methods: Published literature was reviewed for articles related to liquid biopsy in pediatric glioma and adult glioma with a focus on high-grade gliomas., Results: This review discusses the current state of liquid biomarkers of pHGG and their potential applications for liquid biopsy development., Conclusions: While nascent, the progress toward identifying circulating analytes of pHGG primes the field of neuro-oncoogy for liquid biopsy development., (© 2020 The Author(s).)

Background: Delirium affects 10% to 30% of patients in pediatric intensive care units (PICU) and is associated with increased length of stay and prolonged late sequela. There are no prospective trials evaluating delirium in the pediatric hematology, oncology, and bone marrow transplant (PHO) population. Hypothesizing that delirium is underrecognized in this population, our study aimed to identify the prevalence of delirium in hospitalized PHO patients and associated risk factors., Procedure: PHO and PICU nurses were trained to use the Cornell Assessment for Pediatric Delirium and to record scores once every 12-hour shift. Predetermined demographic and clinical variables were collected daily on all hospitalized PHO patients during the year-long prospective study., Results: Prior to initiating routine delirium screening, 1.1% of PHO admissions and 2.4% of unique patients had delirium mentioned in a progress note. This study included 807 consecutive admissions: 671 oncology, 49 hematology, and 87 bone marrow transplant (BMT) hospitalizations among 223 unique PHO patients. The prevalence of delirium among hospitalizations was 5% and among unique patients was 13%. Among BMT hospitalizations, the prevalence was 23%. Multiple logistic regression identified significant association of delirium with increased length of stay, admission to the BMT service, patient location (PICU vs PHO unit), benzodiazepine, opioid, and anticholinergic administration., Conclusions: Before routine screening, delirium was underrecognized in this PHO-hospitalized population. Patients at highest risk had prolonged hospital stays, PICU admissions, BMT, and/or frequent use of benzodiazepines, opioids, or anticholinergics. Routine screening is feasible and may improve our recognition of delirium., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Morbidity and mortality from venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a significant problem for hospitalized patients. Despite the ample prospective literature defining the prevalence of VTE in hospitalized patient populations, the prevalence of VTE in the thermally injured population remains largely unknown., Methods: We prospectively studied 148 thermally injured patients with hospital stays of greater than 3 days with lower extremity duplex ultrasonograms obtained at admission and discharge., Results: Nine patients experienced VTE (6.08%). Eight of the nine deep venous thromboses were proximal. One of the two pulmonary embolisms was fatal. Treatment risk factors that were associated with VTE were the presence of a central venous line (p = 0.020) and transfusion of more than 4 units of packed red blood cells (p = 0.023). These treatment factors were significantly related to each other (p < 0.0001), to body surface area burned, and to intervention., Conclusion: The prevalence of VTE in burn patients is similar to that of moderate- to high-risk general surgical patients for whom VTE prophylaxis is recommended. VTE prophylaxis of burn patients, especially those requiring central venous lines and more than 4 units of packed red blood cells, should be considered.

Open-fire injuries associated with burning trash or brush result in a significant number of burn admissions annually. Trash- and brush-burning injuries are more prevalent in rural environments where open burning is an acceptable practice of waste disposal. These injuries are not "unavoidable accidents" but follow a predictable injury pattern. Understanding this injury pattern is paramount to effective prevention. The purpose of this work is to describe the epidemiology of burn injuries associated with burning trash or brush. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for all trash and brush burning injuries from July 1989 to December 2000. One hundred ninety-four injuries were identified, accounting for one fifth of all flame admissions for the study period. Persons most at risk for these burn injuries were males between the ages of 25 to 45, followed by males ages 16 to 24. Accelerant use was identified in over 80% of these injuries. The median cost for admission was $9,363.00 US dollars. Cost was significantly related to age, percent body surface area burned, and operative intervention. Brush and trash burning can lead to costly injuries especially when accelerants are used. Additional research is needed to explore the cultural and social influences associated with these injuries to target effective prevention.

Women who did not pursue a second in vitro fertilization cycle after a failed cycle were surveyed. The major reason for not pursuing a second cycle was financial.