Search

Malignant ovarian neoplasm is one of the most lethal malignancies among cancers of the female reproductive system. Occasionally, these tumors originate from non-ovarian organs as metastatic lesions since the ovary is a frequent metastatic target of many cancers. However, there limited clinical information on metastatic ovarian carcinoma (MOC) and its hallmarks are unknown. During the period of 1986-2015, 4,284 patients with malignant ovarian neoplasm were identified using the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group (TOTSG) database. Of these, excluding borderline malignant tumor, 3,478 patients with malignant ovarian cancer were extracted. The pathological slides were evaluated under central pathological review. Among them, a total of 143 (4.1%) patients with MOC were identified. The median age of patients with MOC was 54 (29-82) years. The most and second most frequent original tumors were colorectal (43%, N=62) and gastric (29%, N=42) carcinoma, respectively. The rates of carcinoma of the appendix, breast, and pancreas were 8, 6, and 4%, respectively. This is the one of the largest studies clarifying the rates of MOC among malignant ovarian neoplasms. Although the rate is low, we should keep in mind that MOC, particularly from colorectal and gastric cancer should be considered when encountering clinical practice of ovarian cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The association between insulin resistance (IR) and ovarian neoplasm is little known. The present study attempted to investigate the difference in clinicopathological characteristics, metabolic parameters, and IR prevalence between benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms. The cross-sectional study involved 52 non-diabetic women with benign (n=27) and malignant (n=25) diagnoses in a tertiary hospital in Indonesia. Fasting insulin level (FIL), homeostatic model assessment of IR and β-cell dysfunction (HOMA-IR and HOMA-β), fasting IR index (FIRI), and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) were used as surrogate markers to evaluate IR. Parametric and nonparametric statistical tests were employed to analyze the different parameters between the two groups. Pearson or Spearman's rank test assessed the correlation between markers and clinical variables. Results revealed that patients with benign neoplasms were younger than those with malignant neoplasms (38.63 vs. 47.40 years; P=0.003) and had a higher median body mass index (BMI) than their counterparts (22.98 vs. 18.61 kg/m2; P=0.014). Different characteristics between benign and malignant neoplasm cases were found in menopausal status, ovary side affected, systolic blood pressure, and BMI classes. Endometrial cysts and mucinous carcinoma were the most often diagnosed benign and malignant neoplasms. Malignant neoplasms had a lower median HOMA-β score than benign neoplasms (49.33 vs. 75.79; P=0.011), indicating more severe β-cell dysfunction. No significant difference was observed in the prevalence of IR between benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms for the following values of each marker: FIL (25.9% vs. 12.0%), HOMA-IR (37.0% vs. 28.0%), FIRI (51.9% vs. 48.0%) and QUICKI (81.5% vs. 92.0%). The indicators of FIL, HOMA-IR, HOMA-β, FIRI, and QUICKI correlated with each other and confirmed the reliability of these surrogate markers for measuring IR status in ovarian neoplasms. In brief, benign ovarian neoplasms tended to have more IR when compared with malignant ovarian neoplasms. However, this difference was not statistically significant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The association between insulin resistance (IR) and ovarian neoplasm is little known. The present study attempted to investigate the difference in clinicopathological characteristics, metabolic parameters, and IR prevalence between benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms. The cross-sectional study involved 52 non-diabetic women with benign (n=27) and malignant (n=25) diagnoses in a tertiary hospital in Indonesia. Fasting insulin level (FIL), homeostatic model assessment of IR and β-cell dysfunction (HOMA-IR and HOMA-β), fasting IR index (FIRI), and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) were used as surrogate markers to evaluate IR. Parametric and nonparametric statistical tests were employed to analyze the different parameters between the two groups. Pearson or Spearman's rank test assessed the correlation between markers and clinical variables. Results revealed that patients with benign neoplasms were younger than those with malignant neoplasms (38.63 vs. 47.40 years; P=0.003) and had a higher median body mass index (BMI) than their counterparts (22.98 vs. 18.61 kg/m 2 ; P=0.014). Different characteristics between benign and malignant neoplasm cases were found in menopausal status, ovary side affected, systolic blood pressure, and BMI classes. Endometrial cysts and mucinous carcinoma were the most often diagnosed benign and malignant neoplasms. Malignant neoplasms had a lower median HOMA-β score than benign neoplasms (49.33 vs. 75.79; P=0.011), indicating more severe β-cell dysfunction. No significant difference was observed in the prevalence of IR between benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms for the following values of each marker: FIL (25.9% vs. 12.0%), HOMA-IR (37.0% vs. 28.0%), FIRI (51.9% vs. 48.0%) and QUICKI (81.5% vs. 92.0%). The indicators of FIL, HOMA-IR, HOMA-β, FIRI, and QUICKI correlated with each other and confirmed the reliability of these surrogate markers for measuring IR status in ovarian neoplasms. In brief, benign ovarian neoplasms tended to have more IR when compared with malignant ovarian neoplasms. However, this difference was not statistically significant., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright: © Winarto et al.)

Ovarian neoplasms in pregnancy are usually asymptomatic rarely leading onto complications. A 30-year-old G2 P1+0+0+1 was referred at 30 weeks of pregnancy with an ultrasound diagnosis of a large multicystic ovarian cyst with no solid areas, ascites or evidence of metastasis. Antenatal corticosteroid was administered and she was advised to follow-up with reports of tumor markers. She presented a week later with acute pain abdomen and breathlessness. Clinical examination revealed a relaxed uterus and ultrasound was suggestive of rupture of the ovarian cyst. Exploratory laparotomy revealed a ruptured left mucinous ovarian cyst with no evidence of solid areas or metastasis. Left ovariotomy with infracolic omentectomy and concurrent cesarean section was done. A healthy male baby of weight 1.880 kg was delivered. Histopathology revealed stage-1c mucinous cyst adenocarcinoma of left ovary. This was followed-up, with a complete surgery done after a month. She is now receiving postoperative chemotherapy. This is the first reported case of a ruptured malignant ovarian tumor in pregnancy. Torsion or rupture of ovarian masses is an important differential diagnosis of abdominal or pelvic pain during pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]