Search

Summary: Background: There is no effective treatment for women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). We aimed to investigate whether treatment with a high dose of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in early pregnancy can improve pregnancy outcomes in women with unexplained RPL. Methods: In a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, women with primary RPL of unexplained aetiology received 400 mg/kg of IVIG daily or placebo for five consecutive days starting at 4–6 weeks of gestation. They had experienced four or more miscarriages except biochemical pregnancy loss and at least one miscarriage of normal chromosome karyotype. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate at 22 weeks of gestation, and the live birth rate was the secondary outcome. We analysed all women receiving the study drug (intention-to-treat, ITT) and women except those who miscarried due to fetal chromosome abnormality (modified-ITT). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02184741. Findings: From June 3, 2014 to Jan 29, 2020, 102 women were randomly assigned to receive IVIG (n = 53) or placebo (n = 49). Three women were excluded; therefore 50 women received IVIG and 49 women received placebo in the ITT population. The ongoing pregnancy rate at 22 weeks of gestation (31/50 [62·0%] vs. 17/49 [34·7%]; odds ratio [OR] 3·07, 95% CI 1·35–6·97; p = 0·009) and the live birth rate (29/50 [58·0%] vs. 17/49 [34·7%]; OR 2·60, 95% CI 1·15–5·86; p = 0·03) in the IVIG group were higher than those in the placebo group in the ITT population. The ongoing pregnancy rate at 22 weeks of gestation (OR 6·27, 95% CI 2·21–17·78; p

Objective: To elucidate clinical feature and anti-phospholipid antibody (aPL) profiles, including lupus anticoagulant (LA), anti-cardiolipin (CL) antibodies and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (PS/PT) antibodies, of pregnancy failure in patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) already treated with conventional therapy. Materials and methods: Thirty-four women with a history of pregnancy who were diagnosed with APS between 2008 and 2016 were included in the study. We defined the successful pregnancy group as women who gave birth to a healthy baby over 1500 g after 34 weeks of pregnancy under conventional treatment (heparin and/or low-dose aspirin). The unsuccessful pregnancy group was defined as women whose pregnancy outcomes did not meet the aforementioned criteria despite the conventional therapy. The clinical features and aPL profiles were compared between the two groups. Results: Fifteen women were classified into the unsuccessful pregnancy group; seven women were in the successful pregnancy group. Having history of both thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity and LA positivity were significantly more prevalent in the unsuccessful pregnancy group than in the successful pregnancy group (p <.05, respectively). In contrast, single positivity of anti-CL antibody was negatively associated with APS-associated pregnancy morbidity under the conventional treatment (p <.01). The proportion of anti-PS/PT IgG-positive patients was significantly higher in the unsuccessful pregnancy group (p = .02, OR 18.7, 95% CI 1.50, 232.29) with high concordance rate with LA (97% consistence). Conclusion: History of both thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity and the positivity of LA and/or anti-PS/PT-IgG, not but anti-CL-antibodies were correlated with APS-associated pregnancy morbidity refractory to conventional treatment. Clinical feature and aPL profiles might help us to make risk assessment for adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with APS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]