Search

The spread of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) is leading to increased carbapenem consumption. Alternatives to carbapenems need to be investigated. We investigated whether β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLBLI) combinations are as effective as carbapenems in the treatment of bloodstream infections (BSI) due to ESBL-E. A multinational, retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients with monomicrobial BSI due to ESBL-E were studied; specific criteria were applied for inclusion of patients in the empirical-therapy (ET) cohort (ETC; 365 patients), targeted-therapy (TT) cohort (TTC; 601 patients), and global cohort (GC; 627 patients). The main outcome variables were cure/improvement rate at day 14 and all-cause 30-day mortality. Multivariate analysis, propensity scores (PS), and sensitivity analyses were used to control for confounding. The cure/improvement rates with BLBLIs and carbapenems were 80.0% and 78.9% in the ETC and 90.2% and 85.5% in the TTC, respectively. The 30-day mortality rates were 17.6% and 20% in the ETC and 9.8% and 13.9% in the TTC, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) values for cure/improvement rate with ET with BLBLIs were 1.37 (0.69 to 2.76); for TT, they were 1.61 (0.58 to 4.86). Regarding 30-day mortality, the adjusted OR (95% CI) values were 0.55 (0.25 to 1.18) for ET and 0.59 (0.19 to 1.71) for TT. The results were consistent in all subgroups studied, in a stratified analysis according to quartiles of PS, in PS-matched cases, and in the GC. BLBLIs, if active in vitro, appear to be as effective as carbapenems for ET and TT of BSI due to ESLB-E regardless of the source and specific species. These data may help to avoid the overuse of carbapenems. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01764490.), The work was funded by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, cofinanced by European Development Regional Fund titled A Way To Achieve Europe ERDF, the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD12/0015), and FIS (PI10/02021). Participants in the study received support for research from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under the Combatting Bacterial Resistance in Europe—Molecule against Gram Negative Infections (COMBACTE-MAGNET) agreement 115737 resources, which are composed of financial contributions from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) companies' in kind contributions (A. Pascua and J. Rodríguez-Baño), the Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs, the Veterans Affairs Merit Review Program, the Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center VISN 10 (VISN 10 GRECC), and NIAID, NIH, under award numbers R01AI072219 and R01AI063517 (R. A. Bonomo).

REIPI/ESGBIS/INCREMENT Group: J. Gálvez, M. de Cueto, E. Salamanca, M. Falcone, A. Russo, G. Daikos, I. Karaiskos, E. M. Trecarichi, A. R. Losito, D. L. Paterson, A. Hernández, J. Gómez, E. Roilides, E. Iosifidis, Y. Doi, F. F. Tuon, F. Navarro, B. Mirelis, R. San Juan, M. Fernández-Ruiz, N. Larrosa, M. Puig, J. Molina, V. González, V. Rucci, E. Ruiz de Gopegui, C. I. Marinescu, M. C. Fariñas, M. E. Cano, M. Gozalo, J. R. Paño-Pardo, C. Navarro-San Francisco, S. Gómez-Zorrilla, F. Tubau, S. Pournaras, A. Tsakris, O. Zarkotou, Ö. K. Azap, M. Souli, A. Antoniadou, G. Poulakou, D. Virmani, I. Machuca, E. Pérez-Nadales, J. Torre-Cisneros, Ö. Helvaci, A. O. Sahin, R. Cantón, P. Ruiz, M. Bartoletti, M. Giannella, F. Riemenschneider, C. Badia, M. Xercavins, D. Fontanals, E. Jové., [Objectives] Data about the efficacy of ertapenem for the treatment of bloodstream infections (BSI) due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) are limited. We compared the clinical efficacy of ertapenem and other carbapenems in monomicrobial BSI due to ESBL-E., [Methods] A multinational retrospective cohort study (INCREMENT project) was performed (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01764490). Patients given monotherapy with ertapenem or other carbapenems were compared. Empirical and targeted therapies were analysed. Propensity scores were used to control for confounding; sensitivity analyses were performed in subgroups. The outcome variables were cure/improvement rate at day 14 and all-cause 30 day mortality., [Results] The empirical therapy cohort (ETC) and the targeted therapy cohort (TTC) included 195 and 509 patients, respectively. Cure/improvement rates were 90.6% with ertapenem and 75.5% with other carbapenems (P = 0.06) in the ETC and 89.8% and 82.6% (P = 0.02) in the TTC, respectively; 30 day mortality rates were 3.1% and 23.3% (P = 0.01) in the ETC and 9.3% and 17.1% (P = 0.01) in the TTC, respectively. Adjusted ORs (95% CI) for cure/improvement with empirical and targeted ertapenem were 1.87 (0.24–20.08; P = 0.58) and 1.04 (0.44–2.50; P = 0.92), respectively. For the propensity-matched cohorts it was 1.18 (0.43–3.29; P = 0.74). Regarding 30 day mortality, the adjusted HR (95% CI) for targeted ertapenem was 0.93 (0.43–2.03; P = 0.86) and for the propensity-matched cohorts it was 1.05 (0.46–2.44; P = 0.90). Sensitivity analyses were consistent except for patients with severe sepsis/septic shock, which showed a non-significant trend favouring other carbapenems., [Conclusions] Ertapenem appears as effective as other carbapenems for empirical and targeted therapy of BSI due to ESBL-E, but further studies are needed for patients with severe sepsis/septic shock., This study was funded by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Instituto de Salud Carlos III - co-financed by European Development Regional Fund ‘A way to achieve Europe’ ERDF, Spanish Network for the Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD12/0015) and FIS (PI10/02021). The study was also supported in part by funds and/or facilities provided by the Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs, the Veterans Affairs Merit Review Program and the Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center VISN 10 (VISN 10 GRECC) to R. A. B. The NIAID of the NIH under Award Numbers R01AI072219 and R01AI063517 also supported R. A. B.