Search

Objective: We examine levels of candidate blood‐based biomarkers (CBBs) in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treated with tofacitinib. Methods: Patients with JIA who participated in clinical trial NCT02592434 received tofacitinib from baseline to week 18. Serial serum samples were assayed for CBBs (S100A8/9, S100A12, interleukin‐18 [IL‐18], serum amyloid A, resistin, vascular endothelial growth factor, angiopoietin‐1, angiopoietin‐2, matrix metalloproteinase 8 [MMP8], MMP2, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1, leptin, chemokine [C‐X‐C motif] ligand 9, soluble IL‐2 receptor, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor, IL‐6, IL‐23, monocyte chemotactic protein 1, chemokine [C‐C motif] ligand 18 [CCL18], and CCL20). Association of CBBs with JIA response to treatment from baseline to week 18 were assessed. Results: This study included 166 patients with polyarticular‐course JIA. Paired serum samples from 143 patients were available at both baseline and week 18. Thirty‐five percent (50 of 143) of patients had a JIA‐American College of Rheumatology 90 (JIA‐ACR90) level improvement, whereas 90, 121, and 137 (63%, 85%, and 96%) achieved JIA‐ACR70, 50, and 30 improvement at week 18. Despite small numerical differences by JIA category, there were no baseline CBB values that independently predicted a decrease in Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS‐27) or JIA‐ACR90 response by week 18. Decrease in resistin level (baseline to week 18) was significantly associated with week 18 improvement in JADAS‐27 and JIA‐ACR90 response after adjusting for age, sex, JIA disease duration, and baseline resistin (r2 0.79, SE 0.070, P < 0.01, and odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.134 [1.018–1.264]). HLA‐B27 positivity was significantly associated with not achieving a JIA‐ACR90 response at week 18 (P = 0.0097). Conclusion: Among the CBBs included, only resistin was significantly associated with treatment response, and no CBB was identified that forecasts JIA improvement after initiation of tofacitinib. The association of HLA‐B27 positivity with lower response to tofacitinib in JIA is intriguing and merits further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) is a rare disease with distinct features not seen in other categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. In recent years, advances in the understanding of disease immunopathogenesis have led to improved targeted therapies with significant improvement in patient outcomes. Despite these advances, there remain subsets of SJIA with refractory disease and severe disease-associated complications. This review highlights existing options for treatment of refractory SJIA and explores potential future therapeutics for refractory disease. Despite targeted Interleukin IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors a subset of SJIA remains refractory to therapy. About 1 in 7 SJIA patients will be refractory to targeted IL-1 or IL-6 therapy. There is no current agreed upon definition for refractory SJIA and we propose in this review that refractory SJIA is presence of active systemic or arthritic features despite treatment with anti-IL-1 or anti-IL-6 therapy or disease requiring glucocorticoids for control beyond 6 months. SJIA disease associated complications include presence of associated macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), interstitial lung disease (ILD) or amyloidosis and management of each differs. Refractory SJIA treatment options currently include additional conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDS), biologic (bDMARDS), combination biologic therapy, targeted synthetic (tsDMARDS) or other immunomodulatory therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To determine s.c. tocilizumab (s.c.-TCZ) dosing regimens for systemic JIA (sJIA) and polyarticular JIA (pJIA). Methods In two 52-week phase 1 b trials, s.c.-TCZ (162 mg/dose) was administered to sJIA patients every week or every 2 weeks (every 10 days before interim analysis) and to pJIA patients every 2 weeks or every 3 weeks with body weight ≥30 kg or <30 kg, respectively. Primary end points were pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety; efficacy was exploratory. Comparisons were made to data from phase 3 trials with i.v. tocilizumab (i.v.-TCZ) in sJIA and pJIA. Results Study participants were 51 sJIA patients and 52 pJIA patients aged 1–17 years who received s.c.-TCZ. Steady-state minimum TCZ concentration (Ctrough) >5th percentile of that achieved with i.v.-TCZ was achieved by 49 (96%) sJIA and 52 (100%) pJIA patients. In both populations, pharmacodynamic markers of disease were similar between body weight groups. Improvements in Juvenile Arthritis DAS-71 were comparable between s.c.-TCZ and i.v.-TCZ. By week 52, 53% of sJIA patients and 31% of pJIA patients achieved clinical remission on treatment. Safety was consistent with that of i.v.-TCZ except for injection site reactions, reported by 41.2% and 28.8% of sJIA and pJIA patients, respectively. Infections were reported in 78.4% and 69.2% of patients, respectively. Two sJIA patients died; both deaths were considered to be related to TCZ. Conclusion s.c.-TCZ provides exposure and risk/benefit profiles similar to those of i.v.-TCZ. S.c. administration provides an alternative administration route that is more convenient for patients and caregivers and that has potential for in-home use. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov , NCT01904292 and NCT01904279 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of adalimumab (ADA) in polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in the STRIVE registry.Methods: STRIVE enrolled patients with polyarticular-course JIA into 2 arms based on treatment with methotrexate (MTX) alone or ADA with/without MTX (ADA ± MTX). Adverse events (AEs) per 100 patient-years of observation time were analyzed by registry arm. Patients who entered the registry within 4 weeks of starting MTX or ADA ± MTX, defined as new users, were evaluated for change in disease activity assessed by the 27-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score with the C-reactive protein level (JADAS-27CRP ).Results: At the 7-year cutoff date (June 1, 2016), data from 838 patients were available (MTX arm n = 301, ADA ± MTX arm n = 537). The most common AEs were nausea (10.3%), sinusitis (4.7%), and vomiting (4.3%) in the MTX arm and arthritis (3.9%), upper respiratory tract infection (3.5%), sinusitis, tonsillitis, and injection site pain (3.0% each) in the ADA ± MTX arm. Rates of serious infection were 1.5 events/100 patient-years in the MTX arm and 2.0 events/100 patient-years in the ADA ± MTX arm. AE and serious AE rates were similar in patients receiving ADA with versus without MTX. No deaths or malignancies were reported. New users in the ADA ± MTX arm showed a trend toward lower mean JADAS-27CRP compared with new users in the MTX arm in the first year of STRIVE.Conclusion: The STRIVE registry 7-year interim results support the idea that ADA ± MTX is well tolerated by most children. Registry median ADA exposure was 2.47 (interquartile range 1.0-3.6) years, with 42% of patients continuing ADA at the 7-year cutoff date. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To uniquely classify children with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), to describe their demographic characteristics, presenting clinical features, and initial treatments in comparison to patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's) (GPA). Methods The European Medicines Agency (EMA) classification algorithm was applied by computation to categorical data from patients recruited to the ARChiVe (A Registry for Childhood Vasculitis: e-entry) cohort, with the data censored to November 2015. The EMA algorithm was used to uniquely distinguish children with MPA from children with GPA, whose diagnoses had been classified according to both adult- and pediatric-specific criteria. Descriptive statistics were used for comparisons. Results In total, 231 of 440 patients (64% female) fulfilled the classification criteria for either MPA (n = 48) or GPA (n = 183). The median time to diagnosis was 1.6 months in the MPA group and 2.1 months in the GPA group (ranging to 39 and 73 months, respectively). Patients with MPA were significantly younger than those with GPA (median age 11 years versus 14 years). Constitutional features were equally common between the groups. In patients with MPA compared to those with GPA, pulmonary manifestations were less frequent (44% versus 74%) and less severe (primarily, hemorrhage, requirement for supplemental oxygen, and pulmonary failure). Renal pathologic features were frequently found in both groups (75% of patients with MPA versus 83% of patients with GPA) but tended toward greater severity in those with MPA (primarily, nephrotic-range proteinuria, requirement for dialysis, and end-stage renal disease). Airway/eye involvement was absent among patients with MPA, because these GPA-defining features preclude a diagnosis of MPA within the EMA algorithm. Similar proportions of patients with MPA and those with GPA received combination therapy with corticosteroids plus cyclophosphamide (69% and 78%, respectively) or both drugs in combination with plasmapheresis (19% and 22%, respectively). Other treatments administered, ranging in decreasing frequency from 13% to 3%, were rituximab, methotrexate, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil. Conclusion Younger age at disease onset and, perhaps, both gastrointestinal manifestations and more severe kidney disease seem to characterize the clinical profile in children with MPA compared to those with GPA. Delay in diagnosis suggests that recognition of these systemic vasculitides is suboptimal. Compared with adults, initial treatment regimens in children were comparable, but the complete reversal of female-to-male disease prevalence ratios is a provocative finding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Purpose: Comparisons of pediatric ANCA-associated vasculitis subtypes (AAV) are limited by the paucity of reported cases, standardized definitions, and overlapping classification criteria. Published work from ARChiVe (A Registry for Childhood Vasculitis) demonstrated modifications of validated classification algorithms applied to pediatric patients with AAV can classify each patient to mutually exclusive diagnostic categories. We compared presenting features of children with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) classified according to this methodology. Methods: A pediatric modification of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) algorithm for classifying AAV and polyarteritis nodosa (incorporating the EULAR/PRINTO/PRES pediatric classification criteria for GPA) was applied to patients in ARChiVe censored to April 2012. We compared characteristics of patients classified as having MPA and GPA. STATA (Statcorp, 2013) was used to calculate frequencies, percentages, and chi-squared with fisher's exact for categorical variables and means, standard deviations, and t-tests for continuous variables. Results: One hundred fifty-two of 227 children in ARChiVe met criteria for diagnosis of MPA (n = 22) or GPA (n = 130). Characteristics and presenting features are shown in Table . Children with MPA were younger at diagnosis (mean diff. 2.7y, p = <0.01). Renal involvement was predominant in both groups. Renal biopsies in 40% of both groups were consistent with pauci-immune, necrotizing glomerulonephritis. Children with MPA had higher rates of nephrosis, renal failure requiring dialysis, and abnormal creatinine clearance (Table ). Upper and lower airway involvement was more prevalent among those with GPA largely in accordance with surrogate GPA features used to differentiate GPA and MPA in the EMA algorithm. The majority of patients presented with constitutional symptoms, however, other organ systems were less frequently involved. Most patients received combination therapy corticosteroids and cytoxan (64% MPA, 81% GPA) with additional plasmapheresis (29% MPA, 21% GPA), rituximab (14% MPA, 3% GPA) or methotrexate (7% MPA, 1% GPA). The remainder of children received combination corticosteroids and methotrexate or rituximab, without cytoxan (12% MPA, 11% GPA). A larger proportion of patients with MPA received antihypertensive agents and/or ACE inhibitors (64% vs 35%, p = 0.01). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are over 100 rheumatic diseases and approximately 300,000 children with a pediatric rheumatic disease (PRD) in the United States (U.S.). The most common PRDs are juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE), and juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). Effective and safe medications are essential because there are generally no cures for these conditions. Etanercept was the first biologic therapy for the treatment of JIA, approved in 1999. Since then, other biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARDs) blocking relevant immunological pathways have been approved for the treatment of JIA, resulting in a marked improvement of disease prognosis. Conversely, there is only one bDMARD that has been approved for cSLE, but none are approved for the treatment of JDM. Lack of approved therapeutic options, with established dosing regimens and known efficacy and safety, remains a central challenge in the treatment of all PRDs, including autoinflammatory diseases, and for complications of PRDs. This review provides an overview of bDMARD and tsDMARD treatments studied for the treatment of various subtypes of JIA, summarizes information from bDMARD studies in other pediatric rheumatic diseases, with a focus on pivotal trials that led to regulatory approvals and highlights improved outcomes in JIA with the use of these newer medications. Further, we outline barriers and challenges in the treatment of other PRDs. Lastly, we summarize the current regulatory landscape for bDMARD studies and medication approvals in PRDs., (This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.)

Background: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor. This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib versus placebo in patients with polyarticular course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)., Methods: This double-blind, withdrawal phase 3 trial enrolled patients with polyarticular course JIA (extended oligoarthritis, rheumatoid factor-positive or rheumatoid factor-negative polyarthritis, or systemic JIA without active systemic features) aged 2 years to younger than 18 years, and was done at 64 centres of the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation and Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group networks in 14 countries. Patients with psoriatic arthritis or enthesitis-related arthritis were enrolled for exploratory endpoints. During part 1 of the study, patients received oral open-label tofacitinib (weight-based doses; 5 mg twice daily or lower) for 18 weeks. Patients achieving at least JIA/American College of Rheumatology 30 response were randomly assigned (1:1) using an Interactive Response Technology system to continue tofacitinib or switch to placebo in part 2 of the study for 26 weeks. The primary endpoint was JIA flare rate by week 44 in part 2 in patients with polyarticular course JIA; the intention-to-treat principle was applied. Safety was evaluated throughout part 1 and part 2 of the study in all patients who received one dose or more of study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02592434., Findings: Between June 10, 2016, and May 16, 2019, of 225 patients enrolled, 184 (82%) patients had polyarticular course JIA, 20 (9%) had psoriatic arthritis, and 21 (9%) had enthesitis-related arthritis. 147 (65%) of 225 patients received concomitant methotrexate. In part 2, 142 patients with polyarticular course JIA were assigned to tofacitinib (n=72) or placebo (n=70). Flare rate by week 44 was significantly lower with tofacitinib (21 [29%] of 72 patients) than with placebo (37 [53%] of 70 patients; hazard ratio 0·46, 95% CI 0·27-0·79; p=0·0031). In part 2 of the study, adverse events occurred in 68 (77%) of 88 patients receiving tofacitinib and 63 (74%) of 85 in the placebo group. Serious adverse events occurred in one (1%) and two (2%), respectively. In the entire tofacitinib exposure period, 107 (48%) of 225 patients had infections or infestations. There were no deaths during this study., Interpretation: The results of this pivotal trial show that tofacitinib is an effective treatment in patients with polyarticular course JIA. New oral therapies are particularly relevant for children and adolescents, who might prefer to avoid injections., Funding: Pfizer., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests NR has received honoraria for consultancy fees or speaker bureaus from Ablynx, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, F Hoffmann-La Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, R-Pharm, Sanofi, Servier, Sinergie, and Sobi. The IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, where NR works as a full-time public employee, has received contributions from the following pharmaceutical companies in the past 3 years: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, F Hoffmann-La Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sobi; this funding has been reinvested for the research activities of the hospital in a fully independent manner, without any involvement of third parties. HIB has received research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, MedImmune, Novartis, and Pfizer; is an employee of Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; has received consulting fees or other remuneration from AbbVie, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bayer, Biocon, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and R-Pharm; and is a member of speaker bureaus for GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Roche. OS is a member of a speaker bureau for Sanofi. AS is a member of a speaker bureau for Eli Lilly. KM has received research grants from Novartis and Pfizer. SP has received consulting fees or other remuneration from Novartis. EZ is a member of speaker bureaus for AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. ML has received research grants from Amgen. KN has received research grants from Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and Roche. HS has received research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and USB Bioscience. YU is a member of a speaker bureau for Pfizer. DOV has received research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and Pfizer; and is a member of speaker bureaus for AbbVie and Bristol-Myers Squibb. HBP, KSK, AW, CC, RZ, M-AH, and RMS are employees and stockholders of Pfizer. IL is an employee of IQVIA, who were paid contractors to Pfizer in the development of this manuscript and in providing statistical support. AM has received consulting fees or other remuneration from Aurinia, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Janssen, and Pfizer. DJL's institution, the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, has received research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB; and has received consulting fees or other remuneration from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, and UCB for the work of DJL. DJL is a Data Safety and Monitoring Board chairperson for Forest Research and the National Institutes of Health. All otjer authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Few data are available regarding the rates of serious adverse events (SAEs) and important medical events (IMEs) outside of product-based registries and clinical trials for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The Enhanced Drug Safety Surveillance Project (EDSSP) was developed to pilot a novel system to collect SAEs/IMEs in children with JIA. This analysis reports the results from this 4-year (2008-2012) EDSSP., Methods: Participating physicians were surveyed monthly to ascertain whether their JIA patients experienced an SAE or IME. Sites were surveyed every 6 months to determine the number of unique JIA patients seen at each site during that 6-month period. Reporting rates were calculated per 100 person-years and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated based on a Poisson distribution., Results: Thirty-seven Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance sites with 115 physicians participated. The mean response rate to the monthly surveys was 65%. There were 147 total SAEs and 145 total IMEs. The largest proportion of SAEs and IMEs occurred in children with polyarticular JIA (39% and 37%, respectively). The majority of SAEs and IMEs were reported for patients receiving therapy with biologic agents (76% and 69%, respectively). The total event rate for SAEs and IMEs combined was 1.07 events per 100 person-years (95% CI 0.95-1.19). The rates for SAEs and IMEs were 0.54 per 100 person-years (95% CI 0.45-0.63) and 0.53 per 100 person-years (95% CI 0.49-0.62), respectively., Conclusion: The EDSSP provided a simple tool for SAE/IME reporting within an established research network and resulted in a similar range of reported events as captured by a traditional product-based registry., (Copyright © 2015 by the American College of Rheumatology.)

Background: This study aimed to assess long-term safety and developmental data on juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients treated in routine clinical practice with celecoxib or nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (nsNSAIDs)., Methods: Children aged ≥2 to <18 years with rheumatoid-factor-positive or -negative polyarthritis, persistent or extended oligoarthritis, or systemic arthritis were enrolled into this prospective, observational, multicenter standard-of-care registry. Eligible patients were newly or recently prescribed (≤6 months) an nsNSAID or celecoxib. Enrolled patients were followed to the end of the study, whether they remained on the original NSAID, switched, or discontinued therapy altogether. All adverse events (AEs) regardless of severity were captured in the database., Results: A total of 274 patients (nsNSAID, n = 219; celecoxib, n = 55) were observed for 410 patient-years of observation. Naproxen, meloxicam, and nabumetone were the most frequently used nsNSAIDs. At baseline, the celecoxib group was older, had a numerically longer median time since diagnosis, and a numerically higher proportion of patients with a history of gastrointestinal-related NSAID intolerance. AEs reported were those frequently observed with NSAID treatment and were similar across groups (nsNSAIDs: 52.0%; celecoxib: 52.9%). Twelve unique patients experienced a total of 18 serious AEs; the most frequent were infections, and none was attributed to NSAID use., Conclusions: The safety profile of celecoxib and nsNSAIDs appears similar overall. The results from this registry, ongoing pharmacovigilance, and the phase 3 trial that led to the approval of celecoxib for children with JIA provide evidence that the benefit-risk for celecoxib treatment in JIA remains positive., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00688545.

Objective: There are no validated tools for measuring disease activity in pediatric vasculitis. The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) is a valid disease activity tool in adult vasculitis. Version 3 (BVAS v.3) correlates well with physician's global assessment (PGA), treatment decision, and C-reactive protein in adults. The utility of BVAS v.3 in pediatric vasculitis is not known. We assessed the association of BVAS v.3 scores with PGA, treatment decision, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at diagnosis in pediatric antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV)., Methods: Children with AAV diagnosed between 2004 and 2010 at all ARChiVe centers were eligible. BVAS v.3 scores were calculated with a standardized online tool (www.vasculitis.org). Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r(s)) was used to test the strength of association between BVAS v.3 and PGA, treatment decision, and ESR., Results: A total of 152 patients were included. The physician diagnosis of these patients was predominantly granulomatosis with polyangiitis (n = 99). The median BVAS v.3 score was 18.0 (range 0-40). The BVAS v.3 correlations were r(s) = 0.379 (95% CI 0.233 to 0.509) with PGA, r(s) = 0.521 (95% CI 0.393 to 0.629) with treatment decision, and r(s) = 0.403 (95% CI 0.253 to 0.533) with ESR., Conclusion: Applied to children with AAV, BVAS v.3 had a weak correlation with PGA and moderate correlation with both ESR and treatment decision. Prospective evaluation of BVAS v.3 and/or pediatric-specific modifications to BVAS v.3 may be required before it can be formalized as a disease activity assessment tool in pediatric AAV.