Search

Background: The EXXELERATE study revealed poorer clinical outcomes in patients treated with adalimumab (ADL) and baseline rheumatoid factor (RF) above 203 IU/mL. However, responses were similar in patients treated with certolizumab pegol (CZP) regardless of RF levels., Objectives: This study investigated the impact of RF levels >203 IU/mL on TNF inhibitors (TNFi) serum levels and the association with secondary nonresponse in RA patients treated with TNFi., Methods: We performed an observational ambispective study with RA patients treated with infliximab (IFX), ADL, or CZP. Patients were stratified according to baseline RF levels: ≤ or >203 IU/mL. After 6 months, serum drug levels and antidrug antibodies were measured, and reasons for discontinuation were collected., Results: We included 170 RA patients: 90 (53%) received IFX, 48 (28%) ADL, and 32 (19%) CZP. While CZP serum levels did not differ between RF groups at 6 months ( p  = 0.6), RF levels >203 IU/mL were linked to lower serum drug levels in patients treated with IFX ( p  = 0.09) or ADL ( p  = 0.02). Secondary nonresponse was 3.6 times higher in patients with high versus low RF levels in patients under IFX or ADL. However, the reasons for withdrawal were not affected by RF levels in patients treated with CZP., Conclusion: Baseline RF above 203 IU/mL is associated with lower serum drug levels and an increased risk of discontinuation due to secondary nonresponse in patients treated with IFX or ADL. In contrast, drug levels and clinical outcomes are not significantly impacted by baseline RF levels in patients under CZP., Competing Interests: CP-R has received research grants/honoraria from AbbVie, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, and Roche. MN-N has received research grants/honoraria from Galápagos, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, and UCB. AB received grant/research support and fees for consultancies or as a speaker from AbbVie, Amgen, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, Lilly, UCB, and Roche. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Plasencia-Rodríguez, Martínez-Feito, Novella-Navarro, Pérez De Diego, Bonilla, Gehin, Villalba-Yllán, Nuño, Pascual-Salcedo, Nozal, Almirón and Balsa.)

Objectives: To evaluate the survival of different biologic or targeted-synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARD) administered after fulfilling difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) criteria, and to assess factors related to treatment discontinuation., Methods: Retrospective study including D2TRA patients. Drug retention of the b/tsDMARD administered after fulfilling D2TRA was assessed by Kaplan-Meier plots and the log-rank test. Cox hazard models were used to identify factors affecting treatment discontinuation., Results: Of the 122 patients included, 75 maintained active treatment (61.5%) with a subsequent line after D2T compared to 47 (38.5%) who discontinued and required more successive lines of b/tsDMARDs. The median survival of the treatments was 78.3(7.6) months and the treatment after D2T with the better rate of survival was rituximab, followed by JAKi and IL6Ri, while worse survival rates were associated with abatacept and TNFi. Significant differences were noted among b/tsDMARDs (log-rank p < 0.01) and to evaluate these differences, a Cox regression was performed, taking each b/tsDMARD as a reference and comparing it with the others. DAS28 values 6-months after initiation of treatment were higher in those patients who discontinued treatment [4.4(1.2) vs 3.5(1.3), p = 0.01]. The multivariate cox regression model revealed that treatment choice after D2T [HR = 1.26(95%CI 1.06-1.05)] and lower DAS28 values at 6 months [HR = 1.49(95%CI 1.16-1.52)] were independent risk factors associated with treatment discontinuation., Conclusions: Once patients met the D2TRA criteria, the subsequent line of b/tsDMARDs with the best survival rates were rituximab, JAKi and IL6Ri. Moreover, DAS28 at 6-months of treatment after D2T was an independent risk factor for drug discontinuation. Key Points • Rituximab, IL6Ri and JAKi have better retention rates in patients after fulfilling D2TRA criteria • Clinical disease activity in the first six months after fulfillment of D2TRA criteria is an independent risk factor of subsequent treatment survival., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).)

Objectives: A subset of human circulating FoxP3+ regulatory T cells expresses CD39 (cTreg39+) and hydrolyses pro-inflammatory adenine nucleotides released at inflammatory foci, rendering the anti-inflammatory agent adenosine. Methotrexate (MTX), inhibiting ATIC, enhances the extrusion of adenine nucleotides and may help Treg39+ cells control inflammation. Therefore, we examined the relation of cTreg39+ cells with the effect of MTX in early Rheumatoid Arthritis (eRA)., Methods: Freshly isolated peripheral blood lymphocytes from 98 untreated eRA patients and 98 healthy controls (HC) were examined by cytometry. Twelve months (12m) after initiating MTX, 82 patients were clinically re-evaluated and cytometry was repeated in 40 of them. The effect of MTX on Treg cell potency was assessed in Treg/Tresp cocultures., Results: The baseline (0m) cTreg39+ cell frequency was elevated in eRA above HC levels. Patients who reached low disease activity at 12 months (12m-LDA, DAS28-ESR≤ 3.2, n = 51) had presented with a significantly higher 0m cTreg39+ frequency vs those who did not (n = 31). The 0m cTreg39+ cutoff for attaining 12 m-LDA was 42.0% (Sensitivity=90.4%/Specificity=96.8%). At 12m, the cTreg39+ frequency was no longer elevated but its association with disease activity remained: it was still significantly higher in patients who had reached LDA vs those who had not. In vitro, MTX augmented the Treg39+ cell potency but had no effect on Treg39- cells., Conclusion: MTX cooperates with Treg39+ cells and the baseline cTreg39+ frequency predicts the response to MTX in eRA. In addition, the transiently elevated baseline cTreg39+ frequency in eRA may provide a slot for prompt MTX initiation., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To investigate whether hypoechoic wall thickness is influenced by the systole or diastole moment in the cardiac cycle and if this can influence ultrasound (US) assessments of giant cell arteritis (GCA)., Methods: US videos of 100 consecutive patients (50 with GCA, 50 without) performed between January 2021 and June 2023 were reviewed. Intima-media thickness (IMT) of temporal (including common trunk, frontal and parietal branches), axillary and subclavian arteries were measured at two different time points, at systolic peak (SP) and at the end-diastole (ED). Differences between SP IMT and ED IMT, as well as in the halo count (HC) and in the OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS) between these two times, were analyzed., Results: IMT was significantly higher (4.8-5%) at ED in all arteries, in both GCA and non-GCA groups. HC and OGUS were also higher in ED in both groups. In 4 non-GCA patients (8%), the HC was positive in ED and negative in SP; in all of them the HC in ED was 1. In the GCA group, the timing of the cardiac cycle did not influence the final US diagnosis; however, it did modify the HC in 14 patients (28%)., Conclusion: IMT can fluctuate during the cardiac cycle, with higher measurements occurring at ED. This variability could potentially impact the accuracy of US diagnoses and assessments of GCA. If further research corroborates these findings, it may be imperative to revise the guidelines for employing US in diagnosing GCA in order to incorporate these nuanced aspects., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: Certolizumab pegol (CZP), an Fc-free antibody fragment, has shown stable serum levels and steady efficacy in the treatment of RA patients, irrespective of RF levels at baseline. Here, we examine, in clinical practice, the effect of baseline RF and ACPA levels on serum drug levels of IFX, ADL and CZP an Fc-free antibody fragment., Methods: This is a retrospective study performed in real-world patients. We assessed 170 patients with RA: 90 (53%) received IFX, 48 (28%) ADL and 32 (19%) CZP. Demographic and clinical variables, RF and ACPA levels were obtained at the baseline visit (T0), and patients were stratified based on negative, low, medium, or high levels. After 6 months (T6) serum drug levels and anti-drug antibodies (ADAb), were computed., Results: While CZP serum levels did not differ across RF groups at T6, high baseline RF was linked to lower serum drug levels compared to RF negative status in treatment with complete monoclonal antibodies IFX and ADL. No differences in disease activity measured by DAS28 at baseline were observed across RF quartiles in patients treated with IFX or ADL. ADAb was observed in 26 patients with IFX, 3 with ADL and 1 with CZP, following 6 months of treatment. Patients with high baseline RF levels dropped out more frequently by secondary non-response in IFX or ADL than CZP (80% vs. 75% vs. 33%, p=0.002)., Conclusions: In this real word data evaluation, CZP serum levels were independent of RF levels in patients however patients with high baseline RF levels who obtained IFX or ADL had lower serum drug levels at 6 months than baseline RF-negative patients. In addition, secondary non-response was more frequent in patients with high RF levels treated with IFX and ADL.

Background: Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) are chronic diseases that may alternate between asymptomatic periods and flares. These conditions require complex treatments and close monitoring by rheumatologists to mitigate their effects and improve the patient's quality of life. Often, delays in outpatient consultations or the patient's difficulties in keeping appointments make such close follow-up challenging. For this reason, it is very important to have open communication between patients and health professionals. In this context, implementing telemonitoring in the field of rheumatology has great potential, as it can facilitate the close monitoring of patients with RMDs. The use of these tools helps patients self-manage certain aspects of their disease. This could result in fewer visits to emergency departments and consultations, as well as enable better therapeutic compliance and identification of issues that would otherwise go unnoticed., Objective: The main objective of this study is to evaluate the implementation of a hybrid care model called the mixed attention model (MAM) in clinical practice and determine whether its implementation improves clinical outcomes compared to conventional follow-up., Methods: This is a multicenter prospective observational study involving 360 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondylarthritis (SpA) from 5 Spanish hospitals. The patients will be followed up by the MAM protocol, which is a care model that incorporates a digital tool consisting of a mobile app that patients can use at home and professionals can review asynchronously to detect incidents and follow patients' clinical evolution between face-to-face visits. Another group of patients, whose follow-up will be conducted in accordance with a traditional face-to-face care model, will be assessed as the control group. Sociodemographic characteristics, treatments, laboratory parameters, assessment of tender and swollen joints, visual analog scale for pain, and electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) reports will be collected for all participants. In the MAM group, these items will be self-assessed via both the mobile app and during face-to-face visits with the rheumatologist, who will do the same for patients included in the traditional care model. The patients will be able to report any incidence related to their disease or treatment through the mobile app., Results: Participant recruitment began in March 2024 and will continue until December 2024. The follow-up period will be extended by 12 months for all patients. Data collection and analysis are scheduled for completion in December 2025., Conclusions: This paper aims to provide a detailed description of the development and implementation of a digital solution, specifically an MAM. The goal is to achieve significant economic and psychosocial impact within our health care system by enhancing control over RMDs., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06273306; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06273306., International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/55829., (©Marta Novella-Navarro, Jose M Iniesta-Chamorro, Diego Benavent, Javier Bachiller-Corral, Enrique Calvo-Aranda, Helena Borrell, Laura Berbel-Arcobé, Victoria Navarro-Compan, Xabier Michelena, Leticia Lojo-Oliveira, Jaime Arroyo-Palomo, Mariana Diaz-Almiron, Verónica García García, Irene Monjo-Henry, Claudia María Gómez González, Enrique J Gomez, Alejandro Balsa, Chamaida Plasencia-Rodríguez. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 22.04.2024.)

Objectives: To investigate the appearance of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against infliximab (IFX) determined by drug-sensitive and drug-tolerant assays and their relationship with drug levels and drug survival., Methods: This longitudinal observational study included 45 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 61 with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Serum samples were obtained at weeks 2, 6, 12, 24, and 52. Serum IFX levels were measured by a capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and ADA by an in-house drug-sensitive two-site (bridging) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (bELISA) and a commercially available drug-tolerant ELISA (IDK, Immundiagnostik, Germany)., Results: Anti-drug antibodies were detected earlier by IDK than by bELISA. Once ADA appeared, positivity persisted throughout the study period. Patients who were bELISA ADA+ had higher IDK ADA levels (than bELISA ADA- patients). Circulating IFX levels were detected in all patients except those found to be bELISA ADA+. Serum IFX levels were lower in IDK ADA+ than in IDK ADA-patients.Most patients (64%) discontinued due to inefficacy. The early onset of immunogenicity was related to IFX survival. Both in RA and SpA, the median survival (years) was shorter in patients with earlier development of ADA (IDK+ before or at week 24) than those who became IDK+ later (after week 24) or never developed ADA., Conclusion: A drug-tolerant assay detects ADA during IFX therapy earlier and more frequently than a drug-sensitive assay. The onset of immunogenicity detected by drug-tolerant assays is related to the subsequent detection of ADA by drug-sensitive assays and drug survival., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a heterogeneous disease in which therapeutic strategies used have evolved dramatically. Despite significant progress in treatment strategies such as the development of anti-TNF drugs, it is still not possible to differentiate those patients who will respond from who will not. This can lead to effective-treatment delays and unnecessary costs. The aim of this study was to utilize a profile of the patient's characteristics, clinical parameters, immune status (cytokine profile) and artificial intelligence to assess the feasibility of developing a tool that could allow us to predict which patients will respond to treatment with anti-TNF drugs., Methods: This study included 38 patients with RA from the RA-Paz cohort. Clinical activity was measured at baseline and after 6 months of treatment. The cytokines measured before the start of anti-TNF treatment were IL-1, IL-12, IL-10, IL-2, IL-4, IFNg, TNFa, and IL-6. Statistical analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon-Rank-Sum Test and the Benjamini-Hochberg method. The predictive model viability was explored using the 5-fold cross-validation scheme in order to train the logistic regression models., Results: Statistically significant differences were found in parameters such as IL-6, IL-2, CRP and DAS-ESR. The predictive model performed to an acceptable level in correctly classifying patients (ROC-AUC 0.804167 to 0.891667), suggesting that it would be possible to develop a clinical classification tool., Conclusions: Using a combination of parameters such as IL-6, IL-2, CRP and DAS-ESR, it was possible to develop a predictive model that can acceptably discriminate between remitters and non-remitters. However, this model needs to be replicated in a larger cohort to confirm these findings., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Objectives: To analyse the trajectories of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), patient global assessment (PGA) and physician global assessment (PhGA) and to assess their predictive capabilities on difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) classification., Methods: Longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from 2020 to 2022. Based on the D2TRA EULAR (European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology) definition, patients were classified as D2TRA according to biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) failure due to inefficacy (D2TRA-inefficacy) or other reasons (D2TRA-other). Patients who did not fulfil the D2TRA criteria were classified as NoD2TRA. DAS28, PGA and PhGA scores collected every 6 months during the first 24 months of b/tsDMARD treatment were used to identify different trajectories using latent class mixed models (LCMM)., Results: The study population comprised 255 patients with RA, of whom 167 were NoD2TRA, 58 D2TRA-inefficacy and 30 D2TRA-other. LCMM stratified patients into two different trajectories for DAS28 and PhGA and three for PGA according to the most stable model. The most notable variation occurred during the first 6 months of treatment, thereafter remaining stable during the follow-up period. Most D2TRA-inefficacy patients fitted the trajectory, showing higher values of the studied parameters. NoD2TRA followed the trajectory with lower values, and D2TRA-other were distributed more homogeneously across all trajectories., Conclusions: The assessment of disease activity, together with patients' and physicians' perceptions, form a key element in the correct discrimination of patients who are going to develop D2TRA-inefficacy. However, identifying those patients who will be D2TRA-other remains challenging, whether by subjective or objective parameters., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MNN reports grants from UCB, Lilly, Galapagos and Janssen outside the submitted work. AV reports grants from Janssen. IM reports grants from Roche, Novartis, UCB and Gedeon Richter outside the submitted work. CP-R reports grants from AbbVie, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly and Roche outside the submitted work. AB reports grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Pfizer, Galapagos, Novartis, Gilead, BMS, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, Lilly, UCB and Roche outside the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: The study aims to evaluate the utility of major salivary gland ultrasonography for diagnosis of primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) and to assess its concordance with minor salivary gland biopsy (MSGB)., Methods: A cross-sectional study of 72 patients with suspected pSS was performed. Demographic, clinical, and serological data were collected. MSGB was performed, as was ultrasonography. The ultrasound technician was blind to clinical, serological, and histological data. The validity of ultrasonography compared with MSGB, the American-European Consensus Group (AECG), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) criteria was assessed by calculating the percentage of agreement, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under the curve (AUC)., Results: Based on MSGB as the gold standard, the percentage of agreement between both tests was 78% (AUC 0.75). Based on the ACR/EULAR criteria, the percentage of agreement was 83% (AUC 0.78) for ultrasonography and 81% (AUC 0.83) for biopsy. Sensitivity and specificity were 90% and 67%, respectively, for ultrasonography and 76% and 90% for biopsy. The results were similar with the AECG criteria. The intra- and inter-observer variability was good (κ > 0.7). Significant differences were observed for positive anti-Ro52 values and hypergammaglobulinemia in pathological ultrasound scans., Conclusion: Diagnostic ultrasonography is as useful as MSGB in pSS. Therefore, it could be included in the classification criteria. In this cohort, it proved more sensitive than MSGB and could be used as an initial test for patients suspected of having pSS. MSGB could be used in cases where clinical and serological results are inconclusive. Key Points • Major salivary gland ultrasonography adds diagnostic value similar to that of MSGB, thus potentially enabling this invasive procedure to be avoided. • Ultrasonography could be included in the classification criteria for primary Sjögren's syndrome. • Given that ultrasonography is more sensitive and less specific than MSGB, it could be used as an initial diagnostic test in patients with suspected Sjögren's syndrome. • Biopsy should be performed in those cases where ultrasonography, clinical, and serological data are inconclusive., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).)

Background: Real world data on the response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with immunomediated diseases (IMIDs) treated with immunesuppressants is of great interest because vaccine response may be impaired. The main aim was to study the humoral and cellular immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with IMIDs treated with immunosuppressants. The secondary aim was to describe the frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infections after vaccination in these patients., Material and Methods: This is an observational study including 86 patients with IMIDs. All patients were treated with biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [b/tsDMARDs: TNF inhibitors (TNFi), rituximab, anti-interleukin 6 receptor (anti-IL6R) or JAK inhibitors (JAKi)]. Demographic and clinical information were collected. After 4-6 weeks of 2nd and 3rd vaccine doses, humoral response was assessed using the Thermo Scientific ELiA SARS-CoV-2-Sp1 IgG Test. Also, in patients with serum SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels under 100UI/ml, cellular response was analyzed using the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 Starter Pack., Results: A total of 86 patients under b/tsDMARDs and 38 healthy controls were included. Most patients received TNFi (45 with TNFi, 31 with rituximab, 5 with anti-IL6R and 5 with JAKi). SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (Ab) were present in an 86% of patients with IMIDs and in 100% healthy controls (p = 0.017). However, 12 (14%) patients had undetectable SARS-CoV-2 Ab levels, all treated with rituximab. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 Ab (IU/ml) were statistically lower in patients (Mdn (IQR): 59.5 (17-163) in patients vs 625 (405-932) in controls, p < 0.001). Patients treated with rituximab had lower Ab levels than those treated with TNFi and controls (p < 0.001). The cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was evaluated in 30 patients. Eleven patients had a positive cellular response, being more frequent in patients treated with rituximab (p = 0.03). SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported in 43% of patients and 34% of controls after vaccination. Only 6 (7%) patients required hospitalization, most of whom treated with rituximab (67%)., Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels were lower in patients than in controls, especially in patients treated with rituximab. A cellular response can be detected despite having a poor humoral response. Severe infections in vaccinated patients with IMIDs are rare, and are observed mainly in patients treated with rituximab., (© 2023. Canadian Society of Allergy & Clinical Immunology.)

Objectives: Multiple failures to biologic or targeted specific disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) that lead to difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) may be the result of multi-drug inefficacy or reflect treatment problems related to adverse events, comorbidities, and/or poor adherence. We aimed to characterise a cohort of D2TRA patients in clinical practice, to analyse the differences between D2TRA due to inefficacy versus D2TRA from other causes, and to compare them with non-D2TRA., Methods: The D2TRA group included patients who were receiving ≥2b/tsDMARDs due to inefficacy (D2TRA-inef cacy) or because of adverse events, poor adherence, contraindications, comorbidities, drug-intolerance, etc. (D2TRA-other). Patients who achieved low disease activity or remission with the rst bDMARD were classified as non-D2TRA patients. For all patients, demographic, clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters were assessed prior to starting the rst b/tsDMARD. Descriptive analysis was performed and bivariate logistic regression models were assembled., Results: In total, 253 patients were included: 131 non-D2TRA and 122 D2TRA [86 (70.5%) D2TRA-inefficacy and 36 (29.5%) D2TRA-other]. Comparison of the two groups of D2TRA patients: no differences in gender, age at start of b/tsDMARD or age at RA diagnosis were found; this was also true of socioeconomic status, frequency of anxiety-depression and other comorbidities. Patients categorised as D2TRA-other had less extra-articular manifestations than D2TRA-inef cacy, as well as lower values of DAS28 at the start of the rst b/tsDMARD. Comparisons of Non-D2TRA patients versus D2TRA-other resulted in the following observations: no differences in sociodemographic characteristics were evident nor were there any differences in terms of disease activity., Conclusions: Patients with D2TRA-other are indistinguishable from non-D2TRA patients at baseline, indicating the former cohort does not appear to have any predictive value during the early stages of b/tsDMARD treatment, unlike what occurs in patients with D2TRA-inefficacy.

Objectives: Most studies on difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA) have focused on established RA. Here, we analyse whether disease activity in the early stages of RA could influence progression to a D2T RA under real-life conditions. Other clinical and treatment-related factors were also analysed., Methods: A longitudinal multicentre study of patients with RA was conducted from 2009 to 2018. Patients were followed up until January 2021. D2T RA was defined based on EULAR criteria (treatment failure, signs suggestive of currently active/progressive disease and management being perceived as problematic by the rheumatologist and/or patient). The main variable was disease activity in the early stages. The covariates were sociodemographic, clinical and treatment-related factors. We ran a multivariable logistic regression analysis to investigate risk factors associated with progression to D2T RA., Results: The study population comprised 631 patients and 35 (5.87%) developed D2T RA. At the time of diagnosis, the D2T RA group were younger, with a higher disability, 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) score, tender joint count and pain scores. In our final model, DAS28 was not statistically significantly associated with D2T RA. No differences were found between groups for therapy. Disability was independently associated with D2T RA (OR: 1.89; p=0.01)., Conclusions: In this cohort of patients newly diagnosed with RA, our results do not allow us to prove the influence of active disease according to DAS28. However, we did find that younger patients and those with elevated initial disability scores are more likely to develop D2T RA regardless of other factors., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: To analyse the influence of adipokines on attaining the clinical outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) treated with TNF inhibitors (TNFi), and then, to investigate the association of patients' characteristics and adipokine concentrations., Methods: This was a longitudinal study including 110 patients with axSpA who were initiated at TNFi and were followed-up for 6 months (m). Disease activity was assessed by Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at baseline and at 6 m of treatment. Clinical outcomes at 6 m of treatment were defined as remission (ASDAS <1.3) and the attainment of low disease activity (LDA; ASDAS<2.1). Leptin and adiponectin concentrations were measured in serum samples collected at baseline and after 6 m., Results: Both leptin and adiponectin were constitutively elevated in female axSpA patients. At time of TNFi initiation, leptin concentrations were higher in patients with high body mass index (overweight or obese). On the contrary, adiponectin was higher in normalweight patients. After 6 m of TNFi treatment, 24% of patients attained remission. They had significant lower leptin concentration at baseline compared with patients who did not attain remission. Furthermore, this difference remained significant after 6 m of treatment meaning that TNFi did not modify adipokine concentration. Similar results were found considering LDA as the clinical outcome, obtained in 48% of the patients., Conclusions: The present study showed that low leptin concentrations were associated with attaining clinical outcomes in axSpA patients treated with TNFi. In addition, since leptin secretion by white adipocytes is enhanced during obesity and considering that TNFi do not seem to modulate its expression, obese patients should be encouraged to decrease BMI to attain a successful therapy.

Mobile health technology holds great promise for the clinical management of patients with chronic disease. However, evidence on the implementation of projects involving digital health solutions in rheumatology is scarce. We aimed to study the feasibility of a hybrid (virtual and face-to-face) monitoring strategy for personalized care in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA). This project included the development of a remote monitoring model and its assessment. After a focus group with patients and rheumatologists, relevant concerns regarding the management of RA and SpA were raised, leading to the development of the Mixed Attention Model (MAM), which combined hybrid (virtual and face-to-face) monitoring. Then, a prospective study using the mobile solution Adhera for Rheumatology was conducted. Over a 3-month follow-up period, patients were given the opportunity to complete disease-specific electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs) for RA and SpA with a pre-established frequency, as well as flares and changes in medication at any time. Number of interactions and alerts were assessed. The usability of the mobile solution was measured by the Net-Promoter Score (NPS) and through a 5-star Likert scale. Following the MAM development, forty-six patients were recruited to utilize the mobile solution, of whom 22 had RA and 24 SpA. There were 4,019 total interactions in the RA group, and 3,160 in the SpA group. Fifteen patients generated a total of 26 alerts, of which 24 were flares and 2 were medication-related problems; most (69%) were managed remotely. Regarding patient satisfaction, 65% of the respondents were considered to have endorsed Adhera for Rheumatology, yielding a NPS of 57 and an overall rating was 4.3 out of 5 stars. We concluded that the use of the digital health solution is feasible in clinical practice to monitor ePROs for RA and SpA. Next steps involve the implementation of this telemonitoring method in a multicentric setting., Competing Interests: Diego Benavent has received speaker fees from Jannsen, Roche, grant/research support from Novartis and Abbvie. Francisco J. Núñez-Benjumea was an employee of AdheraHealth Inc at the time this research was conducted. Luis Fernández-Luque is an employee of AdheraHealth Inc. Victoria Navarro-Compán has received speakers fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma; she has been consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma; received grant/research support from AbbVie and Novartis. María Sanz: None declared. Marta Novella-Navarro reports grants from UCB, Lilly and Janssen. Enrique Calvo-Aranda has received speaker fees from Abbvie. Leticia Lojo: None declared. Alejandro Balsa has received speaker fees from Pfizer, Abbvie, Lilly, Galapagos, BMS, Sandoz, Nordic Pharma, Gebro, Roche, Sanofi, UCB; he has been consultant of Pfizer, Abbvie, Lilly, Galapagos, BMS, Nordic Pharma, Sanofi, UCB; received grant/research support from Pfizer, Abbvie, BMS, Nordic Pharma, Gebro, Roche, UCB. Chamaida Plasencia has received speaker fees from Pfizer, Abbvie, Lilly, Sandoz, Sanofi, Biogen, Roche, Novartis; received grant/research support from Pfizer and Abbvie., (Copyright: © 2022 Benavent et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) monotherapy in biologic-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) versus patients with previous biologic exposure in a real-world setting., Materials and Methods: Non-controlled clinical-trial, 32-week prospective multicenter study including RA patients with moderate-severe disease activity starting TCZ in monotherapy who had a prior inadequate response or were intolerant to methotrexate (MTX). Effectiveness according to EULAR response evaluated at 24-week and safety at 32-weekwere assessed., Results: Of the 93 were enrolled of whom 84 (90%) were eligible for the effectiveness analysis. Biologic-naïve patients (n=46, 54.8%) were younger (51.5 versus 57.9) with shorter disease duration (6.4 versus 13.3) but presented similar comorbidities in comparison with non-naïve patients. DAS28 remission was achieved in a higher percentage in the group of patients with prior biological treatment. 89 adverse events (AE) were recorded in 50 patients, most of them non-serious AE (non-SAE) (86.3%)., Conclusions: In a real world setting, TCZ exhibit similar effectiveness and safety in monotherapy in patients with RA regardless previous exposure to other biologic therapies. This study provides additional and valuable real-world findings on the use of TCZ in patients with RA., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis is a heterogeneous term in which patients may present with difficulties in their management for different reasons. This can ultimately lead to patients being exposed to multiple treatments because of inefficacy (resulting from mechanisms intrinsic to rheumatoid arthritis or from non-inflammatory causes such as chronic pain syndrome or structural damage, among others), toxicity or adverse effects that may be linked to comorbidities. One particular group in which such characteristics may be more patent is older patients. Increasing life expectancy, an ageing population and the late onset of rheumatoid arthritis have led to an increased interest in the particularities of treating older patients. This may pose a challenge for physicians, as ageing has implications for optimal patient treatment owing to the potential presence of comorbidities, the risk of adverse events and perceptions of disease status by both physicians and patients. All of these factors may have implications for classifying and managing patients aged > 65 years as difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis, as these patients could be misclassified. This can occur when a significant proportion may still exhibit signs of active disease but not necessarily be difficult to treat because the treatment criterion has not been fulfilled. Alternatively, patients may be exposed to multiple biologic/targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs because of contraindications and/or comorbid conditions. Treatment-to-target strategies and an adequate assessment of inflammatory rheumatoid arthritis activity in older patients should be undertaken, taking special care with associated comorbidities, polypharmacy and risk profiles. Such an approach can help to ensure appropriate treatment for older adults and avoid the misclassification of difficult-to-treat patients., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Despite advances in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the wide range of therapies available, there is a percentage of patients whose treatment presents a challenge for clinicians due to lack of response to multiple biologic and target-specific disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs)., Objective: To develop and validate an algorithm to predict multiple failure to biological therapy in patients with RA., Design: Observational retrospective study involving subjects from a cohort of patients with RA receiving b/tsDMARDs., Methods: Based on the number of prior failures to b/tsDMARDs, patients were classified as either multi-refractory (MR) or non-refractory (NR). Patient characteristics were considered in the statistical analysis to design the predictive model, selecting those variables with a predictive capability. A decision algorithm known as 'classification and regression tree' (CART) was developed to create a prediction model of multi-drug resistance. Performance of the prediction algorithm was evaluated in an external independent cohort using area under the curve (AUC)., Results: A total of 136 patients were included: 51 MR and 85 NR. The CART model was able to predict multiple failures to b/tsDMARDs using disease activity score-28 (DAS-28) values at 6 months after the start time of the initial b/tsDMARD, as well as DAS-28 improvement in the first 6 months and baseline DAS-28. The CART model showed a capability to correctly classify 94.1% NR and 87.5% MR patients with a sensitivity = 0.88, a specificity = 0.94, and an AUC = 0.89 (95% CI: 0.74-1.00). In the external validation cohort, 35 MR and 47 NR patients were included. The AUC value for the CART model in this cohort was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73-0.9)., Conclusion: Our model correctly classified NR and MR patients based on simple measurements available in routine clinical practice, which provides the possibility to characterize and individualize patient treatments during early stages., Competing Interests: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: D.P., C.T., V.R.-E., C.A.C., and M.D.-A. have nothing to declare. M.N.-N. reports grants from UCB, Lilly and Janssen outside the submitted work. D.B. reports grants from Roche, AbbVie, and Novartis outside the submitted work. A.V. reports grants from Janssen outside the submitted work. R.S. reports grants from Abbvie, BMS, Gebro-Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Roche outside the submitted work. C.P.-R. reports grants from Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly and Roche outside the submitted work. A.B. reports grants from Abbvie, Amgen, Pfizer, Galapagos, Novartis, Gilead, BMS, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, Lilly, UCB, and Roche outside the submitted work., (© The Author(s), 2022.)

We investigated B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) in relation to response to treatment with TNF inhibitors (TNFis) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This was a longitudinal study including 158 patients with RA treated with TNFis and followed up for 6 months. Clinical response at 6 months of treatment was defined according to the EULAR criteria for good responders (GRs). BAFF concentration was measured in serum samples, collected at baseline and at 6 months. Associations with EULAR response were evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. ROC analysis was performed to determine the optimal threshold of serum BAFF concentration associated with good EULAR response to treatment. After 6 months of TNFi treatment, 24% of patients were GRs. They had a lower BMI, lower baseline DAS28 and lower baseline serum BAFF concentration than non-responders. After 6 months of TNFi treatment, autoantibody-positive patients who attained GR had significantly lower serum BAFF concentrations compared with patients who did not. Serum BAFF < 968 pg/mL at 6 months represented the concentration likely to best discriminate between GR and non-GR at 6 months of TNFi treatment. Autoantibody-seropositive patients who had serum BAFF < 968 pg/mL at 6 months demonstrated a more than four-fold increased probability to be GRs compared with patients with higher BAFF concentrations. In conclusion, serum BAFF concentrations were associated with response to TNFis in seropositive RA patients, corroborating the importance of the B-cell compartment in RA.

Objectives: To analyse the role of body mass index (BMI) in the clinical response to biologic dis-ease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To per-form an in-depth analysis of the pathophysiology of obesity by assessing serum adipokine levels and their potential changes according to treatment., Methods: This study involved 105 patients with RA starting tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or tocilizumab (TCZ). Patients were classified ac-cording to BMI as normal-weight and overweight/obesity. The clinical response to treatment was as-sessed by Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) 6 months after initiation of bDMARDs. Serum adi-pokines (leptin and adiponectin) were determined using a commercial immunoassay kit in samples ob-tained before initiation of bDMARDs and after 6 months of treatment., Results: A correlation was observed between BMI and disease activity and between BMI and serum adipokines. Sixty percent of patients achieved low disease activity (LDA)/remission: 45 patients in TNFi group (64.2%) and 18 (51.4%) in TCZ group. In TNFi group, patients who did not attain LDA/remission had a higher BMI (kg/m2) ([28.7±5.1] vs. [24.5±4.6], p=0.001) and baseline CDAI (26.3 [17.4-33.9] vs. 19.8 [14.0-28.8], p<0.03). However, no differences in BMI or baseline CDAI were observed between patients who achieved LDA after 6 months in TCZ group., Conclusions: Obesity influences the extent of LDA/remission in patients treated with TNFi, but not in patients treated with TCZ, probably because of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms intrinsic to the production of proinflammatory adi-pokines. Therefore, therapeutic strategies with a mechanism of action other than TNF inhibition would be more suitable for obese patients.

Objectives: To determine the frequency of sustained remission (R) or low diseas activity (LDA) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) undergoing long-term biological therapy and to analyse predictive factors for achieving these outcomes., Design: Prospective, observational cohort study., Setting: Spanish hospital., Participants: Patients with axSpA who initiated biological treatment between 2003 and 2017., Intervention: Assessment of demographic and clinical characteristics at the beginning of treatment and disease activity every 6 months up to a maximum of 2 years., Main Outcome Measures: Disease activity was measured by Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and C reactive protein (BASDAI&CRP). Sustained R was defined as ASDAS<1.3 and/or BASDAI <2 and normal CRP while sustained LDA was defined as ASDAS <2.1 and/or BASDAI <4 and normal CRP on at least three consecutive visits., Results: In total 186 patients (66.1% men and 75.3% with radiographic sacroiliitis) were included. Overall, 76.8% of patients achieved ASDAS R/LDA (R53.2%/LDA23.6%) in at least one visit. Forty per cent (R17.6%/LDA22.4%) of the patients fulfilled the sustained ASDAS R/LDA state, whereas only 30.8% maintained this status (R14.8%/LDA15.9%) according to BASDAI&CRP. In the multivariate analysis, male sex (OR=4.01), younger age at the beginning of biological therapy (OR=0.96) and an HLA*B27 positive status (OR=4.30) were associated with achieving sustained ASDAS R/LDA., Conclusions: In clinical practice, around one-third of patients on biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs achieve a sustained R/LDA status, but these rates drop to less than one in five when targeting remission, preventing the use of the latter as a feasible target. Male sex, HLA*B27 positivity and younger age at the beginning of biological therapy are the main predictors for achieving sustained R/LDA., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DB received grants/speaker/research supports from Roche and Abbvie. CP-R received grants/speaker/research supports from Pfizer, Sanofi, Novartis, Roche and Lilly. RN received grants/speaker/research supports from Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Pfizer and Montpellier. IM received grants/research supports from Novartis and speaker’s fees from AbbVie, UCB, Roche and Novartis. DP received grants/research supports from Abbvie, Lilly, MSD and Roche, and had participation in company sponsored speaker’s bureau from Abbvie, Novartis, Lilly, Roche, and MSD. AB received Grant/research support, fees for consultancies or as a speaker for Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, Lilly, UCB, Roche. VN-C: consultancy/speaker/research grants from: Abbvie, BMS, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the identification of biomarkers to adjust treatment intensity and to correctly diagnose the disease in early stages still constitutes a challenge and, as such, novel biomarkers are needed. We proposed that autoantibodies (aAbs) against CD26 (DPP4) might have both etiological importance and clinical value. Here, we perform a prospective study of the potential diagnostic power of Anti-CD26 aAbs through their quantification in plasmas from 106 treatment-naïve early and undifferentiated AR. Clinical antibodies, Anti-CD26 aAbs, and other disease-related biomarkers were measured in plasmas obtained in the first visit from patients, which were later classified as RA and non-RA according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria. Two different isotype signatures were found among ten groups of patients, one for Anti-CD26 IgA and other for Anti-CD26 IgG and IgM isotypes, both converging in patients with arthritis (RA and Unresolved Undifferentiated Arthritis: UUA), who present elevated levels of all three isotypes. The four UUA patients, unresolved after two years, were ACPA and rheumatic factor (RF) negatives. In the whole cohort, 51.3% of ACPA/RF seronegatives were Anti-CD26 positives, and a similar frequency was observed in the seropositive RA patients. Only weak associations of the three isotypes with ESR, CRP and disease activity parameters were observed. Anti-CD26 aAbs are present in treatment-naïve early arthritis patients, including ACPA and RF seronegative individuals, suggestive of a potential pathogenic and/or biomarker role of Anti-CD26 aAbs in the development of rheumatic diseases., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: To assess the prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) and its possible association with clinical and analytical parameters of the disease., Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 38 consecutive patients with pSS were compared with 38 age and sex healthy controls. Demographic variables and classic cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs): Hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and smoking habit were assessed in both groups, and also disease-related features were collected in pSS group. The presence of subclinical atherosclerosis was assessed by carotid ultrasound, with carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) measurement and determination of the presence of atheromatous plaques., Results: Subclinical atherosclerosis presence was remarkably greater in patients with pSS than in healthy controls (OR = 4.17, 95%CI [1.27-16.54]), as well as CIMT values (0.79 ± 0.43mm vs. 0.66 ± 0.27mm; P = .02). No differences for classic CVRFs were found between both groups. An association of subclinical atherosclerosis with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and rheumatoid factor (RF) was observed in patients with pSS., Conclusion: This cohort showed a greater prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with pSS, indicating this disease as an independent risk factor for presence of early vascular damage.

Background: Currently, there is contradictory evidence regarding the best strategy to follow after discontinuation of a first biological agent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to compare the long-term efficacy of switching to a second tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) versus biopharmaceuticals with other mechanisms of action (non-TNFi) in patients with RA who previously failed a first TNFi., Methods: This prospective cohort study analyzed data from 127 patients who discontinued a previous TNFi between 1999 and 2016. Disease activity was assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months (m-6, m-12, m-24) after switching. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving good/moderate EULAR response (E-resp). Factors associated with clinical outcomes were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models., Results: Seventy-seven (61%) patients received a second TNFi and 50 (39%) switched to a non-TNFi. At m-6 and m-12, no differences were observed between groups; nevertheless, at m-24, the proportion of patients with E-resp was higher in the non-TNFi group (49% TNFi group versus 77% non-TNFi group; p  = 0.002). In regression models, switching to a non-TNFi was significantly associated with E-resp at m-24 (odds ratio = 3.21; p  = 0.01). When assessing the response to the second biological agent based on the reason for discontinuation of the first TNFi, similar results were obtained; at m-24, patients who discontinued the first TNFi due to inefficacy (either primary or secondary) experienced a better E-resp if they had switched to a non-TNFi (primary inefficacy: 52% TNFi group versus 79% non-TNFi group, p  = 0.09; secondary inefficacy: 50% versus 76%, p  = 0.03)., Conclusion: In our cohort of RA patients who discontinued a first TNFi, those who switched to a non-TNFi were three times more likely to attain a sustained clinical response, regardless of whether they had discontinued the first biologic due to a primary or secondary inefficacy., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: AB has received research fees from AbbVie, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Nordic, and Sanofi; consultancy fees from AbbVie, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, and Lilly; and speakers bureau from Pfizer, Novartis, UCB, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, and Lilly. VN-C has received speaker fees and grants from AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests., (© The Author(s), 2021.)

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are widely used for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), however a considerable percentage of patients discontinued the therapy. The aim of this study is to explore real-world TNFi survival, stratified for seropositivity, and to determine the factors that may influence it. This is a retrospective, observational and longitudinal study, using real-world data of patients, who started their first TNFi therapy between 1999 and 2018 from the RA-PAZ cohort. Patients were considered seropositive if they showed positive serum levels of either RF, ACPA, or both. Treatment survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the risks of TNFi discontinuation for seronegative and seropositive patients. Of the included 250 patients, 213 (85%) were seropositive. Results showed that TNFi survival did not depend on seropositivity status. However, median survival time was significant longer for seropositive patients who received concomitant MTX compared to patients who did not receive it (median [95% CI]: 3.3 yr. [2.3-4.2] vs. 2.6 yr. [1.7-3.6], respectively; p = 0.008). Furthermore, seropositive patients who received concomitant MTX were 49% less likely to discontinue TNFi therapy than patients who did not receive it (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.35-0.74). In addition, we found that in seropositive patients, the use of prednisone throughout the TNFi treatment was associated with a higher likelihood of therapy discontinuation (OR: 2.30; 95% CI: 1.01-5.23). In conclusion, these data provide evidence to support the use of concomitant MTX in seropositive patients to prolong the effectiveness and the survival of the TNFi therapy. Moreover, the co-administration of prednisone in seropositive patients receiving TNFi was highly associated with TNFi discontinuation., Competing Interests: CP-R has received research grants/honoraria from AbbVie, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Biogen and UCB. DP-S reports speaker fees and grants from Abbvie, Grifols, Menarini, Novartis, Pfizer and Takeda during the conduct of the study. AB reports grants, consultancies and speaker fees from Abbvie, BMS, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi, Roche and UCB during the conduct of the study. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Hernández-Breijo, Brenis, Plasencia-Rodríguez, Martínez-Feito, Novella-Navarro, Pascual-Salcedo and Balsa.)

Currently, there is an increasing interest in treating patients at risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to prevent the development of this chronic disease. In this sense, research has focused attention on the early identification of predictive factors of this disease. Autoantibodies and markers of systemic inflammation can be present before clinical arthritis and RA development. So, the phase of inflammatory arthralgia preceding clinical arthritis is an important part of the window of opportunity and, starting treatment might prevent progression to chronic arthritis. Additionally, the early diagnosis and treatment initiation, in patients with inflammatory arthritis at risk of persistence and/or erosive progression, are fundamental because may allow optimal clinical responses, better chances of achieving sustained remission, preventing irreversible organ damage and optimizing long-term outcomes. This review aims to give an overview of clinical risk factors for developing RA, both in suspected arthralgia and in undifferentiated arthritis. Besides taking into consideration the role of serological markers (immunological and acute phase reactants) and clinical features assessed at consultation such as: articular affection and patient's clinical perception. Other features as sociodemographic and environmental factors (lifestyle habits, microbiota, periodontal disease among others), have been included in this revision to give an insight on strategies to prevent development of RA and/or to treat it in early stages., Competing Interests: AB received grant/research support from Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, UCB, Roche. Worked as a paid consultant for Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, Lilly. Has been paid as a speaker for Pfizer, Novartis, UCB, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, Lilly. CP-R has received research grants/honoraria from AbbVie, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Biogen, and UCB. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Novella-Navarro, Plasencia-Rodríguez, Nuño and Balsa.)

Immunogenicity related to treatment with TNF inhibitors (TNFi) is one of the causes for the decreased attainment of clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The B-cell activating factor (BAFF) may be playing a role in the development of immunogenicity. The objective of this study was to analyse the association of baseline concentration of serum B-cell activating factor (BAFF) with immunogenicity after 6 months of TNFi treatment. A total of 127 patients with RA starting a TNFi (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol or golimumab) were followed-up for 6 months. Serum samples were obtained at baseline and at 6 months and anti-drug antibody (ADA) and BAFF concentrations were measured. Logistic regression models were employed in order to analyse the association between BAFF concentrations and immunogenicity. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the BAFF concentrations with a greater likelihood of showing immunogenicity association. At 6 months, 31 patients (24%) developed ADA. A significant interaction between the age and baseline BAFF concentration was found for the development of ADA (Wald chi-square value = 5.30; p = 0.02); therefore, subsequent results were stratified according to mean age (≤ / > 55 years). Baseline serum BAFF concentration was independently associated with ADA development only in patients over 55 years (OR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.03-2.21). Baseline serum BAFF ≥ 1034 pg/mL predicted the presence of ADA at 6 months (AUC = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.93; p = 0.001; positive likelihood ratio = 3.7). In conclusion, our results suggest that the association of BAFF concentration and immunogenicity depends on the patient's age. Baseline serum BAFF concentration predicts the presence of ADA within 6 months of TNFi therapy in older patients with RA.

Background: Biological therapies have improved the clinical course and quality of life of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Despite the availability and effectiveness of these treatments, some patients experience multiple failures to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), constituting a particular challenge to clinicians., Objectives: This study aims to determine the percentage of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who fail to respond to subsequent bDMARDs, describe their characteristics, and identify specific baseline and early features during the first bDMARD as possible predictors of consecutive multiple bDMARD failure., Methods: This is a longitudinal study involving RA patients from the prospective biological cohort drawn from the La Paz University Hospital RA Registry (RA-Paz), starting a bDMARD during the years 2000 to 2019. Patients who presented insufficient response (due to primary or secondary inefficacy) to at least three bDMARDs or two bDMARDs with different mechanism of action were considered multi-refractory (MR-patients). Patients who achieved low disease activity or remission (by DAS-28) with the first bDMARD and maintained this over a follow-up period of at least 5 years were considered non-refractory (NR-patients)., Results: A total of 41 out of 402 (10%) patients were MR-patients and 71 (18%) NR-patients. In the multivariate analysis, the presence of erosions, younger age, higher baseline DAS-28 and mostly achieving delta-DAS < 1.2 after 6 months of the first bDMARD (OR 11.12; 95% CI 3.34-26.82) were independently associated with being MR-patients to bDMARDs., Conclusions: In our cohort, 10% of patients with RA were observed to have multi-refractoriness to bDMARDs. This study supports the contention that younger patients with erosive disease and especially the early absence of clinical response to the first bDMARDs are predictors of multi-refractoriness to consecutive biologics. Hence, patients with these characteristics should be monitored more closely and may benefit from personalized treatments.

The aim of this study was to assess changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in gouty patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) using a "treat-to-target" (T2T) approach in gout. This multicenter observational retrospective study included patients diagnosed with gout and CKD stage 3 taking xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs) (allopurinol or febuxostat) for at least 12 months. All patients were treated using a T2T strategy according to national gout guidelines to achieve the target levels of serum uric acid (sUA; < 5-6 mg/dl) within 6 months of the first visit. The primary outcome was to assess changes in eGFR. The effects of independent variables were analyzed over eGFR in a linear mixed-effects (LME) model. Fifty patients with gout and CKD stage 3 treated with XOIs with a T2T strategy for 12 months were included. Eighty-two percent of the patients achieved the sUA target during the study period. The improvement seen in eGFR was higher during the first 6 months, showing a median increase of 7.54 ml/min/m 2 (SE = 1.25) and trending towards stability over 12 months. For every 1 mg/dl of decrease in sUA, an improvement of 1.5 ml/min/m 2 in eGFR was observed (coefficient ± SE: - 1.58 ± 0.26) (p < 0.001) with no differences between type and dosage of XOIs treatment, colchicine administration, age, sex, and smoking status. A reduction in sUA levels using a T2T approach with XOIs at an optimal dose is possible and could help conserve and improve renal function in gouty patients with CKD stage 3.

Objectives: To assess subclinical vascular features in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) via carotid ultrasound, and flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD), as measures of cardiovascular risk (CVR)., Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 70 patients diagnosed with SSc (diffuse or limited forms), on whom a vascular study protocol was performed to assess angiodynamic parameters measured by FMD in brachial artery and carotid ultrasound lesions: carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and carotid atheroma plaques (AP). Classical CVR factors were also assessed, as well as main features of SSc regarding skin and organic involvement, laboratory parameters, presence of autoantibodies and specific treatments., Results: 94% of patients were women with a mean age of 50.2±12.5 years. 84% had endothelial dysfunction (ED), being severe in 49%, statistically associated with glucocorticoid (GC) treatment (OR=8.78; CI=1.52-50.78; p=0.015). CIMT was pathological in 39%, 23% had AP (none had significative haemo-dymanic stenosis). Serum vitamin D concentration (25(OH)D3) showed a protective effect on CIMT (OR=0.94; CI=0.89-0.99; p=0.025). No differences between types of SSc were obtained; neither association between SSc features and classical CVR factors., Conclusions: GC treatment has implications in CVR, despite in SSc GC doses administered are lower than in other autoimmune diseases (in our cohort even prednisone ≤10 mg daily was associated with ED). GC may be associated with an early vascular damage in these patients, which could lead to changes in FMD, ED and finally AP. On the other hand, optimum levels of 25(OH)D3 seemed to be beneficial against vascular damage.

Objective: The difficulty in diagnosis and the spectrum of clinical manifestations that can determine the choice of treatment for primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has fostered the development of recommendations by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER), based on the best possible evidence. These recommendations can serve as a reference for rheumatologists and other specialists involved in the management of APS., Methods: A panel of four rheumatologists, a gynaecologist and a haematologist with expertise in APS was created, previously selected by the SER through an open call or based on professional merits. The stages of the work were: identification of the key areas for drafting the document, analysis and synthesis of the scientific evidence (using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network [SIGN] levels of evidence) and formulation of recommendations based on this evidence and formal assessment or reasoned judgement techniques (consensus techniques)., Results: 46 recommendations were drawn up, addressing five main areas: diagnosis and evaluation, measurement of primary thromboprophylaxis, treatment for APS or secondary thromboprophylaxis, treatment for obstetric APS and special situations. These recommendations also include the role of novel oral anticoagulants, the problem of recurrences or the key risk factors identified in these subjects. This document reflects the first 21, referring to the areas of: diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of primary APS. The document provides a table of recommendations and treatment algorithms., Conclusions: An update of the SER recommendations on APS is presented. This document corresponds to partI, related to diagnosis, evaluation and treatment. These recommendations are considered tools for decision-making for clinicians, taking into consideration both the decision of the physician experienced in APS and the patient. A partII has also been prepared, which addresses aspects related to obstetric SAF and special situations., (Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U.)