Search

Background Addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to radiotherapy (RT) improves overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), but previous studies suggest that patients with tumors harboring an unmethylated MGMT promoter derive minimal benefit. The aim of this open-label, phase III CheckMate 498 study was to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab (NIVO) + RT compared with TMZ + RT in newly diagnosed GBM with unmethylated MGMT promoter. Methods Patients were randomized 1:1 to standard RT (60 Gy) + NIVO (240 mg every 2 weeks for eight cycles, then 480 mg every 4 weeks) or RT + TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily during RT and 150–200 mg/m2/day 5/28 days during maintenance). The primary endpoint was OS. Results A total of 560 patients were randomized, 280 to each arm. Median OS (mOS) was 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.6 to 14.3) with NIVO + RT and 14.9 months (95% CI, 13.3 to 16.1) with TMZ + RT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.58; P = .0037). Median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 6.2) with NIVO + RT and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.9 to 6.7) with TMZ + RT (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.65). Response rates were 7.8% (9/116) with NIVO + RT and 7.2% (8/111) with TMZ + RT; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) rates were 21.9% and 25.1%, and any-grade serious TRAE rates were 17.3% and 7.6%, respectively. Conclusions The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved OS; TMZ + RT demonstrated a longer mOS than NIVO + RT. No new safety signals were detected with NIVO in this study. The difference between the study treatment arms is consistent with the use of TMZ + RT as the standard of care for GBM. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02617589

Purpose Classification and treatment of WHO grade II/III gliomas have dramatically changed. Implementing molecular markers into the WHO classification raised discussions about the significance of grading and clinical trials showed overall survival (OS) benefits for combined radiochemotherapy. As molecularly stratified treatment data outside clinical trials are scarce, we conducted this retrospective study. Methods We identified 343 patients (1995–2015) with newly diagnosed WHO grade II/III gliomas and analyzed molecular markers, patient characteristics, symptoms, histology, treatment, time to treatment failure (TTF) and OS. Results IDH-status was available for all patients (259 mutant, 84 IDH1-R132H-non-mutant). Molecular subclassification was possible in 173 tumors, resulting in diagnosis of 80 astrocytomas and 93 oligodendrogliomas. WHO grading remained significant for OS in astrocytomas/IDH1-R132H-non-mutant gliomas (p p = 0.27). Chemotherapy (and temozolomide in particular) showed inferior OS compared to radiotherapy in astrocytomas (median 6.1/12.1 years; p = 0.03) and oligodendrogliomas (median 13.2/not reached (n.r.) years; p = 0.03). While radiochemotherapy improved TTF in oligodendroglioma (median radiochemotherapy n.r./chemotherapy 3.8/radiotherapy 7.3 years; p p Conclusion This is one of the largest retrospective, real-life datasets reporting treatment and outcome in low-grade gliomas incorporating molecular markers. Current histologic grading features remain prognostic in astrocytomas while being insignificant in oligodendroglioma with interfering treatment effects. Chemotherapy (temozolomide) was less effective than radiotherapy in both astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas while radiochemotherapy showed the highest TTF in oligodendrogliomas.

BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary tumor of the central nervous system. Current interdisciplinary treatment strategies outside clinical trials include maximal safe resection, followed by treatment with radiation and an alkylating chemotherapy. Based on the results of the positive phase III trial EF-14, the addition of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) to temozolomide (TMZ) maintenance therapy brought an additional treatment method to clinical routine. The prospective non-interventional study TIGER (TTFields In GErmany in Routine Clinical Care) documents the use of TTFields in routine clinical care with a particular focus on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) within 4 months after starting therapy, treatment compliance and duration. MATERIAL AND METHODS This multi-center prospective non-interventional study in Germany (NCT03258021) included ndGBM patients eligible for TTFields therapy. Following their consent to participate in the study, patients received a comprehensive introduction to the therapy and their baseline demographic data were collected. Information on TTFields therapy decision is evaluated based on a dedicated TTFields questionnaire at baseline in both arms, follow-up information on how patients cope with the therapy is collected two months after TTFields treatment start, if applicable. HRQoL was assessed in patients deciding for TTFields therapy at baseline as well as at 2 months and 4 months thereafter using the EORTC-QLQ-C30/BN-20 questionnaires. RESULTS Between August 2017 and November 2019, 710 patients (259 female/451 male) were enrolled at 81 participating centers. The mean age was 58.5 years (range: 19.0–85.0; Cut-off: August 31, 2020). The overall baseline characteristics of the study group reflects a typical GBM population. Of these, 582 (82%) decided to start TTFields and 128 (18%) refused TTFields treatment. Health-related QoL did not decline during TTFields therapy except for itchy skin, comparable to the results of the EF-14 phase 3 trial. A detailed analysis of the cohort as well as their reported QoL will be presented. CONCLUSION The TIGER study is the largest non-interventional trial on the use of TTFields in routine clinical care. The use of TTFields in patients with ndGBM did not impair HRQoL during the follow-up period, except for more itchy skin.

OBJECTIVE Glioblastoma (GBM) is widely treated with surgery, chemoradiation and TTFields in combination with chemotherapy. Since the introduction of TTFields to first-line GBM treatment, prescribing physicians in Germany are interested to gain additional knowledge on the use in clinical practice. The TIGER study was designed to assess the therapy decision making process, safety and efficacy of TTFields in clinical routine, as well as evaluating quality of life (QoL) within 4 months after start of therapy, treatment compliance and duration. METHODS This multi-center prospective non-interventional study in Germany (NCT03258021) included newly diagnosed GBM patients eligible for TTFields therapy. Within the study, after receiving introduction to TTFields therapy, patients could decide for or against receiving TTFields. The study was designed to recruit 500 patients for each group, with and without TTFields. Demographic data, QoL and reasons for therapy decision 2–4 months after treatment start are assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30/BN-20 and a TTFields questionnaire, respectively, with 18 months follow-up. RESULTS At the last data cut-off (31st March, 2020), the median follow-up was 11 months (range: 0–28 months) and 581 (82%) of the 710 recruited patients in the trial had decided for TTFields therapy. According to preliminary analysis, this patient population represents a typical GBM population regarding median age (59 years, range: 19.0–85.0), gender (37 % female), median KPS (90, range: 40–100) and MGMT promoter methylation status (44% methylated). In this population 49 % received complete resection, 33 % partial resection and 19 % biopsy. CONCLUSION The TIGER study allows prospective and systematic analysis of TTFields treatment decision making and use of typical GBM patient population in routine clinical care. In addition, the study allows the evaluation of compliance and treatment duration. Here, we will present an updated analysis of the TIGER study.

Simple Summary: Targeted therapies are of growing interest to physicians in cancer treatment. These drugs target specific genes and proteins involved in the growth and survival of cancer cells. Brain tumor therapy is complicated by the fact that not all drugs can penetrate the blood brain barrier and reach their target. We explored the non-invasive method, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, for monitoring drug penetration and its effects in live animals bearing brain tumors. We were able to show the presence of the investigated drug in mouse brains and its on-target activity. Abstract: Background: BAY1436032 is a fluorine-containing inhibitor of the R132X-mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase (mIDH1). It inhibits the mIDH1-mediated production of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) in glioma cells. We investigated brain penetration of BAY1436032 and its effects using 1H/19F-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS). Methods: 19F-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy was conducted on serum samples from patients treated with BAY1436032 (NCT02746081 trial) in order to analyze 19F spectroscopic signal patterns and concentration-time dynamics of protein-bound inhibitor to facilitate their identification in vivo MRS experiments. Hereafter, 30 mice were implanted with three glioma cell lines (LNT-229, LNT-229 IDH1-R132H, GL261). Mice bearing the IDH-mutated glioma cells received 5 days of treatment with BAY1436032 between baseline and follow-up 1H/19F-MRS scan. All other animals underwent a single scan after BAY1436032 administration. Mouse brains were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Results: Evaluation of 1H-MRS data showed a decrease in 2-HG/total creatinine (tCr) ratios from the baseline to post-treatment scans in the mIDH1 murine model. Whole brain concentration of BAY1436032, as determined by 19F-MRS, was similar to total brain tissue concentration determined by Liquid Chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), with a signal loss due to protein binding. Intratumoral drug concentration, as determined by LC-MS/MS, was not statistically different in models with or without R132X-mutant IDH1 expression. Conclusions: Non-invasive monitoring of mIDH1 inhibition by BAY1436032 in mIDH1 gliomas is feasible.

Importance Clinical outcomes for glioblastoma remain poor. Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade has shown benefits in many cancer types. To our knowledge, data from a randomized phase 3 clinical trial evaluating a programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor therapy for glioblastoma have not been reported. Objective To determine whether single-agent PD-1 blockade with nivolumab improves survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma compared with bevacizumab. Design, Setting, and Participants In this open-label, randomized, phase 3 clinical trial, 439 patients with glioblastoma at first recurrence following standard radiation and temozolomide therapy were enrolled, and 369 were randomized. Patients were enrolled between September 2014 and May 2015. The median follow-up was 9.5 months at data cutoff of January 20, 2017. The study included 57 multicenter, multinational clinical sites. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or death. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results A total of 369 patients were randomized to nivolumab (n = 184) or bevacizumab (n = 185). TheMGMTpromoter was methylated in 23.4% (43/184; nivolumab) and 22.7% (42/185; bevacizumab), unmethylated in 32.1% (59/184; nivolumab) and 36.2% (67/185; bevacizumab), and not reported in remaining patients. At median follow-up of 9.5 months, median OS (mOS) was comparable between groups: nivolumab, 9.8 months (95% CI, 8.2-11.8); bevacizumab, 10.0 months (95% CI, 9.0-11.8); HR, 1.04 (95% CI, 0.83-1.30);P = .76. The 12-month OS was 42% in both groups. The objective response rate was higher with bevacizumab (23.1%; 95% CI, 16.7%-30.5%) vs nivolumab (7.8%; 95% CI, 4.1%-13.3%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were similar between groups (nivolumab, 33/182 [18.1%]; bevacizumab, 25/165 [15.2%]), with no unexpected neurological TRAEs or deaths due to TRAEs. Conclusions and Relevance Although the primary end point was not met in this randomized clinical trial, mOS was comparable between nivolumab and bevacizumab in the overall patient population with recurrent glioblastoma. The safety profile of nivolumab in patients with glioblastoma was consistent with that in other tumor types. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02017717

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether maps of quantitative T1 (qT1) differences induced by a gadolinium-based contrast agent (CA) are better suited than conventional T1-weighted (T1w) MR images for detecting infiltration inside and beyond the peritumoral edema of glioblastomas. Conventional T1w images and qT1 maps were obtained before and after gadolinium-based CA administration in 33 patients with glioblastoma before therapy. The following data were calculated: (i) absolute qT1-difference maps (qT1 pre-CA - qT1 post-CA), (ii) relative qT1-difference maps, (iii) absolute and (iv) relative differences of conventional T1w images acquired pre- and post-CA. The values of these four datasets were compared in four different regions: (a) the enhancing tumor, (b) the peritumoral edema, (c) a 5 mm zone around the pathology (defined as the sum of regions a and b), and (d) the contralateral normal appearing brain tissue. Additionally, absolute qT1-difference maps (displayed with linear gray scaling) were visually compared with respective conventional difference images. The enhancing tumor was visible both in the difference of conventional pre- and post-CA T1w images and in the absolute qT1-difference maps, whereas only the latter showed elevated values in the peritumoral edema and in some cases even beyond. Mean absolute qT1-difference values were significantly higher (P < 0.01) in the enhancing tumor (838 ± 210 ms), the peritumoral edema (123 ± 74 ms) and in the 5 mm zone around the pathology (81 ± 31 ms) than in normal appearing tissue (32 ± 35 ms). In summary, absolute qT1-difference maps-in contrast to the difference of T1w images-of untreated glioblastomas appear to be able to visualize CA leakage, and thus might indicate tumor cell infiltration in the edema region and beyond. Therefore, the absolute qT1-difference maps are potentially useful for treatment planning.

(1) Background: The phase 2 Regorafenib in Relapsed Glioblastoma (REGOMA) trial indicated a survival benefit for patients with first recurrence of a glioblastoma when treated with the multikinase inhibitor regorafenib (REG) instead of lomustine. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate REG penetration to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), treatment efficacy, and effects on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. (2) Methods: Patients were characterized by histology, adverse events, steroid treatment, overall survival (OS), and MRI growth pattern. REG and its two active metabolites were quantified by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry in patients’ serum and CSF. (3) Results: 21 patients mainly with IDH-wildtype glioblastomas who had been treated with REG were retrospectively identified. Thirteen CFS samples collected from 3 patients of the cohort were available for pharmacokinetic testing. CSF levels of REG and its metabolites were significantly lower than in serum. Follow-up MRI was available in 19 patients and showed progressive disease (PD) in all but 2 patients. Two distinct MRI patterns were identified: 7 patients showed classic PD with progression of contrast enhancing lesions, whereas 11 patients showed a T2-dominant MRI pattern characterized by a marked reduction of contrast enhancement. Median OS was significantly better in patients with a T2-dominant growth pattern (10 vs. 27 weeks respectively, p = 0.003). Diffusion restrictions were observed in 13 patients. (4) Conclusion: REG and its metabolites were detectable in CSF. A distinct MRI pattern that might be associated with an improved OS was observed in half of the patient cohort. Treatment response in the total cohort was poor.

OBJECTIVE Survival for the most common brain tumor, glioblastoma (GBM), has not improved since 2005, despite numerous phase 3 trials. The phase 3 EF-14 trial demonstrated significantly improved overall, progression-free and long-term survival in newly diagnosed GBM (ndGBM) patients by addition of TTFields to adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy. As there is very high interest among prescribing physicians from all disciplines to further evaluate these effects in routine clinical care, the aim of the TIGER study is to assess safety and efficacy of TTFields in routine care and reasons for patients refusing TTFields treatment, quality of life, treatment duration and compliance. METHODS The TIGER study is a multi-centre, prospective, non-interventional study in Germany (NCT03258021). All ndGBM patients who are eligible for TTFields therapy are asked for consent for study-participation and comprehensively introduced to the therapy to allow them to make a conscious positive or negative therapy decision. At baseline and 2–4 months after treatment start, demographic data, the QoL and reasons for therapy decision are evaluated utilizing the EORTC-QLQ-C30/BN-20 and TTFields questionnaire. Inclusion of 1000 patients is planned (500 with positive/negative treatment decision, respectively) with a follow-up period of 18 months. RESULTS At the last data cut-off (May 2019), 497 patients have made a decision regarding treatment with TTFields. Within this population, 84% of patients decided to undergo TTFields therapy. The median age of patients included in the trial is currently 58.3 years (19–85). 91% of patients report that the prospect of treatment success considerably or strongly affects treatment decision. Most recent data will be presented at the meeting. CONCLUSION Systematic and prospective data assessment for using TTFields in routine clinical care including patient’s therapy decision can be evaluated in TIGER. Additionally, the study supports the analysis of treatment duration and usage rate, which could drive future assessment of TTFields treatment duration.

BACKGROUND Chemotherapy is a treatment option in patients diagnosed with anaplastic gliomas or glioblastomas of the spinal cord, or with recurrent lower graded WHO spinal gliomas that are no longer amenable to local treatment. The low incidence of spinal cord gliomas, particularly in adults, limits the ability to perform clinical trials. The role of chemotherapy in these tumors has remained unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a retrospective study of 22 patients diagnosed with spinal gliomas who were treated with chemotherapy at any time during the disease course. Benefit from chemotherapy was estimated by applying Response assessment in neuro-oncology criteria. Data on radiotherapy, as well as the number of neurosurgical interventions were taken into consideration. RESULTS Most patients were diagnosed with astrocytoma WHO grade I-IV (N=14), the remaining patients were diagnosed with ependymoma (N=8). Median follow-up from start of chemotherapy was 92 months (95% CI, 72.6–111.4). The O6-methylguanyl-DNA-methyltransferase(MGMT)promoter methylation status was available in tumors of 12 patients: 9 tumors (75%) had an unmethylated MGMTpromoter. More than 50% of the patients had more than one neurosurgical intervention. After prior surgery 10 patients in the first-line setting had chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy, while 3 patients received chemotherapy only. The remaining 9 patients had initially received radiation therapy and chemotherapy was given at time of recurrence. In patients diagnosed with astrocytoma mainly temozolomide (TMZ) was applied (N=10), while one patient received CCNU and three patients had combination chemotherapy. Patients diagnosed with ependymoma had hydroxyurea (N=1), CCNU (N=1), TMZ (N=3) or combination chemotherapy (N=3). In the group of patients who had chemotherapy combined with radiation, response rates were as follows: anaplastic astrocytoma 3 stable diseases (SD), glioblastoma 1 complete response (CR) and 1 SD, and anaplastic ependymoma 1 SD. After chemotherapy in the group of patients previously irradiated, the following response rates were observed: 1 SD in pilocytic astrocytoma, 1 SD in diffuse astrocytoma, 3 SD in myxopapillary ependymoma, and 2 SD and 1 partial response (PR) in anaplastic ependymoma. All other patients experienced progressive disease. There was no indication for a favorable prognostic role ofMGMTpromoter methylation. CONCLUSION Spinal cord gliomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumors. Survival outcomes in response to chemotherapy in adult spinal glioma patients vary substantially, but individual patients appear to derive benefit from chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND The term gliomatosis cerebri (GC) refers to glial brain tumors with widespread tumor expansion affecting three or more cerebral lobes. Formerly considered a distinct tumor entity, recent studies found no difference in the mutational profile of glial tumors with GC growth pattern compared to non-GC gliomas. Thus, in the new WHO classification of brain tumors, GC is no longer included as a separate diagnosis. While the presence of gliomas with GC growth pattern is associated with worse overall survival (OS), the underlying factors remain to be identified. Here, we asked whether differing therapeutic strategies in first line treatment could account for the worse outcome of patients with GC growth pattern and grade II and III histology. MATERIAL AND METHODS From the patient data bank of the University Cancer Center (UCT) Frankfurt, 47 patients with histological diagnosis of WHO grade II or III glioma, and with record of GC imaging pattern were identified. GC tumor expansion was confirmed by review of MRI scans prior to treatment initiation. Patients with WHO grade II or III glioma without GC growth pattern served as control cohort (n=379). IDH mutational status was available for 75% of GC tumors (IDH R132H mutated 32%; non-mutated 43%) and 69% of non-GC tumors (IDH R132H mutated 57%; non-mutated 12%). RESULTS Within the GC patient cohort, patients with tumors without contrast enhancement, lower WHO grade and mutated IDH status showed better OS. Compared to the control cohort, patients with GC had significantly shorter OS. This was independent of histological diagnosis or IDH mutation status. Patients with GC more frequently underwent radiochemotherapy (17% vs. 9% in the non-GC cohort), and drastically more often received chemotherapy alone (51% vs. 5%). We then analyzed OS in GC and non-GC patients that had received the same first line treatments. For radiochemotherapy in GC versus non-GC patients, OS was 1.1 years vs. 12.7 years (p =0.0075, log-rank test). For upfront chemotherapy alone, OS was significantly shorter in the GC cohort than in the non-GC cohort (3,6 years vs. undefined, p =0.0016, log-rank test). CONCLUSION Differences in first-line treatment cannot account for the worse prognosis of patients with GC imaging pattern. Further studies are needed to pinpoint biological or clinical factors that might influence responsiveness to therapy and prognosis of GC tumors.

The phase II GLARIUS trial assigned patients with newly diagnosed, O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter non-methylated glioblastoma to experimental bevacizumab/irinotecan (BEV/IRI) or standard temozolomide (TMZ). To identify subpopulations with a particularly favorable course, we assessed the prognostic potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers before treatment onset. MRIs at baseline (before treatment onset) were analyzed for T1-hyperintense and diffusion-restricted lesions; as well as the presence of both hyperintense and diffusion-restricted (double positive) lesions. The MRI findings were correlated with overall and progression-free survival. MRI scans were evaluable in 71% of the GLARIUS modified intention-to-treat population (n = 121 of 170; 88 patients in the BEV/IRI arm, and 33 patients in the TMZ control arm). Diffusion-restricted and T1 hyperintense lesions were present in 60% and 65% of patients in BEV/IRI arm, while 57% and 63% were found in the TMZ arm, respectively. Double positive lesions were found in 37% of BEV/IRI patients and in 39% of TMZ patients. Neither the presence of T1-hyperintense, diffusion-restricted lesions, nor double positive lesions were associated with improved survival. Baseline T1-hyperintense and diffusion-restricted lesions are not suitable to predict progression-free or overall survival of patients treated with bevacizumab/irinotecan or temozolomide.

The CeTeG/NOA-09 trial demonstrated a significant survival benefit of radiotherapy with CCNU/temozolomide (TMZ) combination therapy compared to standard TMZ therapy as first-line treatment of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT)-promotor hypermethylated glioblastoma. Quality of life (QoL) assessment was a secondary objective to investigate if CCNU/TMZ combination chemotherapy has a detrimental effect on patient’s QoL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n=141) received standard radiotherapy and were randomized (1:1) for CCNU/TMZ or standard TMZ. The modified intention-to-treat population consisting of 129 patients was analyzed. At least every three months, Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was determined and QoL was measured using the EORTC-QLQ C30 and BN20 questionnaires. A longitudinal mixed-model analysis was used to evaluate differences between treatment arms in the course of KPS and QoL over time. Time to first deterioration was analyzed using a Cox regression model. RESULTS: Over a period of four years, longitudinal mixed-model analysis detected no significant impairment of QoL or KPS in the CCNU/TMZ arm as compared to the TMZ arm. Time to deterioration was prolonged in one QoL domain, motor dysfunction, for patients in the experimental arm. CONCLUSION: Intensified alkylating chemotherapy with CCNU/TMZ for patients with MGMT promotor-methylated glioblastoma did not lead to a reduction of QoL or KPS compared to TMZ standard therapy.

BACKGROUND: The effectivity and safety of TTFields in newly diagnosed GBM was recently demonstrated by the final analysis of the large, randomized controlled EF-14 Trial. To capture the clinical value of new cancer treatments, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) have both developed assessment frameworks. We quantified the clinical value of the TTFields treatment in GBM by applying ASCO and ESMO frameworks to the EF-14 trial data. MATERIALS/ METHODS: The EF-14 Trial (n=695) proved the effect of adding TTFields to maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. The ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS) and the ASCO Net Health Benefit (NHB frameworks provide separate calculations for adjuvant therapies and treatments for advanced diseases. We applied both classifications to the EF-14 trial data as required by the framework rules. Quality of life data from the EF-14 Trial was also included. Additionally, we identified reference points from the literature to understand the NHB and MCBS results for TTFields in GBM. RESULTS: Applying the ASCO framework to the EF-14 data resulted in a NHB score of 56/62 (adjuvant/advanced). Those were among the highest scores identified in the literature search. Additionally, the ASCO framework valued the reduction in cancer-related symptoms (e.g., pain, weakness of legs) with TTFields. Applying the ESMO framework resulted in MCBS scores of A/5 (adjuvant/advanced), which are the highest scores achievable in the ESMO framework. The ESMO framework valued the Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) gain during deterioration-free survival time with TTFields. CONCLUSIONS: Both the ASCO and ESMO frameworks suggest, that adding TTFields to maintenance TMZ for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients provides patients with significant clinical benefits. The high scores underline the fact, that treatment with TTFields extended progression free and overall survival without additional systemic toxicities.

In patients with glioblastoma, antiangiogenic therapy with bevacizumab (BEV) has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS). Especially in patients with an unusual infiltrative phenotype as seen in multifocal glioblastoma, the use of BEV therapy is still more controversial. Therefore, we prepared a retrospective case series with 16 patients suffering from a multifocal glioblastoma treated with BEV. We compared these patients to a matched control cohort of 16 patients suffering from glioblastoma with a single lesion treated with BEV. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the course of disease differs in glioblastoma patients with a multifocal disease pattern compared to those with a single lesion only. Patients were treated with BEV monotherapy or BEV in combination with irinotecan or lomustine (CCNU). Response rates and PFS were similar in both groups. There was a trend for an unfavorable OS in the patient group with multifocal glioblastoma, which was expected due to the generally worse prognosis of multifocal glioblastoma. We investigated whether BEV therapy affects the invasive growth pattern as measured by the appearance of new lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Under BEV therapy, there was a trend for a lower frequency of new lesions both in multifocal and solitary glioblastoma. Based on these results, BEV therapy at relapse appears to be justified to no lesser extent in multifocal glioblastoma than in solitary glioblastoma.

Background: Antiangiogenic treatment of glioblastomas with Bevacizumab lacks predictive markers. Myoinositol (MI) is an organic osmolyte, with intracellular concentration changes depending on the extracellular osmolality. Since Bevacizumab markedly reduces tumor edema and influences the tumor microenvironment, we investigated whether the MI concentration in the tumor changes during therapy. Methods: We used 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure the MI concentrations in the tumor and contralateral control tissue of 39 prospectively recruited patients with recurrent glioblastomas before and 8–12 weeks after starting therapy. 30 patients received Bevacizumab and 9 patients were treated with CCNU/VM26 as control. We performed a survival analysis to evaluate MI as a predictive biomarker for Bevacizumab therapy. Results: MI concentrations increased significantly during Bevacizumab therapy in tumor (p < .001) and control tissue (p = .001), but not during CCNU/VM26 treatment. For the Bevacizumab cohort, higher MI concentrations in the control tissue at baseline (p = .021) and higher differences between control and tumor tissue (delta MI, p = .011) were associated with longer survival. A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a median OS of 164 days for patients with a deltaMI < 1,817 mmol/l and 275 days for patients with a deltaMI > 1,817 mmol/l. No differences were observed for the relative changes or the post treatment concentrations. Additionally calculated creatine concentrations showed no differences in between subgroups or between pre and post treatment measurements. Conclusion: Our data suggest that recurrent glioblastoma shows a strong metabolic reaction to Bevacizumab. Further, our results support the hypothesis that MI might be a marker for early tumor cell invasion. Pre-therapeutic MI concentrations are predictive of overall survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with Bevacizumab.

Purpose: Rechallenge with temozolomide (TMZ) at first progression of glioblastoma after temozolomide chemoradiotherapy (TMZ/RT→TMZ) has been studied in retrospective and single-arm prospective studies, applying temozolomide continuously or using 7/14 or 21/28 days schedules. The DIRECTOR trial sought to show superiority of the 7/14 regimen. Experimental Design: Patients with glioblastoma at first progression after TMZ/RT→TMZ and at least two maintenance temozolomide cycles were randomized to Arm A [one week on (120 mg/m2 per day)/one week off] or Arm B [3 weeks on (80 mg/m2 per day)/one week off]. The primary endpoint was median time-to-treatment failure (TTF) defined as progression, premature temozolomide discontinuation for toxicity, or death from any cause. O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation was prospectively assessed by methylation-specific PCR. Results: Because of withdrawal of support, the trial was prematurely closed to accrual after 105 patients. There was a similar outcome in both arms for median TTF [A: 1.8 months; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.8–3.2 vs. B: 2.0 months; 95% CI, 1.8–3.5] and overall survival [A: 9.8 months (95% CI, 6.7–13.0) vs. B: 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.1–11.6)]. Median TTF in patients with MGMT-methylated tumors was 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.8–7.4) versus 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.8–2) in MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma. Progression-free survival rates at 6 months (PFS-6) were 39.7% with versus 6.9% without MGMT promoter methylation. Conclusions: Temozolomide rechallenge is a treatment option for MGMT promoter-methylated recurrent glioblastoma. Alternative strategies need to be considered for patients with progressive glioblastoma without MGMT promoter methylation. Clin Cancer Res; 21(9); 2057–64. ©2015 AACR.

Anti-angiogenic therapy in glioblastoma (GBM) has unfortunately not led to the anticipated improvement in patient prognosis. We here describe how human GBM adapts to bevacizumab treatment at the metabolic level. By performing 13C6-glucose metabolic flux analysis, we show for the first time that the tumors undergo metabolic re-programming toward anaerobic metabolism, thereby uncoupling glycolysis from oxidative phosphorylation. Following treatment, an increased influx of 13C6-glucose was observed into the tumors, concomitant to increased lactate levels and a reduction of metabolites associated with the tricarboxylic acid cycle. This was confirmed by increased expression of glycolytic enzymes including pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase in the treated tumors. Interestingly, l-glutamine levels were also reduced. These results were further confirmed by the assessment of in vivo metabolic data obtained by magnetic resonance spectroscopy and positron emission tomography. Moreover, bevacizumab led to a depletion in glutathione levels indicating that the treatment caused oxidative stress in the tumors. Confirming the metabolic flux results, immunohistochemical analysis showed an up-regulation of lactate dehydrogenase in the bevacizumab-treated tumor core as well as in single tumor cells infiltrating the brain, which may explain the increased invasion observed after bevacizumab treatment. These observations were further validated in a panel of eight human GBM patients in which paired biopsy samples were obtained before and after bevacizumab treatment. Importantly, we show that the GBM adaptation to bevacizumab therapy is not mediated by clonal selection mechanisms, but represents an adaptive response to therapy. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00401-014-1352-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

B10 is a glycosylated derivative of betulinic acid with promising activity against glioma cells. Lysosomal cell death pathways appear to be essential for its cytotoxicity. We investigated the influence of hypoxia, nutrient deprivation and current standard therapies on B10 cytotoxicity. The human glioma cell lines LN-308 and LNT-229 were exposed to B10 alone or together with irradiation, temozolomide, nutrient deprivation or hypoxia. Cell growth and viability were evaluated by crystal violet staining, clonogenicity assays, propidium iodide uptake and LDH release assays. Cell death was examined using an inhibitor of lysosomal acidification (bafilomycin A1), a cathepsin inhibitor (CA074-Me) and a short-hairpin RNA targeting cathepsin B. Hypoxia substantially enhanced B10-induced cell death. This effect was sensitive to bafilomycin A1 and thus dependent on hypoxia-induced lysosomal acidification. Cathepsin B appeared to mediate cell death because either the inhibitor CA074-Me or cathepsin B gene silencing rescued glioma cells from B10 toxicity under hypoxia. B10 is a novel antitumor agent with substantially enhanced cytotoxicity under hypoxia conferred by increased lysosomal cell death pathway activation. Given the importance of hypoxia for therapy resistance, malignant progression, and as a result of antiangiogenic therapies, B10 might be a promising strategy for hypoxic tumors like malignant glioma.

Therapy-induced calcifications in glioblastoma are rarely recognized. They may represent regressive changes in the tumor tissue, but their occurrence and possible predictive or prognostic value have not been systematically assessed. The observation of hyperintense lesions on precontrast T1-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRIs) in 2 index patients with glioblastoma after therapy with bevacizumab, subsequently identified as calcifications on computed tomographs (CTs), prompted us to prospectively screen for these radiographic changes. Therefore, 36 patients with recurrent glioblastoma prospectively treated with bevacizumab in an observational trial were examined every 8 weeks by MRI and, if clinically necessary, by CT. In 22 patients (61.1%), T1 hyperintense lesions became apparent after bevacizumab treatment. The median time to detection of these lesions was 55 days. In 14 (63.6%) of 22 patients, CTs were available and confirmed the existence of tumor calcifications. No substantial changes in T1 hyperintense lesions or calcifications were recognized on additional MRI or CT scans. Interestingly, the patients with therapy-induced T1 hyperintense lesions had better durations of progression-free survival than patients without these changes (median, 5.8 vs 3.5 months; P< .001), and the duration of overall survival was also superior (median, 9.7 vs 5.0 months; P= .006). There was a striking correlation between the appearance of therapy-induced T1 hyperintense lesions and overall response to bevacizumab. Therefore, this phenomenon is a rather early and time-limited event during the first weeks of treatment and appears to be response related. In summary, T1 hyperintense lesions are common in patients with glioblastoma who have been exposed to bevacizumab, may represent a novel biomarker of response and outcome, and seem to correspond to tumor calcifications.

e13017 Background: Long-term survival of patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma is a rare event with figures in the range of 2–3% for 5-year survival. Prognosis and further clinical course of these patients beyond 5 years after diagnosis are in essence unknown with only anecdotal reports of patients surviving for 10 years or more. Methods: We here report on the extended follow-up (mean, 139.4 months) of a cohort of 10 glioblastoma long-term survivors. Retrospective central histology, clinical monitoring, and regular magnetic resonance imaging were done. Results: A total of 5 patients of the 9 patients alive at a previous analysis have died during the extended follow-up. Four of these patients died from recurrent tumor. One patient died from leukoencephalopathy-associated complications without evidence of tumor progression. Details concerning the occurrence of relapses and their treatment are displayed in table 1. Notably, very late relapses occurred in three patients after 118, 124, and 126 months of progression-free survival. Thus, from the original cohort of 10 patients only 3 remain free from recurrence after the extended follow up of more than 10 years. Conclusions: Very late relapses pose a serious threat for glioblastoma long-term survivors and call for continuous vigilance. The maintenance of a tight control schedule even in patients surviving for more than 10 years should be considered. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Understanding and overcoming multidrug resistance (MDR) may be a promising strategy to develop more effective pharmacotherapies for malignant gliomas. In the present study, human malignant glioma cell lines (n = 12) exhibited heterogeneous mRNAand protein expression and functional activity of the mdr gene‐encoded P‐glycoprotein (PGP) and MDR‐associated protein (MRP). Correlation between mRNA expression, protein levels and functional activity was strong. Inhibition of PGP activity by verapamil or PSC 833 enhanced the cytotoxic effects of vincristine, doxorubicin, teniposide and taxol. Inhibition of MRP activity by indomethacin or probenecid enhanced the cytotoxic effects of vincristine, doxorubicin and teniposide. The human cerebral endothelial cell line, SV‐HCEC, exhibited the strongest PGP activity of all cell lines. Five primary human glioblastomas and one anaplastic astrocytoma displayed heterogenous protein levels of PGP and MRP‐1 in tumor cells and of PGP in biopsy specimens in vivo, but no functional activity of these proteins upon ex vivo culturing. These data suggest that the glioma cell line‐associated MDR‐type drug resistance is a result of long‐term culturing and that cerebral endothelial, but not glioma cells, may contribute to MDR‐type drug resistance of gliomas in vivo.

Background Hereditary diffuse leukodystrophy with spheroids is a rare type of leukoencephalopathy. Mutations in the colony stimulating factor 1 receptor have recently been identified to be the cause of this microgliopathy. Clinical and radiological presentation can often misguide physicians during the diagnosis of patients with this underdiagnosed disease. Case presentation We present a 29 year-old woman with a rapid course of hereditary diffuse leukodystrophy with spheroids. She mainly showed cognitive impairment and severe motor dysfunctions. Her MRI showed spotted and confluent hyperintensities of the white matter on T2-weighted images involving the corticospinal tract as well as the corpus callosum. Further, those lesions showed striking restricted diffusion. As this restricted diffusion in all areas showing signs of leukoencephalopathy was so impressive we searched Medline for these terms and got hereditary diffuse leukodystrophy with spheroids as one of the first results. After a comprehensive diagnostic workup and exclusion of other leukoencephalopathies, stereotactic biopsy and genetic testing confirmed the diagnosis. Conclusion This case points out at two important features of hereditary diffuse leukodystrophy with spheroids being spotted and/or confluent leukoencephalopathy with areas of restricted diffusion. This might help to identify more patients with this underdiagnosed disease. Moreover, the rapid clinical course in our patient raises the question whether the relatively pronounced areas of restricted diffusion are indicative of a more acute progression of the disease.