14 results on '"Papastefanou, Phillip"'
Search Results
2. Quantifying the impacts of land cover change on gross primary productivity globally
- Author
-
Krause, Andreas, Papastefanou, Phillip, Gregor, Konstantin, Layritz, Lucia S., Zang, Christian S., Buras, Allan, Li, Xing, Xiao, Jingfeng, and Rammig, Anja
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Pressure from insect‐resistant maize on protected butterflies and moths.
- Author
-
Otto, Mathias, Papastefanou, Phillip, and Fahse, Lorenz
- Subjects
- *
CORN , *ENVIRONMENTAL risk assessment , *MOTHS , *BT cotton , *INSECTICIDES , *BUTTERFLIES , *TRANSGENIC plants , *AGRICULTURAL intensification , *PEST control - Abstract
Intensification in agriculture affects many insect species, including butterflies. Insect‐resistant crops, such as Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) maize, which produces a toxin active against Lepidoptera, are an alternative to insecticide sprays. Genetically modified crops are regulated in most countries and require an environmental risk assessment. In the European Union, such assessments include the use of simulation models to predict the effects on nontarget Lepidoptera (NTL). To support the assessment of protected NTL, we extended an individual‐based, stochastic, spatially explicit mathematical model (LepiX) to include a wider range of exposure scenarios, a species‐sensitivity distribution, and an option for repeated exposure of individuals. We applied the model to transgenic maize DAS‐1507, which expresses a high concentration of Bt toxin in pollen that may be consumed by NTL larvae on their host plants nearby. Even in the most conservative scenario without repeated exposure, mortality estimates for highly sensitive species ranged from 41% to 6% at distances of 10–1000 m from the nearest maize field. Repeated exposure can cause additional mortality and thus is relevant for the overall risk assessment. Uncertainties in both exposure and ecotoxicity estimates strongly influenced the predicted mortalities. Care should be taken to include these uncertainties in the model scenarios used for decision‐making. In accordance with other modeling results, our simulations demonstrated that mean mortality may not be safe for protected species. With its high pollen expression, DAS‐1507 maize may pose risks to sensitive and protected butterfly and moth species that may be difficult to manage. High expression of Bt toxin in pollen is unnecessary for controlling target pests. Consequently, we suggest that Bt maize with high pollen expression not be cultivated in regions where protected butterflies are to be conserved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Trade‐Offs for Climate‐Smart Forestry in Europe Under Uncertain Future Climate
- Author
-
Gregor, Konstantin, Knoke, Thomas, Krause, Andreas, Reyer, Christopher P. O., Lindeskog, Mats, Papastefanou, Phillip, Smith, Benjamin, Lansø, Anne‐Sofie, Rammig, Anja, 1 TUM School of Life Sciences Technical University of Munich Freising Germany, 2 Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research Member of the Leibniz Association Potsdam Germany, 3 Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science Lund University Lund Sweden, 5 Department of Environmental Science Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark, Technische Universität München = Technical University of Munich (TUM), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Lund University [Lund], Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), and Aarhus University [Aarhus]
- Subjects
[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere ,SHORT-ROTATION COPPICE ,UNMANAGED FORESTS ,VEGETATION DYNAMICS ,climate‐smart forestry ,LAND-USE ,forest management ,substitution effects ,robust optimization ,ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ,climate change mitigation ,ddc ,CARBON SEQUESTRATION ,climate-smart forestry ,ddc:634.9 ,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) ,MANAGEMENT ,ddc:630 ,GREENHOUSE-GAS CONCENTRATIONS ,LPJ-GUESS V4.0 ,ecosystem services ,BIOMASS PRODUCTIVITY ,GENERAL ,Climate and interannual variability ,Numerical modeling ,NATURAL HAZARDS ,Atmospheric ,Geological ,Oceanic ,Physical modeling ,Climate impact ,Risk ,Disaster risk analysis and assessment ,OCEANOGRAPHY: PHYSICAL ,Air/sea interactions ,Decadal ocean variability ,Ocean influence of Earth rotation ,Sea level: variations and mean ,Surface waves and tides ,Tsunamis and storm surges ,PALEOCEANOGRAPHY ,POLICY SCIENCES ,Benefit-cost analysis ,RADIO SCIENCE ,Radio oceanography ,SEISMOLOGY ,Earthquake ground motions and engineering seismology ,Volcano seismology ,TECTONOPHYSICS ,Evolution of the Earth ,VOLCANOLOGY ,Volcano/climate interactions ,Atmospheric effects ,Volcano monitoring ,Effusive volcanism ,Mud volcanism ,Explosive volcanism ,Volcanic hazards and risks ,GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION ,Europe ,Research Article ,robust optimization [ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE ,Air/sea constituent fluxes ,Biosphere/atmosphere interactions ,Evolution of the atmosphere ,Volcanic effects ,BIOGEOSCIENCES ,Modeling ,Climate dynamics ,COMPUTATIONAL GEOPHYSICS ,Numerical solutions ,CRYOSPHERE ,Avalanches ,Mass balance ,GEODESY AND GRAVITY ,Ocean monitoring with geodetic techniques ,Ocean/Earth/atmosphere/hydrosphere/cryosphere interactions ,Global change from geodesy ,GLOBAL CHANGE ,Impacts of global change ,Land/atmosphere interactions ,Abrupt/rapid climate change ,Atmosphere ,Climate variability ,Earth system modeling ,Oceans ,Regional climate change ,Sea level change ,Solid Earth ,Water cycles ,HYDROLOGY ,Climate impacts ,Hydrological cycles and budgets ,INFORMATICS ,MARINE GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS ,Gravity and isostasy ,ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES ,Climate change and variability ,Climatology ,General circulation ,Ocean/atmosphere interactions ,Regional modeling ,Theoretical modeling ,OCEANOGRAPHY] ,[SDU.ENVI]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces, environment ,General Environmental Science - Abstract
Forests mitigate climate change by storing carbon and reducing emissions via substitution effects of wood products. Additionally, they provide many other important ecosystem services (ESs), but are vulnerable to climate change; therefore, adaptation is necessary. Climate‐smart forestry combines mitigation with adaptation, whilst facilitating the provision of many ESs. This is particularly challenging due to large uncertainties about future climate. Here, we combined ecosystem modeling with robust multi‐criteria optimization to assess how the provision of various ESs (climate change mitigation, timber provision, local cooling, water availability, and biodiversity habitat) can be guaranteed under a broad range of climate futures across Europe. Our optimized portfolios contain 29% unmanaged forests, and implicate a successive conversion of 34% of coniferous to broad‐leaved forests (11% vice versa). Coppices practically vanish from Southern Europe, mainly due to their high water requirement. We find the high shares of unmanaged forests necessary to keep European forests a carbon sink while broad‐leaved and unmanaged forests contribute to local cooling through biogeophysical effects. Unmanaged forests also pose the largest benefit for biodiversity habitat. However, the increased shares of unmanaged and broad‐leaved forests lead to reductions in harvests. This raises the question of how to meet increasing wood demands without transferring ecological impacts elsewhere or enhancing the dependence on more carbon‐intensive industries. Furthermore, the mitigation potential of forests depends on assumptions about the decarbonization of other industries and is consequently crucially dependent on the emission scenario. Our findings highlight that trade‐offs must be assessed when developing concrete strategies for climate‐smart forestry., Plain Language Summary: Forests help mitigate climate change by storing carbon and via avoided emissions when wood products replace more carbon‐intensive materials. At the same time, forests provide many other “ecosystem services (ESs)” to society. For example, they provide timber, habitat for various species, and they cool their surrounding regions. They are, however, also vulnerable to ongoing climate change. Forest management must consider all these aspects, which is particularly challenging considering the uncertainty about future climate. Here, we propose how this may be tackled by computing optimized forest management portfolios for Europe for a broad range of future climate pathways. Our results show that changes to forest composition are necessary. In particular, increased shares of unmanaged and broad‐leaved forests are beneficial for numerous ESs. However, these increased shares also lead to decreases in harvest rates, posing a conflict between wood supply and demand. We further show that the mitigation potential of forests strongly depends on how carbon‐intensive the replaced materials are. Consequently, should these materials become “greener” due to new technologies, the importance of wood products in terms of climate change mitigation decreases. Our study highlights that we cannot optimize every aspect, but that trade‐offs between ESs need to be made., Key Points: Strategies for climate‐smart forestry under a range of climate scenarios always lead to trade‐offs between different ecosystem services (ESs). Higher shares of unmanaged and broad‐leaved forests are beneficial for numerous ESs, but lead to decreased timber provision. The mitigation potential of forests strongly relies on substitution effects which depend on the carbon‐intensity of the alternative products., European Forest Institute (EFI) Networking Fund http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013942, Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst, Bayerisches Netzwerk für Klimaforschung (BayKliF) http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004563, Swedish Research Council Formas, German Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6667489, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6612953
- Published
- 2022
5. Evapotranspiration trends and variability in southeastern South America: The roles of land‐cover change and precipitation variability
- Author
-
Ruscica, Romina, Sörensson, Anna, Diaz, Leandro, Vera, Carolina, Castro, Aline, Papastefanou, Phillip, Rammig, Anja, Rezende, Luiz, Sakschewski, Boris, Thonicke, Kirsten, Viovy, Nicolas, Randow, Celso, Universidad de Buenos Aires [Buenos Aires] (UBA), National Institute for Space Research [Sao José dos Campos] (INPE), Technische Universität Munchen - Université Technique de Munich [Munich, Allemagne] (TUM), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Modélisation des Surfaces et Interfaces Continentales (MOSAIC), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), CLIMAX Project was funded by Belmont Forum/ANR-15-JCL/-0002-01, BMBF FKZ 01LP1610A, and FAPESP-BELMONT-Process 2015/50687-8, Agencia Nacional dePromoci on Científica y Tecnol ogica (ANPCyT), Argen-tina [PICTs 2017-1406, 2018-02511], University of BuenosAires, Argentina [UBACyT20020170100428BA], SÃOPAULO STATE RESEARCH FOUNDATION [grants2015/50687-8 and 2017/03048-5] and National Councilfor Scientific and Technological Development [301084/2020-3]. ORCHIDEE simulations were performed usingHPC resources from GENCI-TGCC [2018-6328], and ANR-15-JCLI-0002,CLIMAX,Climate Services Through Knowledge Co-Production: A Euro-South American Initiative For Strengthening Societal Adaptation Response to Extreme Events(2015)
- Subjects
Vegetation models ,[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere ,Precipitation variability ,Evapotranspiration ,Land-cover changes ,Trends analysis ,Dipole evolution ,[SDU.ENVI]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces, environment ,South America climate - Abstract
International audience; Southeastern South America is subject to considerable precipitation variability on seasonal to decadal timescales and has undergone very heavy land-cover changes (LCCs) since the middle of the past century. The influence of local LCC and precipitation as drivers of regional evapotranspiration (ET) long-term trends and variability remains largely unknown in the region. Here, ensembles of stand-alone dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) with different atmospheric forcings are used to disentangle the influence of those two drivers on austral summer ET from 1950 to 2010. This paper examines the influence of both the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the dipole-like first-mode of southeastern South American precipitation variability (EOF1) on regional ET. We found that in the lower La Plata Basin, ET was driven by precipitation variability and showed a positive summer trend. Moreover, the region showed marked seasonal anomalies during El Niño and La Niña summers but mainly during EOF1 phases. On the contrary, in the upper La Plata Basin, LCCs forced the negative summer ET trend and particularly reduced the summer anomalies of the late 1990s, a period of ENSO and EOF1-positive phases. In the South Atlantic Convergence Zone region, the high ET uncertainty across ensemble members impeded finding robust results, which highlights the importance of using multiple DGVMs and atmospheric forcings instead of relying on single model/forcing results.
- Published
- 2022
6. Recent extreme drought events in the Amazon rainforest: assessment of different precipitation and evapotranspiration datasets and drought indicators.
- Author
-
Papastefanou, Phillip, Zang, Christian S., Angelov, Zlatan, de Castro, Aline Anderson, Jimenez, Juan Carlos, De Rezende, Luiz Felipe Campos, Ruscica, Romina C., Sakschewski, Boris, Sörensson, Anna A., Thonicke, Kirsten, Vera, Carolina, Viovy, Nicolas, Von Randow, Celso, and Rammig, Anja
- Subjects
DROUGHT management ,DROUGHTS ,EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ,RAIN forests ,RAINFALL anomalies ,CARBON cycle - Abstract
Over the last decades, the Amazon rainforest has been hit by multiple severe drought events. Here, we assess the severity and spatial extent of the extreme drought years 2005, 2010 and 2015/16 in the Amazon region and their impacts on the regional carbon cycle. As an indicator of drought stress in the Amazon rainforest, we use the widely applied maximum cumulative water deficit (MCWD). Evaluating nine state-of-the-art precipitation datasets for the Amazon region, we find that the spatial extent of the drought in 2005 ranges from 2.2 to 3.0 (mean =2.7) ×106 km 2 (37 %–51 % of the Amazon basin, mean =45 %), where MCWD indicates at least moderate drought conditions (relative MCWD anomaly <-0.5). In 2010, the affected area was about 16 % larger, ranging from 3.0 up to 4.4 (mean =3.6) ×106 km 2 (51 %–74 %, mean =61 %). In 2016, the mean area affected by drought stress was between 2005 and 2010 (mean =3.2×106 km 2 ; 55 % of the Amazon basin), but the general disagreement between datasets was larger, ranging from 2.4 up to 4.1×106 km 2 (40 %–69 %). In addition, we compare differences and similarities among datasets using the self-calibrating Palmer Drought Severity Index (scPDSI) and a dry-season rainfall anomaly index (RAI). We find that scPDSI shows a stronger and RAI a much weaker drought impact in terms of extent and severity for the year 2016 compared to MCWD. We further investigate the impact of varying evapotranspiration on the drought indicators using two state-of-the-art evapotranspiration datasets. Generally, the variability in drought stress is most dependent on the drought indicator (60 %), followed by the choice of the precipitation dataset (20 %) and the evapotranspiration dataset (20 %). Using a fixed, constant evapotranspiration rate instead of variable evapotranspiration can lead to an overestimation of drought stress in the parts of Amazon basin that have a more pronounced dry season (for example in 2010). We highlight that even for well-known drought events the spatial extent and intensity can strongly depend upon the drought indicator and the data sources it is calculated with. Using only one data source and drought indicator has the potential danger of under- or overestimating drought stress in regions with high measurement uncertainty, such as the Amazon basin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Impacts of Land Use Change and Atmospheric CO2 on Gross Primary Productivity (GPP), Evaporation, and Climate in Southern Amazon.
- Author
-
Rezende, Luiz F. C., de Castro, Aline Anderson, Von Randow, Celso, Ruscica, Romina, Sakschewski, Boris, Papastefanou, Phillip, Viovy, Nicolas, Thonicke, Kirsten, Sörensson, Anna, Rammig, Anja, and Cavalcanti, Iracema F. A.
- Subjects
ATMOSPHERIC carbon dioxide ,LEAF area index ,LAND use ,DEFORESTATION ,LEAF physiology ,PLANT physiology - Abstract
Recent publications indicate that the Amazon may be acting more as a carbon source than a sink in some regions. Moreover, the Amazon is a source of moisture for other regions in the continent, and deforestation over the years may be reducing this function. In this work, we analyze the impacts of elevated CO2 (eCO2) and land use change (LUC) on gross primary productivity (GPP) and evaporation in the southern Amazon (7°S 14°S, 66°W 51°W), which suffered strong anthropogenic influence in the period of 1981‒2010. We ran four dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs), isolating historical CO2, constant CO2, LUC, and potential natural vegetation scenarios with three climate variable data sets: precipitation, temperature, and shortwave radiation. We compared the outputs to five "observational" data sets obtained through eddy covariance, remote sensing, meteorological measurements, and machine learning. The results indicate that eCO2 may have offset deforestation, with GPP increasing by ∼13.5% and 9.3% (dry and rainy seasons, respectively). After isolating the LUC effect, a reduction in evaporation of ∼4% and ∼1.2% (dry and rainy seasons, respectively) was observed. The analysis of forcings in subregions under strong anthropogenic impact revealed a reduction in precipitation of ∼15 and 30 mm, and a temperature rise of 1°C and 0.6°C (dry and rainy seasons, respectively). Differences in the implementation of plant physiology and leaf area index in the DGVMs introduced some uncertainties in the interpretation of the results. Nevertheless, we consider that it was an important exercise given the relevance. Key Points: The elevated atmospheric CO2 had a strong positive influence on gross primary productivity (GPP) and also offset deforestation, when native forest was converted to grassesLand use change also had a negative effect on evaporation and most intense effects of climate change (as temperature increasing) were on deforested areasUncertainties were found in the outputs of the models and in the climatic forcings. Divergences were also observed among the models [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Quantifying the spatial extent and intensity of recent extreme drought events in the Amazon rainforest and their impacts on the carbon cycle.
- Author
-
Papastefanou, Phillip, Zang, Christian S., Angelov, Zlatan, de Castro, Aline Anderson, Jimenez, Juan Carlos, De Rezende, Luiz Felipe Campos, Ruscica, Romina, Sakschewski, Boris, Sörensson, Anna, Thonicke, Kirsten, Vera, Carolina, Viovy, Nicolas, Von Randow, Celso, and Rammig, Anja
- Subjects
DROUGHT management ,BIG data ,RAIN forests ,RAINFALL anomalies ,DROUGHTS - Abstract
Over the last decades, the Amazon rainforest was hit by multiple severe drought events. Here we assess the severity and spatial extent of the extreme drought years 2005, 2010, and 2015/2016 in the Amazon region and their impacts on the carbon cycle. As an indicator of drought stress in the Amazon rainforest, we use the widely applied maximum cumulative water deficit (ΔMCWD). Evaluating an ensemble of ten state-of-the-art precipitation datasets for the Amazon region, we find that the spatial extent of the drought in 2005 ranges from 2.8 to 4.2 (mean = 3.2) million km
2 (46-71 % of the Amazon basin, mean = 53 %) where ΔMCWD indicates at least moderate drought conditions (ΔMCWD anomaly < 25 mm). In 2010, the affected area was about 16 % larger, ranging from 3.1 up to 4.6 (mean = 3.7) million km2 (52-78 %, mean = 63 %). In 2016, the mean area affected by drought stress was similar to 2005 (mean = 3.2 million km2 ; 55 % of the Amazon basin), but the general disagreement between data sets was larger, ranging from 2.4 up to 4.1 million km2 (40-70 %). In addition, we compare differences and similarities among datasets using the self-calibrating Palmer Drought Severity Index (scPDSI) and a rainfall anomaly index (RAI). We find that scPDSI shows a much stronger, and RAI a much weaker drought impact in terms of extent and severity for 2016 compared to ΔMCWD. Using an empirical ΔMCWD-mortality relationship, we calculate biomass losses of the three drought events. We show that eight of ten datasets agree on biomass losses of about 1.8 PgC for the drought years 2005 and 2010, indicating that the more intense drought in 2005 equals a larger total area of the 2010 drought regarding biomass loss. For the 2015/2016 drought event, datasets show a large variability of biomass loss induced by drought stress ranging from 1.3 to 2.7 PgC with a mean loss of 1.8 PgC. Disagreement across datasets increased, (1) when comparing the total area of more severe and extreme drought signals and (2) when comparing spatial drought location across datasets. Generally, only half of the datasets agreed on the location of a drought event. We conclude that for deriving impacts of droughts to the Amazon Basin based on precipitation, an ensemble of datasets should be considered. This is especially relevant when assessing the impact of drought on the Amazon rainforest and its carbon cycle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. A Dynamic Model for Strategies and Dynamics of Plant Water-Potential Regulation Under Drought Conditions.
- Author
-
Papastefanou, Phillip, Zang, Christian S., Pugh, Thomas A. M., Liu, Daijun, Grams, Thorsten E. E., Hickler, Thomas, and Rammig, Anja
- Subjects
DROUGHT management ,STANDARD deviations ,DYNAMIC models ,DROUGHTS ,WATER levels ,SOIL moisture - Abstract
Vegetation responds to drought through a complex interplay of plant hydraulic mechanisms, posing challenges for model development and parameterization. We present a mathematical model that describes the dynamics of leaf water-potential over time while considering different strategies by which plant species regulate their water-potentials. The model has two parameters: the parameter λ describing the adjustment of the leaf water potential to changes in soil water potential, and the parameter Δψ
ww describing the typical 'well-watered' leaf water potentials at non-stressed (near-zero) levels of soil water potential. Our model was tested and calibrated on 110 time-series datasets containing the leaf- and soil water potentials of 66 species under drought and non-drought conditions. Our model successfully reproduces the measured leaf water potentials over time based on three different regulation strategies under drought. We found that three parameter sets derived from the measurement data reproduced the dynamics of 53% of an drought dataset, and 52% of a control dataset [root mean square error (RMSE) < 0.5 MPa)]. We conclude that, instead of quantifying water-potential-regulation of different plant species by complex modeling approaches, a small set of parameters may be sufficient to describe the water potential regulation behavior for large-scale modeling. Thus, our approach paves the way for a parsimonious representation of the full spectrum of plant hydraulic responses to drought in dynamic vegetation models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Earth system data cubes unravel global multivariate dynamics.
- Author
-
Mahecha, Miguel D., Gans, Fabian, Brandt, Gunnar, Christiansen, Rune, Cornell, Sarah E., Fomferra, Normann, Kraemer, Guido, Peters, Jonas, Bodesheim, Paul, Camps-Valls, Gustau, Donges, Jonathan F., Dorigo, Wouter, Estupinan-Suarez, Lina M., Gutierrez-Velez, Victor H., Gutwin, Martin, Jung, Martin, Londoño, Maria C., Miralles, Diego G., Papastefanou, Phillip, and Reichstein, Markus
- Subjects
DATA integration ,EARTH system science ,SPATIAL analysis (Statistics) ,CUBES ,ECOSYSTEM dynamics - Abstract
Understanding Earth system dynamics in light of ongoing human intervention and dependency remains a major scientific challenge. The unprecedented availability of data streams describing different facets of the Earth now offers fundamentally new avenues to address this quest. However, several practical hurdles, especially the lack of data interoperability, limit the joint potential of these data streams. Today, many initiatives within and beyond the Earth system sciences are exploring new approaches to overcome these hurdles and meet the growing interdisciplinary need for data-intensive research; using data cubes is one promising avenue. Here, we introduce the concept of Earth system data cubes and how to operate on them in a formal way. The idea is that treating multiple data dimensions, such as spatial, temporal, variable, frequency, and other grids alike, allows effective application of user-defined functions to co-interpret Earth observations and/or model–data integration. An implementation of this concept combines analysis-ready data cubes with a suitable analytic interface. In three case studies, we demonstrate how the concept and its implementation facilitate the execution of complex workflows for research across multiple variables, and spatial and temporal scales: (1) summary statistics for ecosystem and climate dynamics; (2) intrinsic dimensionality analysis on multiple timescales; and (3) model–data integration. We discuss the emerging perspectives for investigating global interacting and coupled phenomena in observed or simulated data. In particular, we see many emerging perspectives of this approach for interpreting large-scale model ensembles. The latest developments in machine learning, causal inference, and model–data integration can be seamlessly implemented in the proposed framework, supporting rapid progress in data-intensive research across disciplinary boundaries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Earth system data cubes unravel global multivariate dynamics.
- Author
-
Mahecha, Miguel D., Gans, Fabian, Brandt, Gunnar, Christiansen, Rune, Cornell, Sarah E., Fomferra, Normann, Kraemer, Guido, Peters, Jonas, Bodesheim, Paul, Camps-Valls, Gustau, Donges, Jonathan F., Dorigo, Wouter, Estupiñan-Suarez, Lina, Gutierrez-Velez, Victor H., Gutwin, Martin, Jung, Martin, Londoño, Maria C., Miralles, Diego G., Papastefanou, Phillip, and Reichstein, Markus
- Subjects
DATA integration ,EARTH system science ,SPATIAL analysis (Statistics) ,CUBES ,ECOSYSTEM dynamics - Abstract
Understanding Earth system dynamics in the light of ongoing human intervention and dependency remains a major scientific challenge. The unprecedented availability of data streams describing different facets of the Earth now offers fundamentally new avenues to address this quest. However, several practical hurdles, especially the lack of data interoperability, limit the joint potential of these data streams. Today many initiatives within and beyond the Earth system sciences are exploring new approaches to overcome these hurdles and meet the growing inter-disciplinary need for data-intensive research; using data cubes is one promising avenue. Here, we introduce the concept ofEarth system data cubes and how to operate on them in a formal way. The idea is that treating multiple data dimensions, such as spatial, temporal, variable, frequency and other grids alike, allows effective application of user-defined functions to co-interpret Earth observations and/or model-data. An implementation of this concept combines analysis-ready data cubes with a suitable analytic interface. In three case studies we demonstrate how the concept and its implementation facilitate the execution of complex workflows for research across multiple variables, spatial and temporal scales: (1) summary statistics for ecosystem and climate dynamics; (2) intrinsic dimensionality analysis on multiple time-scales; and (3) data-model integration. We discuss the emerging perspectives for investigating global interacting and coupled phenomena in observed or simulated data. Latest developments in machine learning, causal inference, and model data integration can be seamlessly implemented in the proposed framework, supporting rapid progress in data-intensive research across disciplinary boundaries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. A generic pixel-to-point comparison for simulated large-scale ecosystem properties and ground-based observations: an example from the Amazon region.
- Author
-
Rammig, Anja, Heinke, Jens, Hofhansl, Florian, Verbeeck, Hans, Baker, Timothy R., Christoffersen, Bradley, Ciais, Philippe, De Deurwaerder, Hannes, Fleischer, Katrin, Galbraith, David, Guimberteau, Matthieu, Huth, Andreas, Johnson, Michelle, Krujit, Bart, Langerwisch, Fanny, Meir, Patrick, Papastefanou, Phillip, Sampaio, Gilvan, Thonicke, Kirsten, and von Randow, Celso
- Subjects
GRID cells ,BIOMASS ,CLIMATE change ,BIOMASS energy ,ENERGY consumption - Abstract
Comparing model output and observed data is an important step for assessing model performance and quality of simulation results. However, such comparisons are often hampered by differences in spatial scales between local point observations and large-scale simulations of grid cells or pixels. In this study, we propose a generic approach for a pixel-to-point comparison and provide statistical measures accounting for the uncertainty resulting from landscape variability and measurement errors in ecosystem variables. The basic concept of our approach is to determine the statistical properties of small-scale (within-pixel) variability and observational errors, and to use this information to correct for their effect when large-scale area averages (pixel) are compared to small-scale point estimates. We demonstrate our approach by comparing simulated values of aboveground biomass, woody productivity (woody net primary productivity, NPP) and residence time of woody biomass from four dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) with measured inventory data from permanent plots in the Amazon rainforest, a region with the typical problem of low data availability, potential scale mismatch and thus high model uncertainty. We find that the DGVMs under- and overestimate aboveground biomass by 25 % and up to 60 %, respectively. Our comparison metrics provide a quantitative measure for model–data agreement and show moderate to good agreement with the region-wide spatial biomass pattern detected by plot observations. However, all four DGVMs overestimate woody productivity and underestimate residence time of woody biomass even when accounting for the large uncertainty range of the observational data. This is because DGVMs do not represent the relation between productivity and residence time of woody biomass correctly. Thus, the DGVMs may simulate the correct large-scale patterns of biomass but for the wrong reasons. We conclude that more information about the underlying processes driving biomass distribution are necessary to improve DGVMs. Our approach provides robust statistical measures for any pixel-to-point comparison, which is applicable for evaluation of models and remote-sensing products. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Estimating acute mortality of Lepidoptera caused by the cultivation of insect-resistant Bt maize – The LepiX model.
- Author
-
Fahse, Lorenz, Papastefanou, Phillip, and Otto, Mathias
- Subjects
- *
CORN harvesting , *BIODIVERSITY , *CORN diseases , *ABSCISSION (Botany) , *SIMULATION methods & models - Abstract
The cultivation of Bt maize, genetically modified to be resistant to insect pests, has led to intense scientific and political debate about its possible adverse impacts on biodiversity. To better address this question we developed an individual-based simulation model ( LepiX ). LepiX considers the temporal dynamics of maize pollen shedding and larval phenology, and pollen deposition on host plants related to distance from the maize field, in order to estimate mortality of lepidopteran larvae exposed to toxic Bt pollen. We employed a refined exposure analysis, comparison to previous approaches, using recent evidence on leaf pollen deposition and accounting for the spatial heterogeneity of pollen on leaves. Moreover, we used a stochastic approach, considering literature data on a minimum dataset for butterfly biology in combination with historic data on temporal pollen deposition to predict the coincidence between larval phenology and pollen deposition. Since conservation management actions may act at the level of the individual for protected species, LepiX , as an individual based spatially explicit model, is suited to assist both risk assessment and management measures based on threshold mortalities. We tested our model using Inachis io (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) as butterfly species and the cultivation of insect resistant MON810 maize. In accordance to predictions based on other models we identified mortality risks of I. io larvae for the second larval generation. An analysis of the sensitivity of input parameters stressed the importance of both the slope and the LC 50 value of the dose-response curve as well as the earliest day of larval hatching. Using different published data to characterize the dose-response of MON810 pollen to I. io we revealed consequences due to uncertainties in ecotoxicological parameters and thus highlight the importance of key biological parameters for reliable estimates of effects, and decision making (e.g. isolation distances) in risk assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. European mushroom assemblages are darker in cold climates.
- Author
-
Krah FS, Büntgen U, Schaefer H, Müller J, Andrew C, Boddy L, Diez J, Egli S, Freckleton R, Gange AC, Halvorsen R, Heegaard E, Heideroth A, Heibl C, Heilmann-Clausen J, Høiland K, Kar R, Kauserud H, Kirk PM, Kuyper TW, Krisai-Greilhuber I, Norden J, Papastefanou P, Senn-Irlet B, and Bässler C
- Subjects
- Climate Change, Cold Climate, Ecosystem, Europe, Agaricales physiology, Pigmentation physiology
- Abstract
Thermal melanism theory states that dark-colored ectotherm organisms are at an advantage at low temperature due to increased warming. This theory is generally supported for ectotherm animals, however, the function of colors in the fungal kingdom is largely unknown. Here, we test whether the color lightness of mushroom assemblages is related to climate using a dataset of 3.2 million observations of 3,054 species across Europe. Consistent with the thermal melanism theory, mushroom assemblages are significantly darker in areas with cold climates. We further show differences in color phenotype between fungal lifestyles and a lifestyle differentiated response to seasonality. These results indicate a more complex ecological role of mushroom colors and suggest functions beyond thermal adaption. Because fungi play a crucial role in terrestrial carbon and nutrient cycles, understanding the links between the thermal environment, functional coloration and species' geographical distributions will be critical in predicting ecosystem responses to global warming.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.