18 results on '"Peek, Jesse"'
Search Results
2. Nonunion of traumatic rib fractures: a suitable indication for surgery?
- Author
-
Minervini, Fabrizio, Peek, Jesse, van Veelen, Nicole M., Kestenholz, Peter B., Kremo, Valerie, Leiser, Alfred, Knobe, Matthias, and Beeres, Frank J. P.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Epidemiology and outcome of rib fractures: a nationwide study in the Netherlands
- Author
-
Peek, Jesse, Beks, Reinier B., Hietbrink, Falco, De Jong, Mirjam B., Heng, Marilyn, Beeres, Frank J. P., IJpma, Frank F. A., Leenen, Loek P. H., Groenwold, Rolf H. H., and Houwert, Roderick M.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Long-term quality of life and functional outcome after rib fracture fixation
- Author
-
Peek, Jesse, Kremo, Valerie, Beks, Reinier, van Veelen, Nicole, Leiser, Alfred, Link, Björn-Christian, Houwert, Roderick M., Minervini, Fabrizio, Knobe, Matthias, Babst, Reto H., and Beeres, Frank J. P.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. The evaluation of pulmonary function after rib fixation for multiple rib fractures and flail chest: a retrospective study and systematic review of the current evidence
- Author
-
Peek, Jesse, Beks, Reinier Bart, Kremo, Valerie, van Veelen, Nicole, Leiser, Alfred, Houwert, Roderick Marijn, Link, Björn-Christian, Knobe, Matthias, Babst, Reto Hansjörg, and Beeres, Frank Joseph Paulus
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Fixation of flail chest or multiple rib fractures: current evidence and how to proceed. A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
-
Beks, Reinier B., Peek, Jesse, de Jong, Mirjam B., Wessem, Karlijn J. P., Öner, Cumhur F., Hietbrink, Falco, Leenen, Luke P. H., Groenwold, Rolf H. H., and Houwert, Roderick M.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Comparison of analgesic interventions for traumatic rib fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
-
Peek, Jesse, Smeeing, Diederik P. J., Hietbrink, Falco, Houwert, Roderick M., Marsman, Marije, and de Jong, Mirjam B.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Complications and outcome after rib fracture fixation: A systematic review
- Author
-
Peek, Jesse, Beks, Reinier B., Hietbrink, Falco, Heng, Marilyn, De Jong, Mirjam B., Beeres, Frank J.P., Leenen, Loek P.H., Groenwold, Rolf H.H., and Houwert, R. Marijn
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Traumatic Rib Fractures: Epidemiology, Treatment and Outcome
- Author
-
Peek, Jesse, Leenen, L.P.H, Groenwold, R.H.H., Houwert, R.M., Beks, R.B., and University Utrecht
- Subjects
Surgery ,Trauma ,Rib fractures ,Epidemiology ,Pain ,Rib fixation - Abstract
Rib fractures are still a relevant and frequently occurring injury associated with a significant morbidity and mortality. Six percent of all hospitalized trauma patients appeared to sustain one or more fractured ribs and the absolute incidence rate of rib fractures requiring hospital admission among the Dutch population was 29 per 100,000 person-years. Furthermore, we found that the incidence rate of rib fractures in the elderly was even higher with 72 per 100,000 person-years, which illustrates the high clinical impact of rib fractures on the elderly population. Hence, given the considerable morbidity and mortality of rib fractures in these patients, it could be argued that rib fractures may impose the largest burden of disease after hip fractures in the elderly trauma patient. Furthermore, with the increasing aging population, it is to be expected that the incidence of elderly patients with fractured ribs requiring clinical care will increase. Pain associated with rib fractures can be severe and disabling. More importantly, it is well known that ineffective pain management significantly increases the likelihood of developing pulmonary complications, which is caused by several mechanisms. First, the thoracic pain associated with rib fractures may lead to hypoventilation, consequently resulting in ineffective coughing, retention of secretions, and ultimately, atelectasis. Second, rib fractures can compromise the integrity of the chest wall, which may alter the normal breathing mechanism, especially in patients suffering from a clinical flail chest. Third, the frequently encountered concomitant injuries to the lungs, such as a pulmonary contusion or hemothorax, may negatively affect the pulmonary gas exchange. As such, in order to reduce the risk of pulmonary complications, prompt evaluation and adequate pain management has traditionally been considered as the cornerstones in the treatment of rib fractures. While non-operative treatment has traditionally been the golden standard in rib fracture treatment, it comes with several challenges and as such new treatment strategies are still being explored. In the modern-day clinical practice, the use of rib fixation has rapidly increased over the last years and it is expected that this trend will continue as it has been received with great enthusiasm in many trauma centers. Although previous randomized controlled trials reported a significant positive treatment effect of surgical fixation, the available evidence mainly focused on patients suffering from a clinical flail chest, instead of all patients with multiple rib fractures, which thus limits its generalizability. Despite rib fixation showing promising results in selected patients, there is a growing debate about the exact indication and patient selection for this operation, as there is no consensus as to which patients would benefit. Besides, while important in the decision-making process, the long-term outcomes and complication risk of surgical fixation have received little attention.
- Published
- 2021
10. Operative vs Nonoperative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Adults
- Author
-
Ochen, Yassine, Peek, Jesse, van der Velde, Detlef, Beeres, Frank J. P., van Heijl, Mark, Groenwold, Rolf H. H., Houwert, R. Marijn, and Heng, Marilyn
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Hand Strength ,Research ,Featured ,Online Only ,Observational Studies as Topic ,Orthopedics ,Treatment Outcome ,Fracture Fixation ,Humans ,Female ,Radius Fractures ,Original Investigation ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - Abstract
This meta-analysis compares functional, clinical, and radiologic outcomes after operative vs nonoperative treatment of distal radial fractures in adults., Key Points Question What outcomes are associated with operative vs nonoperative treatment of distal radius fractures in adults? Findings This meta-analysis of 2254 unique participants in 23 unique studies showed that operative treatment of distal radius fractures improved the medium-term Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire score and grip strength compared with nonoperative treatment in adults, with no difference in overall complication rate. Meaning These findings suggest that operative treatment might be preferred for distal radius fractures., Importance No consensus has been reached to date regarding the optimal treatment for distal radius fractures. The international rate of operative treatment has been increasing, despite higher costs and limited functional outcome evidence to support this shift. Objectives To compare functional, clinical, and radiologic outcomes after operative vs nonoperative treatment of distal radius fractures in adults. Data Sources The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases were searched from inception to June 15, 2019, for studies comparing operative vs nonoperative treatment of distal radius fractures. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting on the following: acute distal radius fracture with operative treatment (internal or external fixation) vs nonoperative treatment (cast immobilization, splinting, or bracing); patients 18 years or older; and functional outcome. Studies in a language other than English or reporting treatment for refracture were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data extraction was performed independently by 2 reviewers. Effect estimates were pooled using random-effects models and presented as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. Data were analyzed in September 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome measures included medium-term functional outcome measured with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) and the overall complication rate after operative and nonoperative treatment. Results A total of 23 unique studies were included, consisting of 8 RCTs and 15 observational studies, that described 2254 unique patients. Among the studies that presented sex data, 1769 patients were women [80.6%]. Overall weighted mean age was 67 [range, 22-90] years). The RCTs included 656 patients (29.1%); observational studies, 1598 patients (70.9%). The overall pooled effect estimates the showed a significant improvement in medium-term (≤1 year) DASH score after operative treatment compared with nonoperative treatment (MD, −5.22 [95% CI, −8.87 to −1.57]; P = .005; I2 = 84%). No difference in complication rate was observed (RR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.69-1.55]; P = .87; I2 = 62%). A significant improvement in grip strength was noted after operative treatment, measured in kilograms (MD, 2.73 [95% CI, 0.15-5.32]; P = .04; I2 = 79%) and as a percentage of the unaffected side (MD, 8.21 [95% CI, 2.26-14.15]; P = .007; I2 = 76%). No improvement in medium-term DASH score was found in the subgroup of studies that only included patients 60 years or older (MD, −0.98 [95% CI, −3.52 to 1.57]; P = .45; I2 = 34%]), compared with a larger improvement in medium-term DASH score after operative treatment in the other studies that included patients 18 years or older (MD, −7.50 [95% CI, −12.40 to −2.60]; P = .003; I2 = 77%); the difference between these subgroups was statically significant (test for subgroup differences, P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance This meta-analysis suggests that operative treatment of distal radius fractures improves the medium-term DASH score and grip strength compared with nonoperative treatment in adults, with no difference in overall complication rate. The findings suggest that operative treatment might be more effective and have a greater effect on the health and well-being of younger, nonelderly patients.
- Published
- 2020
11. Routine X-Rays after the Osteosynthesis of Distal Radius and Ankle Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial on the Necessity of Routine Imaging.
- Author
-
Oehme, Florian, Kremo, Valerie, van Veelen, Nicole, Mühlhäusser, Julia, Brunner, Jonas, Peek, Jesse, van de Wall, Bryan J. M., Link, Björn-Christian, Knobe, Matthias, Babst, Reto, and Beeres, Frank J. P.
- Abstract
Background: The utility of routine x-rays after the osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures and ankle fractures is questionable. We performed a trial to determine whether such x-rays are justified in patients who have undergone standardized imaging with C-arm fluoroscopy during surgery. Methods: Patients requiring surgery for a distal radius fracture or an ankle fracture were candidates for inclusion in this prospective, randomized, controlled, non-blinded trial. Standardized intraoperative images were obtained with C-arm fluoroscopy and stored at the end of the operation. The next day, patients in the control group underwent imaging with a standard postoperative x-ray, while those in the intervention group did not. The primary endpoint was a change in the treatment plan, defined as additional imaging or a second operation. The secondary endpoints included the range of motion, pain as rated on the Visual Analog Scale, and a functional outcome analysis (PRWE/FAOS). Results: 316 patients were included in the trial (163 in the control group, 153 in the intervention group), of whom 202 (64%) had radius fractures and 114 (36%) had ankle fractures. The treatment plan changed in twelve patients (3.8%; four in the control group and eight in the intervention group), seven of whom (2.2%; three in the control group and four in the intervention group) underwent a second operation. The frequency of changes in the treatment plan and of reoperations was comparable in the two groups (p = 0.36). On follow-up at six weeks and one year, the results with respect to functional outcomes and pain were comparable. Conclusion: In this trial, routine postoperative x-rays after the osteosynthesis of distal radial fractures and ankle fractures did not improve the care of patients who had undergone standardized intraoperative imaging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Long-term outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures.
- Author
-
Ochen, Yassine, Peek, Jesse, McTague, Michael F., Weaver, Michael J., van der Velde, Detlef, Houwert, R Marijn, and Heng, Marilyn
- Subjects
- *
TIBIAL plateau fractures , *TOTAL knee replacement , *QUALITY of life , *STAIR climbing , *TRAUMA centers , *RESEARCH , *MULTIVARIATE analysis , *RESEARCH methodology , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *REGRESSION analysis , *EVALUATION research , *MEDICAL cooperation , *SEVERITY of illness index , *COMPARATIVE studies , *FRACTURE fixation , *QUESTIONNAIRES , *TIBIAL fractures , *FRACTURE healing - Abstract
Introduction: To establish normative data, long-term patient-reported functional outcome and health-related quality of life (HrQoL) after operative treatment of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Secondly, to identify risk factors associated with functional outcome and HrQoL.Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study at two Level I trauma centers. All adult patients with AO/OTA 41-C or Schatzker V/ VI tibial plateau fractures treated between 2001 and 2016 (n = 450) by open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). The survey was completed by 214 patients (48%). Primary outcome was patient-reported functional outcome assessed with the PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS PF). Secondary outcomes were HrQoL measured with the EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3 L), infection rate, and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rate.Results: Infection occurred in 26 cases (12%) and TKA was performed in 6 patients (3%). The median PROMIS PF scores was 49.8 (IQR;42-54). The median EQ-5D-3 L was 0.83 (IQR;0.78-1.0).%). The multivariable regression model revealed female gender, diabetes, and worse HrQoL were correlated with worse functional outcome. The multivariable regression model revealed smoking, diabetes, and the subsequent need for TKA to be correlated with worse HrQoL.Conclusion: The PROMIS PF and EQ-5D-3L did not reach a minimum clinically important difference. The PROMIS PF items revealed patients had no difficulty in walking more than a mile or climbing a flight of stairs. However, patients were limited in doing vigorous activities and patients should be counseled about the expected long-term outcomes. This study emphasizes the correlation between injury specific functional outcome measures and general health measures.Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Epidural Analgesia for Severe Chest Trauma: An Analysis of Current Practice on the Efficacy and Safety.
- Author
-
Peek, Jesse, Beks, Reinier B., Kingma, B. Feike, Marsman, Marije, Ruurda, Jelle P., Houwert, Roderick M., Leenen, Loek P. H., Hietbrink, Falco, and de Jong, Mirjam B.
- Subjects
- *
RIB fractures , *EPIDURAL analgesia - Abstract
Background: Adequate pain control is essential in the treatment of patients with traumatic rib fractures. Although epidural analgesia is recommended in international guidelines, the use remains debatable and is not undisputed. The aim of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia in patients with multiple traumatic rib fractures.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients with ≥3 rib fractures following blunt chest trauma who received epidural analgesia between January 2015 and January 2018 were included. The main outcome parameters were the success rate of epidural analgesia and the incidence of medication-related side effects and catheter-related complications.Results: A total of 76 patients were included. Epidural analgesia was successful in a total of 45 patients (59%), including 22 patients without and in 23 patients with an additional analgesic intervention. In 14 patients (18%), epidural analgesia was terminated early without intervention due to insufficient sensory blockade (n=4), medication-related side effects (n=4), and catheter-related complications (n=6). In 17 patients (22%), the epidural catheter was removed after one or multiple additional interventions due to insufficient pain control. Minor epidural-related complications or side effects were encountered in 36 patients (47%). One patient had a major complication (opioid intoxication).Conclusion: Epidural analgesia was successful in 59% of patients; however, 30% needed additional analgesic interventions. As about half of the patients had epidural-related complications, it remains debatable whether epidural analgesia is a sufficient treatment modality in patients with multiple rib fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Long-Term Functional Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.
- Author
-
Peek, Jesse, Vos, Cornelis G., Ünlü, Çağdas, Schreve, Michiel A., van de Mortel, Rob H. W., and de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.
- Subjects
- *
THORACIC outlet syndrome , *RIB surgery , *PNEUMOTHORAX , *SYMPTOMS , *HEALTH outcome assessment , *QUESTIONNAIRES , *THERAPEUTICS - Abstract
First rib resection for thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is clinically successful and safe in most patients. However, long-term functional outcomes are still insufficiently known. Long-term functional outcome was assessed using a validated questionnaire. A multicenter retrospective cohort study including all patients who underwent operations for TOS from January 2005 until December 2016. Clinical records were reviewed and the long-term functional outcome was assessed by the 11-item version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire. Sixty-two cases of TOS in 56 patients were analyzed: 36 neurogenic TOS, 13 arterial TOS, 7 venous TOS, and 6 combined TOS. There was no 30-day mortality. One reoperation because of bleeding was performed and five patients developed a pneumothorax. Survey response was 73% (n = 41) with a follow-up ranging from 1 to 11 years. Complete relief of symptoms was reported postoperatively in 27 patients (54%), symptoms improved in 90%, and the mean QuickDASH score was 22 (range, 0-86). Long-term functional outcome of surgical treatment of TOS was satisfactory, and surgery was beneficial in 90% of patients, with a low risk of severe morbidity. However, the mean QuickDASH scores remain higher compared with the general population, suggesting some sustained functional impairment despite clinical improvement of symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Outcomes after fixation of rib fractures sustained during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A retrospective single center analysis.
- Author
-
van Veelen NM, Buenter L, Kremo V, Peek J, Leiser A, Kestenholz P, Babst R, Paulus Beeres FJ, and Minervini F
- Abstract
Background: Historically rib fractures have been typically treated non-operatively. Recent studies showed promising results after osteosynthesis of rib fractures in trauma patients with flail segments or multiple rib fractures. However, there is a paucity of data on rib fixation after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This study evaluated the outcomes of patients who received rib fixation after CPR., Methods: Adult patients who received surgical fixation of rib fractures sustained during CPR between 2010 and 2020 were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study. Outcome measures included complications, quality of life (EQ 5D 5L) and level of dyspnea., Results: Nineteen patients were included with a mean age of 66.8 years. The mean number of fractured ribs was ten, seven patients additionally had a sternum fracture. Pneumonia occurred in 15 patients (74%), of which 13 were diagnosed preoperatively and 2 post-operatively. Six patients developed a postoperative pneumothorax, none of which required revision surgery. One patient showed persistent flail chest after rib fixation and required additional fixation of a concomitant sternum fracture. One infection of the surgical site of sternal plate occurred, while no further surgery related complications were reported. Mean EQ-5D-5L was 0.908 and the average EQ VAS was 80. One patient reported persisting dyspnea., Conclusion: To date, this is the largest reported cohort of patients who received rib fixation for fractures sustained during CPR. No complications associated with rib fixation were reported whereas one infection after sternal fixation did occur. Current follow-up demonstrated a good long-term quality of life after fixation, warranting further studies on this topic. Deeper knowledge on this subject would be beneficial for a wide spectrum of physicians., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 Van Veelen, Buenter, Kremo, Peek, Leiser, Kestenholz, Babst, Paulus Beeres and Minervini.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Traumatic rib fractures: a marker of severe injury. A nationwide study using the National Trauma Data Bank.
- Author
-
Peek J, Ochen Y, Saillant N, Groenwold RHH, Leenen LPH, Uribe-Leitz T, Houwert RM, and Heng M
- Abstract
Background: In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the treatment of patients with rib fractures. However, the current literature on the epidemiology and outcomes of rib fractures is outdated and inconsistent. Furthermore, although it has been suggested that there is a large heterogeneity among patients with traumatic rib fractures, there is insufficient literature reporting on the outcomes of different subgroups., Methods: A retrospective cohort study using the National Trauma Data Bank was performed. All adult patients with one or more traumatic rib fractures or flail chest who were admitted to a hospital between January 2010 and December 2016 were identified by the International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision diagnostic codes., Results: Of the 564 798 included patients with one or more rib fractures, 44.9% (n=2 53 564) were patients with polytrauma. Two per cent had open rib fractures (n=11 433, 2.0%) and flail chest was found in 4% (n=23 388, 4.1%) of all cases. Motor vehicle accidents (n=237 995, 51.6%) were the most common cause of rib fractures in patients with polytrauma and flail chest. Blunt chest injury accounted for 95.5% (n=5 39 422) of rib fractures. Rib fractures in elderly patients were predominantly caused by high and low energy falls (n=67 675, 51.9%). Ultimately, 49.5% (n=2 79 615) of all patients were admitted to an intensive care unit, of whom a quarter (n=146 191, 25.9%) required invasive mechanical ventilatory support. The overall mortality rate was 5.6% (n=31 524)., Discussion: Traumatic rib fractures are a marker of severe injury as approximately half of patients were patients with polytrauma. Furthermore, patients with rib fractures are a very heterogeneous group with a considerable difference in epidemiology, injury characteristics and in-hospital outcomes. Worse outcomes were predominantly observed among patients with polytrauma and flail chest. Future studies should recognize these differences and treatment should be evaluated accordingly., Level of Evidence: II/III., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Multicentre prospective cohort study of nonoperative versus operative treatment for flail chest and multiple rib fractures after blunt thoracic trauma: study protocol.
- Author
-
Beks RB, de Jong MB, Sweet A, Peek J, van Wageningen B, Tromp T, IJpma F, Wouters R, Lansink K, Bemelman M, van Baal M, Hoogendoorn J, Saltzherr T, Groenwold R, Leenen L, and Houwert RM
- Subjects
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Clinical Trials as Topic, Fracture Fixation, Health Care Costs, Prospective Studies, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Flail Chest etiology, Flail Chest surgery, Flail Chest therapy, Rib Fractures etiology, Rib Fractures surgery, Rib Fractures therapy, Thoracic Injuries complications, Thoracic Injuries surgery, Thoracic Injuries therapy, Wounds, Nonpenetrating complications, Wounds, Nonpenetrating surgery, Wounds, Nonpenetrating therapy
- Abstract
Introduction: A trend has evolved towards rib fixation for flail chest although evidence is limited. Little is known about rib fixation for multiple rib fractures without flail chest. The aim of this study is to compare rib fixation with nonoperative treatment for both patients with flail chest and patients with multiple rib fractures., Methods and Analysis: In this study protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study, all patients with three or more rib fractures admitted to one of the five participating centres will be included. In two centres, rib fixation is performed and in three centres nonoperative treatment is the standard-of-care for flail chest or multiple rib fractures. The primary outcome measures are intensive care unit length of stay and hospital length of stay for patients with a flail chest and patients with multiple rib fractures, respectively. Propensity score matching will be used to control for potential confounding of the relation between treatment modality and length of stay. All analyses will be performed separately for patients with flail chest and patients with multiple rib fractures without flail chest., Ethics and Dissemination: The regional Medical Research Ethics Committee UMC Utrecht approved a waiver of consent (reference number WAG/mb/17/024787 and METC protocol number 17-544/C). Patients will be fully informed of the purpose and procedures of the study, and signed informed consent will be obtained in agreement with the General Data Protection Regulation. Study results will be submitted for peer review publication., Trial Registration Number: NTR6833., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- Author
-
Peek J, Vos CG, Ünlü Ç, van de Pavoordt HDWM, van den Akker PJ, and de Vries JPM
- Subjects
- Decompression, Surgical adverse effects, Humans, Recovery of Function, Risk Factors, Thoracic Outlet Syndrome diagnosis, Thoracic Outlet Syndrome physiopathology, Treatment Outcome, Vascular Surgical Procedures adverse effects, Decompression, Surgical methods, Thoracic Outlet Syndrome surgery, Vascular Surgical Procedures methods
- Abstract
Background: Many publications report outcomes of surgical treatment for thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS); however, high-quality reviews and meta-analyses are lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes and compares the outcomes and major complications of the surgical procedures for the 3 types of TOS: arterial, venous, and neurogenic., Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for papers published between January 1980 and February 2015, using the keywords thoracic outlet syndrome, and treatment and surgical. Articles were eligible for inclusion if the following criteria were met: studies describing outcomes of surgery for TOS, published in English, human studies, and available full-text. The exclusion criteria were case-series and case reports (n < 5), reviews, abstracts, and studies of endoscopic-assisted or robotic endoscopic-assisted transaxillary first rib resection., Results: A total of 12 papers met our inclusion criteria and were finally included in this systematic review. All included articles showed improvement of complaints after surgical treatment. In our meta-analysis, improvement to Derkash's classification category excellent/good was achieved in 90% of the arterial and venous TOS groups. Preoperative and postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores show improvement of 28.3 points after operative treatment of neurogenic TOS., Conclusions: In conclusion, surgical treatment of TOS seems to be beneficial in most patients and is relatively safe. The largest challenge remains the diagnosis of TOS, especially neurogenic TOS, because standardized diagnostic criteria are lacking. Future studies should focus on the diagnostic work-up of TOS., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.