Search

Several classes of important engineering problems require the concurrent application of CFD and CSD techniques. Currently, attempts to model these problems are solved either iteratively, requiring several cycles of CFD run followed by CSD run, or by assuming that the CFD and CSD solutions can be decoupled. The various efforts to develop a fluid/structure coupling can be classified according to the complexity level of the approximations used for each of the domains. These range from simple 6 DOF integration to finite elements with complex models for elasto-plastic materials with rupture laws and contact. Similarly, the fluid dynamics approximations range from the potential flow (irotational, inviscid, isentropic flows) to the full Navier-Stokes set of equations. The present research interests focus on non-linear applications, in particular, structures that experience severe deformations due to blast loads. Hence, the fluid applies either the Euler or Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations, while elasto-plastic materials with rupture criteria are used for the structural modeling.

This paper describes recent algorithm developments and applications of a program that couples parallel Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and Computational Structural Dynamics (CSD) methodologies. FEFL098 is the CFD code used while DYNA3D handles the CSD portion. FEFL098 solves the time-dependent compressible Euler and Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations on an unstructured mesh of tetrahedral elements. DYNA3D solves explicitly the large deformation, large strain formulation equations on an unstructured grid composed of bricks and hexahedral elements. While the initial coupled algorithm used the so-called "glued-mesh" approach, where the CFD and CSD faces match identically, failure of this approach to model severe structural deformation, as well as crack propagation in steel and concrete, led us to the development of the so-called "embedded-mesh" approach. Here, the CSD objects float through the CFD domain. While each approach has its own advantages, limitations, and deficiencies, the embedded approach was proven to be superior for the class of problems modeled here. Critical application of both approaches are described, including weapon detonation and fragmentation, airblast interaction with a reinforced concrete wall, and fragment/airblast interaction with a steel wall. The final application models the interaction of an external airblast with a generic steel ship.

Fluid-structure interaction cases with severe topological change due to fragmentation or rupture in the structure have prompted the development of flow solvers using a so-called embedded mesh approach. A simple embedded domain method for node-based unstructured grid solvers is presented. Edges crossing embedded surface faces are either removed or duplicated. Several techniques to improve the treatment of boundary points close to the immersed surfaces are explored. Adaptive mesh refinement based on proximity to the curvature or corners of the embedded CSD surfaces is used to enhance the accuracy of the solution. User-defined or automatic deactivation for the regions inside immersed solid bodies is employed to avoid unnecessary work. Several examples are included that show the viability of this approach for coupled fluid-structure problems.

This paper describes recent algorithm developments and select applications of a program that couples parallel Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and Computational Structural Dynamics (CSD) methodologies. FEFL098 is the CFD code used while DYNA3D handles the CSD portion. FEFL098 solves the time-dependent, compressible Euler and Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations on an unstructured mesh of tetrahedral elements. DYNA3D solves explicitly the large deformation, large strain formulation equations on an unstructured grid composed of bricks and hexahedral elements. While the initial coupled algorithm used the so-called ”glued-mesh” approach, where the CFD and CSD faces match identically, failure of this approach to model severe structural deformation, as well as crack propagation in steel and concrete, led us to the development of the so-called ”embedded-mesh” approach. here, the CSD objects float through the CFD domain. While each approach has it’s own advantages, limitations and deficiencies, the embedded approach was proven to be superior for the class of problems modeled here. Critical applications of both approaches are described, including weapon detonation and fragmentation, fragment/airblast interaction with a steel wall, and an external airblast interaction with a generic steel ship hull.

This paper describes recent developments and select applications of a program that couples parallel Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and Computational Structural Dynamics (CSD) methodologies. FEFL098 is the CFD code used while DYNA3D handles the CSD portion. FEFL098 solves the time-dependent, compressible Euler and Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations on an unstructured mesh of tetrahedral elements. DYNA3D solves explicitly the large deformation, large strain formulation equations on an unstructured grid composed of bricks and hexahedral elements. The initial algorithm constructed to model the coupled processes used the so-called "glued-mesh" approach, where the CFD and CSD faces match identically. Failure of this approach to model severe structural deformations in steel plates, as well as crack growth and propagation in steel and concrete, led us to the development of the so-called "embedded-mesh" approach, where the CSD mesh float through the CFD domain. While each approach has its own advantages, limitations and deficiencies, the embedded approach was proven to be superior for the class of problems modeled here. Critical applications of both approaches are described, including weapon detonation and fragmentation, airblast interaction with a reinforced concrete wall, and fragment/airblast interactions with steel wall structures including a generic steel ship hull and a steel tower.