1. Relevant factors for neurologists to define effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs and take decisions on treatment. My-LIFE European Delphi survey
- Author
-
Shazia Afridi, Anne Donnet, Raquel Gil-Gouveia, Astrid Gendolla, Cristina Tassorelli, Patricia Pozo-Rosich, Anne-Christine Poole, Gisela M. Terwindt, Rainel Sanchez-De La Rosa, Institut Català de la Salut, [Pozo-Rosich P] Unitat de Cefalea, Servei de Neurologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Grup de Recerca en Cefalea i Dolor Neurològic, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. [Gil-Gouveia R] Headache Center, Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz, Lisboa, Portugal. [Donnet A] Pain Department, Timone Hospital, Marseille, France. [Poole AC] Private Practice: Oslo Headache Centre, Oslo, Norway. [Gendolla A] Private Practice: Essen, Germany. [Afridi S] Headache Service, Department of Neurology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust, London, UK, and Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
- Subjects
Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/prevención & control [Otros calificadores] ,medicine.medical_specialty ,enfermedades del sistema nervioso::enfermedades del sistema nervioso central::enfermedades cerebrales::trastornos con cefaleas::cefaleas primarias::trastornos migrañosos [ENFERMEDADES] ,Acute migraine ,Migraine Disorders ,Delphi method ,MEDLINE ,Qüestionaris ,Logistic regression ,Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/prevention & control [Other subheadings] ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Health care ,medicine ,Humans ,Migranya - Prevenció ,In patient ,Neurologists ,Intensive care medicine ,Nervous System Diseases::Central Nervous System Diseases::Brain Diseases::Headache Disorders::Headache Disorders, Primary::Migraine Disorders [DISEASES] ,business.industry ,diagnóstico::pronóstico::resultado del tratamiento [TÉCNICAS Y EQUIPOS ANALÍTICOS, DIAGNÓSTICOS Y TERAPÉUTICOS] ,Original Articles ,Diagnosis::Prognosis::Treatment Outcome [ANALYTICAL, DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC TECHNIQUES, AND EQUIPMENT] ,medicine.disease ,Conjoint analysis ,Treatment Outcome ,Ciencias de la información::análisis de sistemas::técnica Delfos [CIENCIA DE LA INFORMACIÓN] ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,Pharmaceutical Preparations ,Migraine ,Avaluació de resultats (Assistència sanitària) ,Information Science::Systems Analysis::Delphi Technique [INFORMATION SCIENCE] ,Original Article ,business - Abstract
Mètode Delphi; Eficàcia dels fàrmacs preventius de la migranya Delphi survey; Effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs Método Delfos; Eficacia de los medicamentos preventivos contra la migraña Background Clinical guidelines agree that preventive treatment should be considered in patients with uncontrolled migraine despite acute medications or patients with ≥4 migraine days per month. However, the criteria to define the effectiveness of treatment and the factors that inform the decision to (dis)continue it are not clearly defined in clinical practice. Methods Overall, 148 healthcare practitioners from five European countries completed a two-wave questionnaire. The Steering Committee defined a simulated set of 108 migraine patient profiles based on the combination of five factors (frequency of the attacks, intensity of the attacks, use of acute migraine medications, patient perception and presence/absence of tolerable side effects). These profiles were used in a Delphi survey among European neurologists to identify the criteria that should be used to decide treatment response and continuation using a conjoint analysis approach. Results Consensus was reached for 82/108 (76%) of profiles regarding treatment response, and for 86/108 (80%) regarding treatment continuation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that a ≥50% reduction in the use of acute migraine medications and positive patient's perception of treatment were the most important factors that lead to the decision of continuing (combined factors, OR = 18.3, 95% CI 13.4–25.05). Conclusions This survey identifies two relevant outcome measures: one objective (use of acute migraine treatment medications) and one subjective (positive patient perception) that guide the clinician decision to continue preventive treatment in migraine patients. Significance In clinical practice, criteria to define the effectiveness of migraine preventive treatment and factors that guide treatment stop or continuation are not clearly defined. In this simulated clinical setting study, a reduction in the use of acute migraine medications was the factor associated with preventive treatment effectiveness definition. This study also revealed that factors strongly associated with the decision of treatment continuation in real life are the acute migraine medications use and a positive patient's perception of treatment effectiveness. Novartis Pharma AG financially supported the development of this project, the medical writing assistance and the page processing charges for this article. The authors have received no payment to write this article.
- Published
- 2021