Search

The traditional purpose of physical synthesis is to perform timing closure, i.e., to create a placed design that meets its timing specifications while also satisfying electrical, routability, and signal integrity constraints. In modern design flows, physical synthesis tools hardly ever achieve this goal in their first iteration. The design team must iterate by studying the output of the physical synthesis run, then potentially massage the input, e.g., by changing the floorplan, timing assertions, pin locations, logic structures, etc., in order to hopefully achieve a better solution for the next iteration. The complexity of physical synthesis means that systems can take days to run on designs with multimillions of placeable objects, which severely hurts design productivity. This paper discusses some newer techniques that have been deployed within IBM's physical synthesis tool called PDS [1] that significantly improves throughput. In particular, we focus on some of the biggest contributors to runtime, placement, legalization, buffering, and electric correction, and present techniques that generate significant turnaround time improvements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Buffer insertion is a fundamental technology for very large scale integration interconnect optimization. This work presents the repeater insertion with adaptive tree adjustment (RIATA) heuristic that directly extends van Ginneken's classic algorithm to handle blockages in the layout. Given a Steiner tree containing a Steiner point that overlaps a blockage, a local adjustment is made to the tree topology that enables additional buffer insertion candidates to be considered. This adjustment adapts to the demand on buffer insertion and is incurred only when it facilitates the maximal slack solution. RIATA can be combined with any performance-driven Steiner tree algorithm and permits various solution search schemes to achieve different solution quality and runtime tradeoffs. Experiments on several large nets confirms that high-quality solutions can be obtained through this technique with greater efficiency than simultaneous approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Focuses on a study which examined Steiner-tree constructions for difficult instances to optimize the buffered tree resulting from the van Ginneken-style buffer insertion. Notation and problem formulation; Information on the proposed clustered tree algorithm; Experimental comparison.