Search

Background: Low-field (LF) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a technology that is widely used in resource-limited settings for clinical imaging. The images produced, even though of low resolution with noise and artefacts, provide valuable information and guidance for patient assessment and treatment. This study shows a spectrum of MRI artefacts that affect image quality during routine clinical neuroradiology practice using LF MRI in a Nigerian hospital and suggests ways to avoid them. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed brain and spine MRI studies performed on a 0.36T MagSense 360 (Mindray, China) open MRI at our hospital over a 2-year period to identify image artefacts. About 90% of MRI studies performed at our facility during the study period were neuroimaging. The pattern and distribution of artefacts that featured during imaging were described and illustrative cases demonstrated highlighting their causes and ways to avoid or limit them. Results: Of 936 brain and spine cases evaluated, 506 (54.1%) had artefacts with 369 (72.9%) seen in the brain. Truncation/Gibbs (37.6%) and motion (20.6%) were the most common artefacts in the series, seen most commonly in T2-weighted images. There was no significant difference in the proportion of artefacts between adults and children (P = 0.736). Conclusion: Artefacts are relatively common in neuroimaging with LF MRI and may potentially degrade image quality and interfere with accurate radiological reporting and diagnosis. Improving the recognition of LF MRI artefacts may assist imaging practitioners to avoid or limit their effect on image quality and interpretation.

INTRODUCTION:Stroke is a prominent cause of death, disability, and dementia in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The Stroke Investigative Research and Education Network works collaboratively with stroke survivors and individuals serving as community controls to comprehensively characterize the genomic, sociocultural, economic and behavioral risk factors for stroke in SSA. PURPOSE:In this paper, we aim to: i) explore the attitudes, beliefs, and practices related to stroke in Ghana and Nigeria using the process of qualitative description; and ii) propose actions for future research and community-based participation and education. METHODS:Stroke survivors, their caregivers, health care professionals, and community representatives and faith-based leaders participated in one of twenty-six focus groups, which qualitatively explored community beliefs, attitudes and practices related to stroke in Ghana and Nigeria. Arthur Kleinman's Explanatory Model of Illness and the Social Ecological Model guided the questions and/or thematic analysis of the qualitative data. We hereby describe our focus group methods and analyses of qualitative data, as well as the findings and suggestions for improving stroke outcomes. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:The major findings illustrate the fears, causes, chief problems, treatment, and recommendations related to stroke through the views of the participants, as well as recommendations for working effectively with the SIREN communities. Findings are compared to SIREN quantitative data and other qualitative studies in Africa. As far as we are aware, this is the first paper to qualitatively explore and contrast community beliefs, attitudes, and practices among stroke survivors and their caregivers, community and faith-based leaders, and health professionals in multiple communities within Nigeria and Ghana.