Search

Author(s): Lee, Joyce S; La, Janet; Aziz, Sara; Dobrinskikh, Evgenia; Brownell, Robert; Jones, Kirk D; Achtar-Zadeh, Natalia; Green, Gary; Elicker, Brett M; Golden, Jeffrey A; Matthay, Michael A; Kukreja, Jasleen; Schwartz, David A; Wolters, Paul J | Abstract: AimsIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a genetically mediated, age-associated, progressive form of pulmonary fibrosis characterised pathologically by a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern of fibrosis. The UIP pattern is also found in pulmonary fibrosis attributable to clinical diagnoses other than IPF (non-IPF UIP), whose clinical course is similarly poor, suggesting common molecular drivers. This study investigates whether IPF and non-IPF UIP lungs similarly express markers of telomere dysfunction and senescence.Methods and resultsTo test whether patients with IPF and non-IPF UIP share molecular drivers, lung tissues from 169 IPF patients and 57 non-IPF UIP patients were histopathologically and molecularly compared. Histopathological changes in both IPF and non-IPF UIP patients included temporal heterogeneity, microscopic honeycombing, fibroblast foci, and dense collagen fibrosis. Non-IPF UIP lungs were more likely to have lymphocytic infiltration, non-caseating granulomas, airway-centred inflammation, or small airways disease. Telomeres were shorter in alveolar type II (AECII) cells of both IPF and non-IPF UIP lungs than in those of age-similar, unused donor, controls. Levels of molecular markers of senescence (p16 and p21) were elevated in lysates of IPF and non-IPF UIP lungs. Immunostaining localised expression of these proteins to AECII cells. The mucin 5B (MUC5B) gene promoter variant minor allele frequency was similar between IPF and non-IPF UIP patients, and MUC5B expression was similar in IPF and non-IPF UIP lungs.ConclusionsMolecular markers of telomere dysfunction and senescence are pathologically expressed in both IPF and non-IPF UIP lungs. These findings suggest that common molecular drivers may contribute to the pathogenesis of UIP-associated pulmonary fibrosis, regardless of the clinical diagnosis.

Precision medicine is defined by the National Institute of Health's Precision Medicine Initiative Working Group as an approach to disease treatment that takes into account individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle. There has been increased interest in applying the concept of precision medicine to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, in particular to search for genetic and molecular biomarker-based profiles (so called endotypes) that identify mechanistically distinct disease subgroups. The relevance of precision medicine to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is yet to be established, but we believe that it holds great promise to provide targeted and highly effective therapies to patients. In this manuscript, we describe the field's nascent efforts in genetic/molecular endotype identification and how environmental and behavioral subgroups may also be relevant to disease management.

Background: Respiratory isolation of inpatients during evaluation for TB is a slow and costly process in low-burden settings. Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) is a novel molecular test for tuberculosis (TB) that is faster and more sensitive but substantially more expensive than smear microscopy. No previous studies have examined the costs of molecular testing as a replacement for smear microscopy in this setting. Methods: We conducted an incremental cost–benefit analysis comparing the use of a single negative Xpert versus two negative sputum smears to release consecutive adult inpatients with presumed TB from respiratory isolation at an urban public hospital in the United States. We estimated all health-system costs and patient outcomes related to Xpert implementation, diagnostic evaluation, isolation, hospitalization, and treatment. We performed sensitivity and probabilistic uncertainty analyses to determine at what threshold the Xpert strategy would become cost-saving. Results: Among a hypothetical cohort of 234 individuals undergoing evaluation for presumed active TB annually, 6.4% had culture-positive TB. Compared to smear microscopy, Xpert reduced isolation bed utilization from an average of 2.7 to 1.4 days per patient, leading to a 48% reduction in total annual isolation bed usage from 632 to 328 bed-days. Xpert saved an average of $2,278 (95% uncertainty range $1582–4570) per admission, or $533,520 per year, compared with smear microscopy. Conclusions: Molecular testing for TB could provide substantial savings to hospitals in high-income countries by reducing respiratory isolation usage and overall length of stay.