Search

This study attempts to interrogate the upper mantle deformation pattern beneath the Kumaon-Garhwal region, located in the western Himalaya, using shear wave splitting (SWS) analysis of core-refracted (XK(K)S) phases recorded at 53 broad-band stations. The fast polarization azimuths (FPAs) revealed by 338 well constrained measurements are dominantly clustered around ENE–WSW, with a few along the NE and E–W directions. The delay times vary from 0.2 to 1.4 s, with an average of 0.6 s that is smaller than that for the Indian shield (∼0.8 s), central and eastern Himalayas. The northern part of the lesser Himalaya shows a slightly smaller delay time compared to the southern part, which is attributed to the weakening of azimuthal anisotropy caused by the dipping of the Indian lithosphere. In order to understand the crustal contribution, its anisotropy is measured by analysing the splitting of Ps conversions from the Moho (Pms), akin to that of the XK(K)S phases. However, reliable results for crustal anisotropy could be obtained only at 10 stations. The average delay time due to crustal anisotropy is 0.47 s, with a variation from 0.2 to 0.9 s. Although the dominant period of Pms is smaller than that of SK(K)S, crustal anisotropy contributing to splitting of the latter phases cannot be ruled out. The orientation of FPAs obtained from Pms phases is found to be parallel or sub-parallel to those from XK(K)S phases, suggesting a similar deformation mechanism in the mid- to lower-crust and upper mantle. On the basis of FPAs derived from XK(K)S measurements, the Kumaon-Garhwal Himalaya (KGH) region can be divided into four subregions. In the western and eastern parts, the FPAs are mostly aligned along NE and ENE–WSW, and NE, respectively. In the central and south-eastern parts, their orientation is along ENE–WSW and NW, respectively. The strong ENE–WSW orientation in the central part could result from a slightly variable anisotropy in the crust to the upper part of the lithosphere or basal topography causing deflection of mantle flow. Also, the NW orientation in the south-eastern part of KGH is associated with a shallow source within the lithosphere. Application of the spatial coherency technique to single-layered anisotropic parameters results in a depth of 220–240 km, implying that the dominant source of anisotropy could lie in the upper mantle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigates crustal anisotropy beneath the Koyna-Warna region (KWR) using waveforms of local earthquakes of magnitude M L ≥ 1.0, recorded at 24 surface and 6 borehole seismic stations during September 2005–February 2020. Waveforms of 1402 local earthquakes that fulfil the splitting criteria (i c < 45°) are used for shear wave splitting analysis, yielding 738 measurements. The study examines the spatial, temporal and depth variations in the fast polarization azimuths (FPAs) and delay times (δ t). The average delay times in the Koyna and Warna regions are 0.035 and 0.050 s, respectively, which did not show any significant correlation with depth. The FPAs are predominantly oriented in the NNW–SSE direction in the KWR, commensurate with the in situ maximum horizontal stress (SHmax) obtained using data from a 3-km-deep scientific borehole and individual focal mechanism solutions. The anisotropy beneath KWR is due to the alignment of fluid-filled cracks and pore throats along the SHmax, and is attributed to stress-induced anisotropy. A considerable variation in the orientation of FPAs from NW to NNW–SSE beneath KWR could be associated with heterogeneity in the lithological properties due to variation in the fracture orientation under regional stress. The non-parallel orientation of FPAs with SHmax or faults at some stations is attributed to structure-induced anisotropy, which seems to be associated with surface topography. Measurements at stations, even near the reservoirs, did not show any significant temporal variation in the splitting parameters due to the fluctuation in the water levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We found that SH diff phases generated by earthquakes in the Fiji–Tonga, recorded in India, are accompanied by secondary pulses. We interpreted them as a consequence of multipathing of S waves caused by the Pacific large low-shear-velocity province (LLSVP). We analysed the differential traveltimes between SH diff and the secondary pulse, together with the absolute SH diff arrival times, to constrain the thickness and velocity perturbations in the western end of the Pacific LLSVP. Our preferred model shows a lateral variation in the thickness of the LLSVP; the southern part reveals a thicker (300 km) low-velocity region compared to the northern part (200 km). However, the velocity perturbations of the LLSVP appear to be comparable (⁠|$-1.5\hbox{ per cent}$|⁠). The results are consistent with a scenario that the LLSVP is a chemically distinct pile with significant surface topography. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study presents new results of shear wave splitting at 56 broadband stations installed in the Eastern Himalaya, Burmese Arc, and adjoining regions. The fast polarization directions (FPDs) within the Himalaya, Burmese Arc and the foredeep are parallel to the strike of the orogens, suggesting a coherently deformed lithospheric mantle under compression. The FPDs follow the Main Boundary Thrust and the Main Central Thrust in the central segment of the Arunachal Himalaya. Smaller delay times (∼0.7 s) can be best explained by multiple layers of anisotropy, where combined effects of the anisotropic fabric of a coherently deformed lithosphere of the Arunachal Himalaya and plate motion related strain are playing a role. Null measurements in the Siang window may be due to the Indian plate interaction with Eurasia and Burma plates, causing different layers of anisotropy. Another possibility is the coincidence of source polarization direction with the fast axis. In the Bengal Basin, the Nulls could be due to annihilation of frozen anisotropy in the downwelling Indian lithosphere and the APM‐related strain, or a highly heterogeneous mantle affected by the Kereguelen plume magmatism, at ∼116 Ma. Key Points: New results of shear wave splitting from the Eastern HimalayaCoherently deformed lithospheric mantle under compressionVariable nature of anisotropy along the Himalaya [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study presents 106 splitting and 40 null measurements of source side anisotropy in subduction zones, utilizing direct S waves registered at two stations sited on the Indian continent, which show null shear wave splitting measurements for S K S phases. Our results suggest that trench-parallel anisotropy is dominant beneath the Philippines, Mariana, Izu-Bonin, and edge of the Java slab, while plate motion-parallel anisotropy is observed beneath the Solomon, Aegean, Japan, and Java slabs. Results from Kuril and Aleutian regions reveal trench-oblique anisotropy. We chose to interpret these observations primarily in terms of mantle flow beneath a subduction zone. While the two-dimensional (2-D) slab entrained flow model offers a simple explanation for trench-normal fast polarization azimuths (FPA), the trench-parallel FPA can be reconciled by extension due to slab rollback. The model that invokes age of the subducting lithosphere can explain anisotropy in the subslab, derived from rays recorded at the updip stations. However, when downdip stations are used, contributions from the slab and supraslab need to be considered. In Japan, anisotropy in the subslab mantle shallower than 300 km might be associated with trench-parallel mantle flow resulting in the alignment of FPA in the same direction. Anisotropy in the deeper part, above the transition zone, is probably associated with 2-D flow resulting in trench-normal FPA. Anisotropy in the Mariana Trench might be associated with trench-parallel mantle flow in the supraslab region, with similar deformation in the upper mantle and the transition zone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study attempts to characterize the nature of seismicity, anisotropy and coherency of deformation in the crust and upper mantle beneath the Doda- Kisthwar region (DKR), Jammu, located in the Kashmir seismic gap of NW Himalaya. Location of earthquakes using local waveforms, and shear wave splitting in local and teleseismic waveforms recorded at 5 temporary stations, are performed for this purpose. The relocation of 890 earthquakes reveals two clusters along the NE and SW part (referred to as Kisthwar and Doda cluster respectively), which is attributed to the under-thrusting of the Indian plate and uplifting of Kisthwar Window respectively. The shear wave splitting analysis yielded a total of 47 local S and 11 XK(K)S splitting measurements. The corresponding Fast Polarization Azimuths (FPAs) show two distinct spatial patterns. In the first pattern, the FPAs are oriented along the NW direction, are perpendicular to the maximum horizontal stress, and are parallel to the structural trend as a result of oblique compression in the NW Himalaya. In the second pattern, the FPAs are oriented along the ENE-WSW direction and the corresponding delay times are found to be larger than those in the DKR. This could be because of localized deformation; the strike of fluid-filled fractures in the fault zone is also along the ENE-WSW direction, parallel to the course of the Chenab river. Thus, for both the trends, structure-induced anisotropy seems to be the most possible cause for the observed anisotropy. Further, the splitting parameters show a slight variation with depth for the respective orientation patterns. The delay times of the XK(K)S phases vary from 0.3 to 1.3 s, and cluster around 0.5 s, with the majority of FPAs, oriented along the ENE-WSW direction. This can be reconciled in terms of a combined effect of absolute plate motion (APM) related strain and finite strain induced by compression. The inconsistency in the upper crust and upper mantle anisotropy does not favour a coherently distributed lithospheric deformation in this segment of the NW Himalaya. The source of anisotropy in the upper crust is complex compared to that in the upper mantle. • Analysed the local S and XK(K)S phases to examine the coherency of deformation in the crust and upper mantle • The fast axis of anisotropy in the upper crust does not correlate with the regional stress pattern. • The anisotropy in the upper mantle is due to the combined effect of basal shear and extension induced by collision. • Lack of coherent deformation in the crust and upper mantle suggests a decoupled nature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]