1. Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
- Author
-
Douglas A. Young, Norman Tinanoff, Marcelle M. Nascimento, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Lauren Pilcher, Sandra Guzmán-Armstrong, Laura Banfield, Gaurav V. Joshi, Margherita Fontana, Marcelo W.B. Araujo, Mark S. Wolff, Domenick T. Zero, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Robert J. Weyant, A. Parikh, Rebecca L. Slayton, Malavika P. Tampi, Olivia Urquhart, and Brian B. Nový
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Pit and Fissure Sealants ,Clinical Review ,business.product_category ,Network Meta-Analysis ,Dentistry ,Reviews ,Dental Caries ,law.invention ,Lesion ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,stomatognathic system ,law ,Medicine ,Humans ,Silver diamine fluoride ,Tooth, Deciduous ,General Dentistry ,Permanent teeth ,caries ,Toothpaste ,evidence-based dentistry/health care ,business.industry ,systematic reviews and evidence-based dentistry ,030206 dentistry ,pediatric dentistry ,Dentition, Permanent ,stomatognathic diseases ,030104 developmental biology ,Systematic review ,Meta-analysis ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Dental public health ,geriatric dentistry ,dental public health - Abstract
The goal of nonrestorative or non- and microinvasive caries treatment (fluoride- and nonfluoride-based interventions) is to manage the caries disease process at a lesion level and minimize the loss of sound tooth structure. The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to summarize the available evidence on nonrestorative treatments for the outcomes of 1) arrest or reversal of noncavitated and cavitated carious lesions on primary and permanent teeth and 2) adverse events. We included parallel and split-mouth randomized controlled trials where patients were followed for any length of time. Studies were identified with MEDLINE and Embase via Ovid, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Pairs of reviewers independently conducted the selection of studies, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and assessment of the certainty in the evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Data were synthesized with a random effects model and a frequentist approach. Forty-four trials (48 reports) were eligible, which included 7,378 participants and assessed the effect of 22 interventions in arresting or reversing noncavitated or cavitated carious lesions. Four network meta-analyses suggested that sealants + 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish, resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish, and 5,000-ppm F (1.1% NaF) toothpaste or gel were the most effective for arresting or reversing noncavitated occlusal, approximal, and noncavitated and cavitated root carious lesions on primary and/or permanent teeth, respectively (low- to moderate-certainty evidence). Study-level data indicated that 5% NaF varnish was the most effective for arresting or reversing noncavitated facial/lingual carious lesions (low certainty) and that 38% silver diamine fluoride solution applied biannually was the most effective for arresting advanced cavitated carious lesions on any coronal surface (moderate to high certainty). Preventing the onset of caries is the ultimate goal of a caries management plan. However, if the disease is present, there is a variety of effective interventions to treat carious lesions nonrestoratively.
- Published
- 2018