Search

Background Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease has been associated with early‐term delivery and cesarean delivery (CD). We implemented a multi‐institutional standardized clinical assessment and management plan (SCAMP) through the University of California Fetal‐Maternal Consortium. Our objective was to decrease early‐term (37–39 weeks) delivery and CD in pregnancies complicated by fetal congenital heart disease using a SCAMP methodology to improve practice in a high‐risk and clinically complex setting. Methods and Results University of California Fetal‐Maternal Consortium site‐specific management decisions were queried following SCAMP implementation. This contemporary intervention group was compared with a University of California Fetal‐Maternal Consortium historical cohort. Primary outcomes were early‐term delivery and CD. A total of 496 maternal–fetal dyads with prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease were identified, 185 and 311 in the historical and intervention cohorts, respectively. Recommendation for later delivery resulted in a later gestational age at delivery (38.9 versus 38.1 weeks, P=0.01). After adjusting for maternal age and site, historical controls were more likely to have a CD (odds ratio [OR],1.8; 95% CI, 2.1–2.8; P=0.004) and more likely (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4–3.3) to have an early‐term delivery than the intervention group. Vaginal delivery was recommended in 77% of the cohort, resulting in 61% vaginal deliveries versus 50% in the control cohort (P=0.03). Among pregnancies with major cardiac lesions (n=373), vaginal birth increased from 51% to 64% (P=0.008) and deliveries ≥39 weeks increased from 33% to 48% (P=0.004). Conclusions Implementation of a SCAMP decreased the rate of early‐term deliveries and CD for prenatal congenital heart disease. Development of clinical pathways may help standardize care, decrease maternal risk secondary to CD, improve neonatal outcomes, and reduce healthcare costs.

There are potential benefits and risks to the infant with higher and lower oxygen saturation (SpO2) targets, and the ideal range for infants with pulmonary hypertension (PH) remains unknown. Targeting high SpO2 can promote pulmonary vasodilation but cause oxygen toxicity. Targeting lower SpO2 may increase pulmonary vascular resistance, especially in the presence of acidosis and hypothermia. We will conduct a randomized pilot trial to compare two ranges of target preductal SpO2 in late-preterm and term infants with hypoxic respiratory failure (HRF) and acute pulmonary hypertension (aPH) of the newborn. We will assess the reliability of a newly created HRF/PH score that could be used in larger trials. We will assess trial feasibility and obtain preliminary estimates of outcomes. Our primary hypothesis is that in neonates with PH and HRF, targeting preductal SpO2 of 95–99% (intervention) will result in lower pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressures, and lower the need for pulmonary vasodilators (inhaled nitric oxide—iNO, milrinone and sildenafil) compared to targeting SpO2 at 91–95% (standard). We also speculate that a higher SpO2 target can potentially induce oxidative stress and decrease response to iNO (oxygenation and pulmonary vasodilation) for those patients that still require iNO in this range. We present considerations in planning this trial as well as some of the details of the protocol design (Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04938167)).