Search

The ICARIA-MM study was sponsored by Sanofi. The authors thank, Helgi van de Velde, Valérie Boutet, Shujia Dai, Deborah DiNoto, Graziella Engelvin, Olivier Fedeli, Sébastien Hugla, Dominique Mouret, Béatrice Pradeilles, and Alain Roccon, all employees of Sanofi, for their contribution to the study, technology, and comments on the manuscript. The authors thank the participating patients and their families, and the study centers and investigators, for their contributions to the study. The medical writing support was provided by John Clarke, PhD and Stephanie Brillhart, PhD of Elevate Medical Affairs, contracted by Sanofi Genzyme for publication support services.

Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) experience several relapses, and become refractory to successive therapies. In the ICARIA-MM trial (NCT02990338), isatuximab plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone prolonged median progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with RRMM. This subgroup analysis of ICARIA-MM assessed the treatment benefit of isatuximab by prior lines of therapy and refractory status. A total of 307 patients were randomized to isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone (n = 154) or pomalidomide-dexamethasone (n = 153). Isatuximab (10 mg/kg intravenously) was given weekly in the first 28-day cycle, then every other week. Standard pomalidomide-dexamethasone doses were given. PFS was assessed by prior lines and refractory status. Overall, 102 (66 %) patients receiving isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone and 101 (66 %) patients receiving pomalidomide-dexamethasone had received 2–3 prior lines; 52 (34 %) and 52 (34 %) had received >3 prior lines, respectively. Median PFS was higher with isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone versus pomalidomide-dexamethasone for patients who received 2–3 prior lines of therapy (12.3 vs. 7.8 months) and >3 prior lines of therapy (9.4 vs. 4.3 months). Median PFS was higher with isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone versus pomalidomide-dexamethasone for patients who were lenalidomide-refractory (11.4 vs. 5.6 months), lenalidomide-refractory at last line (11.6 vs. 5.7 months), refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI) (11.4 vs. 5.6 months), and double-refractory (11.2 vs. 4.8 months). Overall response rate (ORR) in patients receiving isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone versus pomalidomide-dexamethasone was 59.0 % versus 31.4 % in lenalidomide-refractory; 60.2 % versus 32.2 % in PI-refractory; and 58.6 % versus 29.9 % in double-refractory patients. Isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone improved PFS and ORR regardless of prior lines of therapy or refractory status, consistent with the benefit in the overall population. © 2021 The Authors, Amgen Bristol-Myers Squibb, BMS Pfizer Roche Sanofi Celgene Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, TPC Janssen Pharmaceuticals, SB reports honoraria from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, and Janssen; and reports a consultancy/advisory role for Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm, and Takeda. VV reports a consultancy/advisory role for Astellas, Biocad, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda. VM reports a consultancy/advisory role for Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda. LK reports honoraria from Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda; a consultancy/advisory role for Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda; and travel support from Amgen and Janssen. MP reports honoraria from Celgene, Pfizer, and Takeda; consultancy/advisory role for Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Roche, and Takeda; and research funding from Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda. PGR reports a consultancy/advisory role for Amgen, Janssen, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, and Takeda; and research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Oncopeptides, and Takeda. LP, FV, KW, LB, and YK have no disclosures. FC, SLG, FM, and HvdV are employees of Sanofi., The ICARIA-MM study was sponsored by Sanofi . The authors thank the participating patients and their families, and the study centers and investigators for their contributions to the study. Medical writing support was provided by Stephanie Brillhart, Julian Ball, and Smitha Reddy of Elevate Medical Affairs E (Fairfield, CT, USA), and funded by Sanofi (Cambridge, MA, USA).

BACKGROUND: Isatuximab is a monoclonal antibody that binds a specific epitope on the human CD38 receptor and has antitumour activity via multiple mechanisms of action. In a previous phase 1b study, around 65% of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma achieved an overall response with a combination of isatuximab with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone. The aim of this study was to determine the progression-free survival benefit of isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone compared with pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. METHODS: We did a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study at 102 hospitals in 24 countries in Europe, North America, and the Asia-Pacific regions. Eligible participants were adult patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who had received at least two previous lines of treatment, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor. Patients were excluded if they were refractory to previous treatment with an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to either isatuximab 10 mg/kg plus pomalidomide 4 mg plus dexamethasone 40 mg (20 mg for patients aged ≥75 years), or pomalidomide 4 mg plus dexamethasone 40 mg. Randomisation was done using interactive response technology and stratified according to the number of previous lines of treatment (2-3 vs >3) and age (