Search

3-Hydroxybutyric acid (also referred to as β-hydroxybutyric acid or BHB), a small molecule metabolite whose concentration is elevated in type I diabetes and diabetic coma, was found to modulate the properties of 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC) monolayers when added to the subphase at clinical concentrations. This is a key piece of evidence supporting the hypothesis that the anesthetic actions of BHB are due to the metabolite's abilities to alter physical properties of cell membranes, leading to indirect effects on membrane protein function. Pressure-area isotherms show that BHB changes the compressibility of the monolayer and decrease the size of the two-phase coexistence region. Epi-fluorescent microscopy further reveals that the reduction of the coexistence region is due to the significant reduction in morphology of the liquid condensed domains in the two-phase coexistence region. These changes in monolayer morphology are associated with the diminished interfacial viscosity of the monolayers (measured using an interfacial stress rheometer), which gives insight as to how changes in phase and structure may contribute to membrane function.

Volatile anesthetics serve as useful probes of a conserved biological process that is essential to the proper functioning of the central nervous system. A kinetic and thermodynamic analysis of their unusual pharmacological and physiological characteristics has led to a general, predictive theory in which small molecules that adsorb to membranes modulate ion channel function by altering physical properties of membrane bilayers. A kinetic model that is both parsimonious and falsifiable has been developed to test this mechanism. This theory leads to predictions about the structure, function, origin, and evolution of synapses, the etiology of several diseases and disease symptoms affecting the brain, and the mechanism of action of several drugs that are used therapeutically. Neuronal membranes may offer an appealing drug target, given the large number of compounds that adsorb to interfaces and hence membranes.

Background: β3 containing γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA(A)-Rs) mediate behavioral end points of IV anesthetics such as immobility and hypnosis. A knockout mouse with targeted forebrain deletion of the β3 subunit of the GABA(A)-R shows reduced sensitivity to the hypnotic effect of etomidate, as measured by the loss of righting reflex. The end points of amnesia and immobility produced by an inhaled anesthetic have yet to be evaluated in this conditional knockout., Methods: We assessed forebrain selective β3 conditional knockout mice and their littermate controls for conditional fear to evaluate amnesia and MAC, the minimum alveolar concentration of inhaled anesthetic necessary to produce immobility in response to noxious stimulation, to assess immobility. Suppression of conditional fear was assessed for etomidate and isoflurane, and MAC was assessed for isoflurane., Results: Etomidate equally suppressed conditional fear for both genotypes. The knockout showed resistance to the suppression of conditional fear produced by isoflurane in comparison with control littermates. Controls and knockouts did not differ in isoflurane MAC values., Conclusions: These results suggest that β3 containing GABA(A)-Rs in the forebrain contribute to hippocampal-dependent memory suppressed by isoflurane, but not etomidate.

Pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs), which mediate chemo-electric signal transduction in animals, have been recently found in bacteria. Despite clear sequence and 3D structure homology, the phylogenetic distance between prokaryotic and eukaryotic homologs suggests significant structural divergences, especially at the interface between the extracellular (ECD) and the transmembrane (TMD) domains. To challenge this possibility, we constructed a chimera in which the ECD of the bacterial protein GLIC is fused to the TMD of the human α1 glycine receptor (α1GlyR). Electrophysiology in Xenopus oocytes shows that it functions as a proton-gated ion channel, thereby locating the proton activation site(s) of GLIC in its ECD. Patch-clamp experiments in BHK cells show that the ion channel displays an anionic selectivity with a unitary conductance identical to that of the α1GlyR. In addition, pharmacological investigations result in transmembrane allosteric modulation similar to the one observed on α1GlyR. Indeed, the clinically active drugs propofol, four volatile general anesthetics, alcohols, and ivermectin all potentiate the chimera while they inhibit GLIC. Collectively, this work shows the compatibility between GLIC and α1GlyR domains and points to conservation of the ion channel and transmembrane allosteric regulatory sites in the chimera. This provides evidence that GLIC and α1GlyR share a highly homologous 3D structure. GLIC is thus a relevant model of eukaryotic pLGICs, at least from the anionic type. In addition, the chimera is a good candidate for mass production in Escherichia coli, opening the way for investigations of "druggable" eukaryotic allosteric sites by X-ray crystallography.

General anaesthetics have enjoyed long and widespread use but their molecular mechanism of action remains poorly understood. There is good evidence that their principal targets are pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs) such as inhibitory GABA(A) (γ-aminobutyric acid) receptors and excitatory nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, which are respectively potentiated and inhibited by general anaesthetics. The bacterial homologue from Gloeobacter violaceus (GLIC), whose X-ray structure was recently solved, is also sensitive to clinical concentrations of general anaesthetics. Here we describe the crystal structures of the complexes propofol/GLIC and desflurane/GLIC. These reveal a common general-anaesthetic binding site, which pre-exists in the apo-structure in the upper part of the transmembrane domain of each protomer. Both molecules establish van der Waals interactions with the protein; propofol binds at the entrance of the cavity whereas the smaller, more flexible, desflurane binds deeper inside. Mutations of some amino acids lining the binding site profoundly alter the ionic response of GLIC to protons, and affect its general-anaesthetic pharmacology. Molecular dynamics simulations, performed on the wild type (WT) and two GLIC mutants, highlight differences in mobility of propofol in its binding site and help to explain these effects. These data provide a novel structural framework for the design of general anaesthetics and of allosteric modulators of brain pLGICs.

The mechanism by which the inhaled anesthetic isoflurane produces amnesia and immobility is not understood. Isoflurane modulates GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)-Rs) in a manner that makes them plausible targets. We asked whether GABA(A)-R α2 subunits contribute to a site of anesthetic action in vivo. Previous studies demonstrated that Ser270 in the second transmembrane domain is involved in the modulation of GABA(A)-Rs by volatile anesthetics and alcohol, either as a binding site or a critical allosteric residue. We engineered GABA(A)-Rs with two mutations in the α2 subunit, changing Ser270 to His and Leu277 to Ala. Recombinant receptors with these mutations demonstrated normal affinity for GABA, but substantially reduced responses to isoflurane. We then produced mutant (knockin) mice in which this mutated subunit replaced the wild-type α2 subunit. The adult mutant mice were overtly normal, although there was evidence of enhanced neonatal mortality and fear conditioning. Electrophysiological recordings from dentate granule neurons in brain slices confirmed the decreased actions of isoflurane on mutant receptors contributing to inhibitory synaptic currents. The loss of righting reflex EC(50) for isoflurane did not differ between genotypes, but time to regain the righting reflex was increased in N(2) generation knockins. This effect was not observed at the N(4) generation. Isoflurane produced immobility (as measured by tail clamp) and amnesia (as measured by fear conditioning) in both wild-type and mutant mice, and potencies (EC(50)) did not differ between the strains for these actions of isoflurane. Thus, immobility or amnesia does not require isoflurane potentiation of the α2 subunit.

The mechanisms by which ethanol and inhaled anesthetics influence the nervous system are poorly understood. Here we describe the positional cloning and characterization of a new mouse mutation isolated in an N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) forward mutagenesis screen for animals with enhanced locomotor activity. This allele, Lightweight (Lwt), disrupts the homolog of the Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) unc-79 gene. While Lwt/Lwt homozygotes are perinatal lethal, Lightweight heterozygotes are dramatically hypersensitive to acute ethanol exposure. Experiments in C. elegans demonstrate a conserved hypersensitivity to ethanol in unc-79 mutants and extend this observation to the related unc-80 mutant and nca-1;nca-2 double mutants. Lightweight heterozygotes also exhibit an altered response to the anesthetic isoflurane, reminiscent of unc-79 invertebrate mutant phenotypes. Consistent with our initial mapping results, Lightweight heterozygotes are mildly hyperactive when exposed to a novel environment and are smaller than wild-type animals. In addition, Lightweight heterozygotes exhibit increased food consumption yet have a leaner body composition. Interestingly, Lightweight heterozygotes voluntarily consume more ethanol than wild-type littermates. The acute hypersensitivity to and increased voluntary consumption of ethanol observed in Lightweight heterozygous mice in combination with the observed hypersensitivity to ethanol in C. elegans unc-79, unc-80, and nca-1;nca-2 double mutants suggests a novel conserved pathway that might influence alcohol-related behaviors in humans., Competing Interests: EIE is a paid consultant of Baxter Healthcare.

A prokaryotic member of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor superfamily (GLIC) was recently cloned from the cyanobacterium Gloeobacter violaceus, its function characterized, and its 3-dimensional x-ray diffraction crystal structure determined. We report its modulation by 9 anesthetics using 2-electrode voltage clamping in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Desflurane, halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol inhibited currents through GLIC at and below concentrations used clinically. Hill numbers averaged 0.3, indicating negative cooperativity or multiple sites or mechanisms of action. A 2-site model fit the data for desflurane and halothane better than a 1-site model. Xenon and etomidate modulated GLIC at or above clinical concentrations, with no cooperativity. Ethanol and nitrous oxide did not modulate GLIC at surgical anesthetic concentrations. These investigations lay the groundwork for further structural and functional studies of anesthetic actions on GLIC.

Background: General anesthesia produces multiple end points including immobility, hypnosis, sedation, and amnesia. Tonic inhibition via gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA(A)-Rs) may play a role in mediating behavioral end points that are suppressed by low concentrations of anesthetics (e.g., hypnosis and amnesia). GABA(A)-Rs containing the alpha4 subunit are highly concentrated in the hippocampus and thalamus, and when combined with delta subunits they mediate tonic inhibition, which is sensitive to low concentrations of isoflurane., Methods: In this study, we used a GABA(A) alpha4 receptor knockout mouse line to evaluate the contribution of alpha4-containing GABA(A)-Rs to the effects of immobility, hypnosis, and amnesia produced by isoflurane. Knockout mice and their wild-type counterparts were assessed on 3 behavioral tests: conditional fear (to assess amnesia), loss of righting reflex (to assess hypnosis), and the minimum alveolar concentration of inhaled anesthetic necessary to produce immobility in response to noxious stimulation in 50% of subjects (to assess immobility)., Results: Genetic inactivation of the alpha4 subunit reduced the amnestic effect of isoflurane, minimally affected loss of righting reflex, and had no effect on immobility., Conclusions: These results lend support to the hypothesis that different sites of action mediate different anesthetic end points and suggest that alpha4-containing GABA(A)-Rs are important mediators of the amnestic effect of isoflurane on hippocampal-dependent declarative memory.

Introduction: Elevated concentrations of isovaleric (IVA), methylmalonic (MMA), and propionic acid are associated with impaired consciousness in genetic diseases (organic acidemias). We conjectured that part of the central nervous system depression observed in these disorders was due to anesthetic effects of these metabolites. We tested three hypotheses. First, that these metabolites would have anesthetic-sparing effects, possibly being anesthetics by themselves. Second, that these compounds would modulate glycine and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(A)) receptor function, increasing chloride currents through these channels as potent clinical inhaled anesthetics do. Third, that these compounds would affect physical properties of lipids., Methods: Anesthetic EC(50)s were measured in Xenopus laevis tadpoles. Glycine and GABA(A) receptors were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and studied using two-electrode voltage clamping. Pressure-area isotherms of 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC) monolayers were measured with and without added organic acids., Results: IVA acid was an anesthetic in tadpoles, whereas MMA and propionic acid decreased isoflurane's EC(50) by half. All three organic acids concentration-dependently increased current through alpha(1) glycine receptors. There were minimal effects on alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2s) GABA(A) receptors. The organic acids increased total lateral pressure (surface pressure) of DPPC monolayers, including at mean molecular areas typical of bilayers., Conclusion: IVA, MMA, and propionic acid have anesthetic effects in tadpoles, positively modulate glycine receptor function and affect physical properties of DPPC monolayers.

Introduction: Tolerance is observed for a variety of central nervous system depressants including ethanol, which is an anesthetic, but has not been convincingly demonstrated for a potent halogenated volatile anesthetic. Failure to demonstrate tolerance to these agents may be the result of inadequate exposure to anesthetic. In this study, we exposed Xenopus laevis tadpoles to surgical anesthetic concentrations of isoflurane for 1 wk., Methods: Xenopus laevis tadpoles were produced by in vitro fertilization, and exposed to isoflurane (0.59%, 0.98%, 1.52%) or oxygen for 1 wk starting from the time of fertilization., Results: Changes in anesthetic EC(50) were small and not in a consistent direction. Control animals had an anesthetic EC(50) of 0.594% +/- 0.003% isoflurane. Tadpoles exposed to 1.52% isoflurane had a lower EC(50) than controls (by 16%), whereas tadpoles raised under 0.59% and 0.98% isoflurane had higher EC(50)s than control (by 4.7% and 7.4%, respectively)., Conclusion: We provide the first description of week-long exposures of vertebrates to surgical anesthetic concentrations of isoflurane, and the first report of such exposures in developing vertebrates. Tolerance to isoflurane does not occur in developing Xenopus laevis tadpoles. Taken together with studies in other organisms, the development of tolerance to ethanol but not isoflurane suggests that mechanisms shared by these drugs probably do not account for the development of tolerance.

The molecular site of action for volatile anesthetics remains unknown despite many years of study. Members of the K(2P) potassium channel family, whose currents are potentiated by volatile anesthetics have emerged as possible anesthetic targets. In fact, a mouse model in which the gene for TREK-1 (KCNK2) has been inactivated shows resistance to volatile anesthetics. In this study we tested whether inactivation of another member of this ion channel family, KCNK7, in a knockout mouse displayed altered sensitivity to the anesthetizing effect of volatile anesthetics. KCNK7 knockout mice were produced by standard gene inactivation methods. Heterozygous breeding pairs produced animals that were homozygous, heterozygous or wild-type for the inactivated gene. Knockout animals were tested for movement in response to noxious stimulus (tail clamp) under varying concentrations of isoflurane, halothane, and desflurane to define the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) preventing movement. Mice homozygous for inactivated KCNK7 were viable and indistinguishable in weight, general development and behavior from heterozygotes or wild-type littermates. Knockout mice (KCNK7-/-) displayed no difference in MAC for the three volatile anesthetics compared to heterozygous (+/-) or wild-type (+/+) littermates. Because inactivation of KCNK7 does not alter MAC, KCNK7 may play only a minor role in normal CNS function or may have had its function compensated for by other inhibitory mechanisms. Additional studies with transgenic animals will help define the overall role of the K(2P) channels in normal neurophysiology and in volatile anesthetic mechanisms.

Introduction: Inhaled anesthetics are interfacially active, concentrating at interfaces such as the protein/water or bilayer/water interfaces. We tested the hypothesis that interfacial activity was a sufficient condition for anesthetic-like modulation of receptor function by applying surfactants to gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)), glycine, and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. We defined anesthetic-like modulation as an increase in currents through native channels that isoflurane and ethanol increased currents through, and a decrease in currents through channels that isoflurane and ethanol decreased currents through. We also tested the null hypothesis that there would be no difference in modulation of channel currents by surfactants in receptors with point mutations that diminished their response to isoflurane and ethanol compared to the native version of these receptors., Methods: The effect of seven surfactants with different head group charges (anionic, cationic, zwitterionic, and uncharged) and tail lengths (8 carbons and 12 carbons) on homomeric wild type alpha1 and mutant alpha(1) (S267I) glycine receptors, wild type alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2s) and mutant alpha(1)(S270I)beta(2)gamma(2s) GABA(A) receptors, and wild type NR1/NR2A and mutant NR1(F639A)/NR2A NMDA receptors was studied. Receptors were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and studied using two-electrode voltage clamping., Results: All seven surfactants, isoflurane, and ethanol enhanced GABA(A) receptor function. Six of seven surfactants, isoflurane, and ethanol enhanced glycine receptor function. Six of seven surfactants, isoflurane, and ethanol inhibited NMDA receptor function. For the mutant receptors, five of seven surfactants increased currents through GABA(A) receptors, whereas six of seven surfactants increased currents through glycine receptors. Six of seven surfactants decreased currents through the NMDA receptor. In contrast to isoflurane and ethanol, surfactants as a group did not diminish modulation of mutant compared to wild type receptors., Conclusion: These findings identify another large class of compounds (surfactants) that modulate the function of GABA(A), glycine, and NMDA receptors in a manner that is qualitatively similar to inhaled anesthetics. We cannot reject the hypothesis that interfacial activity is a sufficient condition for anesthetic-like modulation of these receptors. Mutations that diminish the modulatory effect of isoflurane and ethanol did not diminish the modulatory effect of the surfactants.

In this article, I present an evolutionary explanation for why organisms respond to inhaled anesthetics. It is conjectured that organisms today respond to inhaled anesthetics owing to the sensitivity of ion channels to inhaled anesthetics, which in turn has arisen by common descent from ancestral, anesthetic-sensitive ion channels in one-celled organisms (i.e., that the response to anesthetics did not arise as an adaptation of the nervous system, but rather of ion channels that preceded the origin of multicellularity). This sensitivity may have been refined by continuing selection at synapses in multicellular organisms. In particular, it is hypothesized that 1) the beneficial trait that was selected for in one-celled organisms was the coordinated response of ion channels to compounds that were present in the environment, which influenced the conformational equilibrium of ion channels; 2) this coordinated response prevented the deleterious consequences of entry of positive charges into the cell, thereby increasing the fitness of the organism; and 3) these compounds (which may have included organic anions, cations, and zwitterions as well as uncharged compounds) mimicked inhaled anesthetics in that they were interfacially active, and modulated ion channel function by altering bilayer properties coupled to channel function. The proposed hypothesis is consistent with known properties of inhaled anesthetics. In addition, it leads to testable experimental predictions of nonvolatile compounds having anesthetic-like modulatory effects on ion channels and in animals, including endogenous compounds that may modulate ion channel function in health and disease. The latter included metabolites that are increased in some types of end-stage organ failure, and genetic metabolic diseases. Several of these predictions have been tested and proved to be correct.

A paradox arises from present information concerning the mechanism(s) by which inhaled anesthetics produce immobility in the face of noxious stimulation. Several findings, such as additivity, suggest a common site at which inhaled anesthetics act to produce immobility. However, two decades of focused investigation have not identified a ligand- or voltage-gated channel that alone is sufficient to mediate immobility. Indeed, most putative targets provide minimal or no mediation. For example, opioid, 5-HT3, gamma-aminobutyric acid type A and glutamate receptors, and potassium and calcium channels appear to be irrelevant or play only minor roles. Furthermore, no combination of actions on ligand- or voltage-gated channels seems sufficient. A few plausible targets (e.g., sodium channels) merit further study, but there remains the possibility that immobilization results from a nonspecific mechanism.

Background: We hypothesized that pairs of inhaled anesthetics having divergent potencies [one acting weakly at minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC); one acting strongly at MAC] on specific receptors/channels might act synergistically, and that such deviations from additivity would support the notion that anesthetics act on multiple sites to produce anesthesia., Methods: Accordingly, we studied the additivity of MAC for 11 anesthetic pairs divergently (one weakly, one strongly) affecting a specific receptor/channel at MAC. By "divergently," we usually meant that at MAC the more strongly acting anesthetic enhanced or blocked the in vitro receptor or channel at least twice (and usually more) as much as did the weakly acting anesthetic. The receptors/channels included: TREK-1 and TASK-3 potassium channels; and gamma-aminobutyric acid type A, glycine, N-methyl-D-aspartic acid, and acetylcholine receptors. We also studied the additivity of cyclopropane-benzene because the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid blocker MK-801 had divergent effects on the MACs of these anesthetics. We also studied four pairs that included nitrous oxide because nitrous oxide had been reported to produce infraadditivity (antagonism) when combined with isoflurane., Results: All combinations produced a result within 10% of that which would be predicted by additivity except for the combination of isoflurane with nitrous oxide where infraadditivity was found., Conclusions: Such results are consistent with the notion that inhaled anesthetics act on a single site to produce immobility in the face of noxious stimulation.

Background: Drug interactions may reveal mechanisms of drug action: additive interactions suggest a common site of action, and synergistic interactions suggest different sites of action. We applied this reasoning in a review of published data on anesthetic drug interactions for the end-points of hypnosis and immobility., Methods: We searched Medline for all manuscripts listing propofol, etomidate, methohexital, thiopental, midazolam, diazepam, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, clonidine, morphine, fentanyl, sufentanil, alfentanil, remifentanil, droperidol, metoclopramide, lidocaine, halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane, N2O, and Xe that contained terms suggesting interaction: interaction, additive, additivity, synergy, synergism, synergistic, antagonism, antagonistic, isobologram, or isobolographic. When available, data were reanalyzed using fraction analysis or response surface analysis., Results: Between drug classes, most interactions were synergistic. The major exception was ketamine, which typically interacted in either an additive or infra-additive (antagonistic) manner. Inhaled anesthetics typically showed synergy with IV anesthetics, but were additive or, in the case of nitrous oxide and isoflurane, possibly infra-additive, with each other., Conclusions: Except for ketamine, IV anesthetics acting at different sites usually demonstrated synergy. Inhaled anesthetics usually demonstrated synergy with IV anesthetics, but no pair of inhaled anesthetics interacted synergistically.

Introduction: No theory of inhaled anesthetic action requires volatility of the anesthetic to accomplish the biophysical interaction of anesthetic with biological target. The identification of mutations that attenuate the effect of inhaled anesthetics on various receptors raises the possibility that nonvolatile compounds with anesthetic effects can be identified with the aid of these receptors. In previous studies, we identified compounds that were either charged or had an exceptionally low vapor pressure and which modulated anesthetic-sensitive receptors in a manner similar to inhaled anesthetics. We tested whether these, and another charged compound, shared a common mechanism with volatile anesthetics, by comparing their effect on wild-type gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) or glycine receptors and mutant receptors that were engineered to be relatively resistant to inhaled anesthetics., Methods: The effect of beta-hydroxybutyric acid, ammonium chloride, diethylhexyl phthalate, and GABA were tested on homomeric alpha1 and mutant alpha1 (S267I) glycine receptors. The effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate and glycine were tested on alpha1 b2 gamma2s and mutant alpha1(S270I) beta2 gamma2s GABA(A) receptors. Receptors were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and studied using two-electrode voltage clamping. For both GABA(A) and glycine receptors, isoflurane and ethanol were used as positive controls and propofol as a negative control (i.e., unaffected by the mutation)., Results: Beta-hydroxybutyric acid, ammonium chloride, diethylhexyl phthalate, and GABA all enhanced glycine receptor function. This effect was reduced by the S267I mutations. Sodium dodecyl sulfate and glycine enhanced GABA(A) receptor function, and the S270I mutation attenuated this effect., Conclusion: These findings support the hypothesis that the compounds studied modulate GABA(A) or glycine receptors by a mechanism similar to that of isoflurane and ethanol. Comparing the effect of drugs on anesthetic-sensitive wild-type receptors with relatively less sensitive mutant receptors may help identify compounds with anesthetic effects.

Background: Previous studies demonstrated that MAC (the minimum alveolar concentration of an inhaled anesthetic that produces immobility in 50% of subjects exposed to noxious stimulation) for halothane directly correlates with the central nervous system concentration of Na+. However, those studies globally altered Na+ concentrations, and thus did not distinguish effects on the spinal cord from cerebral effects. This is an important distinction because the cord appears to be the primary site for mediation of the immobility produced by inhaled anesthetics. Accordingly, in the present study, we examined the effect of altering intrathecal versus intracerebroventricular concentrations of Na+ on MAC., Methods: In rats prepared with chronic indwelling catheters or stylets, we infused solutions deficient in Na+ and with an excess of Na+ into the lumbar subarachnoid and intracerebroventricular spaces and measured MAC for isoflurane before, during, and after infusion., Results: MAC of isoflurane correlated directly with concentrations of Na+ infused intrathecally but did not correlate with concentrations infused intracerebroventricularly., Conclusion: The results are consistent with a mediation or modulation of MAC by Na+ channels. These might include voltage-gated or ligand-gated channels or other Na-sensitive targets (e.g., pumps, transporters, exchangers).

Background: We tested the hypothesis that two metabolites that are elevated in ketosis (beta-hydroxybutyric acid, and acetone) modulate ion channels in a manner similar to anesthetics and produce anesthesia in animals., Methods: alpha1beta2gamma2sgamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)), alpha1 glycine, NR1/NR2A N-methyl-d-aspartate, and two pore domain TRESK channels were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and studied using two-electrode voltage clamping. The effect of beta hydroxybutyric acid and acetone on channel function was measured. The anesthetic effects of these drugs were measured in X. laevis tadpoles., Results: Both beta hydroxybutyric acid and acetone enhanced glycine receptor function in the concentration range that is obtained in ketoacidosis in humans. Beta hydroxybutyric acid also enhanced GABA(A) receptor function at these concentrations. Both acetone and beta-hydroxybutyric acid anesthetized tadpoles, with an EC50 for acetone of 264 +/- 2 mM (mean +/- se) and for beta-hydroxybutyric acid of 151 +/- 11 mM at pH 7.0. Acetone enhanced GABA(A) receptors at concentrations of 50 mM and above. Inhibition of TRESK channel function was seen with 100 mM acetone or larger concentration. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor function was inhibited at concentrations of acetone of 200 mM and larger., Conclusions: Beta hydroxybutyric acid and acetone are anesthetics. Both ketone bodies enhance inhibitory glycine receptors at concentrations observed clinically in ketoacidosis. In addition, beta-hydroxybutyric acid enhances GABA(A) receptor function at these concentrations. Subanesthetic concentrations of these drugs may contribute to the lethargy and impairment of consciousness seen in ketoacidosis.

Introduction: Intravenous (IV) fluid bags made of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) often contain the plasticizer di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) to make the PVC flexible. Phthalate esters have been reported to inhibit neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, which are sensitive to many inhaled anesthetics. This raises the possibility that DEHP might modulate the function of other cys-loop receptors, such as gamma-amino butyric acid type A (GABA(A)) and glycine receptors, and that DEHP-plasticized PVC might interfere with electrophysiologic studies of anesthetic mechanisms on those receptors., Methods: alpha(1)beta(2) GABA(A) and alpha(1) glycine receptors were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and studied using two-electrode voltage clamping. We then measured the effect of buffers from IV bags containing DEHP-plasticized PVC, and of buffers saturated with DEHP, on agonist-induced currents., Results: Agonist-induced currents from glycine receptors were enhanced by buffers from IV bags containing DEHP-plasticized PVC by 291.9% +/- 84.5% (mean +/- se) and from saturated solutions of DEHP by 70.8% +/- 16.7%. Agonist-induced currents from alpha(1)beta(2) GABA(A) receptors were inhibited by buffers from IV bags containing DEHP-plasticized PVC by 19.3% +/- 3.2% and by 31.7% +/- 7.0% from buffers saturated with DEHP., Conclusions: The plasticizer DEHP modulates the function of both GABA(A) and glycine receptors. DEHP contamination can confound the results of electrophysiologic studies of anesthetic mechanisms on these receptors if DEHP-plasticized PVC is present in the experimental apparatus.

Introduction: A mechanism of anesthesia has recently been proposed which predicts that coreleased neurotransmitters may modulate neurotransmitter receptors for which they are not the native agonist in a manner similar to anesthetics., Methods: We tested this prediction by applying acetylcholine to a NR1/NR2A N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor, glycine to a wild-type alpha(1)beta(2) and anesthetic-resistant alpha(1)(S270I)beta(2) gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA) type A receptor, and GABA to a homomeric alpha(1) wild type and anesthetic-resistant alpha(1) S267I glycine receptor. Receptors were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and studied using two-electrode voltage clamping., Results: We found inhibition of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor function by acetylcholine, enhancement of glycine receptor function by GABA, and enhancement of GABA type A receptor function by glycine. As expected of compounds with anesthetic activity, GABA showed far less potentiation (enhancement) of the function of the anesthetic-resistant S267I glycine receptor than that of the wild-type receptor. Glycine potentiated the function of wild-type GABA type A receptors but inhibited the function of the anesthetic-resistant S270I GABA type A receptor., Conclusions: These results show that neurotransmitters that are coreleased onto anesthetic-sensitive receptors may modulate the function of receptors for which they are not the native agonist via an anesthetic-like mechanism. These findings lend support to a recent theory of anesthetic action.

Background: The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of isoflurane is a quantitative trait because it varies continuously in a population. The location on the genome of genes or other genetic elements controlling quantiative traits is called quantitative trait loci (QTLs). In this study we sought to detect a quantitative trait locus underlying isoflurane MAC in mice., Methods: To accomplish this, two inbred mouse strains differing in isoflurane MAC, the C57BL/6J and LP/J mouse strains, were bred through two generations to produce genetic recombination. These animals were genotyped for microsatellite markers. We also applied an independent, computational method for identifying QTL-regulating differences in isoflurane MAC. In this approach, the isoflurane MAC was measured in a panel of 19 inbred strains, and computationally searched for genomic intervals where the pattern of genetic variation, based on single nucleotide polymorphisms, correlated with the differences in isoflurane MAC among inbred strains., Results and Conclusions: Both methods of genetic analysis identified a QTL for isoflurane MAC that was located on the proximal part of mouse chromosome 7.

Background: Carbon dioxide decreases halothane minimum alveolar concentrations (MAC) in dogs when Paco(2) exceeds 95 mm Hg. We sought to confirm these findings for several potent inhaled anesthetics in rats., Methods: Groups of eight rats were anesthetized with halothane, isoflurane, or desflurane. MAC was determined for each anesthetic alone, and then with increasing concentrations of inspired CO(2). A fourth group was given CO(2) alone to determine the MAC of CO(2)., Results: Increasing inspired CO(2) concentrations produced a linear dose-dependent decrease in MAC of each potent inhaled anesthetic. With elimination of CO(2), the MAC of isoflurane and desflurane returned to the original MAC. As determined by extrapolating these data to 0% of the inhaled anesthetic, the MAC of CO(2) was approximately 50% of 1 atm. Given alone, CO(2) proved lethal., Conclusions: Unlike dogs, no threshold for the CO(2)-MAC response arose with halothane, isoflurane, or desflurane in rats. The ED(50) for CO(2) is also approximately 50% greater in rats than reported in dogs.

Background: A recent theory of anesthesia predicts that some endogenous compounds should have anesthetic properties. This theory raises the possibility that metabolites that are profoundly elevated in disease may also exert anesthetic effects. Because in pathophysiologic concentrations, ammonia reversibly impairs memory, consciousness, and responsiveness to noxious stimuli in a manner similar to anesthetics, we investigated whether ammonia had anesthetic properties., Methods: The effect of ammonia was studied on alpha1beta2 and alpha1beta2gamma2s gamma-amino butyric acid type A, alpha1 glycine, and NR1/NR2A N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, and the two-pore domain potassium channel TRESK. Channels were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and studied using two-electrode voltage clamping. The immobilizing effect of ammonia in rats was evaluated by determining the reduction in isoflurane minimum alveolar concentration produced by IV infusion of ammonium chloride. The olive oil-water partition coefficient was measured to determine whether free ammonia (NH3) followed the Meyer-Overton relation., Results: Ammonia positively modulated TRESK channels and glycine receptors. No effect was seen on alpha1beta2 and alpha1beta2gamma2s gamma-amino butyric acid type A receptors or NR1/NR2A N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors. Ammonia reversibly decreased the requirement for isoflurane, with a calculated immobilizing EC50 of 1.6 +/- 0.1 mM NH4Cl. The Ostwald olive oil-water partition coefficient for NH3 was 0.018. At a pH of 7.4, and at the anesthetic EC50, the NH3 concentration in bulk olive oil is 0.42 muM, approximately five orders of magnitude less than observed by anesthetics that follow the Meyer-Overton relation., Conclusions: These findings support the hypothesis that ammonia has anesthetic properties. Bulk oil concentration did not predict the potency of ammonia.

Background: Previous studies have found that the local anesthetic/sodium channel blocker lidocaine decreased MAC by maximum amounts approximately equal to the decreases produced by dizocilpine (MK-801), a N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist. Blockade of sodium channels by inhaled anesthetics has been suggested as a possible cause for impairment of transmission through NMDA receptors. We postulated that the net effect of lidocaine and MK-801 on MAC would be the same, albeit by affecting NMDA neurotransmission at different points., Methods: We measured the effect of various lidocaine infusions on the MAC of cyclopropane, halothane, isoflurane, and o-difluorobenzene in rats. We also measured the effect of concurrent lidocaine-MK-801 infusion on the MAC of isoflurane and o-difluorobenzene., Results: Our data contradicted our predictions. (a) We found no limit to the effect of lidocaine infusion, in some cases finding that lidocaine, alone, produced immobility; (b) lidocaine infusion did not decrease the MAC of o-difluorobenzene differently from the MAC of other inhaled anesthetics; and (c) the addition of MK-801 equally affected the decrease in MAC produced by lidocaine infusion for isoflurane versus o-difluorobenzene., Conclusion: Lidocaine does not primarily decrease MAC by decreasing the release of glutamate from nerve terminals.

Background: Administration of drugs blocking muscarinic plus neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (e.g., atropine and mecamylamine) does not affect the MAC of isoflurane. Although this implies that acetylcholine receptors do not mediate the immobility produced by inhaled anesthetics, another interpretation is possible. Sub-MAC concentrations of isoflurane alone profoundly block acetylcholine receptors, allowing for the possibility that atropine and mecamylamine have no effect because the receptors already are blocked., Methods: In the present study, we indirectly tested this possibility by measuring the capacity of acetylcholine receptor blockade to decrease the anesthetic requirement for etomidate, an anesthetic thought to act solely by enhancing the effect of gamma-aminobutyric acid on gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) receptors., Results: Administration of 10 mg/kg atropine plus 5 mg/kg mecamylamine did not change the infusion rate of etomidate, or the blood or brain concentrations of etomidate required to produce immobility in rats., Conclusion: Acetylcholine receptors do not mediate the capacity of anesthetics to produce immobility in the face of noxious stimulation.

Background: Etomidate is a widely used general anesthetic that has become a useful tool to investigate mechanisms of anesthetic action in vivo and in brain slices. However, the free aqueous concentration of etomidate that corresponds to amnesia in vivo and the diffusion profile of etomidate in brain slices are not known., Methods: The authors assessed the effect of intraperitoneally injected etomidate on contextual fear conditioning in mice. Etomidate concentrations in brain tissue were obtained by high-performance liquid chromatography. Uptake studies in 400-microm-thick brain slices were used to calculate the diffusion and partition coefficients of etomidate. A diffusion model was used to calculate the expected concentration profile within a brain slice as a function of time and depth. The predicted rate of drug equilibration was compared with the onset of electrophysiologic effects on inhibitory circuit function in recordings from hippocampal brain slices., Results: Etomidate impaired contextual fear conditioning with an ED50 dose of 11.0+/-0.1 mg after intraperitoneal injection, which corresponded to an EC50 brain concentration of 208+/-9 ng/g. The brain:artificial cerebrospinal fluid partition coefficient was 3.35, yielding an EC50,amnesia aqueous concentration of 0.25 microm. The diffusion coefficient was approximately 0.2x10 cm/s. The development of etomidate action in hippocampal brain slices was compatible with the concentration profile predicted by this diffusion coefficient., Conclusions: The free aqueous concentration of etomidate corresponding to amnesia, as defined by impaired contextual fear conditioning in mice, is 0.25 microM. Diffusion of etomidate into brain slices requires approximately an hour to reach 80% equilibration at a typical recording depth of 100 microm. This information will be useful in designing and interpreting in vitro studies using etomidate.

Background: Enhancement of the function of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors containing the alpha1 subunit may underlie a portion of inhaled anesthetic action. To test this, the authors created gene knock-in mice harboring mutations that render the receptors insensitive to isoflurane while preserving sensitivity to halothane., Methods: The authors recorded miniature inhibitory synaptic currents in hippocampal neurons from hippocampal slices from knock-in and wild-type mice. They also determined the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC), and the concentration at which 50% of animals lost their righting reflexes and which suppressed pavlovian fear conditioning to tone and context in both genotypes., Results: Miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents decayed more rapidly in interneurons and CA1 pyramidal cells from the knock-in mice compared with wild-type animals. Isoflurane (0.5-1 MAC) prolonged the decay phase of miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents in neurons of the wild-type mice, but this effect was significantly reduced in neurons from knock-in mice. Halothane (1 MAC) slowed the decay of miniature inhibitory postsynaptic current in both genotypes. The homozygous knock-in mice were more resistant than wild-type controls to loss of righting reflexes induced by isoflurane and enflurane, but not to halothane. The MAC for isoflurane, desflurane, and halothane did not differ between knock-in and wild-type mice. The knock-in mice and wild-type mice did not differ in their sensitivity to isoflurane for fear conditioning., Conclusions: gamma-Aminobutyric acid type A receptors containing the alpha1 subunit participate in the inhibition of the righting reflexes by isoflurane and enflurane. They are not, however, involved in the amnestic effect of isoflurane or immobilizing actions of inhaled agents.

Background: Depletion of central nervous system catecholamines, including dopamine, can decrease MAC (the minimum alveolar concentration of an inhaled anesthetic required to suppress movement in response to a noxious stimulus in 50% of test subjects); release of central nervous system catecholamines, including dopamine, can increase MAC; and increased free dopamine concentrations in the striatum can decrease MAC. Such findings suggest that dopamine receptors might mediate part of the capacity of inhaled anesthetics to provide immobility in the face of noxious stimulation., Methods: We measured the effect of blockade of D2 dopamine-mediated transmission with 0.3 mg/kg or 3.0 mg/kg droperidol on the MAC of cyclopropane, desflurane, halothane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane in rats, and the effect of 3.0 mg/kg droperidol on the dose or concentration of etomidate (an anesthetic known to act principally by enhancing the response of gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) receptors to gamma-aminobutyric acid) required to suppress movement in response to noxious stimulation., Results: Blockade of D2 dopamine-mediated transmission with droperidol does not decrease the MAC of cyclopropane, desflurane, halothane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane or its equivalent for etomidate in rats., Conclusions: These data, plus data from studies by others about D1 dopamine receptors, indicate that dopamine receptors do not mediate the immobility produced by inhaled anesthetics.

Chirality has been proposed as a means for distinguishing relevant from irrelevant molecular targets of action, but the sensitivity and specificity of this test is unknown for volatile anesthetics. We applied enantiomers of two chiral anesthetic alcohols (2-butanol and 2-pentanol) that are enantioselective for the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) preventing movement in 50% of animals and one (2-hexanol) that was not to frog oocytes. Each oocyte expressed one of three anesthetic-sensitive ion channels: a Twik-related-spinal cord K+ (TRESK) channel, a gamma-amino butyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptor and an N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. Using voltage-clamp techniques, we found that 2-butanol was not enantioselective for any channel (e.g., 16 mM 2-butanol R(-) and S(-) enantiomers decreased current through an NMDA receptors by 44% +/- 3% [mean +/- se] and 37% +/- 4%, respectively); 2-pentanol was enantioselective for one channel (the GABA(A) receptor, the enantiomers increasing current by 277% +/- 20% and 141% +/- 30%); 2-hexanol was enantioselective for both GABA(A) and NMDA receptors (e.g., decreasing current through the NMDA receptor by 19% +/- 3% and 43% +/- 5%). We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of chirality as a test of anesthetic relevance under two scenarios: 1) all three channels were relevant mediators of MAC and 2) no channel was a mediator of MAC. These sensitivities and specificities were poor because there is no consistent correspondence between receptor and whole animal results. We recommend that enantioselectivity not be used as a test of relevance for inhaled anesthetic targets.

Most studies of chirality in inhaled anesthetic action have used the enantiomers of isoflurane. These enantiomers are expensive and scarce, which limits studies, such as the preliminary identification of molecular targets of anesthetic action, that can be performed with these isomers. We hypothesized that secondary alcohols (i.e., compounds having a -CH2-CHOH-CH3 group) that are experimental anesthetics would show enantioselectivity. To test this hypothesis, we determined the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of the enantiomers of the homologous series of 2-alcohols from 2-butanol to 2-heptanol in rats. Because these alcohols are partially metabolized to 2-ketones during the course of study (i.e., having a -CH2-CO-CH3 group), we independently measured the MAC of the 2-ketones. Assuming additivity of MAC of the ketones with the alcohols, we corrected for the anesthetic effect of the ketones in rats to determine the MAC of the alcohols. We found that the 2-butanol and 2-pentanol isomers were enantioselective. S-(+)-2-butanol had a MAC that was 17% larger than for the R-(-)-enantiomer, whereas S-(+)-2-pentanol had a MAC that was 38% larger than the R-(-)- enantiomer. No stereoselectivity was observed for 2-hexanol and 2-heptanol. These findings may permit studies of chirality in anesthesia, particularly in in vitro systems where metabolism does not occur, using inexpensive volatile compounds.

We hypothesized that N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors mediate some or all of the capacity of inhaled anesthetics to prevent movement in the face of noxious stimulation, and that this capacity to prevent movement correlates directly with the in vitro capacity of such anesthetics to block the NMDA receptor. To test this hypothesis, we measured the effect of IV infusion of the NMDA blockers dizocilpine (MK-801) and (R)-4-(3-phosphonopropyl) piperazine-2-carboxylic acid (CPP) to decrease the MAC (the minimum alveolar concentration of anesthetic that prevents movement in 50% of subjects given a noxious stimulation) of 8 conventional anesthetics (cyclopropane, desflurane, enflurane, halothane, isoflurane, nitrous oxide, sevoflurane, and xenon) and 8 aromatic compounds (benzene, fluorobenzene, o-difluorobenzene, p-difluorobenzene, 1,2,4-trifluorobenzene, 1,3,5-trifluorobenzene, pentafluorobenzene, and hexafluorobenzene) and, for comparison, etomidate. We postulated that MK-801 or CPP infusions would decrease MAC in inverse proportion to the in vitro capacity of these anesthetics to block the NMDA receptor. This notion proved correct for the aromatic inhaled anesthetics, but not for the conventional anesthetics. At the greatest infusion of MK-801 (32 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) the MACs of conventional anesthetics decreased by 59.4 +/- 3.4% (mean +/- sd) and at 8 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) by 45.5 +/- 4.2%, a decrease not significantly different from a 51.4 +/- 19.0% decrease produced in the EC50 for etomidate, an anesthetic that acts solely by enhancing gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) receptors. We conclude that some aromatic anesthetics may produce immobility in the face of noxious stimulation by blocking the action of glutamate on NMDA receptors but that conventional inhaled anesthetics do not.

Antagonism of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors markedly decreases the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of inhaled anesthetics. To assess the importance of suppression of the temporal summation NMDA receptor component of MAC, we stimulated the tail of rats with trains of electrical pulses of varying interstimulus intervals (ISIs) and determined the inhaled anesthetic concentrations (crossover concentrations) that suppressed movement at different ISIs. The slopes of crossover concentrations versus ISIs provided a measure of temporal summation for each anesthetic. We studied five anesthetics that differ widely in their in vitro capacity to block NMDA receptors. To block NMDA receptor transmission and reveal the NMDA receptor component, the NMDA receptor antagonist, MK801, was separately added during each anesthetic. Halothane, isoflurane, and hexafluorobenzene did not appreciably suppress the NMDA receptor components of temporal summation, which contributed to 21% to 29% of MAC (P < 0.05 for each). Xenon and o-difluorobenzene suppressed these components to 8% to 0%, respectively, of MAC (neither significant), consistent with their greater NMDA receptor blocking action in vitro. NMDA receptor blockade may contribute to the MAC produced by inhaled anesthetics that potently inhibit NMDA receptors in vitro but not those that have a limited in vitro effect.

The Meyer-Overton hypothesis predicts that anesthetic potency correlates inversely with lipophilicity; e.g., MAC times the olive oil/gas partition coefficient equals a constant of approximately 1.82 +/- 0.56 atm (mean +/- sd) for conventional inhaled anesthetics. MAC is the minimum alveolar concentration of anesthetic required to eliminate movement in response to a noxious stimulus in 50% of subjects. In contrast to conventional inhaled anesthetics, MAC times the olive oil/gas partition coefficient for normal alcohols from methanol through octanol equals a constant one tenth as large as that for conventional inhaled anesthetics. The alcohol (C-OH) group causes a great affinity of alcohols to water, and the C-OH may tether the alcohol at the hydrophobic-hydrophilic interface where anesthetics are thought to act. We hypothesized that the position of the C-OH group determined potency, perhaps by governing the maximum extent to which the acyl portion of the molecule might extend into a hydrophobic phase. Using the same reasoning, we added studies of ketones with similar numbers of carbon atoms between the C=O group and the terminal methyl group. The results for both alcohols and ketones showed the predicted correlation, but the correlation was no better than that with carbon chain length regardless of the placement of the oxygen. The oil/gas partition coefficient predicted potency as well as, or better than, either chain length or oxygen placement. Hydrophilicity, as indicated by the saline/gas partition coefficient, also seemed to influence potency.

Several previous studies concluded that opioid receptors do not mediate the capacity of inhaled anesthetics to produce immobility in the face of noxious stimulation because administration of naloxone (a nonspecific opioid receptor antagonist) does not increase the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of inhaled anesthetic that produces immobility in 50% of subjects given a noxious stimulation. In contrast, a recent study found that 0.1 mg/kg naloxone given intraperitoneally increased sevoflurane MAC in mice by 18% (P < 0.01). We repeated the recent study with sevoflurane in the same strain of mice, administering nothing (control), 0.1 mg/kg, and 1.0 mg/kg of naloxone. Our study differed in that we also tested a parallel group given saline rather than naloxone. We were blinded to drug administration. MAC decreased 4.8% +/- 11.0% (mean+/- sd) and 2.4% +/- 12.5% with the first and second administrations of saline. Similarly, MAC decreased 4.7% +/- 7.1% and 5.5% +/- 10.0% with the administration of 0.1 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg of naloxone. We do not find that naloxone increases MAC. Opioid receptors do not underlie a portion of the capacity of inhaled anesthetics to produce immobility.

Our charge was to define anaesthesia as produced by inhaled anaesthetics. A definition may be useful to an understanding of the anaesthetic state, and it may guide studies of the mechanisms by which anaesthesia is produced. All inhaled anaesthetics act on the central nervous system to produce two reversible conditions, immobility and amnesia, that define the anaesthetic state. No other reversible, clinically useful, conditions are essential to the definition. Some conditions are unmeasurable (unconsciousness), not present for all inhaled anaesthetics (relaxation), or are not present at anaesthetizing concentrations (suppression of autonomic reflexes.) One (analgesia) is unmeasurable (the anaesthetized patient cannot tell an investigator that he/she hurts or does not hurt), and surrogate measures (increases in breathing, blood pressure, and heart rate with surgery) suggest that some pain is perceived. These and myriad other changes produced by inhaled anaesthetics are side effects; they do not define anaesthesia; only immobility and amnesia supply such a definition.

Despite the known capacity of hypothermia to increase anesthetic potency (decrease the partial pressure required to produce anesthesia), many in vitro studies examine the effects of ethanol and other anesthetics in oocytes or isolated neurons at room temperature. We tested whether, as predicted for potent inhaled anesthetics, a proportionate increase in solubility with hypothermia matched a decrease in ethanol minimum alveolar concentration (MAC), and thereby made the use of a single anesthetic concentration appropriate regardless of temperature. We determined ethanol MAC in normothermic (37.3 degrees C) and hypothermic (28.5 degrees C) rats, and, at the two temperatures, also determined ethanol solubilities in olive oil and saline. Ethanol MAC decreased, while olive oil/gas and saline/gas partition coefficients increased. However, the increase in the saline/gas partition coefficient did not match the decrease in MAC, and thus the aqueous-phase partial pressure producing absence of movement in 50% of rats (EC50) values for ethanol decreased by 17%. Although this decrease is not large, it may be important for comparative estimates of the in vitro effects of ethanol at different temperatures.

Unlabelled: Mice bearing an N265M point mutation in the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)(A) receptor beta3 subunit resist various anesthetic effects of propofol and etomidate. They also require a 16% larger concentration of enflurane and a 21% larger concentration of halothane to abolish the withdrawal reflex than do wild-type mice. Using a Pavlovian test, we measured whether this mutation increased the concentration of isoflurane required to impair learning and memory relative to wild-type mice. We found that the concentration was not significantly increased. We also measured MAC (the minimum alveolar concentration required to eliminate movement in response to noxious stimulation in 50% of subjects). Isoflurane MAC for mutant mice (1.93% +/- 0.0.03%; mean +/- se; n = 14) was 17.0% larger than MAC for wild-type mice (1.65 +/- 0.04; n = 14; P < 0.001). Similarly, the cyclopropane MAC for mutant mice (27.6% +/- 0.55%; n = 16) was 13.6% larger than MAC for wild-type mice (24.3 +/- 0.46; n = 8; P < 0.01). The increase in MAC for cyclopropane was unexpected, because published reports find only minimal actions at alpha1beta2gamma2 GABA(A) receptors whereas isoflurane provides a large enhancement. Consistent with previous work on alpha1beta2gamma2 GABA(A) receptors, we found in Xenopus oocytes that 5 MAC cyclopropane enhanced the effect of GABA on alpha1beta2gamma2 GABA(A) receptors by only 76%, and by a nearly identical enhancement in alpha1beta3gamma2, and alpha6beta3gamma2 receptors. In contrast, a much smaller concentration of isoflurane (1 MAC) produced a 160% to 310% enhancement in these receptors. If, relative to isoflurane, cyclopropane minimally increases GABA-induced chloride currents at any GABA(A) receptor subtype, the present data for MAC are consistent with the notion that GABA(A) receptors do not mediate the immobility produced by inhaled anesthetics., Implications: The results of the present study indicate that beta3-containing gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptors do not mediate the amnesia produced by isoflurane and do not mediate, or only partially mediate, the immobility produced by inhaled anesthetics.

A photoactivable diazirine derivative of etomidate, azietomidate, shares many actions of etomidate, including a capacity to abolish the righting reflexes in tadpoles and enhance gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-induced currents. Azietomidate's usefulness in studies of mechanisms of anesthesia depends on the assumption that it shares a site of action with etomidate. Mice bearing an N265M beta3 subunit point mutation in GABA(A) receptors have a markedly decreased sensitivity to loss of righting reflexes induced by etomidate over a range of doses. Accordingly, in the present study we measured the time to recovery of righting reflexes of wild type and mutant mice as a function of dose given as an IV bolus. Analysis of the data for azietomidate yielded mean times to recovery of righting reflexes at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg of 10.0 +/- 0.9 min and 3.0 +/- 1.6 min for wild type and mutant mice, respectively (mean +/- sd). A similar analysis for etomidate yielded mean times to recovery of righting reflexes at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg of 12.0 +/- 1.3 min and 4.0 +/- 0.7 min for wild type and mutant mice respectively. Thus, at this dose a single mutation, N265M on the beta3 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor, approximately halved the time to recovery of righting reflexes for both etomidate and azietomidate (by 7.6 +/- 1.5 min and 7.2 +/- 1.8 min, respectively), emphasizing the contribution of this residue as a determinant of a behavioral response of azietomidate in mice.

Inhaled anesthetics are believed to produce anesthesia by their actions on ion channels. Because inhaled anesthetics robustly enhance GABA A receptor (GABA(A)-R) responses to GABA, these receptors are considered prime targets of anesthetic action. However, the importance of GABA(A)-Rs and individual GABA(A)-R subunits to specific anesthetic-induced behavioral effects in the intact animal is unknown. We hypothesized that inhaled anesthetics produce amnesia, as assessed by loss of fear conditioning, by acting on the forebrain GABA(A)-Rs that harbor the alpha1 subunit. To test this, we used global knockout mice that completely lack the alpha1 subunit and forebrain-specific, conditional knockout mice that lack the alpha1 subunit only in the hippocampus, cortex, and amygdala. Both knockout mice were 75 to 145% less sensitive to the amnestic effects of the inhaled anesthetic isoflurane. These results indicate that alpha1-containing GABA(A)-Rs in the hippocampus, amygdala, and/or cortex influence the amnestic effects of inhaled anesthetics and may be an important molecular target of the drug isoflurane.

Combinations of GluR5-GluR7, KA1, and KA2 subunits form kainate receptors, a subtype of excitatory ionotropic glutamate receptors. Isoflurane enhances the action of kainate receptors comprising GluR6 subunits expressed in oocytes. To test whether alterations of the GluR6 subunit gene affect the actions of inhaled anesthetics in vivo, we measured the minimum alveolar concentration of desflurane, isoflurane, and halothane in mice lacking the kainate receptor subunit GluR6 (GluR6 knockout mice) and mice with a dominant negative glutamine/arginine (Q/R) editing mutation in membrane domain 2 of the GluR6 receptor (GluR6 editing mutants), which increases the calcium permeability of kainate receptors containing GluR6Q. We also measured the capacity of isoflurane to interfere with Pavlovian fear conditioning to a tone and to context. Absence of the GluR6 subunit did not change the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane, desflurane, or halothane. Possibly, kainate receptors assembled from the remaining kainate receptor subunits compensate for the absent subunits and thereby produce a normal minimum alveolar concentration. A Q/R mutation that dominantly affects kainate receptors containing the GluR6 subunit in mice increased isoflurane minimum alveolar concentration (by 12%; P < 0.01), decreased desflurane minimum alveolar concentration (by 18%; P < 0.001), and did not change halothane minimum alveolar concentration (P = 0.25). These data may indicate that kainate receptors containing GluR6Q subunits differently modulate, directly or indirectly, the mechanism by which inhaled anesthetics cause immobility. The mutations of GluR6 that were studied did not affect the capacity of isoflurane to interfere with fear conditioning.

Previous reports suggest that the administration of epinephrine increases learning during deep barbiturate-chloral hydrate anesthesia in rats but not during anesthesia with 0.4% isoflurane in rabbits. We revisited this issue, using fear conditioning to a tone in rats as our experimental model for learning and memory and isoflurane and desflurane as our anesthetics. Expressed as a fraction of the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) preventing movement in 50% of rats, the amnestic 50% effective dose (ED(50)) for fear to tone in control rats inhaling isoflurane and injected with saline intraperitoneally (i.p.) was 0.32 +/- 0.03 MAC (mean +/- se) compared with 0.37 +/- 0.06 MAC in rats injected with 0.01 mg/kg of epinephrine i.p. and 0.38 +/- 0.03 MAC in rats injected with 0.1 mg/kg of epinephrine i.p. For desflurane, the amnestic ED(50) were 0.32 +/- 0.05 MAC in control rats receiving a saline injection i.p. versus 0.36 +/- 0.04 MAC in rats injected with 0.1 mg/kg of epinephrine i.p. We conclude that exogenous epinephrine does not decrease amnesia produced by inhaled isoflurane or desflurane, as assessed by fear conditioning to a tone in rats.

Meperidine has potent antishivering properties. The underlying mechanisms are not fully elucidated, but recent investigations suggest that alpha2-adrenoceptors are likely to be involved. We performed the current study to investigate the effects of meperidine on nonshivering thermogenesis in a model of thermoregulation in mice. After injection (0.1 mL/kg intraperitoneally) of saline, meperidine (20 mg/kg), the specific alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist atipamezole (2 mg/kg), plus saline or atipamezole plus meperidine, respectively, mice were positioned in a Plexiglas chamber. Rectal temperature and mixed expired carbon dioxide were measured after provoking thermoregulatory effects by whole body cooling. Maximum response intensity of nonshivering thermogenesis and the thermoregulatory threshold for nonshivering thermogenesis, which was defined as the temperature at which a sustained increase in expiratory carbon dioxide can be measured, were investigated. Meperidine significantly decreased the threshold of nonshivering thermogenesis (36.6 degrees C +/- 0.7 degrees C) versus saline (37.9 degrees C +/- 0.6 degrees C) and versus atipamezole plus saline (37.8 degrees C +/- 0.4 degrees C; P <0.01). This effect was abolished after administration of meperidine combined with atipamezole (37.7 degrees C +/- 0.6 degrees C; P <0.05). Meperidine did not decrease the maximum intensity of nonshivering thermogenesis. The results suggest a major role of alpha2-adrenoceptors in the inhibition of thermoregulation by meperidine in mice.

The spinal cord mediates most of the immobilizing action of inhaled anesthetics. In the present study we investigated whether spinal or supraspinal sites mediate the immobilizing action of thiopental in rats. Thiopental was administered IV, intrathecally (IT), intracerebroventricularly (ICV), or simultaneously IT and ICV. Only the IV infusion produced anesthesia, defined as immobility in response to application of a tail clamp (i.e., the equivalent of minimum alveolar concentration, MAC). Consequently, the MAC-sparing effect (for isoflurane) of thiopental was used to assess the immobilizing contribution of IT and ICV infusions of thiopental. Thiopental concentrations were determined in whole brain, spinal cord, and a slice of cerebral cortex distant from the infusion sites. These concentrations were correlated with the MAC-sparing effect of the thiopental infusions in a multiple regression model. To assess the rate at which thiopental penetrates the cord, rat spinal cords were equilibrated in a bath of thiopental ex vivo and the concentration of thiopental in the cord was measured as a function of equilibration time. This was repeated in vivo with IT infusions of thiopental spanning the time of the behavioral studies. We found that IT or ICV infusion of thiopental 25 microg/min decreased isoflurane MAC <25%. The associated thiopental concentrations in the spinal cord after IT infusion, and in the whole brain after ICV infusion of 25 microg/min thiopental, exceeded by 500% and 680%, respectively, the concentrations found in the spinal cord and in the whole brain after IV infusion of thiopental in a dose that produced anesthesia in the absence of isoflurane. The percentage decrease in the MAC of isoflurane correlated primarily with the concentration of thiopental found in cerebral tissue not in contact with the cerebral ventricles. The spinal cord infusion produced an approximately 20% decrease in MAC. Ex vivo IT thiopental readily diffused into the spinal cord, with a time constant of approximately 1 h. We conclude that, unlike inhaled anesthetics, the immobilizing action of thiopental is largely supraspinal. Centers in the brain other than those near the third and fourth ventricles produce the greatest effect.

Many inhaled anesthetics enhance the effect of the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA), supporting the view that the GABAA receptor could mediate the capacity of inhaled anesthetics to produce immobility in the face of noxious stimulation (i.e., MAC, the minimum alveolar concentration required to suppress movement in response to a noxious stimulus in 50% of subjects). However, only limited in vivo data support the relevance of the GABAA receptor to MAC. In the present study we used two findings to test for the relevance of this receptor to immobilization for isoflurane: 1) differences among anesthetics in their capacity to enhance the response of receptor expression systems to GABA: isoflurane (considerable enhancement), xenon (minimal enhancement), and cyclopropane (minimal enhancement); and 2) studies showing that the spinal cord mediates MAC for isoflurane. If GABAA receptors mediate isoflurane MAC, then their blockade in the spinal cord should increase isoflurane MAC more than cyclopropane or xenon MAC and the MAC increase should be proportional to the in vitro enhancement of the GABAA receptor. To test this thesis, isoflurane, cyclopropane, or xenon MAC was determined in rats during intrathecal infusion of artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) via chronically implanted catheters. Then MAC was redetermined during infusion of 1 microL/min aCSF containing either 0.6 or 2.4 mg/mL picrotoxin, which noncompetitively blocks GABAA receptors. There was no consistent increase in MAC consequent to increasing the picrotoxin dose from 0.6 to 2.4 microg/min, which suggests that maximal blockade of GABAA receptors in the spinal cord had been achieved. Picrotoxin infusion increased MAC approximately 40% with all anesthetics. This indicates that GABA release in the spinal cord influences anesthetic requirement. However, the increase did not consistently differ among anesthetics and did not correlate with in vitro enhancement of GABAA receptors by these anesthetics. This supports the view that GABAA receptors do not mediate immobilization for isoflurane.

Studies using molecular modeling, genetic engineering, neurophysiology/pharmacology, and whole animals have advanced our understanding of where and how inhaled anesthetics act to produce immobility (minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration; MAC) by actions on the spinal cord. Numerous ligand- and voltage-gated channels might plausibly mediate MAC, and specific amino acid sites in certain receptors present likely candidates for mediation. However, in vivo studies to date suggest that several channels or receptors may not be mediators (e.g., gamma-aminobutyric acid A, acetylcholine, potassium, 5-hydroxytryptamine-3, opioids, and alpha(2)-adrenergic), whereas other receptors/channels (e.g., glycine, N-methyl-D-aspartate, and sodium) remain credible candidates.