Search

Background Despite recent advances in immunotherapy, many patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) do not respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Resistance to ICI may be driven by suboptimal priming of antitumor T lymphocytes due to poor antigen presentation as well as their exclusion and impairment by the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). In a recent phase I trial in patients with NSCLC, in situ vaccination (ISV) with dendritic cells engineered to secrete CCL21 (CCL21-DC), a chemokine that facilitates the recruitment of T cells and DC, promoted T lymphocyte tumor infiltration and PD-L1 upregulation.Methods Murine models of NSCLC with distinct driver mutations (KrasG12D/P53+/-/Lkb1-/- (KPL); KrasG12D/P53+/- (KP); and KrasG12D (K)) and varying tumor mutational burden were used to evaluate the efficacy of combination therapy with CCL21-DC ISV plus ICI. Comprehensive analyses of longitudinal preclinical samples by flow cytometry, single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) and whole-exome sequencing were performed to assess mechanisms of combination therapy.Results ISV with CCL21-DC sensitized immune-resistant murine NSCLCs to ICI and led to the establishment of tumor-specific immune memory. Immunophenotyping revealed that CCL21-DC obliterated tumor-promoting neutrophils, promoted sustained infiltration of CD8 cytolytic and CD4 Th1 lymphocytes and enriched progenitor T cells in the TME. Addition of ICI to CCL21-DC further enhanced the expansion and effector function of T cells both locally and systemically. Longitudinal evaluation of tumor mutation profiles revealed that CCL21-DC plus ICI induced immunoediting of tumor subclones, consistent with the broadening of tumor-specific T cell responses.Conclusions CCL21-DC ISV synergizes with anti-PD-1 to eradicate murine NSCLC. Our data support the clinical application of CCL21-DC ISV in combination with checkpoint inhibition for patients with NSCLC.

Background Severe COVID-19-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) may warrant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We evaluated the safety and physiologic changes in oxygenation and hemodynamic profile during ECMO, prone positioning, and the two modalities combined in patients receiving veno-venous (VV) ECMO. Methods Cohort study of consecutive adult patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS requiring VV-ECMO, classified into three groups: ECMO support only; Prone positioning only; and Prone positioning during ECMO. We collected hemodynamic, respiratory and ventilation variables as follows: pre-treatment, 1, 6, and 24 h post-treatment, and documented treatment-related complications. On-treatment variables were compared with pre-treatment using one-sample paired t-test with Bonferroni correction. Results Fourteen patients (mean age 48.1 [SD 9.3] years, male [100%]) received VV-ECMO. Of those, 10 patients had data during prone positioning alone and seven had data while proned on ECMO. While on ECMO, patients had improvement in oxygen saturation, PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio, and minute ventilation up to 24 h post-treatment. Vasopressor requirements increased with ECMO at 1 h and 24 h post-treatment. Prone positioning was not associated with clinically significant hemodynamic or respiratory changes, either alone or during ECMO support. All patients sustained deep tissue injuries, but only those on the face or chest were related to prone positioning. Three patients required cannula replacement. In-hospital mortality was 43%. Conclusions VV-ECMO and prone positioning in patients with COVID-19 ARDS was overall well-tolerated; however, physiologic improvements were marginal, and patients sustained deep tissue injuries. Although this was a selected population with high mortality, our data call into question the benefits of these management modalities in this severe COVID-19 population.