Search

Purpose: Scant information is available about the makeup of Career and Professional Advising systems, and who the advisors are in U.S. medical schools. We created a survey in 2019 and collated the responses to gain information about Advisors and advising systems. Materials and Methods: An 11 question survey was emailed to 72 U.S. medical schools, querying information about whether they had a Career and Professional Advising system and what is the construct of the system. Kruskal Wallis and Fisher’s Exact tests were utilized for analysis. Results: 30/72 responses were received (41.67%). Educational backgrounds of advisors included: 27/30 (90%) by physicians; 7/30 (23.3%) by PhDs; 9/30 (30%) by Masters; 4/30 (13.3%) by others. AAMC Careers in Medicine curriculum was delivered in 23/30 (75.7%). Most advising systems were in Student Affairs (27/30, 90%), although only 20/30 (66.7%) reported to the Dean of Student Affairs. Conclusion: There was no unanimity in any of the responses to the 11 questions about who Career and Professional Advisors are, or how the systems are constructed. The closest to unanimity is that most medical schools have advising systems, that they are in Student Affairs departments, and that most advisors are physicians.

Purpose: The residency interview is the most important factor for residency program directors when deciding on how to rank medical student applicants. With the residency match becoming increasingly competitive, it is more important than ever for students to perform well in this high-stakes interview. Video-stimulated recall (VSR) has been shown to be an effective tool for facilitating reflection on performance and behaviors. As such, we conducted mock interviews with and without video-stimulated recall to gauge its effect on student perceptions of preparedness and confidence for residency interviews. Methods: Students completed a pre-mock interview survey followed by a video recorded interview with faculty. All students received verbal feedback on their performance immediately after the interview. Students were randomized to receive their feedback from their faculty interviewer either while reviewing their video or without the video review. Post-mock interview and post-residency interview surveys were completed. Wilcoxon signed-rank was used to compare median aggregate scores between pre/post surveys. Wilcoxon rank-sum was used to compare pre/post aggregate scores between the video review vs. no-video review groups. Results: 33 of 70 students participated (47%). 14 students (42%) reviewed their video and 19 (58%) received feedback without video. Likert scores for pre- and post-mock interview and post-residency interview surveys revealed median aggregate scores of 10 (interquartile range, or IQR=8,11), 12 (IQR=12,13), and 13 (IQR=12,13) (p