Search

BACKGROUND: Abnormalities in serum calcium, phosphorus, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations are common in patients with chronic kidney disease and have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. No clinical trials have been conducted to clearly identify categories of calcium, phosphorus, and PTH levels associated with the lowest mortality risk. Current clinical practice guidelines are based largely on expert opinions, and clinically relevant differences exist among guidelines across countries. We sought to describe international trends in calcium, phosphorus, and PTH levels during 10 years and identify mortality risk categories in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS), an international study of hemodialysis practices and associated outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: 25,588 patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis therapy for longer than 180 days at 925 facilities in DOPPS I (1996-2001), DOPPS II (2002-2004), or DOPPS III (2005-2007). PREDICTORS: Serum calcium, albumin-corrected calcium (Ca(Alb)), phosphorus, and PTH levels. OUTCOMES: Adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality calculated using Cox models. RESULTS: Distributions of mineral metabolism markers differed across DOPPS countries and phases, with lower calcium and phosphorus levels observed in the most recent phase of DOPPS. Survival models identified categories with the lowest mortality risk for calcium (8.6 to 10.0 mg/dL), Ca(Alb) (7.6 to 9.5 mg/dL), phosphorus (3.6 to 5.0 mg/dL), and PTH (101 to 300 pg/mL). The greatest risk of mortality was found for calcium or Ca(Alb) levels greater than 10.0 mg/dL, phosphorus levels greater than 7.0 mg/dL, and PTH levels greater than 600 pg/mL and in patients with combinations of high-risk categories of calcium, phosphorus, and PTH. LIMITATIONS: Because of the observational nature of DOPPS, this study can only indicate an association between mineral metabolism categories and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide important information about mineral metabolism trends in hemodialysis patients in 12 countries during a decade. The risk categories identified in the DOPPS cohort may be relevant to efforts at international harmonization of existing clinical guidelines for mineral metabolism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: The impact of the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Bone Metabolism and Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease has not been assessed. METHODS: We compared albumin-adjusted serum calcium, phosphate, calcium x phosphate (Ca x P) product, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) values among active hemodialysis patients who received care at Dialysis Clinic Inc facilities during 8-month periods before (n = 9,516) and after (n = 9,543) the October 2003 release of the KDOQI guidelines. We examined the impact of missed sessions, abbreviated sessions, and patient-dietitian ratio on achievement of consistent control (defined as >or= 75% values within guideline targets) for each parameter. We also evaluated whether achievement of consistent control of a given parameter precluded control of another. RESULTS: There was a modest decrease in mean per-patient concentration for all mineral metabolic indicators after release of the guidelines. Similarly, the proportion of values within the recommended ranges for serum calcium, phosphate, and Ca x P product increased, but remained unchanged for PTH. The likelihood of achieving consistent control for each indicator increased when other parameters were concomitantly in range. Missed dialysis sessions were associated with a lower likelihood of achieving consistent control of calcium, phosphate, and Ca x P product levels, whereas abbreviated sessions were associated inversely with consistent achievement of phosphate and Ca x P product target levels. Variations in patient-dietitian ratio had no discernible association with mineral metabolic control. CONCLUSION: The KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Bone Metabolism and Disease had a small, but noticeable, effect in the year after their release. Additional studies should evaluate whether achievement of the prescribed target levels confers an advantage with respect to relevant clinical outcomes. Copyright © 2007 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Keywords:acute renal failure; antiphospholipid antibody syndrome; membranous obstruction of the inferior vena cava; percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; thrombolytic therapy [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

A response by F. Tentori and colleagues to a letter to the editor about their article "Mortality risk among hemodialysis patients receiving different vitamin D analogs" in the previous issue is presented.

A response by F. Tentori to a letter to the editor about his article "Survival differences between activated injectable vitamin D2 and D3 analogs" in the previous issue is presented.

Background: Incremental peritoneal dialysis (PD) can be defined as a PD prescription that is less than the standard, full dose prescription and is typically used for patients initiating PD with residual kidney function. It has been suggested that use of incremental peritoneal dialysis may help preserve residual kidney function and may offer better quality of life due to the lower treatment burden, however published evidence is limited. In this study we assessed the associations between incremental peritoneal dialysis use and both clinical outcomes and quality of life measures in a large cohort of incident peritoneal dialysis patients in the US., Methods: We considered adult patients initiating peritoneal dialysis between 31 July, 2015 and 31 May, 2019 within a single dialysis organization. Patients with body weight < 40 kg, amputation, or an estimated glomerular filtration rate > 20 mL/min during the first 4 weeks on peritoneal dialysis were excluded. Patients were assigned to exposure groups based on peritoneal dialysis prescription during dialysis weeks 5-8. Incremental peritoneal dialysis was defined by treatment frequency, number of exchanges/day, and exchange volume (for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients) or by treatment frequency and presence/absence of last fill (for automated peritoneal dialysis patients). Analyses were performed separately for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and automated peritoneal dialysis. For each analysis, incremental peritoneal dialysis patients were propensity score matched to eligible full-dose peritoneal dialysis patients. Patients were followed for a maximum of 12 months until censoring for loss to follow-up or study end. Outcomes were compared using Poisson models (mortality, hospitalization, peritoneal dialysis discontinuation), linear mixed models (estimated glomerular filtration rate), and paired t tests (KDQOL domain scores)., Results: Among continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients, compared to full-dose peritoneal dialysis, incremental peritoneal dialysis use was associated with better KDQOL scores on 3 domains: physical composite score (42.5 vs 37.7, p = 0.03), burden of kidney disease (60.2 vs 45.6, p = 0.003), effects of kidney disease (79.4 vs 72.3, p = 0.05). Hospitalization and mortality rates were numerically lower (0.77 vs 1.12 admits/pt-year, p = 0.09 and 5.0 vs 10.2 deaths/100 pt-years, p = 0.22), while no associations were found with estimated glomerular filtration rate or peritoneal dialysis discontinuation rate. Use of incremental peritoneal dialysis was not associated with any discernable effects on outcomes in automated peritoneal dialysis patients., Conclusion: These results suggest that there may be benefits of using incremental PD in the context of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, particularly with respect to quality of life as a prescription strategy when initiating peritoneal dialysis. While no significant benefits of incremental peritoneal dialysis were detected among patients initiating automated peritoneal dialysis, no detrimental effects of using incremental schedules were observed for either peritoneal dialysis type., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Italian Society of Nephrology.)

The majority of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients start dialysis without adequate pre-dialysis planning. Of these patients, the vast majority initiate in-centre haemodialysis using a central venous catheter (ICHD-CVC). A minority utilise urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD), whereby a peritoneal dialysis catheter is placed and used for dialysis without the usual 2-4-week waiting period. In this multicentre, retrospective study of adult patients initiating dialysis during 2018, we compared outcomes among patients utilising these two dialysis initiation routes. Patients who initiated dialysis via ICHD-CVC were matched 1:1 to patients who utilised USPD on the basis of aetiology of ESKD, race, diabetes status and insurance type. Hospitalisation and mortality were evaluated from dialysis initiation through the first of death, transplant, loss to follow-up or study end (30 June 2019). Outcomes were compared using models adjusted for age and sex. A total of 717 USPD patients were matched to ICHD-CVC patients. During follow-up, USPD patients were hospitalised at a rate of 1.21 admissions/patient-year (pt-yr) versus 1.51 admissions/pt-yr for ICHD-CVC. This corresponded to a 24% lower rate of hospitalisation among USPD patients (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.88). Mortality rates were 0.08 and 0.11 deaths/pt-yr among USPD patients and ICHD-CVC patients, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.62, 1.15). These findings suggest that more widespread adoption of USPD may be beneficial among patients with limited pre-dialysis planning.

Skeletal muscle cramping is a common and bothersome symptom for patients on maintenance dialysis therapy, regardless of modality, and it has not been prioritized for innovative assessments or treatments. Research to prevent or treat skeletal muscle cramping in patients receiving dialysis is hindered by poorly understood pathophysiology, lack of an accepted definition, and the absence of a standardized measurement method. The Kidney Health Initiative, a public-private partnership between the American Society of Nephrology and US Food and Drug Administration, convened a multidisciplinary workgroup to define a set of patient-reported outcome measures for use in clinical trials to test the effect of new dialysis devices, new KRTs, lifestyle/behavioral modifications, and medications on skeletal muscle cramping. Upon determining that foundational work was necessary, the workgroup undertook a multistep process to elicit concepts central to developing the basis for demonstrating content validity of candidate patient-reported outcome measures for skeletal muscle cramping in patients on dialysis. The workgroup sought to ( 1 ) create an accepted, patient-endorsed definition for skeletal muscle cramping that applies to all dialysis modalities, ( 2 ) construct a conceptual model for developing and evaluating a skeletal muscle cramping-specific patient-reported outcome measure, and ( 3 ) identify potential questions from existing patient-reported outcome measures that could be modified or adapted and subsequently tested in the dialysis population. We report the results of the workgroup's efforts, provide our recommendations, and issue a call to action to address the gaps in knowledge and research needs we identified. These action steps are urgently needed to quantify skeletal muscle cramping burden, assess the effect, and measure meaningful changes of new interventions to improve the experience of patients receiving dialysis and suffering from skeletal muscle cramping., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

The end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) Data Standards Project was launched by the Kidney Health Initiative (KHI) with the goal of standardizing dialysis-related measurements for research use. KHI is a public-private partnership between the American Society of Nephrology, US Food and Drug Administration, and organizations with an interest in kidney disease. KHI promotes safe and effective patient-centered therapies for people with kidney disease. In 2018, KHI established a workgroup with expertise in nephrology, nursing, quality management, ESKD data, organizational management, and clinical research. The workgroup identified 5 topic areas and 8 specific measures for the development of standards on the basis of the existing ESKD Measurement Specification Manual published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The topic areas were ultrafiltration rate, vascular access, dialysis small solute clearance (3 data standards), hospitalization (2 data standards), and mortality. The research standards were approved by the workgroup, reviewed by external reviewers, and opened to public comment. The data standards attempt to achieve balance between brevity and completeness in the face of knowledge gaps. The ESKD Data Standards are publicly available on the KHI website (https://khi.asn-online.org/projects/project.aspx?ID=78)., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Rationale & Objective: Treatment options for kidney failure are complex, and the majority of patients transitioning to dialysis lack important information about treatment options and are not prepared to make informed decisions about their care. Correspondingly, the majority of patients who start dialysis default to in-center hemodialysis using a central venous catheter for vascular access as the initial modality; furthermore, hospital admissions, mortality, and infections are exceedingly common over the first few months., Study Design: Matched retrospective cohort study., Setting & Patients: 2,398 adult patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who attended a structured CKD education program and pair-matched control patients who did not receive education before starting dialysis between January 2018 and June 2019., Exposure: CKD education attendance documented from 2 months (60 days)-3 years before dialysis initiation. CKD education consisted of a 1-time, 90-minute, inperson or virtual class., Outcome: Primary outcomes were dialysis modality and vascular access type on the first day of dialysis (day 0) and at day 90 after dialysis initiation. Secondary outcomes included hospitalizations and deaths during the first year of receiving dialysis., Analytical Approach: Generalized linear models were used to compare outcomes between patients receiving CKD education and controls., Results: Compared with controls, CKD education patients were more frequently receiving home dialysis (38.5% vs 12.6%, P  < 0.001) and used a permanent vascular access (57.9% vs 33.8%, P  < 0.001) at dialysis initiation; differences were minimally attenuated and remained statistically significant at day 90. Hospitalization rates were lower among CKD education patients than among controls during the first year of receiving dialysis (1.00 vs 1.38 admissions per patient-year; P  < 0.001). CKD education patients also had lower mortality over the first year of receiving dialysis ( P  < 0.001)., Limitations: Bias and confounding cannot fully be accounted for in an observational study. Analyses only included patients with commercial and Medicare insurance who received CKD care before dialysis initiation and may not be generalizable to other patient populations., Conclusions: Our findings indicate that attending a CKD education class before starting dialysis resulted in positive clinical outcomes, including reduction in hospitalization and mortality rates. Broad implementation of structured CKD education may result in more patients choosing home dialysis as their first treatment option and reduce the risk of adverse outcomes in the crucial early period after dialysis initiation., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: Studies have demonstrated that mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are highly effective among patients on dialysis. Because individual vaccines may be differentially available or acceptable to patients, it is important to understand comparative effectiveness relative to other vaccines, such those on the basis of adenovirus technologies., Methods: In this retrospective study, we compared the clinical effectiveness of adenovirus vector-based Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen/Johnson & Johnson) to mRNA-based BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) in a contemporary cohort of patients on dialysis. Patients who received a first BNT162b2 dose were matched 1:1 to Ad26.COV2.S recipients on the basis of date of first vaccine receipt, US state of residence, site of dialysis care (in-center versus home), history of COVID-19, and propensity score. The primary outcome was the comparative rate of COVID-19 diagnoses starting in the 7th week postvaccination. In a subset of consented patients who received Ad26.COV2.S, blood samples were collected ≥28 days after vaccination and anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G antibodies were measured., Results: A total of 2572 matched pairs of patients qualified for analysis. Cumulative incidence rates of COVID-19 did not differ for BNT162b2 versus Ad26.COV2.S. No differences were observed in peri-COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths among patients receiving BNT162b2 versus Ad26.COV2.S, who were diagnosed with COVID-19 during the at-risk period. Results were similar when excluding patients with a history of COVID-19, in subgroup analyses restricted to patients who completed the two-dose BNT162b2 regimen, and in patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in 59.4% of 244 patients who received Ad26.COV2.S., Conclusions: In a large real-world cohort of patients on dialysis, no difference was detected in clinical effectiveness of BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S over the first 6 months postvaccination, despite an inconsistent antibody response to the latter., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Ene-reductases from the Old Yellow Enzyme (OYE) superfamily are a well-known and efficient biocatalytic alternative for the asymmetric reduction of C=C bonds. Considering the broad variety of substituents that can be tolerated, and the excellent stereoselectivities achieved, it is apparent why these enzymes are so appealing for preparative and industrial applications. Different classes of C=C bonds activated by at least one electron-withdrawing group have been shown to be accepted by these versatile biocatalysts in the last decades, affording a vast range of chiral intermediates employed in the synthesis of pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, flavours, fragrances and fine chemicals. In order to access both enantiomers of reduced products, stereodivergent pairs of OYEs are desirable, but their natural occurrence is limited. The detailed knowledge of the stereochemical course of the reaction can uncover alternative strategies to orient the selectivity via mutagenesis, evolution, and substrate engineering. An overview of the ongoing studies on OYE-mediated bioreductions will be provided, with particular focus on stereochemical investigations by deuterium labelling., (© 2021 The Authors. ChemBioChem published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.)

Background: Patients on hemodialysis have an elevated risk for COVID-19 but were not included in efficacy trials of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines., Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational study to estimate the real-world effectiveness and immunogenicity of two mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in a large, representative population of adult hemodialysis patients in the United States. In separate, parallel analyses, patients who began a vaccination series with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 in January and February 2021 were matched with unvaccinated patients and risk for outcomes were compared for days 1-21, 22-42, and ≥43 after first dose. In a subset of consented patients, blood samples were collected approximately 28 days after the second dose and anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G was measured., Results: A total of 12,169 patients received the BNT162b2 vaccine (matched with 44,377 unvaccinated controls); 23,037 patients received the mRNA-1273 vaccine (matched with 63,243 unvaccinated controls). Compared with controls, vaccinated patients' risk of being diagnosed with COVID-19 postvaccination became progressively lower during the study period (hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval for BNT162b2 was 0.21 [0.13, 0.35] and for mRNA-1273 was 0.27 [0.17, 0.42] for days ≥43). After a COVID-19 diagnosis, vaccinated patients were significantly less likely than unvaccinated patients to be hospitalized (for BNT162b2, 28.0% versus 43.4%; for mRNA-1273, 37.2% versus 45.6%) and significantly less likely to die (for BNT162b2, 4.0% versus 12.1%; for mRNA-1273, 5.6% versus 14.5%). Antibodies were detected in 98.1% (309/315) and 96.0% (308/321) of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 patients, respectively., Conclusions: In patients on hemodialysis, vaccination with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 was associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 diagnosis and lower risk of hospitalization or death among those diagnosed with COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in nearly all patients after vaccination. These findings support the use of these vaccines in this population., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

The demand for natural food flavorings increases every year. Biotransformation has become an attractive approach to obtain natural products. In this work, enantiomerically pure (R)-(+)-δ-decalactone was obtained by reduction of the C=C double bond of natural massoia lactone in a continuous-flow reactor. Of 13 different ene-reductases isolated, purified and tested, OYE3 was found to be the most efficient biocatalyst. The selected biocatalyst, either in the form of purified enzyme, cell lysate, whole cells or immobilized cells, was tested in the batch system as well as in the packed-bed flow bioreactor. The biotransformation performed in batch mode, using Ca 2+ -alginate immobilized cells of Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)/pET30a-OYE3, furnished the desired product with complete conversion in 30 min. The process was intensified using a continuous-flow reactor-membrane filtration system (flow 0.1 mL/min, substrate concentration 10 mM, pH 7, 24 °C) with cell lysate as biocatalyst combined with a cofactor regeneration system, which allowed obtaining > 99% bioconversion of massoia lactone., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Although reinfection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is rare among individuals with few coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) risk factors, the ability of naturally acquired immunity to prevent reinfection among patients with ESKD is not known., Methods: This prospective study was conducted among adults with ESKD treated with in-center hemodialysis (ICHD) in the United States. Exposure was ascribed on the basis of the presence or absence of IgG against SARS-CoV-2 at baseline, and separately, a history of documented COVID-19 before study entry. Outcomes were assessed after an infection-free period, and were any SARS-CoV-2 infection ( i.e., detected by protocolized PCR tests or during routine clinical surveillance), and clinically manifest COVID-19 (consisting of only the latter)., Results: Of 2337 consented participants who met study inclusion criteria, 9.5% were anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive at baseline; 3.6% had a history of COVID-19. Over 6679 patient-months of follow-up, 263 participants had evidence of any SARS-CoV-2 infection, including 141 who had clinically manifest COVID-19. Presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (versus its absence) at baseline was associated with lower risk of any SARS-CoV-2 infection (incidence rate ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.95) and clinically manifest COVID-19 0.21 (95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.67)., Conclusion: Among patients with ESKD, naturally acquired anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG positivity is associated with a 45% lower risk of subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection, and a 79% lower risk of clinically manifest COVID-19. Because natural immunity is incomplete, patients with ESKD should be prioritized for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, independent of their COVID-19 disease history., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Background: Decisions about dialysis for advanced kidney disease are often strongly shaped by sociocultural and system-level factors rather than the priorities and values of individual patients. We examined international variation in the uptake of conservative approaches to the care of patients with advanced kidney disease, in particular discontinuation of dialysis., Methods: We employed an observational cohort study design using data collected from patients maintained on long-term hemodialysis between 1996 and 2015 in facilities across 12 developed countries participating in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). The main outcome was discontinuation of dialysis therapy. We analyzed the association between several patient characteristics and time to dialysis discontinuation by country and phase of study entry., Results: A total of 259 343 DOPPS patients contributed data to the study, of whom 48 519 (18.7%) died during the study period. Of the decedents, 5808 (12.0%) discontinued dialysis before death. Rates of discontinuation were higher within the first few months after initiation of dialysis, among older adults, among those with a greater number of comorbidities and among those living in an institution. After adjustment for age, sex, dialysis duration, diabetes and dialysis era, rates of discontinuation were highest in Canada, the United States and Australia/New Zealand (33.8, 31.4 and 21.5 per 1000/yr, respectively) and lowest in Japan and Italy (< 0.1 per 1000/yr). Crude discontinuation rates were highest in dialysis facilities that were more likely to offer comprehensive conservative renal care to older adults., Interpretation: We found persistent international variation in average rates of dialysis discontinuation not explained by differences in patient case-mix. These differences may reflect physician-, facility- and society-level differences in clinical practice. There may be opportunities for international cross-collaboration to improve support for patients with end-stage renal disease who prefer a more conservative approach., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Kitty Jager reports speaker fees from Fresenius Medical Care. Ronald Pisoni reports that this project was supported by funds from a consortium of funders who have supported the international DOPPS Program without restrictions on publications; the organizations are listed at www.dopps.org/AboutUs/Support.aspx. No other competing interests were declared., (© 2020 Joule Inc. or its licensors.)

A chemo-enzymatic approach for the conversion of oleic acid into azelaic and pelargonic acid is herein described. It represents a sustainable alternative to ozonolysis, currently employed at the industrial scale to perform the reaction. Azelaic acid is produced in high chemical purity in 44% isolation yield after three steps, avoiding column chromatography purifications. In the first step, the lipase-mediated generation of peroleic acid in the presence of 35% H 2 O 2 is employed for the self-epoxidation of the unsaturated acid to the corresponding oxirane derivative. This intermediate is submitted to in situ acid-catalyzed opening, to afford 9,10-dihydroxystearic acid, which readily crystallizes from the reaction medium. The chemical oxidation of the diol derivative, using atmospheric oxygen as a stoichiometric oxidant with catalytic quantities of Fe(NO 3 ) 3 ∙9∙H 2 O, (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO), and NaCl, affords 9,10-dioxostearic acid which is cleaved by the action of 35% H 2 O 2 in mild conditions, without requiring any catalyst, to give pelargonic and azelaic acid.

Rationale & Objective: Among patients treated with in-center hemodialysis (HD), missed treatments are associated with higher subsequent rates of hospitalization and other adverse outcomes compared with attending treatment. The objective of this study was to determine whether and to what degree attending a rescheduled treatment on the day following a missed treatment ameliorates these risks., Study Design: Retrospective, observational., Setting & Participants: Included patients were those who were, as of any of 12 index dates during 2014, adult Medicare beneficiaries treated with in-center HD (vintage ≥ 90 days) on a Monday/Wednesday/Friday schedule., Exposure: Treatment attendance on the index date and the subsequent day., Outcomes: Hospital admissions, emergency department visits, mortality, blood pressure, and anemia measures, considered during the 7- and 30-day periods following exposure., Analytical Approach: In parallel analyses, patients who missed or rescheduled treatment were each matched (1:5) to patients who attended treatment on the index date on the basis of index day of week and propensity score. Within the matched cohorts, outcomes were compared across exposures using repeated-measures generalized linear models., Results: Compared with attending treatment (N = 19,260), a missed treatment (N = 3,852) was associated with a 2.09-fold higher rate of hospitalization in the subsequent 7 days; a rescheduled treatment (N = 2,128) was associated with a 1.68-fold higher rate of hospitalization than attending (N = 10,640). Compared with attending treatment, hospitalization rates were 1.39- and 1.28-fold higher among patients who missed and rescheduled treatment, respectively, during the 30-day outcome period. Emergency department visits followed a similar pattern of associations as hospitalization. No statistically significant associations were observed with respect to mortality for either missed or rescheduled treatments compared with attending treatment., Limitations: Possible influence of unmeasured confounding; unknown generalizability to patients with non-Medicare insurance., Conclusions: Attending a rescheduled in-center HD treatment attenuates but does not fully mitigate the adverse effects of a missed treatment., (© 2019 The Authors.)

Long-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is associated with an increased risk of fractures in the general population. PPIs are widely prescribed to dialysis patients but to date no study has specifically tested, by state-of-art statistical methods, the relationship between use of PPIs and fractures in this patient population. This study aimed to assess whether use of PPIs is associated with bone fractures (ie, hip fractures and fractures other than hip fractures) in a large international cohort of hemodialysis patients. We considered an observational prospective cohort of 27,097 hemodialysis patients from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Data analysis was performed by the Fine and Gray method, considering the competitive risk of mortality, as well as by a cause-specific hazards Cox model with death as a censoring event and matching patients according to the prescription time. Of 27,097 hemodialysis patients, 13,283 patients (49%) were on PPI treatment. Across the follow-up period (median, 19 months), 3.8 bone fractures × 100 person-years and 1.2 hip fractures × 100 person-years occurred. In multiple Cox models, considering the competitive risk of mortality, the incidence rate of bone (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.36; p < 0.001) and hip fractures (SHR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.62; p = 0.001) was significantly higher in PPI-treated than in PPI-untreated patients. These findings also held true in multiple, cause-specific, hazards Cox models matching patients according to the prescription time (bone fractures: HR 1.47; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.76; p < 0.001; hip fractures: HR 1.85; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.50; p < 0.001). The use of PPIs requires caution and a careful evaluation of risks/benefits ratio in hemodialysis patients. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research., (© 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)

Background: Prior studies have developed a chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) composite score based on combinations of calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) that have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of clinical outcomes in the USA. We examined this association in a contemporary, international cohort of hemodialysis patients., Methods: We studied 19 313 patients surviving ≥12 months in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study Phases 3-5 (2005-15) from Europe, Canada and the USA. The CKD-MBD composite score was defined as the number of markers above target levels (P, 3.5-5.5 mg/dL; Ca, 8.4-10.2 mg/dL; PTH, 150-600 pg/mL). Using Cox models, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for death and a composite event (death or hospitalization), contrasting MBD 2/3 (2-3 parameters above target) with MBD 0 (all in target), adjusted for a disease risk score (DRS)., Results: MBD 2/3 above target was observed in 10-14% of patients across regions and was associated with greater DRS-adjusted mortality {HR 1.41 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.82]} and composite events [HR 1.23 (95% CI 1.10-1.38)] in the USA compared with MBD 0; the mortality association was stronger for patients ≥ 65 years of age [HR 1.82 (95% CI 1.28-2.58)] compared with patients <65 years of age [HR 1.11 (95% CI 0.80-1.55)]. HRs observed in Canada and Europe were generally consistent but weaker. Estimates for MBD 2/3 outside target (above or below) were slightly lower in all regions., Conclusions: Simultaneous consideration of Ca, P and PTH may help in identifying patients on dialysis with a higher risk of major clinical outcomes related to CKD-MBD., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA.)

Background: Hypoalbuminemia is a strong predictor of hospitalization and mortality among adult dialysis patients. However, data are scant on the association between serum albumin and hospitalization among children new to dialysis., Methods: In a retrospective cohort study of children 1-17 years old with end-stage renal disease receiving dialysis therapy in a large US dialysis organization 2007-2011, we examined the association of serum albumin with hospitalization frequency and total hospitalization days using a negative binomial regression model., Results: Among 416 eligible patients, median (interquartile range) age was 14 (10-16) years and mean ± SD baseline serum albumin level was 3.7 ± 0.8 g/dL. Two hundred sixty-six patients (64%) were hospitalized during follow-up with an incidence rate of 2.2 (95%CI, 1.9-2.4) admissions per patient-year. There was a U-shaped association between serum albumin and hospitalization frequency; hospitalization rates (95%CI) were 2.7 (2.2-3.2), 1.9 (1.5-2.4), 1.6 (1.3-1.9), and 2.7 (1.7-3.6) per patient-year among patients with serum albumin levels < 3.5, 3.5- < 4.0, 4.0- < 4.5, and ≥ 4.5 g/dL, respectively. Case mix-adjusted hospitalization incidence rate ratios (IRRs) (95%CI) were 1.63 (1.24-2.13), 1.32 (1.10-1.58), and 1.25 (1.06-1.49) at serum albumin levels 3.0, 3.5, and 4.5 g/dL, respectively (reference: 4.0 g/dL). Similar trends were observed in hospitalization days. These associations remained robust against further adjustment for laboratory variables associated with malnutrition and inflammation., Conclusions: Both high and low serum albumin were associated with higher hospitalization in children starting dialysis. Because the observed association is novel and not fully explainable especially for high serum albumin levels, interpreting the results requires caution and further studies are needed to confirm and elucidate this association before clinical recommendations are made.

Rationale & Objective: Annually, about 100,000 US patients face the difficult choice between the most common dialysis types, in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. This study evaluated the value of a new decision aid to assist in the choice of dialysis modality., Study Design: A parallel-group randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of the decision aid on decision-making outcomes., Setting & Participants: English-speaking US adults with advanced chronic kidney disease and internet access enrolled in 2015., Intervention: Participants randomly assigned to the decision aid intervention received information about chronic kidney disease, peritoneal dialysis, and hemodialysis and a value clarification exercise through the study website using their own electronic devices. Participants in the control arm were only required to complete the control questionnaire. Questionnaire responses were used to assess differences across arms in decision-making outcomes., Outcomes: Treatment preference, decisional conflict, decision self-efficacy, knowledge, and preparation for decision making., Results: Of 234 consented participants, 94 (40.2%) were lost to follow-up before starting the study. Among the 140 (70 in each arm) who started the study, 7 were subsequently lost to follow-up. Decision aid users had lower decisional conflict scores (42.5 vs 29.1; P<0.001) and higher average knowledge scores (90.3 vs 76.5; P<0.001). Both arms had high decisional self-efficacy scores independent of decision aid use. Uncertainty about choice of dialysis treatment declined from 46% to 16% after using the decision aid. Almost all (>90%) users of the decision aid reported that it helped in decision making., Limitations: Limited generalizability from the study of self-selected study participants who had to have internet access, speak English, and have computer literacy. High postrandomization loss to follow-up. Evaluation of only short-term outcomes., Conclusions: The decision aid improves decision-making outcomes immediately after use. Implementation of the decision aid in clinical practice may allow further assessment of its effects on patient engagement and empowerment in choosing a dialysis modality., Funding: This study was funded through a Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) award (#1109)., Trial Registration: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT02488317., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The putative benefits of cinacalcet therapy for management of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) are thought to be most manifested when patients are taking it consistently and as prescribed. Real-world descriptions of cinacalcet prescription discontinuation and reinitiation in European hemodialysis patients are lacking. To address this knowledge gap, we used Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) data, based on dialysis facility medical records, from seven European countries to estimate rates and predictors of cinacalcet prescription discontinuation and reinitiation in hemodialysis patients and to describe the trajectories of CKD-MBD laboratory values after discontinuation., Methods: Cox regression analyses were used to predict (1) cinacalcet discontinuation among 613 patients with ≥3 consecutive months without cinacalcet prescription immediately prior to a new cinacalcet prescription and (2) cinacalcet reinitiation among 415 patients with a newly discontinued cinacalcet prescription immediately after ≥3 consecutive months of prescribed use., Results: Cinacalcet was discontinued in 21 and 35% of new users after 6 and 12 months, respectively. Cinacalcet was reinitiated in 38 and 49% of newly-discontinued users after 6 and 12 months, respectively. Predictors of discontinuation included lower parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the previous month (< 150 pg/ml vs. 150-299, HR = 2.57 [95% CI: 1.52-4.33]) and lower serum calcium in the previous month (< 8.4 mg/dl vs. 8.4-10.19, HR = 1.67 [95% CI: 1.08-2.59]). Predictors of reinitiation included higher PTH in the previous month (300-599 pg/ml vs. 150-299, HR = 1.88 [95% CI = 1.19-2.97]; 600+ pg/ml, HR = 3.02 [95% CI = 1.92-4.76]). After cinacalcet discontinuation, mean serum PTH increased from 408 to 510 pg/ml, mean serum calcium briefly rose from 9.12 to 9.22 mg/dl before declining to 9.06 mg/dl, and mean serum phosphorus showed little change., Conclusions: Nephrologist discontinuation of cinacalcet therapy is common in European countries. Additional research is needed to identify optimal cinacalcet treatment strategies for SHPT management, including comparisons of intermittent cinacalcet therapy versus sustained treatment with reduced dose or frequency.

Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a key outcome for dialysis patients, and its assessment is mandated by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. The Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL-36™) survey is widely used for this assessment. KDQOL-36™ completion rates, and the distributions of scores and item responses, have not been examined in a large, nationally representative cohort of dialysis patients., Methods: This retrospective, observational study considered 413,951 survey opportunities contributed by adult patients who received dialysis at a large dialysis organization in the United States during calendar years 2014, 2015, and 2016 and were not Veterans Affairs beneficiaries., Results: During the study period, 240,343 unique patients completed a total of 330,412 surveys (overall completion rate 79.8%). Mean domain scores on the physical component summary (PCS), mental component summary (MCS), burden of kidney disease (BKD), symptoms and problems of kidney disease (SPKD), and effects of kidney disease (EKD) subscales were 36.6, 49.0, 51.3, 78.1, and 73.0, respectively. Scores were similar across dialysis modalities. Patient perceptions of general health were not correlated (R < 0.05) with PCS or SPKD. The SPKD showed ceiling effects: among patients treated with in-center hemodialysis, for all 12 items, < 10% of patients were "extremely bothered," while > 65% of patients reported being "not at all" or only "somewhat bothered;" for 3 items, > 85% of patients gave these latter two responses. Interdialytic weight gain was not correlated with patient-reported shortness of breath, PCS, or SPKD., Conclusions: Survey completion rates for the KDQOL-36™ were high, and scores were similar across dialysis modalities. Ceiling effects were observed for SPKD. Revision of the KDQOL-36™ to address factors that are most important to contemporary dialysis patients may be warranted.

Background and Objectives: Loop diuretics are commonly used to manage nondialysis-dependent CKD. Despite benefits of augmented urine output, loop diuretics are often discontinued after dialysis initiation. Here, we assessed the association of the early decision to continue loop diuretics at hemodialysis start with clinical outcomes during the first year of dialysis., Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: We considered all patients on in-center hemodialysis at a large dialysis organization (2006-2013) with Medicare Part A and D benefits who had an active supply of a loop diuretic at dialysis initiation ( n =11,297). Active therapy was determined on the basis of whether loop diuretic prescription was refilled after dialysis initiation and within 30 days of exhaustion of prior supply. Patients were followed under an intention-to-treat paradigm for up to 12 months for rates of death, hospitalization, and intradialytic hypotension and mean monthly values of interdialytic weight gain, serum potassium, predialysis systolic BP, and ultrafiltration rates., Results: We identified 5219 patients who refilled a loop diuretic and 6078 eligible controls who did not. After adjustments for patient mix and clinical differences, continuation of loop diuretics was associated with lower hospitalization (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 0.98) and intradialytic hypotension (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 0.99) rates, no difference in death rate (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.01), and lower interdialytic weight gain ( P =0.03)., Conclusions: Continuation of loop diuretics after hemodialysis initiation was associated with lower rates of hospitalization and intradialytic hypotension as well as lower interdialytic weight gain, but there was no difference in mortality over the first year of dialysis., (Copyright © 2019 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Rationale & Objective: Missed hemodialysis (HD) treatments not due to hospitalization have been associated with poor clinical outcomes and related in part to treatment nonadherence. Using data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) phase 5 (2012-2015), we report findings from an international investigation of missed treatments among patients prescribed thrice-weekly HD., Study Design: Prospective observational study., Setting & Participants: 8,501 patients participating in DOPPS, on HD therapy for more than 120 days, from 20 countries. Longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses were performed based on the 4,493 patients from countries in which 4-month missed treatment risk was > 5%., Predictors: The main predictor of patient outcomes was 1 or more missed treatments in the 4 months before DOPPS phase 5 enrollment; predictors of missed treatments included country, patient characteristics, and clinical factors., Outcomes: Mortality, hospitalization, laboratory measures, patient-reported outcomes, and 4-month missed treatment risk., Analytical Approach: Outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional hazards, logistic, and linear regression, adjusting for case-mix and country., Results: The 4-month missed treatment risk varied more than 50-fold across all 20 DOPPS countries, ranging from < 1% in Italy and Japan to 24% in the United States. Missed treatments were more likely with younger age, less time on dialysis therapy, shorter HD treatment time, lower Kt/V, longer travel time to HD centers, and more symptoms of depression. Missed treatments were positively associated with all-cause mortality (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.37-2.05), cardiovascular mortality, sudden death/cardiac arrest, hospitalization, serum phosphorus level > 5.5mg/dL, parathyroid hormone level > 300pg/mL, hemoglobin level < 10g/dL, higher kidney disease burden, and worse general and mental health., Limitations: Possible residual confounding; temporal ambiguity in the cross-sectional analyses., Conclusions: In the countries with a 4-month missed treatment risk > 5%, HD patients were more likely to die, be hospitalized, and have poorer patient-reported outcomes and laboratory measures when 1 or more missed treatments occurred in a 4-month period. The large variation in missed treatments across 20 nations suggests that their occurrence is potentially modifiable, especially in the United States and other countries in which missed treatment risk is high., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients reaching end-stage renal disease must make a difficult decision regarding renal replacement therapy (RRT) options. Because the choice between dialysis modalities should include patient preferences, it is critical that patients are engaged in the dialysis modality decision. As part of the Empowering Patients on Choices for RRT (EPOCH-RRT) study, we assessed dialysis patients' perceptions of their dialysis modality decision-making process and the impact of their chosen modality on their lives., Methods: A 39-question survey was developed in collaboration with a multi-stakeholder advisory panel to assess perceptions of patients on either peritoneal dialysis (PD) or in-center hemodialysis (HD). The survey was disseminated to participants in the large US cohorts of the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) and the Peritoneal DOPPS (PDOPPS). Survey responses were compared between PD and in-center HD patients using descriptive statistics, adjusted logistic generalized estimating equation models, and linear mixed regression models., Results: Six hundred fourteen PD and 1346 in-center HD participants responded. Compared with in-center HD participants, PD participants more frequently reported that they were engaged in the decision-making process, were provided enough information, understood differences between dialysis modalities, and felt satisfied with their modality choice. PD participants also reported more frequently than in-center HD participants that partners or spouses (79% vs. 70%), physician assistants (80% vs. 66%), and nursing staff (78% vs. 60%) had at least some involvement in the dialysis modality decision. Over 35% of PD and in-center HD participants did not know another dialysis patient at the time of their modality decision and over 60% did not know the disadvantages of their modality type. Participants using either dialysis modality perceived a moderate to high impact of dialysis on their lives., Conclusions: PD participants were more engaged in the modality decision process compared to in-center HD participants. For both modalities, there is room for improvement in patient education and other support for patients choosing a dialysis modality.

The benefits of renin angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) are well-established in the general population, particularly among those with diabetes, congestive heart failure (CHF), or coronary artery disease (CAD). However, conflicting evidence from trials and concerns about hyperkalemia limit RAASi use in hemodialysis patients, relative to other antihypertensive agents, including beta blockers and calcium channel blockers. Therefore, we investigated prescription patterns and associations with mortality for RAASi and other antihypertensive agents using data from the international Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Cox regression was used to estimate the effect of the prescription of RAASi and other antihypertensive agents at study entry on mortality in 11,421 incident (120 days or less) hemodialysis and 37,124 prevalent (over 120 days) hemodialysis patients from DOPPS phases 2-5 (2002-2015). Over 95% of RAASi were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. RAASi prevalence was 39% and varied minimally by CHF and CAD. The adjusted hazard ratio for RAASi (vs. no RAASi) was 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.80-0.99) among incident and 0.94 (0.90-0.99) among prevalent hemodialysis patients, with no convincing evidence of interaction with diabetes, CAD or CHF. Inverse associations with mortality were also observed for beta blockers and calcium channel blockers, and were stronger for angiotensin receptor blockers than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, but this latter finding requires further study. Thus, our observations suggest a relatively small survival benefit of RAASi and other antihypertensive agents in hemodialysis patients, though randomized prospective studies are needed to potentially change prescribing criteria., (Copyright © 2018 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lower limb ischemia affects the quality of life, physical activity and life expectancy of dialysis patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors associated with ischemic foot ulcers considering clinical, laboratory and therapeutic domains., Methods: This observational cohort study was based on data from the Nephrology and Dialysis Department database of Alessandro Manzoni Hospital, Lecco (Italy). All of the incident patients who started dialysis between 1 January 1999 and 29 February 2012 were enrolled, excluding temporary guests, patients with acute renal failure and patients with previous limb ischemia or amputation. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the predictors in each domain, which were matched in the final model. A time-dependent approach was used to take into account the evolution of some of the prognostic covariates., Results: Of the 526 incident dialysis patients, 120 developed a lower limb ischemic lesion after a median of 13 months. The incidence of new ulcers was constant during the study period (6 per 100 person-years), but higher in the diabetics with a relative rate of 4.5. The variables significantly related to an increased risk of lower limb ulcers were age, male gender, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, treatment with proton pump inhibitors, iron, anticoagulants and calcium-based binders, and blood levels of phosphorus, triglycerides and C-reactive protein., Conclusion: The incidence of lower limb ulcers was highest during the early dialysis follow-up and was associated with, in addition to diabetes, modifiable laboratory and therapeutic predictors such as anticoagulants, proton pump inhibitors, calcium-containing binders, calcimimetics and iron.

Patients' experience of care (PEC) is as an important dimension in quality of care. As a distinct entity from patient satisfaction and patient health-related quality of life, PEC is defined as patients' perceptions of the range of interactions they have with the health care system, including care from providers, facilities, and health plans. While traditionally PEC may be ascertained via informal assessments, in recent years, especially in the United States, there has been a shift towards standardized surveillance of PEC amongst dialysis patients in order to: (1) set a normative expectation regarding the importance of PEC; (2) standardize the components of patients' experience that are assessed to minimize potential "blind spots"; (3) provide a direct "voice" to the patient in communicating perceptions of their care; (4) facilitate comparisons of quality across facilities; and (5) broaden accountability for PEC to the entire multidisciplinary dialysis care team. In this review, we will discuss the significance of PEC as a quality of care metric in dialysis patients; the history of PEC assessment across other health care arenas; the development of the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and Systems survey as a means to standardize PEC assessment among US dialysis patients; experiences in PEC assessment across international dialysis populations; and future areas of research needed to refine the ascertainment of PEC and its impact upon patient outcomes.

Background: With its convective component, hemodiafiltration (HDF) provides better middle molecule clearance compared with hemodialysis (HD) and is postulated to improve survival. A previous analysis of Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) data in 1998-2001 found lower mortality rates for high replacement fluid volume HDF versus HD. Randomized controlled trials have not shown uniform survival advantage for HDF; in secondary (non-randomized) analyses, better outcomes were observed in patients receiving the highest convection volumes., Methods: In a 'real-world' setting, we analyzed patients on dialysis >90 days from seven European countries in DOPPS Phases 4 and 5 (2009-15). Adjusted Cox regression was used to study HDF (versus HD) and mortality, overall and by replacement fluid volume., Results: Among 8567 eligible patients, 2012 (23%) were on HDF, ranging from 42% in Sweden to 12% in Germany. Median follow-up was 1.5 years during which 1988 patients died. The adjusted mortality hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was 1.14 (1.00-1.29) for any HDF versus HD and 1.08 (0.92-1.28) for HDF >20 L replacement fluid volume versus HD. Similar results were found for cardiovascular and infection-related mortality. In an additional analysis aiming to avoid treatment-by-indication bias, we did not observe lower mortality rates in facilities using more HDF (versus HD)., Conclusions: Our results do not support the notion that HDF provides superior patient survival. Further trials designed to test the effect of high-volume HDF (versus lower volume HDF versus HD) on clinical outcomes are needed to adequately inform clinical practices.

Background: Vascular access practice is strongly associated with clinical outcomes. There is substantial international variation in the use of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and grafts (AVGs), as well as AVF maturation time and location., Study Design: Prospective cohort study., Setting & Participants: Hemodialysis patients participating in the prospective Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) from the United States, Japan, and Europe/ANZ (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand), including 3,850 patients receiving 4,247 new AVFs and 842 patients receiving 1,129 new AVGs in 2009 to 2015. AVF location trends were based on 38,868 AVFs recorded in DOPPS 1 to 5 cross-sections (1996-2015)., Predictors: Demographics, comorbid conditions, dialysis vintage, body mass index, facility percentage AVF use, median blood flow rate, and AVF location., Outcomes: AVF location; successful AVF/AVG use (≥30 days of continuous use); time-to-first successful AVF/AVG use (maturation)., Results: During DOPPS 1 to 5, the percentage of AVFs created in the lower arm was consistently ≥93% in Japan and 65% to 77% in Europe/ANZ, but in the United States, this value declined from 70% (DOPPS 1) to 32% (DOPPS 5). Patient characteristics associated with AVF location differed by region. Successful AVF use was 87% in Japan, 67% in Europe/ANZ, and 64% in the United States, whereas successful AVG use was 86%, 75%, and 78%, respectively. Successful AVF use was greater for upper- versus lower-arm AVFs in the United States, with little difference in Europe/ANZ and the opposite pattern in Japan. Median time until first successful AVF use was 10 days in Japan, 46 days in Europe/ANZ, and 82 days in United States; until first successful AVG use: 6, 24, and 29 days, respectively., Limitations: Potential measurement error related to chart data abstraction in multiple hemodialysis facilities., Conclusions: Large international differences exist in AVF location, predictors of AVF location, successful use of AVFs, and time to first AVF/AVG use, challenging what constitutes best practice. The large US shift from lower- to upper-arm AVFs raises serious concerns about long-term health implications for some patients and how policies and practices aimed at increasing AVF use have affected AVF placement location., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Seasons and climate influence the regulation of blood pressure (BP) in the general population and in hemodialysis patients. It is unknown whether this phenomenon varies across the world. Our objective was to estimate BP seasonality in hemodialysis patients from different geographical locations. Patients from 7 European countries (Spain, Italy, France, Belgium, Germany, United Kingdom, and Sweden) participating in the DOPPS (Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study) on years 2005 to 2011 were studied. Factors influencing pre- and postdialysis systolic BP and diastolic BP levels were analyzed by mixed models. There were 9655 patients (median age, 68; 59% male) from 263 facilities, seen every 4 months during a median duration of 1.3 years. Pre- and postdialysis systolic BP increased by a mean estimate of 5.1 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7-6.4 mm Hg) and 4.4 mm Hg (95% CI, 2.9-5.9 mm Hg) for each 10° increase in latitude (1111 km to the North). In the longitudinal analysis, predialysis systolic BP was lower in summer and higher in winter (difference, 1.7 mm Hg; 95% CI, 1.3-2.2 mm Hg), with greater differences in southern locations ( P interaction =0.04). Predialysis systolic BP was inversely associated with outdoor temperature (-0.8 mm Hg/7.2°C; 95% CI, -1.0 to -0.5 mm Hg/7.2°C), with steeper slopes in southern locations ( P interaction =0.005). Results were similar for predialysis diastolic BP. In conclusion, there is a geographical and seasonal gradient of BP in European hemodialysis patients. There is a need to consider these effects when evaluating and treating BP in this population and potentially in others., (© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Background: Abnormal chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) markers have been associated with adverse outcomes in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Dialysate calcium concentration (D-Ca) likely influences serum calcium and phosphorus levels. Optimal D-Ca level remains unclear. We hypothesized that higher D-Ca is associated with cardiovascular events and mortality among Japanese HD patients., Methods: Enrollment data of chronic HD patients in the prospective observational study JDOPPS, phases 1-5 (1999-2015), provided exposures and covariates. All-cause mortality, non-arrhythmic cardiovascular events (NonAR-CVE), or their composites were analyzed by D-Ca, and divided into 2.5, 2.75, and 3.0 mEq/L. To minimize confounding by indication, analyses were restricted to facilities in which at least 90% of patients received the same D-Ca prescription. Association of D-Ca level with outcomes was evaluated in Cox models stratified by phase and accounting for facility clustering. Covariates describing patient demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, CKD-MBD therapy, and facility attributes provided adjustment., Results: Of 9,201 patients included, 25.0% had D-Ca of 2.5 mEq/L; 6.8% D-Ca 2.75; and 68.2% D-Ca 3.0. Median follow-up time was 2.03 years. D-Ca was not associated with all-cause mortality, with hazards ratios for 2.5 vs. 3.0 mEq/L of 0.90 and 95% CI (0.73-1.11), nor with other outcomes. One effect modification occurred, protective for lower D-Ca on NonAR-CVE in the absence of cardiovascular comorbidities (p = 0.032), although corresponding D-Ca effects were not significant after multiple comparisons adjustment (p = 0.261 [D-Ca 2.5] and 0.125 [D-Ca 2.75])., Conclusion: Lowering D-Ca level below 3.0 mEq/L seems not to have a meaningful effect on patient outcomes., (© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background and Objectives: Uremic pruritus in patients on hemodialysis is associated with depression, lower quality of life, and mortality. We studied the prevalence, awareness, and treatment of pruritus to assess how well this important condition is currently managed internationally., Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: Data from 35,452 patients on hemodialysis in up to 17 countries from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study were analyzed to describe pruritus prevalence from 1996 to 2015. Data from 6256 patients and 268 medical directors in 17 countries in 2012-2015 were analyzed to describe predictors, effects, medical directors' awareness, and treatment of pruritus., Results: Patients very much or extremely bothered by itching declined from 28% in 1996 to 18% in 2015. In 2012-2015, among patients nearly always or always bothered by itching, pruritus had a major effect on work and social life; 18% used no treatment for pruritus, and 17% did not report itching to health care staff. In total, 69% of medical directors underestimated the prevalence of pruritus in their unit. Managing high serum phosphorus and low Kt/V was ranked as the most important intervention, but no relationship was found between these factors and pruritus; 57% of medical directors used oral antihistamines for first-line chronic treatment of pruritus. Gabapentin was used by 45% as first-, second-, or third-line treatment. Nalfurafine was only used in Japan., Conclusions: The prevalence of pruritus in people on hemodialysis is decreasing but remains underestimated. Large numbers of patients on hemodialysis with severe pruritus do not receive treatment. There is wide variation in the use of unlicensed medications for the treatment of pruritus. These data provide a benchmark for initiatives to improve the management of uremic pruritus., Multimedia: This article contains multimedia at https://vimeo.com/49458473This article contains multimedia at vimeo.com/49455976., (Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Nephrology.)