Search

Background: We assessed the effectiveness of cetuximab plus chronomodulated irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (FA) and oxaliplatin (L-OHP) (chrono-IFLO) administered as neoadjuvant chemotherapy to increase the resectability of colorectal liver metastases.Methods: This was a phase II prospective trial with rate of liver metastases resection as primary end point. Forty-three patients with unresectable metastases were enroled: 9 with metastases >5 cm; 29 with multinodular (>4) disease; 1 with hilar location; 4 with extrahepatic lung disease. Treatment consisted of cetuximab at day 1 plus chronomodulated irinotecan 5-FU, FA and L-OHP for 2-6 days every 2 weeks. After the first 17 patients, doses were reduced for irinotecan to 110 mg m⁻², 5-FU to 550 mg m⁻² per day and L-OHP to 15 mg m⁻² per day.Results: Macroscopically complete resections were performed in 26 out of 43 patients (60%) after a median of 6 (range 3-15) cycles. Partial response was noticed in 34 patients (79%). Median overall survival was 37 months (95% CI: 21-53 months), with a 2-year survival of 68% in the entire population, 80.6% in resected patients and 47.1% in unresected patients (P=0.01). Grade 3/4 diarrhoea occurred in 93% and 36% of patients before and after dose reduction.Conclusion: Cetuximab plus chrono-IFLO achieved 60% complete resectability of colorectal liver metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This trial was conducted to assess the activity and tolerability of the gemcitabine, epirubicin, taxol triplet combination in patients with operable breast cancer. After core biopsy, 43 women with stage II-IIIA breast cancer were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) over 30 min on days 1 and 4, epirubicin 90 mg m(-2) as an intravenous bolus on day 1, and taxol 175 mg m(-2) as a 3-h infusion on day 1, every 21 days for four cycles. The primary end point was the percentage of pathological complete responses (pCR) in the breast; secondary end points were tolerability, clinical response rates, overall and progression-free survival, tumour biomarkers before and after primary chemotherapy (PCT). All patients were included in safety and survival analyses; 41 eligible patients were evaluated for response. The overall clinical response rate was 87.8% (95% CI 77.8-97.8), with 26.8% complete responses (95% CI 13.3-40.3). A pCR in the breast was observed in six patients (14.6%; 95% CI 3.8-25.4); 15 patients (36.6%; 95% CI 21.9-51.3) had negative axillary lymph nodes. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 67.4% of the patients; febrile neutropenia occurred in 1.9% of cycles (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was used in 3.2% of the cycles to shorten the duration of neutropenia). A statistically significant difference between Mib-1 at baseline (> or =20% in 71.4% of the patients) and at definitive surgery (28.6%, P < 0.05) was observed. The gemcitabine, epirubicin, taxol regimen is active and well tolerated as PCT for operable breast cancer. This combination allows the administration of full doses of active agents with a low incidence of febrile neutropenia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this phase II, multicentre trial, patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were treated with a combination of gemcitabine, epirubicin and paclitaxel (GET). The primary objective of this study was to determine the tolerability and activity in terms of complete responce (CR) and overall response rate of the GET combination in this patient population. Patients with no prior treatment for MBC, and at least one bidimensionally measurable lesion received gemcitabine 1000?mg?m-2 intravenously (i.v.) over 30?min on days 1 and 4, followed by epirubicin i.v. at 90?mg?m-2 on day 1, and paclitaxel 175?mg?m-2 over 3?h on day 1, every 21 days, up to eight courses. From May 1999 to June 2000, 48 patients were enrolled from seven Italian institutions. A total of 297 chemotherapy courses were administered with a median of six cycles patient-1 (range 1-8). Seven patients (15%) obtained CR and 27 patients (56%) had partial responce, for an overall response rate of 71% (95% CI: 58.3-83.7). After a median follow-up of 23.7 months (range 7.0-34.4), median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (95% CI: 9.2-11.7), and median overall survival 25.9 months. The main haematological toxicity consisted of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia that occurred in 62% of cycles (22% grade 4 and 40% grade 3). The GET combination is active and well tolerated as first-line chemotherapy for MBC.British Journal of Cancer (2004) 90, 31-35. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601518www.bjcancer.com [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A randomized trial conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG, study #111) in the United States showed a better outcome for patients with advanced ovarian cancer on the paclitaxel-cisplatin regimen than for those on a standard cyclophosphamide-cisplatin regimen. Before considering the paclitaxel-cisplatin regimen as the new "standard," a group of European and Canadian investigators planned a confirmatory phase III trial.Methods: This intergroup trial recruited 680 patients with broader selection criteria than the GOG #111 study and administered paclitaxel as a 3-hour instead of a 24-hour infusion; progression-free survival was the primary end point. Patient survival was analyzed by use of the Kaplan-Meier technique. Treatment effects on patient survival were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided.Results: The overall clinical response rate was 59% in the paclitaxel group and 45% in the cyclophosphamide group; the complete clinical remission rates were 41% and 27%, respectively; both differences were statistically significant (P =.01 for both). At a median follow-up of 38.5 months and despite a high rate of crossover (48%) from the cyclophosphamide arm to the paclitaxel arm at first detection of progression of disease, a longer progression-free survival (log-rank P =.0005; median of 15.5 months versus 11.5 months) and a longer overall survival (log-rank P =. 0016; median of 35.6 months versus 25.8 months) were seen in the paclitaxel regimen compared with the cyclophosphamide regimen.Conclusions: There is strong and confirmatory evidence from two large randomized phase III trials to support paclitaxel-cisplatin as the new standard regimen for treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of socio-demographic and professional factors on physicians' attitudes to the terminally ill. Between May 1992 and May 1993, a survey was conducted in the province of Pordenone (north-east, Italy) in order to analyse a number of specific issues, such as emotional involvement, the need for aggressive treatments and the communication of diagnosis and prognosis. After obtaining a list of board-certified physicians from the Medical Association office in Pordenone, a modification of the cancer questionnaire of Haley and Blanchard (QSPT) was mailed to 916 doctors. Of these, 605 (60%; 487 male, 118 female; mean age 41 +/- 11 SD) returned the completed questionnaire. Within the group of responders, we identified three main subgroups, according to their type of activity: general practitioners (175, 29%), hospital doctors (235, 39%) and other doctors (195, 32%). In age, sex and activity, the only significant difference between responders and non-responders was age (mean age 41 and 43 years respectively). Most of the responders (77%) stated that they were able to deal with the terminally ill patient and his/her needs; 44%, however, admitted that patients' anxiety is sometimes unbearable. For the vast majority of the doctors polled (91%), providing a comfortable environment for an incurable patient was more important than pursuing aggressive treatment, but only 44% were convinced of the uselessness of aggressive care. To the question on whether to disclose information about imminent death to allow patients to prepare spiritually, 37% answered "No", 38% "Yes", and 25% were uncertain. Almost all responders (95%), however, believed in the beneficial effect of hope on the terminally ill. Our results suggest that doctors' professional and, most of all, socio-demographic and cultural factors determine the relationship with the patient on both the emotional and the clinical decision-making levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This prospective, randomized, nonblind study comparing the antiemetic effectiveness of high-dose IV metoclopramide and high-dose IV dexamethasone was performed in 78 advanced cancer patients. Chemotherapeutic treatment consisted in cisplatin at a high-dose (120 mg/m2) (HD-CDDP) and at a low-dose (LD-CDDP), either alone (60 mg/m2) or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents (50 mg/m2). The evaluation of the effectiveness of antiemetic therapy was based on three parameters: prevention of vomiting ("major protection"), number of emetic episodes, and subjective preference. Out of 78 study patients, 67 were evaluable. Overall, metoclopramide proved to be statistically superior to dexamethasone in preventing vomiting (P less than 0.005), in reducing the median/mean number of emetic episodes (P less than 0.001/0.001), and in subjective preference (P less than 0.01). The results divided between HD-CDDP and LD-CDDP groups were also in favor of metoclopramide for reduction of the median/mean number of emetic episodes (P less than 0.001/0.001 for the HD-CDDP group and P less than 0.001/0.005 for the LD-CDDP group) and in subjective preference (P less than 0.001 and P less than 0.001 for the HD- and LD-CDDP groups, respectively). No statistical differences were noted when LD-CDDP was used in monochemotherapy, whereas when LD-CDDP was used in combination chemotherapy, statistical differences in favor of metoclopramide were noted again for the median/mean number of emetic episodes (P less than 0.01/0.05) and for subjective preference (P less than 0.01), even though the effectiveness of both antiemetic agents was greatly reduced. The evaluation of previously untreated patients reflected the overall results: for the HD-CDDP group all three parameters demonstrated statistical significance in favor of metoclopramide; for the LD-CDDP group, of all three parameters, prevention of vomiting (major protection) was the only one for which there was no significant difference. Mild sedation was the only side effect of metoclopramide. No extrapyramidal reactions were noted during this trial, but concomitant orphenadrine treatment was given. Dexamethasone was always well tolerated. In conclusion, high-dose IV metoclopramide demonstrated its superiority over high-dose IV dexamethasone in all subsets of our population except the LD-CDDP monochemotherapy group, in which the two antiemetics were found to be equivalent in effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Etoposide dosage in patients with liver dysfunction remains controversial. Since etoposide has a hepatic component to its clearance (CL) and shows a high degree of protein binding, hepatic impairment could affect etoposide disposition. However, the empiric recommendation that the dose of etoposide be decreased in such patients may reduce systemic exposure and be detrimental to its antitumor activity. To address these issues we studied the pharmacokinetics (PK) of etoposide in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and underlying cirrhosis ( n= 17) treated with daily oral etoposide. Unbound etoposide was obtained by ultrafiltration. Etoposide concentrations (total and free drug) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and analyzed by noncompartmental equations. The patients had mild or moderate liver dysfunction. Albuminemia was in the normal range for all the patients. Creatininemia was normal in all but two patients. PK results (mean and range) showed that etoposide disposition was unchanged in patients with liver dysfunction. We found slightly high etoposide bioavailability [F, 61% (17–95%)] and clearance [CL, 1.1 (0.7–2.3) l h−1 m−2] resulting in a normal degree of systemic exposure (AUCoral 27 μg h ml−1). Normal protein binding [PB 93.2% (84.4–98.1%)] contributed to a normal level of exposure to free drug (AUCf, oral 1.9 μg h ml−1). The distribution volume [VSS 8.4 (6.1–13.2) l/m2] and the effective half-life [ t1/2eff, 5.1 (3.0–9.6) h] were normal. Median CL and protein binding did not differ in the seven patients with total bilirubin value of >1.2 mg/dl as compared with the ten patients with total bilirubin levels of ≤1.2 mg/dl (1.3 versus 1.0 l h−1 m−2 and 92.5% versus 93.4%, respectively). In agreement with this PK finding, we observed no clinical evidence of increased toxicity in patients with hyperbilirubinemia as compared with patients with normal bilirubinemia (mean WBC decrease 38% versus 47%). The only case of severe (grade 4) hematological toxicity was observed in one patient with reduced glomerular filtration. Since the pharmacological effects of etoposide correlate with the level of systemic exposure to the free drug, our data suggest that no dose reduction is needed in patients with HCC. It is even possible to increase the dose intensity in patients with favorable PK parameters under appropriate hematological and therapeutic drug monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

From December 1981 to November 1982, a consecutive series of 37 patients with advanced non-oat cell bronchogenic carcinoma were treated with cis-platinum and etoposide in doses of 20 mg/m2 and 75 mg/m2, respectively, for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Among the 33 evaluable patients, one complete response, 11 partial responses, five minor responses, seven unchanged states, and nine cases of progression were noted. Median duration of response was 30+ weeks. Toxicity was significant, but no treatment-related deaths were encountered. Combined cis-platinum and etoposide can provide significant palliation in approximately one-third of patients with the doses and schedule used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a case study of a 65-year-old woman and a 73-year-old woman with advanced squamous vulvar carcinoma. The patients experienced disease progression and were given cisplatin-gemcitabine as palliative chemotherapy. It concludes that a cisplatin-gemcitabine combination therapy which is effective against cancers.