Search

Background: Robotic-assisted surgery is gaining more adaption in different surgical specialties. The number of patients undergoing robotic-assisted thymectomy is continuously increasing. Such procedures are accompanied by new challenges for anesthesiologists. We are presenting our primary anesthesiologic experience in such patients. Methods: This is a retrospective single center study, evaluating 28 patients who presented with thymoma or myasthenia gravis (MG) and undergone minimal invasive robotic-assisted thoracic thymectomy between 01/2020–01/2022. We present our fast-track anesthesia management as a component of the enhanced recovery program and its primary results. Results: Mean patient’s age was 46.8 ± 18.1 years, and the mean height was 173.1 ± 9.3 cm. Two-thirds of patients were female (n = 18, 64.3%). The preoperative mean forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) was 3.8 ± 0.7 L, forced vital capacity (FVC) was 4.7 ± 1.1 L, and the FEV1/FVC ratio was 80.4 ± 5.3%. After the creation of capnomediastinum, central venous pressure and airway pressure have been significantly increased from the baseline values (16.5 ± 4.9 mmHg versus 13.4 ± 5.1 mmHg, p < 0.001 and 23.4 ± 4.4 cmH2O versus 19.3 ± 3.9 cmH2O, p < 0.001, respectively). Most patients (n = 21, 75%) developed transient arrhythmias episodes with hypotension. All patients were extubated at the end of surgery and discharged awake to the recovery room. The first 16 (57.1%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit and the last 12 patients were only observed in intermediate care. Postoperatively, one patient developed atelectasis and was treated with non-invasive ventilation therapy. Pneumonia or reintubation was not observed. Finally, no significant difference was observed between MG and thymoma patients regarding analgesics consumption or incidence of complications. Conclusions: Robotic-assisted surgery is a rapidly growing technology with increased adoption in different specialties. Fast-track anesthesia is an important factor in an enhanced recovery program and the anesthetist should be familiar with challenges in this kind of operation to achieve optimal results. So far, our anesthetic management of patients undergoing robotic-assisted thymectomy reports safe and feasible procedures.

Background Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung (LCNEC) is a rare entity occurring in less than 4% of all lung cancers. Due to its low differentiation and high glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) expression, LCNEC demonstrates an increased glucose turnover. Thus, PET/CT with 2-[18F]-fluoro-deoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) is suitable for LCNEC staging. Surgery with curative intent is the treatment of choice in early stage LCNEC. Prerequisite for this is correct lymph node staging. This study aimed at evaluating the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/CT validated by histopathology following surgical resection or mediastinoscopy. N-staging interrater-reliability was assessed to test for robustness of the [18F]FDG PET/CT findings. Methods Between 03/2014 and 12/2020, 46 patients with LCNEC were included in this single center retrospective analysis. All underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT for pre-operative staging and subsequently either surgery (n = 38) or mediastinoscopy (n = 8). Regarding the lymph node involvement, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for [18F]FDG PET/CT using the final histopathological N-staging (pN0 to pN3) as reference. Results Per patient 14 ± 7 (range 4–32) lymph nodes were resected and histologically processed. 31/46 patients had no LCNEC spread into the lymph nodes. In 8/46 patients, the final stage was pN1, in 5/46 pN2 and in 2/46 pN3. [18F]FDG PET/CT diagnosed lymph node metastasis of LCNEC with a sensitivity of 93%, a specificity of 87%, an accuracy of 89%, a PPV of 78% and a NPV of 96%. In the four false positive cases, the [18F]FDG uptake of the lymph nodes was 33 to 67% less in comparison with that of the respective LCNEC primary. Interrater-reliability was high with a strong level of agreement (κ = 0.82). Conclusions In LCNEC N-staging with [18F]FDG PET/CT demonstrates both high sensitivity and specificity, an excellent NPV but a slightly reduced PPV. Accordingly, preoperative invasive mediastinal staging may be omitted in cases with cN0 disease by [18F]FDG PET/CT. In [18F]FDG PET/CT cN1-cN3 stages histological confirmation is warranted, particularly in case of only moderate [18F]FDG uptake as compared to the LCNEC primary.

Background: Large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC) are rare pulmonary malignancies. Reported survival rates are heterogeneous and the optimal therapeutic strategy is still debated. The prognosis of LCNEC is generally inferior compared to other non-small lung cancers. In early stages, surgery is recommended but might not be sufficient alone. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive LCNEC patients operated at three institutions with curative intent between May 2005 and January 2017. Data retrieved from individual clinical databases were analyzed with the aim to identify prognostic parameters. Results: A total of 251 patients with LCNEC underwent curative intent surgery during the observation period. The median age was 64 years, 156 patients (62.2%) were male and 88.4% were smokers. The pathologic AJCC stage was I in 136 patients, II in 77, III in 33, and IV in 5 patients. Median followup was 26 months. Lymphatic vessel invasion (P=0.031) was identified as significant prognostic factor by multivariable analysis. There was a trend towards decreased survival in patients with blood vessel invasion (P=0.067). Even in earlier tumor stages, adjuvant chemotherapy had a positive effect on survival. The overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 79.2%, 48.6% and 38.8% respectively. Conclusions: Lymphatic invasion (L1) is an independent prognostic factor. Surgery in LCNEC is beneficial in early tumor stages and platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy may help in achieving better long-term outcomes resulting in most obvious survival differences in stage Ib. CA extern