Search

Abstract: Despite the generalization of immunoprophylaxis by anti-RH immunoglobulins over 40 years, fetomaternal incompatibility due to RH1 antigen (RhD) is not completely eradicated, although perinatal consequences might be extremely serious. Additionally, allo-immunizations against other antigens, especially anti-RH4 (anti-c) and anti-KEL1 (anti-Kell), may cause severe haemolytic disease. Follow-up of allo-immunization during pregnancy and its prevention are therefore still a concern for all pregnant women. Immunohaematological tests used in antenatal patients are under practice for a long time. However, despite significant progress, it is clear that these tests provide only an indirect indication and will only help the obstetrician, in conjunction with over fetal parameters, to assess the severity of the haemolytic disease. Since almost two decades, fetal RHD genotyping became a reality, first using amniocytes, but more recently by analyzing fetal DNA present in the maternal plasma. RH prophylaxis concerns RH:-1 women, who are non-sensitized against RH1 antigen during and at the end of their pregnancy with a RH1 child. RH prophylaxis includes targeted prophylaxis after foetomaternal haemorrhage and now routine antenatal RH prophylaxis at 28 gestation weeks. Indications for RH prophylaxis and immunohaematological testing to assure an efficient therapeutic prevention have been summarized in France through specific recommendations of the National College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Despite the generalization of immunoprophylaxis by anti-RH immunoglobulins since 1970 and improved management of at-risk pregnancies, allo-immunization due to the RH1 antigen (formerly known as Rhesus D or Rh D) remains widespread. In fact, anti-RH1 antibodies currently constitute over one-third of the immune antibodies detected after pregnancy. At the same time, allo-immunizations against others antigens than anti-RH1, especially anti-RH4 (anti-c) and anti-KEL1 (anti-Kell) increase. Allo-immunization, its follow-up during pregnancy, and its prevention are therefore still topical, and concern all the pregnant women. Immunohematological tests used in antenatal patients have gone a long way. However, despite a great deal of progress, we should not loose sight of the fact that these tests give only an indirect measurement and will only help the obstetrician, in conjunction with other fetal parameters to assess the severity of the haemolytic disease. The best method to assess the severity is the determination of the level of fetal hemoglobin after fetal blood sampling but this procedure is not without risk. Since 13 years, it is possible to determine the fetal RHD genotype of using amniocytes and to day directly with maternal plasma. All pregnant women should be blood-typed for ABO-RH-KEL1 and the blood tested for clinically irregular antibodies. The trend in anti-RH levels is more important than the level itself. Manual titration is simple but only provides rough, semiquantitative estimates of anti-RH concentration. Quantitative hemagglutination methods, using auto-analyzers and appropriate anti-RH1 standards, measured in μg/ml, are sensitive, rapid and have acceptable intra-laboratory reproducibility. RH:-1 women who are non-sensitized against RH1 antigen during and at the end of their pregnancy with a RH1 child. RH prophylaxis includes targeted prophylaxis after feto-maternal hemorrhage and now routine antenatal RH prophylaxis at the 28th week of gestation. It has been necessary to synthesize the indications of RH prophylaxis and immunohematological tests to assure an efficient therapeutic prevention. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]