Dans ses travaux plus recents, Jean-Guy Belley propose, sur la base de ses recherches sur le pluralisme juridique, un diagnostic desenchante de la modernite avancee, caracterisee par la predominance du phenomene organisationnel et par un nouveau type de « rupture entre psychisme collectif et psychisme individuel ». Ce diagnostic merite d’etre rapproche d’autres interpretations d’ensemble de la realite sociale, en particulier de la theorie des systemes de Niklas Luhmann. La comparaison entre ces deux approches suggere un possible developpement du modele qui peut etre derive des travaux de Belley. Il vaudrait la peine de mieux prendre en compte la difference entre, d’une part, les organisations et, d’autre part, les systemes sociaux fonctionnellement differencies tels l’economie, le droit ou la science. Ceci pourrait permettre de repenser des evolutions actuellement en cours concernant l’individualite humaine. L’hypothese est que l’individu aujourd’hui agit de plus en plus comme agent d’organisations et de moins en moins comme professionnel d’activites fonctionnellement differenciees, et qu’il est invite desormais a se vivre moins comme individusujet que comme individu-organisation. Abstract: In his recent works, Jean-Guy Belley, based on his research on legal pluralism, puts forward a disenchanted diagnosis of late modernity as characterized by the prominence of organizational phenomena and by a new kind of “break between collective and individual consciousness.” This diagnosis merits comparison with other global interpretations of social reality, in particular Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory. Such a comparison suggests a possible development of the model that can be derived from Belley’s work. It is worth taking into account the differences between organizations, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, functionally differentiated systems such as economy, law, or science. This could enable us to revisit ongoing evolutions with respect to human individuality. The hypothesis is that individuals today act more and more as agents of organizations, and less and less as professionals carrying out functionally differentiated activities, and that they are invited to experience themselves less as individual subjects, than as organization-individuals.