Search

Introduction: Spinal anesthesia in outpatient urology is controversial (longer hospital stay, risk of urinary retention). The main goal was to evaluate outpatient spinal anesthesia and to compare 2 local anesthetics secondarily., Material: Monocentric retrospective study including all patients undergoing surgery in urological ambulatory surgery under spinal anesthesia between December 2011 and May 2015, split into two groups according to the local anesthetic used: bupivacaine (BP) and chloroprocaine (CP). Quantitative variables were compared by Student's t-test, qualitative variables by χ 2 test., Results: Seventy-one (95%) out of the 75 patients included have been discharged the same day. Discharge was impossible in these cases: patient alone at home (1), bladder clot (1), JJ intolerance (1), delayed micturition (1). The mean duration of the procedure was 27±19min, the SSPI's was 55±31min, the stay's was 360±91min. A total of 45 patients (60%) received BP and 30 (40%) received CP. The mean residence time in SSPI was significantly reduced in the CP group (47±24min vs. 61±34min, P=0.04). One patient experienced urination delay in the BP group with no significant difference. No significant difference for the other criteria studied despite the mean age, which is higher in the CP group (P=0.02)., Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia is adapted to ambulatory urology, and does not increase the risk of urinary retention, especially with CP that would decrease the length of stay in SSPI compared to BP., Level of Evidence: 4., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Over the period 2010-2012, maternal mortality linked to anesthesia accounted for 2% of maternal deaths, with no significant change since 2007-2009. Of the 7 maternal deaths analyzed by the expert committee, anesthetic complications were in 5 cases the main cause of death: 4 attributed to direct causes related to anesthetic procedures during childbirth and 1 to indirect cause in connection with an ENT complication during pregnancy. The anesthetic causes of maternal mortality were for the 2010-2012 period: cardiac arrest under spinal anesthesia during caesarean section, local anesthetic intoxication with unsuccessful resuscitation after cardiac arrest without intralipid administration, acute respiratory distress syndrome in the postpartum period after pulmonary aspiration during caesarean section, cardiac arrest during caesarean section under general anesthesia in a context of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with mediastinal syndrome, unsuccessful endotracheal intubation in a context of cellulitis of the oral cavity floor. In two other cases, anesthetic complications were identified as associated causes of death, the primary cause being intracerebral hemorrhage stroke and pulmonary hypertension. In most of the cases analyzed over the period 2010-2012, anesthesia and resuscitation have been involved in the occurrence of maternal deaths, mainly through strategic errors in the management of patients with severe pathology before delivery, as well as through insufficient cardiac resuscitation duration after cardiac arrest., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Spinal anesthesia (SA) is the first locoregional anesthesia. It can cause side effects and carry risks that need to be avoided, prevented or treated early. We here report the case of a female patient operated under spinal anesthesia who had intense headache associated with nausea and vomiting evolving in the context of fever within a few days after surgeryLumbar puncture showed cloudy liquid revealing Gram + cocci on direct examination. This allowed the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. Patient's evolution was favorable after antibiotic therapy.

Meningitis is a rare but serious complication of epidural and spinal anesthesia. Bacterial meningitis is mainly caused by Gram-positive cocci, implying an exogenous contamination which suggests a lack of asepsis. The evolution is usually favorable after treatment, but at the expense of increased health care costs and, sometimes, of significant neurological sequelae. We report a case of bacterial meningitis after spinal anesthesia for caesarean section.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of HES 130/0.4 coloading compared to normal saline solution for prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section., Study Design: Prospective, randomized., Patients and Methods: One hundred and twenty ASA I and II patients scheduled for elective caesarean section were recruited. Patients were randomized to receive either 500mL of HES 130/0.4 (Voluven(®)) coloading (GroupV) or 500mL of normal saline solution coloading (GroupC). Spinal anesthesia technique and ephedrine administration were standardized in both groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section., Results: Hypotension occurred in 43 patients in group C and 24 patients in group V (p=0.001). Ephedrine consumption was significantly lower in group V (P=0.005). Nausea, vomiting and headache incidence was higher in group C (p=0.006). Apgar scores and umbilical blood gazes were comparable between groups., Conclusion: HES 130/0.4 coload was more effective than normal saline solution to prevent hypotension following spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. HES 130/0.4 coload reduced the incidence, the duration of longest hypotension, the need for ephedrine and the adverse maternal effects., (Copyright © 2014 Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Meningitis is a rare complication after spinal anesthesia. aim: We report 4 cases of meningitis occurred after spinal anesthesia., Observations: These meningitis were diagnosed during tow months and with 3 different operators. The first symptoms appeared 4 to 6 hours after surgery and were represented especially by headaches and fever. Cyto-chimic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) indicates bacterial meningitis but soluble antigens and culture were negative. Evolution was favorable in all cases under or without antibiotics. The exactly cause of these meningitis remained unknown and an insufficient asepsis was the principle risk factor found in all cases., Conclusion: Prevention of this risk consists on hygienic rules and perfect skin disinfection.

Objective: To review the current research and formulate a rational approach to the physiopathology, cause and treatment of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH)., Data Sources: Articles published to December 2011 were obtained through a search of Medline for the MeSh terms "epidural blood-patch" and "post-dural puncture headache"., Study Selection: Six hundred and eighty-two pertinent studies were included and 200 were analysed., Data Synthesis: Resulting of a dural tap after spinal anaesthesia or diagnostic lumbar puncture or as a complication of epidural anaesthesia, PDPH occurs when an excessive leak of cerebrospinal fluid leads to intracranial hypotension associated to a resultant cerebral vasodilatation. Reduction in cerebrospinal fluid volume in upright position may cause traction of the intracranial structure and stretching of vessels. Typically postural, headache may be associated to nausea, photophobia, tinnitus or arm pain and changes in hearing acuity. In severe cases, there may be cranial nerve dysfunction and nerve palsies secondary to traction on those nerves. The Epidural Blood-Patch (EBP) is considered as the "gold standard" in the treatment of PDHP because it induces a prolonged elevation of subarachnoid and epidural pressures, whereas such elevation is transient with saline or dextran. EBP should be performed within 24-48hours of onset of headache; the optimum volume of epidural blood appears to be 15-20mL. Severe complications following EBP are exceptional. The use of echography may be safety puncture. The optimum timing of epidural blood-patch, the resort of repeating procedure if the symptomatology does not disappear, the alternative to the conventional medical treatment need to be determined by future clinical trial., (Copyright © 2013 Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To evaluate hemodynamic repercussion of a protocol of spinal anesthesia (SA) for cesarean and release the predictive factors of maternal arterial hypotension post spinal anesthesia., Methods: We included parturients proposed for Cesarean under SA. They were not included the women of statute ASA > II, preeclamptics, eclamptics and/or having counter-indications of SA. We excluded the cases where there were technical difficulties at the time of the realization of SA, a failure or a complication of this SA. We injected 10 Mg of bupivacaïne 0.5% isobar, 10 μg of fentanyl and 100 μg of morphine. The data were collected before the realization of SA (anthropometric parameters; antecedents; basic systolic and diastolic blood pressures (BSBP and DSBP) and basic heart rate (BHR)) and after SA (systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), heart rate (HR); occurred or not of a sympathetic block (falls of the SBP of more than 20% of its basic value or a SBP<90 mm Hg); the time of installation of the sympathetic block and the duration of hypotension., Results: The full number of parturients included was 1016 among whom 16 were excluded. Only 1000 parturients finished the study and were divided into 2 groups (group 1: 500 emergency cesarean and group 2: 500 elective cesarean). The incidence of the sympathetic block was of 44.2% as a whole and this block was significantly more frequent in group 2 (p=0.0001). There was a significant relation between the incidence of a sympathetic block and the advanced age of the parturient (p=0.0001), the important weight (p=0.047), high ASA statute (p=0.0001), the presence of hypertension (p=0.0001), diabetes (p=0.001) or cesarean (p=0.00015) in the antecedents and the low BSBP (p=0.015)., Conclusion: In spite of the beneficial effect of the reduction in the amounts of local anesthetic in the SA, the sympathetic block remains frequent after SA for Cesarean. Thus, it is essential to detect the high risk women of occurred of sympathetic block after SA, and to propose strategies of prevention, monitoring and management for this population.

Purpose: The purpose of this Continuing Professional Development module is to review the physiology of maternal hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia in pregnant women, and the effects of fluids and vasopressors., Principal Findings: Maternal hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia is caused mainly by peripheral vasodilatation and is not usually associated with a decrease in cardiac output. Although the intravenous administration of fluids helps to increase cardiac output, it does not always prevent maternal hypotension. Three strategies of fluid administrations are equivalent for the prevention of maternal hypotension and a reduced need for vasopressors: (1) colloid preload; (2) colloid coload; and (3) crystalloid coload. Crystalloid preload is not as effective as any of those three strategies. Unlike phenylephrine, ephedrine can cause fetal acidosis. Therefore, phenylephrine is recommended as first line treatment of maternal hypotension. A phenylephrine infusion (25-50 μg x min(-1)) appears to be more effective than phenylephrine boluses to prevent hypotension, and nausea and vomiting. In pre-eclamptic patients, spinal anesthesia produces less hypotension than in normal pregnant women and fluid volumes up to 1,000 mL are usually well tolerated. Therefore mild to moderate intravascular volume loading is recommended, keeping in mind the increased risk for pulmonary edema in this population. In pre-eclamptic patients, hypotension can be treated either with ephedrine or phenylephrine, and phenylephrine infusions are not recommended., Conclusion: A volume loading regimen other than crystalloid preload should be adopted. A phenylephrine infusion during elective Cesarean delivery is beneficial for the mother and safe for the newborn.

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common iatrogenic and incapacitating complication. Dural puncture can be intentional (spinal block, myelography,...) or accidental (epidural block). Risk factors are well described and the obstetric patient is at high risk for PDPH. The treatment of PDPH is not standardised. Many options have been proposed, but only the epidural blood patch has apparent benefits. A few measures have been suggested to prevent PDPH after unintentional dural puncture, but none has been shown to work with certainty.

We report a case of severe and differed respiratory depression to a 70-year-old patient after spinal anaesthesia for prostatic adenomectomy. Ten milligram of bupivacaine, 30 microg of clonidine and 100 microg of morphine has been administrated intrathecally. The anaesthesia has lasted 4h and, 16h after the induction, the patient had a respiratory depression with bradypnea (5c/min), hypoxia (SpO(2) 80%) and sedation (scale 3 of Wilson). The evolution was favourable after intravenous injection of naloxone and oxygenotherapy. The use of low dose intrathecal morphine can involve a respiratory depression. Intrathecal association of morphine and clonidine must be careful used among old patients and require a monitoring during the first 24h.

Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the consumption and cost of ephedrine in parturients with respect to two packagings: ampoules and prefilled syringes., Study Design: Prospective observational study in a French university obstetrical unit., Patients and Methods: Assessing the consumption and cost of ephedrine during two consecutive periods of 14 days: use of ampoules for period 1 (P1) versus use of prefilled syringes for period 2 (P2). Consumption was daily evaluated. The costs (ampoules and consumable supplies for P1 and prefilled syringes for P2) were calculated on the basis of the price list given by our institutional pharmacy. The number of parturients and the anaesthetic techniques which were performed were prospectively recorded., Results: One hundred and thirteen parturients were managed for the present study. The number of parturients and the anaesthetic care were similar between the two periods. In contrast, 155 ampoules were used for P1 versus 45 prefilled syringes for P2 (p<0.0001). The cost per parturient was 3.1 euro for P1 versus 2.6 euro for P2, i.e. 0.5 euro was saved for each parturient., Conclusion: The results of the present study show that the use of prefilled syringes reduces significantly the wastage of ephedrine, allowing subsequent cost minimization in obstetrical anaesthesia.

The authors report a case of subdural haematoma after spinal anaesthesia. A 36-year-old woman underwent phlebectomy under spinal anaesthesia. Two days later, she complains of severe headache without neurological signs, not responding to bed rest and analgesics. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a small acute subdural haematoma in the right parieto-occipital region. On the forth day, she was given a blood-patch, which improved rapidly the patient. Recovery was complete.

Objective: To describe the effects of anaesthetic techniques and agents on the risk of fetal distress during labour pain relief and anaesthesia for caesarean section., Study Design: Data on obstetric anaesthesia- and analgesia-induced fetal distress were searched in Medline database using MESH terms: fetal distress, anaesthesia, analgesia, labour, caesarean section, and umbilical artery pH. Trials published in English or French language were selected., Results: Because of their haemodynamic effects, regional anaesthesia and analgesia, especially spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section, could induce a decrease in umbilical artery pH (UApH). Moreover, intravenous ephedrine, especially when used in large doses can worsen the acidosis. Labour epidural analgesia is associated with a better acid-base balance than systemic analgesia. Experimental studies have demonstrated harmful effects of systemic opioids and hypnotic drugs on UApH and the foetal brain respectively. Clinical implications of these potentially detrimental effects remain to be determined., Conclusion: All obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia techniques are associated with a theoretical risk of fetal distress, but given the fact that regional anaesthesia techniques are also associated with well-demonstrated benefits for the mother and the newborn, the latter remain the preferred choice in obstetric practice.

Objective: To analyze the different preventive and curative strategies for the management of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section., Data Sources: Data related to hypotension during spinal anesthesia for caesarean section were searched in the Medline database. Trials published in English or French were reviewed., Data Synthesis: Hypotension during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia is very frequent (55 to 90%) if not prevented. It can induce complications for the mother and/or the fetus. Crystalloid preload alone is ineffective. Colloid preload is effective but might be better used as a second line treatment. Ephedrine has been the vasopressor of choice for long, but has a weak prophylactic efficacy. In addition, it can induce maternal cardiovascular adverse effects and fetal acidosis. Prophylactic phenylephrine, with or without ephedrine according to maternal heart rate, is at least as effective as ephedrine, with less adverse effects. Crystalloid loading at the time of spinal injection ("co-/post-loading") enhances the haemodynamic control provided by vasopressors., Conclusion: Hypotension during spinal anesthesia for caesarean section must be systematically detected, prevented and treated without delay. The association of vasopressor(s) (phenylephrine with or without ephedrine) with a rapid crystalloid loading at the time of spinal injection represents the most interesting strategy nowadays.

Spinal anaesthesia is the gold standard for elective caesarean section. This technique presents several adverse effects. We report a severe case of hypothermia (33.3 degrees C) after spinal administration of bupivacaine (10 mg) and morphine (100 microg) for elective caesarean section. After excluding other causes of hypothermia, this one could be explained by both the own effects of local anaesthesia (i.e. peripheral vasodilatation) and by the central effect of intrathecal morphine. Because hypothermia is not predictable after spinal injection of morphine both monitoring of central temperature and active warming of the patients could be proposed. Naloxone has been proposed in a case of hypothermia related to spinal injection of morphine.

Sedation has been used widely for reducing patient anxiety during peribulbar block for ocular surgery. We report the case of a patient in whom a spontaneous move after injection of propofol for peribulbar block resulted in a globe perforation.

A clinical case of spontaneous ventricular dysrythmia in a 47-year-old patient scheduled for ankle osteosynthesis is reported. During initial peripheral vein canulation, a spontaneous ventricular tachycardia occurred and disappeared spontaneously in about 3 min. It was decided to proceed with surgery. Thirty minutes after spinal anaesthesia, asystole occurred. Normal sinus rhythm was rapidly restored after basic life support. There was no harmful consequence for the patient. He had a history of repetitive monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (Gallavardin type). The aetiologies of asystole after spinal anaesthesia are well known and will be not discussed in the text. Although the origin of the asystole is unclear in this case, the literature on Gallavardin's syndrome is reviewed, showing that a prolonged and complex preoperative assessment is not mandatory in this syndrome.

The development of an acute respiratory distress syndrome following hip surgery in elderly patients is suggestive of thromboembolism in most instances. However, we must keep in mind the possibility of rarer complications, which can remain undiagnosed because they are hidden by prominent abnormal behaviours, which can develop following any type of anaesthesia. We report the case of a patient who developed a confusion following an orthopaedic surgery under spinal anaesthesia; this confusion concealed a penetration syndrome resulting from accidental inhalation of a dental crown. Because this patient was old and had previously developed chronic lung disorders, we selected a spinal anaesthesia for performing the surgery; these underlying respiratory disorders worsened the clinical consequences of the inhalation. The dental crown was removed under general anaesthesia with spontaneous ventilation using a bronchoscope after an unsuccessful attempt with a fibrescope due to the size of the foreign body.

We described a case of discitis and meningitis following spinal anaesthesia for transurethral resection of the prostate. The patient received antibiotics for a month before surgery, because of Klebsiella prostatitis. Spinal anaesthesia was performed in L3-L4 interspace by using 22G Quincke needle. Bacteriaemia occurred during the first postoperative hours. Ten days after spinal anaesthesia, patient suffered from lumbar pain, exacerbated by vertebral percussion, and motor weakness within lower limb, which was marked on right side. MRI examination showed L3-L4 discitis with psoas abcess in regard, and epiduritis marked around L3 right spinal root. CSF examination confirmed meningitis but no bacteria was found. Antibiotics were administered over a 6 weeks period, and then patient discharged from hospital without neurological sequellae. Infectious discitis related to disk puncture during spinal anaesthesia and postoperative bacteriaemia was likely in our patient.

We report a case of pupilloplasty under peribulbar anaesthesia complicated by a brainstem anaesthesia requiring tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Immediate outcome was good. We discuss the different mechanisms of this complication. The subarachnoidal (intrathecal) injection of local anaesthesic seems to be the most probable cause. The use of short needles should theoretically decrease the risk. Despite all these precautions, peribulbar anaesthesia should not be considered as an ordinary procedure.

We report a case of idiopathic brachial nevralgia of the right shoulder in a 30-year-old female, after caesarean section, under spinal anaesthesia. Two days after surgery, intense cervical pain appeared on the second day, associated with rapid collapse of muscular shoulder belt. Full recovery occurred in four months.

Temperature monitoring and prevention of hypothermia are rarely used during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section because hypothermia risk is considered very low. However, in same conditions, we observed two cases of severe hypothermia. We report these two cases and discuss the effects of spinal anaesthesia on thermoregulatory system. Hypothermia seems explained by the effects of perimedullar anaesthesia that decrease the shivering and the vasoconstriction thresholds. These effects are potentiated by morphinomimetic adjunction. At last, we recall prophylactics measures.

We report the case of a 76-year-old man who received a spinal anaesthesia for inguinal hernia repair surgery. A cranial CT scan which was performed because the patient complained of postoperative headache and hemiparesis showed an important pneumocephalus. Because postoperative questioning revealed that the patient had a chronic and neglected rhinorrhea, we hypothesise that this pneumocephalus was secondary to an old unknown osteodural leak with intracranial air entry secondary to the spinal anaesthesia-releated decrease in CSF pressure.

The goal of this prospective work is to study the per- and post-operative complications of spinal anaesthesia for cesarean and to evaluate their management. We included in the study all parturients undergoing cesarean section to the maternity of hospital Aristide Le Dantec since December 1998 to March 1999. Patients presented contra-indications of spinal anaesthesia, arterial hypertension and/or acute fetal distress were excluded. After a vascular preload of 1000 ml of Ringer lactate, a spinal anaesthesia was realized through a 25 G needle between L3 and L4 in a sitting position with 12.5 mg of 0.5% bupivacain associated with 1 ml of 10% dextrose. Patients were installed after a left light lateral position and oxygenated via a facial mask with 3 1 per mn until the extraction of the child. Studied parameters are following: the sensitive level block before surgical incision, per- and post-operative complications and their management. Sensitive level block was up to T4 in 14.9%, between T4 and T6 in 74.6% and at T8 in 23.6%. Maternal hypotension was the only per-operative complication in our study: 52% with 2 cases of cardiac arrest who needed tracheal intubation and injection of epinephrine. Post operative complications were represented by post-dural headaches about 5.4% and no epidural blood-patch were necessary for their management. We have noted any neurological or infectious complication during supervision of our patients.