Search

Background: The update of the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM5) emphasizes the definition of psychological traumatism as an objective and external event. Nevertheless, the scientific debate about the criteriology of PTSD, its clinical pertinence for application and the role of subjective dimension appears still open. Although the relation between psychotrauma and psychosis has been well examined, in the way of trauma as a risk factor for the development of schizophrenia, the potential traumatism represented by the psychotic experience seems to be less known., Objective: This paper aims to provide a state of the art about the PTSD in reaction to psychosis, defined as PTSD post psychosis (PTSD-PP), particularly in epidemiological and psychopathological terms., Methods: We performed a bibliographic research on Pubmed using the keywords "post-traumatic stress disorder", "psychological trauma", "schizophrenia review", "psychosis", "first episode psychosis"« », "recovery schizophrenia", with a first screening on titles and abstracts. An acute psychotic episode referred to a decompensation of any pathology of the DSM5-schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorders or to a mood disorder with psychotic features. The articles exclusively interested in the traumatic impact of hospitalizations and treatment conditions were excluded., Results: The literature noted that PTSD-PP affected about a quarter to a third of the psychotic patients interrogated during the recovery of an acute psychotic episode. The analytic epidemiology showed that the main validated risk factors for PTSD were also relevant in the development of PTSD-PP, including past traumatic history, childhood trauma and feeling of helplessness during the traumatic event. Criticizing the methodological heterogeneity through studies, the observational approach brought out the lack of clinical pertinence of the DSM5A criteria defining the traumatic event for PTSD. This criteriology failed to consider the subjective dimension of the threat to psychological integrity generated by a psychotrauma. Historical case studies presented a complete post-traumatic symptomatology in reaction to psychosis, suggesting that the supposed psychotic residual symptoms after acute phase could referr to actual traumatic reactions. The PTSD-PP process observed in descriptive research and patients' interviews appeared congruent with the cognitive model of PTSD elaborated by Ehlers and Clark. Indeed, psychotic patients developed negative appraisals about themselves, others and the world because of the occurrence and the content of their psychotic symptoms. Shame, fear of recurrence, intolerance to uncertainty and perception of losing control of one's mind were demonstrated as significantly related to PTSD-PP. A perception of current threat then settled, leading to adaptation strategies, possibly psychotic themselves, to avoid intrusions and others indices about their past psychotic episode. Thus, reliving syndrome, avoidance, emotional numbing could simulate a new psychotic exacerbation to an outer-observer., Conclusion: A psychotic experience could be traumatic for patients and lead to complete PTSD. Although it appears as a non-consensual clinical entity, from a likely epistemological slip of the definition of "psychotrauma", the consideration of potential PTSD-PP presents an undoubted clinical relevance. Indeed, it could help practioners to precise the semiological analysis of patients recovering from an acute psychotic episode; to impact the prognosis of psychosis, thinking about impairment on the quality of life and the affective and suicidal comorbidities; and to modify the therapeutic approach in the recovery of schizophrenia. In addition, the literature about psychotic recovery seems particularly related to the concept of "post-traumatic growth" (PTG). The inscription of a psychotic episode in a traumatic frame requires a clinical approach as close as possible to the subjectivity of the patient experience, beyond the evaluation of psychotic symptoms and its remission. The question of trauma-focused therapies applied to PTSD-PP opens the field for future research., (Copyright © 2019 L'Encéphale, Paris. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Big Data, the production of a massive amount of heterogeneous data, is often presented as a means to ensure the economic survival and sustainability of health systems. According to this perspective, Big Data could help save the spirit of our welfare states based on the principles of risks-sharing and equal access to care for all. According to a second perspective, opposed to the first, Big Data would fuel a process of demutualization, transferring to individuals a growing share of responsibility for managing their health. This article proposes to develop a third approach: Big Data does not induce a loss of solidarity but a transformation of the European model of welfare states. These are the data that are now the objects of the pooling. Individual and collective responsibilities are thus redistributed. However, this model, as new as it is, remains liberal in its inspiration; it basically allows the continuation of political liberalism by other means., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

In psychiatry, clinical staging raises awareness of the need to understand disease trajectories and heterotypic continuity; it draws attention to individuals at risk of developing disorders, such as those with a family history or subsyndromal presentations; and it actively promotes greater attention to prevention strategies and interventions for individuals at ultra-high risk of developing a severe mental disorder. Staging paradigms have been increasingly applied in early intervention in psychoses, but there are issues in broadening the scope of clinical staging to the more prevalent affective disorders. For example, it is potentially more complex to devise a model that considers the varying clinical presentations of the late prodromal stage of bipolar disorder and where to locate depressive episodes that precede the first manic episode and how to describe subthreshold manic syndromes, especially hypomania. The above issues might be resolved if we had a greater understanding of the risk factors, biomarkers or endophenotypes for the onset and progression of bipolar disorder. This level of understanding is not yet available in psychiatry, but clinical staging may help us improve our knowledge of the pathophysiological correlates of disease progression and reduce our over-reliance on cross-sectional assessments of symptoms in bipolar disorders., (© 2018 L’Encéphale, Paris.)